Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jul 12, 2025 6:54 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 265 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 14  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 1:19 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21648
Location: North of the border
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
There was an instance where Lappin took the ball on the wing kicked it forward to Fish then pushed really hard to the open space in the forward line only to see Fish turn his back take a big turn around ark and try and spear a pass to Lance who had three around him .

thats clearly poor coaching and the kick to the hotspot method . If he would have spotted up Lappin He would have been taking a shot from 30 metres out in the easy pocket .



It's clearly poor coaching if Fisher doesn't spot Lappin when he's open, or makes a poor decision to ignore him to go for Lance?

The players can't be that well programmed that Pagan is making all their decisions for them.

I'm tipping you won't like the next coach either.



I liked the last coach and tha coach before that and the one before that so that is not quite right what you say there..

In regards to fish he clearly saw Lappin run past him he even looked in his direction and then looked like he did what he was programmed to do and kick it to the hot spot.

It wasn't the only instance either Waite did the same thing a couple times they seem liked they are programmed to bring the ball back to the middle all the time regardless of who is free . The players soon get sick of running to the space and by half way through the second quarter they were stagnate and hailing cabs.


Do they seem like they're programmed to kick to the hot spot or is it clear they're programmed to kick to the hot spot?

Are you actually suggesting that Pagan instructs the players to ignore open men inside 50 and kick to the hot spot (or Whitnall/Fevola) instead? You don't think its possible Fisher didn't see him or made a poor decision?


Fish is just an example they were all doing it
I played with the TC boys on the Saturday and they were making better choices and new to kick to the guy that was free . They are clearly told to kick it to the hot spot and bring the ball back into the middle

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 1:20 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 9:27 pm
Posts: 5270
Sydney Blue wrote:
In regards to fish he clearly saw Lappin run past him he even looked in his direction and then looked like he did what he was programmed to do and kick it to the hot spot.

It wasn't the only instance either Waite did the same thing a couple times they seem liked they are programmed to bring the ball back to the middle all the time regardless of who is free . The players soon get sick of running to the space and by half way through the second quarter they were stagnate and hailing cabs.


See, there has been several occasions this year when this kind of effort has been rewarded, I remember we looked like a super team against Melbourne and looked bloody good against Collingwood for 2 quarters and ditto to the Westcoast game.

I think it is more that they were physically and mentally drained and couldn't give a shit.

_________________
The problem will be made. for the solution to be sold, to your face before your eyes, tolerance is now the new danger


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 1:29 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
Sydney Blue wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
There was an instance where Lappin took the ball on the wing kicked it forward to Fish then pushed really hard to the open space in the forward line only to see Fish turn his back take a big turn around ark and try and spear a pass to Lance who had three around him .

thats clearly poor coaching and the kick to the hotspot method . If he would have spotted up Lappin He would have been taking a shot from 30 metres out in the easy pocket .



It's clearly poor coaching if Fisher doesn't spot Lappin when he's open, or makes a poor decision to ignore him to go for Lance?

The players can't be that well programmed that Pagan is making all their decisions for them.

I'm tipping you won't like the next coach either.



I liked the last coach and tha coach before that and the one before that so that is not quite right what you say there..

In regards to fish he clearly saw Lappin run past him he even looked in his direction and then looked like he did what he was programmed to do and kick it to the hot spot.

It wasn't the only instance either Waite did the same thing a couple times they seem liked they are programmed to bring the ball back to the middle all the time regardless of who is free . The players soon get sick of running to the space and by half way through the second quarter they were stagnate and hailing cabs.


Do they seem like they're programmed to kick to the hot spot or is it clear they're programmed to kick to the hot spot?

Are you actually suggesting that Pagan instructs the players to ignore open men inside 50 and kick to the hot spot (or Whitnall/Fevola) instead? You don't think its possible Fisher didn't see him or made a poor decision?


