The players may have sent a message, but what's the message?
I can't see any formula to winning in todays football other than working harder than your opponents. Is some new coach going to show up and offer a better game plan that involves less work rate?
I honestly think our problems stem from our lack of forward power. We literally have the worst forward line in the comp. I'm not talking about some massive forward unit who kicks bags (would be nice though) just a balanced capable forward structure.
We have Casboult who, lets face it, is probably one of the biggest let downs of the modern era. A big bodied forward who can take a grab, but can't kick to save his life. Jones (the jury is still out imho) That leaves Henderson. Pretty simple to double up on your only forward option and shut him down.
We lost Waite, Garlett and Betts. Three very capable goal scorers sorely missed up forward.
I am pretty certain Malthouse had massive plans for Kreuzer up forward as a target with support from Casboult, Jones and Henderson. When you look at it that way, it doesn't seem like a bad set up. But no Kreuzer, Casboult can't slot them through, Jones looks a little lost and Henderson carrying the entire forward hopes on his shoulders week in week out isn't going to cut it.
And this is where our troubles stem from. The rest of the team know up forward, we have nothing. Its not that they don't believe or trust in some master game plan from Malthouse, I believe no matter who our coach is, you can only work with what you have. And in our case, what we don't have, and that's a potent forward line.
Its not that the team doesn't believe Malthouse is the man for the job, they see the obvious (they are professional footballers) and our forward set up is useless at the moment. Their lack of effort (though purely between the ears) is evident, for what's the point of moving the ball forward when their is little to no reward for effort?
If we want to blame Malthouse for the loss of Waite, Garlett and Betts, fine. That's a separate argument altogether. But as it stands right now, I don't believe there is a coach in the country who can work with what we HAVEN'T got up forward. And this is having an impact on team morale in a very significant way.
Malthouse is trying to get the boys to work harder to cover what we lack up forward. Its a complex issue he's facing, and one that requires EVERYONE to do their bit, and even then, its an uphill battle as the opposition know this and counters effectively. This, I believe, is why we have fade outs. The workload to cover our lack of forward potency puts us on the back foot from the first bounce.
Malthouse and all the boys pre-season raved about Kreuzer. I think they all could see a workable forward structure with the absence of Waite, Garlett and Betts, having Kreuzer, new recruit Jones and Henderson up forward. If, and that's a big if, Casboult improved his goal kicking, I could see how the boys were looking forward to the season.
Kreuzer goes down. Casboult hasn't improved. Jones is lost. And Henderson is a legend of a player who we're lucky to have, but lets face it, he ain't no FEVOLA!!!!!!!!

So I don't blame Malthouse for our current woes. He can only work with the cattle available and IF that cattle has some form. Right now, the entire team knows our forward set up blows chunks and its killing us.
Now maybe the cashed up board can pull a miracle and get us a forward worth his weight in gold, or its recruit, rebuild and get the cattle the coach needs to do his job.
Imo, you are giving malthouse a free pass. A consistent tall forward would be nice but I don't think its an absolute requirement.
1. Kreuzer being developed as a forward has largely been a pipe dream - he can contribute here and there but I don't think he has ever looked like a key forward (even when he has kicked bags of 3)
2. Casboult hasn't actually been played as a forward. He plays more a roaming role, in the ruck and I'd be surprised if he spent 50% of the game in the forward line. If you want him to develop as a forward, plonk him in the goal square for 4 weeks and see what might eventuate - it could fail spectacularly, or alternatively he might show something more than he has previously (less fatigued, more confidence)
3. I don't think its that we don't have any forwards, but rather we don't have any obvious forwards. IIRC matty lappin did wonders with our forward structure years ago when the cupboard looked bare.
4. Our goal scoring ability links in with our delivery into the forward 50 - we don't have a lot of I50s and the quality of entries is poor. It is something that we have been abysmal at in recent times (game plan, loss of betts etc)
5. linked in with 4. we don't actually have a forward structure and consequently move the ball way too slowly - half the time our mids look up to see nothing forward of the centre line except 2-3 opposition backmen. Consequently they dither until our forwards get back into the forward line (where they are inevitably outnumbered!)
6. Give watson a go!