Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu May 15, 2025 5:22 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1009 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 ... 51  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 2:04 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 12:22 pm
Posts: 6272
Location: Lurking
Blue Vain wrote:
ryan2000 wrote:
Sorry but i have to disagree.

The game style has indeed changed. We go wide a lot less now and we choose to run and carry it out of the backline - the Gibbs move on the weekend was clear indication of this.



Sorry Ryan, you've lost me there. What was the "Gibbs move"?

The "Up and Down Potato".

_________________
I AM DISENFRANCHISED


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 2:09 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34426
Location: The Brown Wedge
club29 wrote:
LC wrote:

Watch the cats game and watch the dons game again. If you cant see the difference between the players efforts then you have lost the plot.


I'm not going to watch the sndon game again - I've just had lunch.

I'd suggest the big difference is the way they took the ball forward.

The sndon game was continuously wide and indirect, and as Ryan says, the Cats and Crows was run, run, run, carry, carry, carry, goal, goal, goal :thumbsup: .

If the players weren't switched on for the sndon game, then there's a whole nuther argument.

_________________
end of message


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 2:24 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
The Duke wrote:
club29 wrote:
LC wrote:

Watch the cats game and watch the dons game again. If you cant see the difference between the players efforts then you have lost the plot.


I'm not going to watch the sndon game again - I've just had lunch.

I'd suggest the big difference is the way they took the ball forward.

The sndon game was continuously wide and indirect, and as Ryan says, the Cats and Crows was run, run, run, carry, carry, carry, goal, goal, goal :thumbsup: .

If the players weren't switched on for the sndon game, then there's a whole nuther argument.


I really think that was the main concern with supporters.

Most supporters accept there will be a random couple of games throughout the season where a flat performance will occur. That happens.

But the timing of this match with us knowing the tough draw ahead and the fact we had lost the 5 previous meetings to that ordinary team suggested to most Carlton people this was a huge occasion.

For the club as a collective to put in such a flat and underprepared performance was mindboggling for supporters and a major cause for concern.

To Ratts and the MC's credit they've responded in the best possible way by adapting their approach and making a statement at the selection table.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 4:22 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9099
Location: Nth Fitzroy
The Duke wrote:
club29 wrote:
LC wrote:

Watch the cats game and watch the dons game again. If you cant see the difference between the players efforts then you have lost the plot.


I'm not going to watch the sndon game again - I've just had lunch.

I'd suggest the big difference is the way they took the ball forward.

The sndon game was continuously wide and indirect, and as Ryan says, the Cats and Crows was run, run, run, carry, carry, carry, goal, goal, goal :thumbsup: .

If the players weren't switched on for the sndon game, then there's a whole nuther argument.


I agree with those points but we didnt apply any pressure. The walked passed us. We were crazy around goals doing things that indicated we were not switched on. This allowed them to use the ball as they please and allowed their pressure to push us wide. We were asleep in that game.

Credit to Ratts for working out the problem and since then we have come out breathing fire and the Crows and the Cats didnt even get close.

This week will be tough one. The Maggies play like the saints, hawks and crows (last year) and we all know we can struggle against those sorts of teams. I dont expect to see the same sort of running we have been allowed to do over the last fortnight.

I expect it to be a dogfight like the saints v blues last year. There will be plenty of times when we are stuck behind their zone and the chip chip will come out. The ball mihgt even go above the head 10 mins in as it did during the Crows game pre season which helped us turn that game.

The team that causes the most turnovers will win.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 5:00 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
club29 wrote:
The Duke wrote:

I'm not going to watch the sndon game again - I've just had lunch.

I'd suggest the big difference is the way they took the ball forward.

The sndon game was continuously wide and indirect, and as Ryan says, the Cats and Crows was run, run, run, carry, carry, carry, goal, goal, goal :thumbsup: .

If the players weren't switched on for the sndon game, then there's a whole nuther argument.


I agree with those points but we didnt apply any pressure. The walked passed us. We were crazy around goals doing things that indicated we were not switched on. This allowed them to use the ball as they please and allowed their pressure to push us wide. We were asleep in that game.

Credit to Ratts for working out the problem and since then we have come out breathing fire and the Crows and the Cats didnt even get close.

This week will be tough one. The Maggies play like the saints, hawks and crows (last year) and we all know we can struggle against those sorts of teams. I dont expect to see the same sort of running we have been allowed to do over the last fortnight.