Fish is just an example they were all doing it
I played with the TC boys on the Saturday and they were making better choices and new to kick to the guy that was free . They are clearly told to kick it to the hot spot and bring the ball back into the middle


I have no doubt they're told to kick to the hot spot or bring the ball back into the middle, but not at the expense of ignoring a free man in the pocket. The one thing that is clear is your bias against Pagan. It's blinding you.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 1:54 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
Sydney Blue wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
There was an instance where Lappin took the ball on the wing kicked it forward to Fish then pushed really hard to the open space in the forward line only to see Fish turn his back take a big turn around ark and try and spear a pass to Lance who had three around him .

thats clearly poor coaching and the kick to the hotspot method . If he would have spotted up Lappin He would have been taking a shot from 30 metres out in the easy pocket .



It's clearly poor coaching if Fisher doesn't spot Lappin when he's open, or makes a poor decision to ignore him to go for Lance?

The players can't be that well programmed that Pagan is making all their decisions for them.

I'm tipping you won't like the next coach either.



I liked the last coach and tha coach before that and the one before that so that is not quite right what you say there..

In regards to fish he clearly saw Lappin run past him he even looked in his direction and then looked like he did what he was programmed to do and kick it to the hot spot.

It wasn't the only instance either Waite did the same thing a couple times they seem liked they are programmed to bring the ball back to the middle all the time regardless of who is free . The players soon get sick of running to the space and by half way through the second quarter they were stagnate and hailing cabs.


Do they seem like they're programmed to kick to the hot spot or is it clear they're programmed to kick to the hot spot?

Are you actually suggesting that Pagan instructs the players to ignore open men inside 50 and kick to the hot spot (or Whitnall/Fevola) instead? You don't think its possible Fisher didn't see him or made a poor decision?


Fish is just an example they were all doing it
I played with the TC boys on the Saturday and they were making better choices and new to kick to the guy that was free . They are clearly told to kick it to the hot spot and bring the ball back into the middle

Ever heard of the concept of a poisoned chalice?

Completely hypothetical here:

Brad Fisher, having seen around 15 wins in his entire time at Carlton, knowing that he's not a super kick, sees Lappin charging into the pocket on his own.

Brad thinks "Wow, Lappo's on his own! I could even kick it to him. No wait a second, how can he be on his own? No one's ever on their own. Look there's Lance! On a lead! He's a good grab and clever with the footy, he's closer so I'll spear it to him and it shouldn't be cut off."

Am I as confident as you that my theory is correct? No.

Do I think you're right? No.

The easy chances have come our way so infrequently at Carlton in the last few years. You'd have to have an amazing level of resolve to have not been struck down by paranoia out on the field.

I bet if that was the case, most of the players wouldn't even want to recognise it.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 1:54 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:28 pm
Posts: 4960
buzzaaaah wrote:
What a farce.

2 best friends of a coach in waiting doing a review of the coaching structure. 1 of whom doesnt get along witht the incumbent.

It seems the most likely suggestion is to dump the incumbent and appoint someone because he'll "do it cheap". Are we coaching a team in Australia's premier sport or building a verandah.

Why cant we do this properly and get independant experts and look for the best availbale candidiate, Longmire, Mitchell or Pagan, whoever is the best. Why are we looking for the cheapest?


I agree.

It all sounds a bit like St Kilda in 2001/02 where Thomas was appointed because he was mates with Buttress.

_________________
There is no footy god


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 2:05 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18761
Location: threeohfivethree
All of us can argue until we're blue in the face (not such a bad look if you're a Carlton supporter) about what Denis is or isn't responsible for regarding list management and development of players. Those who attend training regularly are obviously going to have a clearer idea of what the players are working on. That's of critical importance to the future of our list but it's not the primary reason to end his tenure as coach as far as I'm concerned.

I'm pleased with the development of a number of players and less so with others. Trying to pinpoint which good or bad bits Denis is responsible for and which bits he isn't is extremely difficult if not impossible.

I have little doubt that if we stick with Denis for the next two years we'll improve significantly with the addition of more good kids and the reduction of passengers on the list. Will it be Denis who's responsible for that progress or will it be a natural shift brought about by a slowly improving list? Who knows?

What concerns me most is what happens on game day. If Denis stays and we do improve either a lot or just marginally it won't change the way he coaches during a match.

