Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Wed Jun 18, 2025 8:07 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6401 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 268, 269, 270, 271, 272, 273, 274 ... 321  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2015 4:04 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:02 am
Posts: 1724
Effes wrote:
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/life-of-mick-blue-messiah-20120901-257iz.html

Quote:
The club, for its part, would do well to consider its past pattern of coaching appointments. Its devotion to the messiah cult remains undiminished. Barassi, Stewart, Parkin, Walls and Pagan were all brought from outside to produce instant results. To that list the name Malthouse is soon likely to be added. Thus far, the results are a mixed bag.

In thinking long term, and looking for a model, the Blues need look no further than the team on top of the AFL ladder. In 2005, the Hawks took a major risk on a coach with no profile. They accepted a 32 per cent win rate through two seasons of rebuilding, won a flag two years later, and may win another this year. On current indications, it's likely they have a 10-year-plus coach. It's a reward for their courage, conviction and clear thinking.

It was the type of appointment Carlton of the past 50 years would never have made.


Have been saying this for ages the club have an instant mentality and that's the fault of the supporters always demanding this.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2015 5:38 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 5:24 pm
Posts: 1531
Location: Melbourne
My collingwood mate made a good point today. When buttitant was at the pies, they were top of the fitness mantra around 2010ish. Since then fitness levels have gone up with the demand of the game, but training never changed at the pies. They get a new trainer and were surprised how unfit they were. Since then they have been smashed on the track. Even beams at lions has been surprised in the different level of training they are doing there, compared to pies.

Meanwhile we get another collingwood guru stuck in the old times. Makes sense why the blues look unfit.

Micks really good at getting his mates to the club. Any more brilliant decisions from this man.
Both must go


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2015 6:14 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
Goltzenberg wrote:
My collingwood mate made a good point today. When buttitant was at the pies, they were top of the fitness mantra around 2010ish. Since then fitness levels have gone up with the demand of the game, but training never changed at the pies. They get a new trainer and were surprised how unfit they were. Since then they have been smashed on the track. Even beams at lions has been surprised in the different level of training they are doing there, compared to pies.

Meanwhile we get another collingwood guru stuck in the old times. Makes sense why the blues look unfit.

Micks really good at getting his mates to the club. Any more brilliant decisions from this man.
Both must go


The pies also were the pioneers of the huge rotations. Caught the league out with that and the high forward press. Taking St Kildas version the year before to new levels. Think Butterfingers had his teams fitness geared a different way back then. Once everyone took those tactics and turned the fitness up a notch Butters had nothing left to give.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2015 6:27 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
I've raised some points in the Buttifant thread about this very topic.

I'd suggest if Buttifant is leading us astray, it's with a poor philosophical approach to AFL, rather than inept technical knowledge on how to deliver a result.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2015 6:56 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 8:41 pm
Posts: 2385
Effes wrote:
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/life-of-mick-blue-messiah-20120901-257iz.html

Quote:
The club, for its part, would do well to consider its past pattern of coaching appointments. Its devotion to the messiah cult remains undiminished. Barassi, Stewart, Parkin, Walls and Pagan were all brought from outside to produce instant results. To that list the name Malthouse is soon likely to be added. Thus far, the results are a mixed bag.

In thinking long term, and looking for a model, the Blues need look no further than the team on top of the AFL ladder. In 2005, the Hawks took a major risk on a coach with no profile. They accepted a 32 per cent win rate through two seasons of rebuilding, won a flag two years later, and may win another this year. On current indications, it's likely they have a 10-year-plus coach. It's a reward for their courage, conviction and clear thinking.

It was the type of appointment Carlton of the past 50 years would never have made.

Cool. Look no further than the team on top of the ladder.

Clarkson, come on down :thanks:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2015 7:48 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am
Posts: 3136
idle wrote:
The players may have sent a message, but what's the message?

I can't see any formula to winning in todays football other than working harder than your opponents. Is some new coach going to show up and offer a better game plan that involves less work rate?

I honestly think our problems stem from our lack of forward power. We literally have the worst forward line in the comp. I'm not talking about some massive forward unit who kicks bags (would be nice though) just a balanced capable forward structure.

We have Casboult who, lets face it, is probably one of the biggest let downs of the modern era. A big bodied forward who can take a grab, but can't kick to save his life. Jones (the jury is still out imho) That leaves Henderson. Pretty simple to double up on your only forward option and shut him down.

