Clayman wrote:
Synbad wrote:
DIAMOTISM,... whats your pint again re Fevola anyway????
Cos i dont get what your point is...
Can you go over your point for me????
I think TeagueyYouBeauty was asking what your point was?
From what I am reading the point is to not pay Fev big dollars based on potential because he is 27 and rather pay him a salary that recognises his past performance. He has won a hand full of games off his own boot and been a problem child for the club. His past performance does not represent the salary he is commanding. This contract has to be performance based or we are flowered.
It is a pretty good point.
I also agree with Caz, we cannot afford to put our eggs all in one basket. We still need some quality to come into the team from outside for us to win a premiership.
I think my point is.....that Fev will stay and i dont get why people are just negative on him cos he hasnt signed...
Let me ask you this.....
Does Fev need to sign today in order to play for the CFC next year?
Does the club need Fev signed today in order for him to play for the CFC next year?
Do we have other players to sign at the moment as well?
Do other clubs have players to sign as well?
Is Fev not signing(at present) unique in football???
I can ask a whole heap of questions and get giggles out of you lot but i wont.....cos im abit busy.....
... but the Chicken Littles get MY point.....
... contract negotiations are just that..... it happens every year with countless players....
BUT my last questions is..... WHY WOULD FEV LEAVE???....cos some of you are acting like he said so....
... and do we need to turn onto Murph also?????
.. just for consistencies sake.....
Just grow up!!!!(not you .... just the chicken littles)