Wayne Brittain lost me because it appeared he'd run out of ideas. Wallace and Eade were flooding all over the place and it gave me the shits. Brittain followed suit and he lost me with his lack of vision. I can accept the importance of players understanding how to flood and how to counter it and as a shock tactic it's very useful. The problem is that a shock tactic is only a shock if you use it sparingly.

Denis doesn't appear to have adapted to the changes in the game of the last five years. Hardly a game goes by where the flood isn't used for at least a quarter or two. In the four years Denis has been at the helm I haven't seen one new technique on game day. The only tactics he's used have been ones he's been using throughout his coaching career and a couple (such as flooding) that are basic at best and not of his own creation.

I want a coach who can think beyond the established systems.

I want a coach who can adapt to changing circumstances.

I want a coach who can put structures in place that make his players want to die for him when they go out onto the ground. I want them to be so convinced of his genius that they will follow orders without thinking.

If Denis stays on for the next two years and things improve regardless of his input due to a better list and the natural development of players we may be stuck with a coach who doesn't have the adaptability and creative flair to take them further.

I've generally backed Denis over his first three years because I believed (and still do) that he didn't have much to work with and he was inheriting a poisoned culture that needed a complete cleanout. The cleanout's far enough progressed by now for that to all be left behind. It's time for him to be judged on what he's doing right now and from where I'm sitting it's not up to standard.

Unfortunately due to the financial position of the club I can't see them doing anything other than appointing Mitchell if they do take the plunge. Mitchell may be fantastic but I'd prefer to see him get the job by winning it over a group of highly competent applicants rather than by default. Due to those financial constraints I'll understand if we go down that road. If we do then I'll expect Mitchell to revolutionise the club within a couple of years. If he can do that he stays. If he can't we have a proper appointment process for a new coach at the end of 2008.

For now I'm yet to be 100% convinced that Mitchell's the right appointment (and I'll be filthy if they bring in a conga line of old navy blue suckholes as assistants rather than getting the best available) but he'll have to do.

Time to go Denis.

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 2:12 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18076
GWS wrote:
All of us can argue until we're blue in the face (not such a bad look if you're a Carlton supporter) about what Denis is or isn't responsible for regarding list management and development of players. Those who attend training regularly are obviously going to have a clearer idea of what the players are working on. That's of critical importance to the future of our list but it's not the primary reason to end his tenure as coach as far as I'm concerned.

I'm pleased with the development of a number of players and less so with others. Trying to pinpoint which good or bad bits Denis is responsible for and which bits he isn't is extremely difficult if not impossible.

I have little doubt that if we stick with Denis for the next two years we'll improve significantly with the addition of more good kids and the reduction of passengers on the list. Will it be Denis who's responsible for that progress or will it be a natural shift brought about by a slowly improving list? Who knows?

What concerns me most is what happens on game day. If Denis stays and we do improve either a lot or just marginally it won't change the way he coaches during a match.

Wayne Brittain lost me because it appeared he'd run out of ideas. Wallace and Eade were flooding all over the place and it gave me the shits. Brittain followed suit and he lost me with his lack of vision. I can accept the importance of players understanding how to flood and how to counter it and as a shock tactic it's very useful. The problem is that a shock tactic is only a shock if you use it sparingly.

Denis doesn't appear to have adapted to the changes in the game of the last five years. Hardly a game goes by where the flood isn't used for at least a quarter or two. In the four years Denis has been at the helm I haven't seen one new technique on game day. The only tactics he's used have been ones he's been using throughout his coaching career and a couple (such as flooding) that are basic at best and not of his own creation.

I want a coach who can think beyond the established systems.

I want a coach who can adapt to changing circumstances.

I want a coach who can put structures in place that make his players want to die for him when they go out onto the ground. I want them to be so convinced of his genius that they will follow orders without thinking.

If Denis stays on for the next two years and things improve regardless of his input due to a better list and the natural development of players we may be stuck with a coach who doesn't have the adaptability and creative flair to take them further.

I've generally backed Denis over his first three years because I believed (and still do) that he didn't have much to work with and he was inheriting a poisoned culture that needed a complete cleanout. The cleanout's far enough progressed by now for that to all be left behind. It's time for him to be judged on what he's doing right now and from where I'm sitting it's not up to standard.