We lost Waite, Garlett and Betts. Three very capable goal scorers sorely missed up forward.

I am pretty certain Malthouse had massive plans for Kreuzer up forward as a target with support from Casboult, Jones and Henderson. When you look at it that way, it doesn't seem like a bad set up. But no Kreuzer, Casboult can't slot them through, Jones looks a little lost and Henderson carrying the entire forward hopes on his shoulders week in week out isn't going to cut it.

And this is where our troubles stem from. The rest of the team know up forward, we have nothing. Its not that they don't believe or trust in some master game plan from Malthouse, I believe no matter who our coach is, you can only work with what you have. And in our case, what we don't have, and that's a potent forward line.
Its not that the team doesn't believe Malthouse is the man for the job, they see the obvious (they are professional footballers) and our forward set up is useless at the moment. Their lack of effort (though purely between the ears) is evident, for what's the point of moving the ball forward when their is little to no reward for effort?

If we want to blame Malthouse for the loss of Waite, Garlett and Betts, fine. That's a separate argument altogether. But as it stands right now, I don't believe there is a coach in the country who can work with what we HAVEN'T got up forward. And this is having an impact on team morale in a very significant way.

Malthouse is trying to get the boys to work harder to cover what we lack up forward. Its a complex issue he's facing, and one that requires EVERYONE to do their bit, and even then, its an uphill battle as the opposition know this and counters effectively. This, I believe, is why we have fade outs. The workload to cover our lack of forward potency puts us on the back foot from the first bounce.

Malthouse and all the boys pre-season raved about Kreuzer. I think they all could see a workable forward structure with the absence of Waite, Garlett and Betts, having Kreuzer, new recruit Jones and Henderson up forward. If, and that's a big if, Casboult improved his goal kicking, I could see how the boys were looking forward to the season.

Kreuzer goes down. Casboult hasn't improved. Jones is lost. And Henderson is a legend of a player who we're lucky to have, but lets face it, he ain't no FEVOLA!!!!!!!! :P

So I don't blame Malthouse for our current woes. He can only work with the cattle available and IF that cattle has some form. Right now, the entire team knows our forward set up blows chunks and its killing us.

Now maybe the cashed up board can pull a miracle and get us a forward worth his weight in gold, or its recruit, rebuild and get the cattle the coach needs to do his job.

Imo, you are giving malthouse a free pass. A consistent tall forward would be nice but I don't think its an absolute requirement.

A few points
1. Kreuzer being developed as a forward has largely been a pipe dream - he can contribute here and there but I don't think he has ever looked like a key forward (even when he has kicked bags of 3)
2. Casboult hasn't actually been played as a forward. He plays more a roaming role, in the ruck and I'd be surprised if he spent 50% of the game in the forward line. If you want him to develop as a forward, plonk him in the goal square for 4 weeks and see what might eventuate - it could fail spectacularly, or alternatively he might show something more than he has previously (less fatigued, more confidence)
3. I don't think its that we don't have any forwards, but rather we don't have any obvious forwards. IIRC matty lappin did wonders with our forward structure years ago when the cupboard looked bare.
4. Our goal scoring ability links in with our delivery into the forward 50 - we don't have a lot of I50s and the quality of entries is poor. It is something that we have been abysmal at in recent times (game plan, loss of betts etc)
5. linked in with 4. we don't actually have a forward structure and consequently move the ball way too slowly - half the time our mids look up to see nothing forward of the centre line except 2-3 opposition backmen. Consequently they dither until our forwards get back into the forward line (where they are inevitably outnumbered!)
6. Give watson a go!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 06, 2015 9:03 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
Goltzenberg wrote:
My collingwood mate made a good point today. When buttitant was at the pies, they were top of the fitness mantra around 2010ish. Since then fitness levels have gone up with the demand of the game, but training never changed at the pies. They get a new trainer and were surprised how unfit they were. Since then they have been smashed on the track. Even beams at lions has been surprised in the different level of training they are doing there, compared to pies.

Meanwhile we get another collingwood guru stuck in the old times. Makes sense why the blues look unfit.

