Blue Vain wrote:
Braithy wrote:
agree, measuring contested possessions/ clearances is no longer a gauge to how good you're going.
hawks – and now the dogs – are a great example. they play the "give them enough rope, let 'em hang themselves" ball. they'll give up a stoppage by sending the minimum of players to it and then zoning off around the stoppage, wait for the other team to get the ball, look up have no one there and turn it over to them ... then they smash them on the rebound/ counter.
imo, if there was one stat modern footy is all about, it's disposal efficiency, followed by metres gained per disposal. the elite teams are finishing games in the 80% and having 5 or 6+ players average 300m gained (hawks have gone 90% Vs norf)... last time i checked carlton was 59%, and our metres gained is the worst in the league by a landslide.
basically it's about how much teams are willing to run and forward penetrate teams by foot.
Yes but you're addressing the outcome but I'm talking about the methodology that produces that outcome.
Disposal efficiency is largely based on having time and space to use the ball. It's no coincidence that the top 3 teams in the AFL last year for disposal efficiency also averaged the highest uncontested possession numbers per game.
It's also no coincidence that the top 4 sides in the AFL at the moment for disposal efficiency have the highest uncontested possession percentages.
And surprise surprise, those 4 teams are top 6 in the AFL.
It's also not a coincidence that our effective disposal numbers have gone through the floor with the change of game plan.
Under Ratten we were usually top 8 in the AFL for effective disposals (as high as second) because our uncontested numbers were much higher.
We ran, created, took attacking options and worked hard to retain possession.
Under Malthouse we gain possession, kick down the line and give the opposition a 50/50 chance at winning the ball back.
In Micks first year at the club our disposal efficiency dropped to last in the AFL. Guess what? Our uncontested possession average dropped to last as well. That's not personnel. That's purely game style.
So contested football numbers are enormously important. You have to win the ball to use it. It's game style that dictates how you function once you have won the ball. How you retain possession. That's what produces disposal efficiency.
That's coaching philosophy and structure.
As I've said previously, the key is to get the balance of contested V uncontested ball right. We're off the scale one way under Mick. That's purely coaching.[/quote]
Logical and blatantly true for MM.
Doesn't look good for him.