I expect it to be a dogfight like the saints v blues last year. There will be plenty of times when we are stuck behind their zone and the chip chip will come out. The ball mihgt even go above the head 10 mins in as it did during the Crows game pre season which helped us turn that game.


The team that causes the most turnovers will win.

:?
Is this an attempt to gently prepare TCers for a possible revert back to that ineffective style of chip chip sideways backwards play?

Haven't we learnt anything the last 2 weeks?

We cannot let ourselves be dictated to and forced on the back foot.

We must take them on with confidence again with Scotland Armfield Gibbs Bower et al leading the way from defence on the front foot and dictating the terms and pressuring them into mistakes.

Games are won by being assertive. :thumbsup:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 5:02 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 9:20 am
Posts: 548
jimmae wrote:
Wasn't Gibbs on one of Chapman or Bartel?

He's been playing deep in midfield all season.


Don't confuse the issue Jimmae :lol: Isn't deep midfield just the new half back flanker?

Mainly Chapman, especially first half and a bit of Rooke with a touch of Hogan in the last. Might have had Bartel for time enough to get a shot at goal against him during a switch.

Not part of the centre bounce rotation though.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 5:14 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
Belisarius wrote:
jimmae wrote:
Wasn't Gibbs on one of Chapman or Bartel?

He's been playing deep in midfield all season.


Don't confuse the issue Jimmae :lol: Isn't deep midfield just the new half back flanker?

Mainly Chapman, especially first half and a bit of Rooke with a touch of Hogan in the last. Might have had Bartel for time enough to get a shot at goal against him during a switch.

Not part of the centre bounce rotation though.

Given that we had Armfield, Walker, Russell, White, Jamison & Lucas all playing deeper roles than him, it's difficult to call him a defender.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 5:18 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
jimmae wrote:
Belisarius wrote:
jimmae wrote:
Wasn't Gibbs on one of Chapman or Bartel?

He's been playing deep in midfield all season.


Don't confuse the issue Jimmae :lol: Isn't deep midfield just the new half back flanker?

Mainly Chapman, especially first half and a bit of Rooke with a touch of Hogan in the last. Might have had Bartel for time enough to get a shot at goal against him during a switch.

Not part of the centre bounce rotation though.

Given that we had Armfield, Walker, Russell, White, Jamison & Lucas all playing deeper roles than him, it's difficult to call him a defender.


He was playing on Chapman and was clearly part of the defence huddle at the breaks.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 5:37 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 9:20 am
Posts: 548
jimmae wrote:
Belisarius wrote:
jimmae wrote:
Wasn't Gibbs on one of Chapman or Bartel?

He's been playing deep in midfield all season.


Don't confuse the issue Jimmae :lol: Isn't deep midfield just the new half back flanker?

Mainly Chapman, especially first half and a bit of Rooke with a touch of Hogan in the last. Might have had Bartel for time enough to get a shot at goal against him during a switch.

Not part of the centre bounce rotation though.

Given that we had Armfield, Walker, Russell, White, Jamison & Lucas all playing deeper roles than him, it's difficult to call him a defender.


Sorry mate can't agree with you on this one :smile: With all the rotations that back six you mentioned weren't on there all the time together. Gibbs even spent brief periods on Byrnes and Stevie J when Russell and Army were off.


Last edited by Belisarius on Thu Apr 29, 2010 5:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 5:50 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
Ratts today saying that downplaying the rivalry with Essendon* contributed to our shit performance. You know, the downplaying we did because last time we lost we made too big a deal of it.

FFS, these pricks really are in our heads, aren't they? :garthp:

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 5:58 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 9:20 am
Posts: 548
Donstuie wrote:
Ratts today saying that downplaying the rivalry with Essendon* contributed to our shit performance. You know, the downplaying we did because last time we lost we made too big a deal of it.

FFS, these pricks really are in our heads, aren't they? :garthp:



Unfortunately yes they are :sad: We tense up and...we get the round three nightmare. I doubt we will ever downplay it again though. They tried something different and it sure didn't work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:03 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
Matthew Lloyd commented that they know our midfield arent accountable so they try to exploit us going back the other way.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:24 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9099
Location: Nth Fitzroy
Rexy wrote:
club29 wrote:
The Duke wrote:

I'm not going to watch the sndon game again - I've just had lunch.