Micks really good at getting his mates to the club. Any more brilliant decisions from this man.
Both must go


This might help you be a bit more "informed''.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/c ... 7094710500


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 06, 2015 9:49 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34525
Location: The Brown Wedge
redback wrote:
london blue wrote:
C'mon 2 more pages and we are ahead of the essenscum discussion of 272 pages!!!



Sadly I think we might have to put up with micky a little while longer

let’s take a minute and reflect at Mickys coaching legacy at carlton
Millions in wasted funds
Jobs (retirement slush fund) for the boys
Regressed and laughing stock of a club
Wasted /lost memberships millions in gate takings and (future strength of support ?)
Long contracted and overpriced vfl footballers
Lost draft picks (not to mention the majority of our highest leading goal kickers)

Not bad for just over two seasons

On the bright side we can now rebuild

Thanks micky and all the bestn’t

I hope the family and all its inappropriate matters you so wonderfully shared with us and incorporated into our club are the only ones that appreciate all you’re waffling all so privately in the not so distant future


Who decided to trade pick 11 for Brock Mclean? Was it MM?
Who told Jacobs he was 4th in line for the ruck position? Was it MM?
Who traded pick 24 and 56 for Warnock? Was it MM?
Who decided they couldn't fit Simon Black into their midfield despite his desire to come and play with CJ5? Was it MM?
Who drafted Lucas, Davies, Watson, McCarthy, Bootsma, McInnes etc etc? was it MM?

_________________
end of message


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 06, 2015 9:55 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 7208
The Duke wrote:

Who decided to trade pick 11 for Brock Mclean? Was it MM?
Who told Jacobs he was 4th in line for the ruck position? Was it MM?
Who traded pick 24 and 56 for Warnock? Was it MM?
Who decided they couldn't fit Simon Black into their midfield despite his desire to come and play with CJ5? Was it MM?
Who drafted Lucas, Davies, Watson, McCarthy, Bootsma, McInnes etc etc? was it MM?




that is the most calamitous running of a football club i've ever read.

i feel queasy


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 06, 2015 9:57 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:20 pm
Posts: 6923
The Duke wrote:
Who decided they couldn't fit Simon Black into their midfield despite his desire to come and play with CJ5? Was it MM?


What?

_________________
BLUES 2010: PAV AND JUDD = FLAGS. DOING IT FOR THE LOVE OF DICK PRATT.

HAVE YOU SIGNED UP FOR TALKINGCARLTON SUPERCOACH 2009 YET?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 06, 2015 9:58 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34525
Location: The Brown Wedge
I think you mean 'ruining' Braithy.

_________________
end of message


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 06, 2015 10:02 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:57 pm
Posts: 5338
Location: Melbourne
Goltzenberg wrote:
My collingwood mate made a good point today. When buttitant was at the pies, they were top of the fitness mantra around 2010ish. Since then fitness levels have gone up with the demand of the game, but training never changed at the pies. They get a new trainer and were surprised how unfit they were. Since then they have been smashed on the track. Even beams at lions has been surprised in the different level of training they are doing there, compared to pies.

Meanwhile we get another collingwood guru stuck in the old times. Makes sense why the blues look unfit.

Micks really good at getting his mates to the club. Any more brilliant decisions from this man.
Both must go


Have to admit that I did expected more from Butters when we got him then what has transpired.

_________________
James Hird and Essendon* FC - #FOREVERDRUGCHEATS


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 06, 2015 10:04 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34525
Location: The Brown Wedge
The Rhino wrote:
The Duke wrote:
Who decided they couldn't fit Simon Black into their midfield despite his desire to come and play with CJ5? Was it MM?


What?


An AFL recruiter told me Simon Black (who he mentored as a junior) wanted to leave the BL (desperately) to play for Carlton for the last 3-4 years of his career. He would drop his wage to fit in our cap, but Ratts said no.

Apparently we couldn't squeeze him into our midfield.

_________________
end of message


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 06, 2015 10:05 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:57 pm
Posts: 5338
Location: Melbourne
Braithy wrote:
The Duke wrote:

Who decided to trade pick 11 for Brock Mclean? Was it MM?
Who told Jacobs he was 4th in line for the ruck position? Was it MM?
Who traded pick 24 and 56 for Warnock? Was it MM?
Who decided they couldn't fit Simon Black into their midfield despite his desire to come and play with CJ5? Was it MM?
Who drafted Lucas, Davies, Watson, McCarthy, Bootsma, McInnes etc etc? was it MM?


that is the most calamitous running of a football club i've ever read.

i feel queasy


What's ever more sad is, thats only the tip of the iceberg.