Unfortunately due to the financial position of the club I can't see them doing anything other than appointing Mitchell if they do take the plunge. Mitchell may be fantastic but I'd prefer to see him get the job by winning it over a group of highly competent applicants rather than by default. Due to those financial constraints I'll understand if we go down that road. If we do then I'll expect Mitchell to revolutionise the club within a couple of years. If he can do that he stays. If he can't we have a proper appointment process for a new coach at the end of 2008.

For now I'm yet to be 100% convinced that Mitchell's the right appointment (and I'll be filthy if they bring in a conga line of old navy blue suckholes as assistants rather than getting the best available) but he'll have to do.

Time to go Denis.


Right on the money as usual GWS.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 2:14 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21648
Location: North of the border
Nice post GWS

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 2:56 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 10:39 pm
Posts: 487
This is a dumb move if ever I heard one, we should stick with Pagan. Smorgan is in trouble and he is going to put together some shitty line up like Mitchell, SOS, Ratten, Dean to appease the members - Pathetic. This is the kind of thing you would do in the 1970's.

Given how pathetic our list is we had to go for the priority pick. You can't engineer a five point loss every game. Finishing with seven wins would have been a disaster and despite the sheep bleating that winning 6 games would lead to a premiership faster, it wouldn't.

If we are gunna replace him why wouldn't you appoint the best possible person - McKenna, Longmuir, Royal whoever and then allow them to appoint their own assistants?

If Mitchell is so damn good why not let him take over a team in the VFL with an average playing list rather than a star studded one and see how he goes? I'm pretty sure he won't get them to finish 17-1.

_________________
"Davies could eventually become a player of Judd's ability" - Paganite03 Click here to see for yourself!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 2:56 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:24 am
Posts: 1217
Location: Melbourne
Back to back spoons says it all.

We've gone nowhere.

Unacceptable.

Time for change.

_________________
"Two roads diverged in a wood,
and I,
I took the one less travelled by,
and that has made all the difference."

Robert Frost


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 3:08 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21648
Location: North of the border
Carlton God wrote:
This is a dumb move if ever I heard one, we should stick with Pagan. Smorgan is in trouble and he is going to put together some shitty line up like Mitchell, SOS, Ratten, Dean to appease the members - Pathetic. This is the kind of thing you would do in the 1970's.

Given how pathetic our list is we had to go for the priority pick. You can't engineer a five point loss every game. Finishing with seven wins would have been a disaster and despite the sheep bleating that winning 6 games would lead to a premiership faster, it wouldn't.

If we are gunna replace him why wouldn't you appoint the best possible person - McKenna, Longmuir, Royal whoever and then allow them to appoint their own assistants?

If Mitchell is so damn good why not let him take over a team in the VFL with an average playing list rather than a star studded one and see how he goes? I'm pretty sure he won't get them to finish 17-1.


CG you do realise at some time in the future we are at some stage going to win 6-7 meaningless games - If you think we are going from spooners to finals in one hit youre dreaming son

I knew there was a reason I didn't believe in God. :lol:

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 3:14 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 11:39 am
Posts: 30269
Location: riding shotgun on Agros Karma Train
same here Syd Blue, someone around here looks at what the majority think and then posts the opposite - why? Dunno

_________________
Between our dreams and actions lies this world


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 3:22 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24655
Location: Kaloyasena
The @#$%&! problem is that we should have Picks 1 & 3 THIS YEAR not picks 1, 17 & 18.

Then we would be getting somewhere sooner.

Gibbs and Gumbleton or Gibbs and Hansen.


We have been right royally reamed by the AFL again in a penalty almost as bad as Black Friday 2002 and our namby pamby board have done @#$%&! all about it - happy to accept the 30 pieces of silver from the AFL in return for us shutting up about the changes to the Priority Pick rules which are meant to assist clubs with shit lists and as far as I am concerned there aint not club with a shitter list than us. :( :evil:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 3:24 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21078
Location: Missing Kouta
Sydney Blue wrote:
Carlton God wrote:
This is a dumb move if ever I heard one, we should stick with Pagan. Smorgan is in trouble and he is going to put together some shitty line up like Mitchell, SOS, Ratten, Dean to appease the members - Pathetic. This is the kind of thing you would do in the 1970's.