I'd suggest the big difference is the way they took the ball forward.

The sndon game was continuously wide and indirect, and as Ryan says, the Cats and Crows was run, run, run, carry, carry, carry, goal, goal, goal :thumbsup: .

If the players weren't switched on for the sndon game, then there's a whole nuther argument.


I agree with those points but we didnt apply any pressure. The walked passed us. We were crazy around goals doing things that indicated we were not switched on. This allowed them to use the ball as they please and allowed their pressure to push us wide. We were asleep in that game.

Credit to Ratts for working out the problem and since then we have come out breathing fire and the Crows and the Cats didnt even get close.

This week will be tough one. The Maggies play like the saints, hawks and crows (last year) and we all know we can struggle against those sorts of teams. I dont expect to see the same sort of running we have been allowed to do over the last fortnight.

I expect it to be a dogfight like the saints v blues last year. There will be plenty of times when we are stuck behind their zone and the chip chip will come out. The ball mihgt even go above the head 10 mins in as it did during the Crows game pre season which helped us turn that game.


The team that causes the most turnovers will win.

:?
Is this an attempt to gently prepare TCers for a possible revert back to that ineffective style of chip chip sideways backwards play?

Haven't we learnt anything the last 2 weeks?

We cannot let ourselves be dictated to and forced on the back foot.

We must take them on with confidence again with Scotland Armfield Gibbs Bower et al leading the way from defence on the front foot and dictating the terms and pressuring them into mistakes.

Games are won by being assertive. :thumbsup:


I agree but the magpies play a different style to the cats. We are going to get stuck with 18 black and whites in front of us a lot more tha we did cats last week and different tactics will come into play. You will see plenty of short passes and chipping and the blues playing with patience IMO.
I agree about the front foot thing. If we can get away from them early then we can dictate the terms and perhaps their zone will start to crumble.

I see it being a dogfight like that saints game last year. I reckon it will be great game.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 7:12 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6328
If we dont win a final this year so long that we have a good run with injures we have failed.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:04 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 6450
Donstuie wrote:
Ratts today saying that downplaying the rivalry with Essendon* contributed to our shit performance. You know, the downplaying we did because last time we lost we made too big a deal of it.

FFS, these pricks really are in our heads, aren't they? :garthp:
I think it would be prudent of the whole club to get downright angry when we play these guys next time. Watching first gamers in Melksham and Colyer (especially in the last quarter) get possession after possession unimpeded was demorolising. Colyer in the last quarter gave me the absolute $hits, he should have been buried multiple times and been too sore to make the impact he did in that last quarter.

Its a big rivalry, trying to make a big deal of it or downplaying it is nothing if you don't have the passion to want to get down and dirty. The only thing they should think about next time we play them is how we are going to hurt them everytime we get the chance to, total aggression in every single tackle, every single shepherd, around the clearances or in open space.

_________________
"I will rejoice in their anguish, delight in their failure and revel in our success"

We are Carlton, @#$%&! the rest !!!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:12 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
So what you're saying teaguey is next time we need Donstuie to go in and do the pre-match motivation speech to the players.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:51 am 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 9:20 am
Posts: 548
keogh wrote:
If we dont win a final this year so long that we have a good run with injures we have failed.



Is that you Synbad? :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 10:17 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 2:37 pm
Posts: 1932
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Matthew Lloyd commented that they know our midfield arent accountable so they try to exploit us going back the other way.


Matthew 'spot the obvious' Lloyd.

What does that make the Ess midfield then?

I would have though this is what every team tries to accomplish against every other team every week!

_________________
Koperek.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 10:41 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34426
Location: The Brown Wedge
Our gameplan for sndon was the same as the 9nthmond game. We went out of our way to take the ball back via FB to switch wide to the right wing. We only beat richmond because they were crap. If we try that again against a good side, we'll get smashed.

The reason we kicked it OOF so often was because we were hell-bent on playing along the boundary.

_________________
end of message


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:29 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
Watching AFL Teams last night David Parkin mentioned that there were serious rumblings from parts of the inner sanctum as well as from the outside following the Essendon* game.
Ratts is smart enough to be adaptable and willing to drop name players which is a credit to him and a major difference from the Pagan reign where Denis was ridiculously stubborn.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1009 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 ... 51  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 78 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group