_________________
James Hird and Essendon* FC - #FOREVERDRUGCHEATS


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 06, 2015 10:15 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:29 am
Posts: 6418
Location: Casa Da Carlton - The Place to Be
Dominator_7 wrote:
Braithy wrote:
The Duke wrote:

Who decided to trade pick 11 for Brock Mclean? Was it MM?
Who told Jacobs he was 4th in line for the ruck position? Was it MM?
Who traded pick 24 and 56 for Warnock? Was it MM?
Who decided they couldn't fit Simon Black into their midfield despite his desire to come and play with CJ5? Was it MM?
Who drafted Lucas, Davies, Watson, McCarthy, Bootsma, McInnes etc etc? was it MM?


that is the most calamitous running of a football club i've ever read.

i feel queasy


What's ever more sad is, thats only the tip of the iceberg.


we really have been shit for a long time haven't we.

its going to be a long hard slog ... ive sort of changed my mind on malthouse ... its no longer can I think he has the ability, but will he have the staying power to do it ... i.e. in 5 years time ...

we do need a 5-8 year plan and im not sure Malthose will be around for that long.

lets not get caught up in what other clubs are doing, that is only being reactionary ... lets set the example!

_________________
Got to love the stare Down by Setanta on Llyod :)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 06, 2015 10:23 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:57 pm
Posts: 5338
Location: Melbourne
Its been embarrassing since the late 90s actually.
- Essendon* and Collingwood get massive deals to move home games away from their traditional homes, and take them, while we reject a similar deal and build a crappy, unpopular new grandstand, crippling ourselves in debt in the process.
- Elliott does his paper bag payments. We get busted, and overly punished the the point on near non existence.
- Elliott signs a washed up Denis Pagan on massive $$$ in a panic move to hold onto power prior to board Elections.
- Pagan comes in with a hammer and quickly gets players off side.
- We bring in recruiters from the Dockers (Hughes and Rogers) even though the cautionary example of a to that point crappy, underachieving Freo was there for all to see. We would stick with these guys for 10 years lol.
- We waste a whole 2004 draft bringing in duds from other Clubs. Only 1 of the players will remain at the club for more then 2 years.
- Chambers, Longmuir, McLaren, Saddington, Ackland
- We sign up Pagan to two more years purely on the back of a pre season comp win alone.
- Our draft/trading success rate between 2000-2012 (last two years are still too early to call) is at about 30% success rate.
- Continued bad decisions and infighting at Board level mean we cant get ourselves out of mess as a Club, but instead of developing a solid plan, staying united and fighting our way out of the mess ala Hawthorn, we run to Pratt and beg him for money, in the process indebting ourselves to him and the other rich benefactors who tossed us money to keep us afloat in those days.
- We sack Pagan, but don't go through a proper process to appoint the next coach. Instead, we appoint an obviously inexperienced Ratten because he's a Carlton person and mates with Sticks and Pratt, nd hope he 'learns on the job'.
- Selling the farm for Judd
- Not being hard enough on Fev
- Two picks for Warnock (which we wasted)
- A pick in the 30s for Sauce (which we wasted)
- Pick 11 for Brock
- Pick 12 of Lucas instead of Daniel Talia
- Bad injury management of Kreuzer
- First picks on Watson and Bootsma
- Pathetic list management (giving contract extensions to Davies, Joseph, Warnock and others, clogging up our Salary Cap with junk in the process).
- Chasing Malthouse while Ratten was still coach. Not going through a proper process (again) once Ratten was let go
- MM freezing out Laidler, who goes on to be snapped up by Sydney.
- Brining in Daisy when we were screaming for a key forward
- Persisting with a key forward / ruck who after 6 years in the AFL system, still cant kick.
- The Board getting bigger and bigger with hangers on, and only shrinking when ther was mass media backlash. When was the last time members voted on a board member ?

Its not just the coach that's wrong with this place. Its the rusted on arrogance of 'old Carlton'.

If MM was to continue, it would only be in a Roos/Goodwin style 2-3 year 'grooming a younger assistant' type situation. Don't think thats going to happen.
And I think that the non improvement and continued bad results, and a lot of our own fans general feelings towards him, have really left the Club with no option but to not continue with MM.