Given how pathetic our list is we had to go for the priority pick. You can't engineer a five point loss every game. Finishing with seven wins would have been a disaster and despite the sheep bleating that winning 6 games would lead to a premiership faster, it wouldn't.

If we are gunna replace him why wouldn't you appoint the best possible person - McKenna, Longmuir, Royal whoever and then allow them to appoint their own assistants?

If Mitchell is so damn good why not let him take over a team in the VFL with an average playing list rather than a star studded one and see how he goes? I'm pretty sure he won't get them to finish 17-1.


CG you do realise at some time in the future we are at some stage going to win 6-7 meaningless games - If you think we are going from spooners to finals in one hit youre dreaming son

I knew there was a reason I didn't believe in God. :lol:

You're a Pagan then? :shock:

Did you have a nice Father's day?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 3:28 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:35 pm
Posts: 2436
Electric Blue wrote:
I'm tipping we will know sooner than later! :wink:


From the man who brought it to us first :wink:

Now, who are we taking at No. 1 again, EB????


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 3:30 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 4719
Location: Parliament House, Canberra
A couple of problems here.

1) If we're going to get a new coach, then we really need to apply a thorough process and get someone to bring new life and ideas into the club. If Barry Mitchell is a good enough candidate he should go into this job interview process and come out on top if he's any good.

2) Those who want Pagan to stay need to watch yesterday's game again. It was no different to when we lost to the Swans in round 1 2003 at Telstra Stadium. Same bomb to CHF, bomb to a contest, no leading, NO ONE making space. We haven't moved forward in 4 seasons. Same tactics, same ineffectual bullcrap.

Something has to give, it's not just the cattle, we've turned over a heap of cattle over the last 4 years.

_________________
"A good composer does not initiate. He steals."

- Igor Stravinsky


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 3:31 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 10:39 pm
Posts: 487
Sydney Blue wrote:
CG you do realise at some time in the future we are at some stage going to win 6-7 meaningless games - If you think we are going from spooners to finals in one hit youre dreaming son

I knew there was a reason I didn't believe in God. :lol:


I'm more than happy to win 6 or 7 games when we have an adequate talent base that is able to deliver a premiership. If we had won 7 games last year we wouldn't have Murphy, forget about me dreaming, I think you are permanently stuck in dreamland.

_________________
"Davies could eventually become a player of Judd's ability" - Paganite03 Click here to see for yourself!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 3:36 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:35 pm
Posts: 2436
GWS wrote:
I'll be filthy if they bring in a conga line of old navy blue suckholes as assistants rather than getting the best available.


That's what worries me, GWS.

Small price to pay if Den den goes, though :P


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 3:37 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 10:39 pm
Posts: 487
CarltonClem wrote:
2) Those who want Pagan to stay need to watch yesterday's game again. It was no different to when we lost to the Swans in round 1 2003 at Telstra Stadium. Same bomb to CHF, bomb to a contest, no leading, NO ONE making space. We haven't moved forward in 4 seasons. Same tactics, same ineffectual bullcrap..


If you are just comparing on a game by game basis why don't you compare our result against west coast in 2003 to in 2006.

_________________
"Davies could eventually become a player of Judd's ability" - Paganite03 Click here to see for yourself!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 3:38 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21648
Location: North of the border
Carlton God wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
CG you do realise at some time in the future we are at some stage going to win 6-7 meaningless games - If you think we are going from spooners to finals in one hit youre dreaming son

I knew there was a reason I didn't believe in God. :lol:


I'm more than happy to win 6 or 7 games when we have an adequate talent base that is able to deliver a premiership. If we had won 7 games last year we wouldn't have Murphy, forget about me dreaming, I think you are permanently stuck in dreamland.


And when do we meet this magical talent base is it next year the year after that hell we have been hanging around the bottom for a while now collecting draft picks . I was just wondering how many more picks we need to satisfy you oh Holy one

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 265 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 14  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ByteDanceSpider, Google [Bot] and 51 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group