_________________
James Hird and Essendon* FC - #FOREVERDRUGCHEATS


Last edited by Dominator_7 on Wed May 06, 2015 11:37 am, edited 3 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 06, 2015 11:13 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
Who had as 1 win 4 losses, season over, start again, two years in a row?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 06, 2015 12:11 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 9603
Location: Beijing
Dominator_7 wrote:
Its been embarrassing since the late 90s actually.
- Essendon** and Collingwood get massive deals to move home games away from their traditional homes, and take them, while we reject a similar deal and build a crappy, unpopular new grandstand, crippling ourselves in debt in the process.
- Elliott does his paper bag payments. We get busted, and overly punished the the point on near non existence.
- Elliott signs a washed up Denis Pagan on massive $$$ in a panic move to hold onto power prior to board Elections.
- Pagan comes in with a hammer and quickly gets players off side.
- We bring in recruiters from the Dockers (Hughes and Rogers) even though the cautionary example of a to that point crappy, underachieving Freo was there for all to see. We would stick with these guys for 10 years lol.
- We waste a whole 2004 draft bringing in duds from other Clubs. Only 1 of the players will remain at the club for more then 2 years.
- Chambers, Longmuir, McLaren, Saddington, Ackland
- We sign up Pagan to two more years purely on the back of a pre season comp win alone.
- Our draft/trading success rate between 2000-2012 (last two years are still too early to call) is at about 30% success rate.
- Continued bad decisions and infighting at Board level mean we cant get ourselves out of mess as a Club, but instead of developing a solid plan, staying united and fighting our way out of the mess ala Hawthorn, we run to Pratt and beg him for money, in the process indebting ourselves to him and the other rich benefactors who tossed us money to keep us afloat in those days.
- We sack Pagan, but don't go through a proper process to appoint the next coach. Instead, we appoint an obviously inexperienced Ratten because he's a Carlton person and mates with Sticks and Pratt, nd hope he 'learns on the job'.
- Selling the farm for Judd
- Not being hard enough on Fev
- Two picks for Warnock (which we wasted)
- A pick in the 30s for Sauce (which we wasted)
- Pick 11 for Brock
- Pick 12 of Lucas instead of Daniel Talia
- Bad injury management of Kreuzer
- First picks on Watson and Bootsma
- Pathetic list management (giving contract extensions to Davies, Joseph, Warnock and others, clogging up our Salary Cap with junk in the process).
- Chasing Malthouse while Ratten was still coach. Not going through a proper process (again) once Ratten was let go
- MM freezing out Laidler, who goes on to be snapped up by Sydney.
- Brining in Daisy when we were screaming for a key forward
- Persisting with a key forward / ruck who after 6 years in the AFL system, still cant kick.
- The Board getting bigger and bigger with hangers on, and only shrinking when ther was mass media backlash. When was the last time members voted on a board member ?

Its not just the coach that's wrong with this place. Its the rusted on arrogance of 'old Carlton'.

If MM was to continue, it would only be in a Roos/Goodwin style 2-3 year 'grooming a younger assistant' type situation. Don't think thats going to happen.
And I think that the non improvement and continued bad results, and a lot of our own fans general feelings towards him, have really left the Club with no option but to not continue with MM.


Very sad and depressing reading. How the mighty have fallen.

_________________
"our electorate seeks less to be informed and more to be validated." Sad times.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 06, 2015 1:18 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2646
The Duke wrote:
redback wrote:
london blue wrote:
C'mon 2 more pages and we are ahead of the essenscum discussion of 272 pages!!!



Sadly I think we might have to put up with micky a little while longer

let’s take a minute and reflect at Mickys coaching legacy at carlton
Millions in wasted funds
Jobs (retirement slush fund) for the boys
Regressed and laughing stock of a club
Wasted /lost memberships millions in gate takings and (future strength of support ?)
Long contracted and overpriced vfl footballers
Lost draft picks (not to mention the majority of our highest leading goal kickers)

Not bad for just over two seasons

On the bright side we can now rebuild

Thanks micky and all the bestn’t

I hope the family and all its inappropriate matters you so wonderfully shared with us and incorporated into our club are the only ones that appreciate all you’re waffling all so privately in the not so distant future


Who decided to trade pick 11 for Brock Mclean? Was it MM?
Who told Jacobs he was 4th in line for the ruck position? Was it MM?
Who traded pick 24 and 56 for Warnock? Was it MM?
Who decided they couldn't fit Simon Black into their midfield despite his desire to come and play with CJ5? Was it MM?
Who drafted Lucas, Davies, Watson, McCarthy, Bootsma, McInnes etc etc? was it MM?



yes we know mistakes have been made (just like every other club) but we were still playing good footy and finals

with all the changes for the better micky has made can you address why we have become a laughing stock over the last 3 years when our million dollar coach and his merry men have been brought into our club
apart from the aligning stars and the players so clearly love him reasoning

a/ our potent forwards, the ones still at this club
b/ mickys impressive dossier of youth development
c/ the flower and the competitive beast :lol: this one always makes me laugh
d/ the defensive and impressive game plan
e/ our crafty team selections
f/ mickys match day coaching
g/ ellard our new CHF
h/ the 5 tagger system
I/ our ground breaking fitness (not last year because of our unprecedented off season surgery list)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 06, 2015 1:24 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 6:11 pm
Posts: 15001
Taff wrote:
Dominator_7 wrote:
Its been embarrassing since the late 90s actually.
- Essendon*** and Collingwood get massive deals to move home games away from their traditional homes, and take them, while we reject a similar deal and build a crappy, unpopular new grandstand, crippling ourselves in debt in the process.
- Elliott does his paper bag payments. We get busted, and overly punished the the point on near non existence.
- Elliott signs a washed up Denis Pagan on massive $$$ in a panic move to hold onto power prior to board Elections.
- Pagan comes in with a hammer and quickly gets players off side.
- We bring in recruiters from the Dockers (Hughes and Rogers) even though the cautionary example of a to that point crappy, underachieving Freo was there for all to see. We would stick with these guys for 10 years lol.
- We waste a whole 2004 draft bringing in duds from other Clubs. Only 1 of the players will remain at the club for more then 2 years.
- Chambers, Longmuir, McLaren, Saddington, Ackland
- We sign up Pagan to two more years purely on the back of a pre season comp win alone.
- Our draft/trading success rate between 2000-2012 (last two years are still too early to call) is at about 30% success rate.
- Continued bad decisions and infighting at Board level mean we cant get ourselves out of mess as a Club, but instead of developing a solid plan, staying united and fighting our way out of the mess ala Hawthorn, we run to Pratt and beg him for money, in the process indebting ourselves to him and the other rich benefactors who tossed us money to keep us afloat in those days.
- We sack Pagan, but don't go through a proper process to appoint the next coach. Instead, we appoint an obviously inexperienced Ratten because he's a Carlton person and mates with Sticks and Pratt, nd hope he 'learns on the job'.
- Selling the farm for Judd
- Not being hard enough on Fev
- Two picks for Warnock (which we wasted)
- A pick in the 30s for Sauce (which we wasted)
- Pick 11 for Brock
- Pick 12 of Lucas instead of Daniel Talia
- Bad injury management of Kreuzer
- First picks on Watson and Bootsma
- Pathetic list management (giving contract extensions to Davies, Joseph, Warnock and others, clogging up our Salary Cap with junk in the process).
- Chasing Malthouse while Ratten was still coach. Not going through a proper process (again) once Ratten was let go
- MM freezing out Laidler, who goes on to be snapped up by Sydney.
- Brining in Daisy when we were screaming for a key forward
- Persisting with a key forward / ruck who after 6 years in the AFL system, still cant kick.
- The Board getting bigger and bigger with hangers on, and only shrinking when ther was mass media backlash. When was the last time members voted on a board member ?

Its not just the coach that's wrong with this place. Its the rusted on arrogance of 'old Carlton'.

If MM was to continue, it would only be in a Roos/Goodwin style 2-3 year 'grooming a younger assistant' type situation. Don't think thats going to happen.
And I think that the non improvement and continued bad results, and a lot of our own fans general feelings towards him, have really left the Club with no option but to not continue with MM.


Very sad and depressing reading. How the mighty have fallen.

It is depressing. The thing that really annoys me is that us, the average supporter, could see what was happening yet the club couldn't.
There are no words to describe how shitty I am right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6401 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 268, 269, 270, 271, 272, 273, 274 ... 321  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], snakehips and 43 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group