Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jun 17, 2025 7:23 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6401 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263, 264 ... 321  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2015 7:16 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 10:17 pm
Posts: 2058
jimmae wrote:
He plays decent footy, but we struggle as a team whenever he is out on the field. Wins a few taps, hits less of them to decent areas, runs on the spot.

Would have preferred to see Wood lead the ruck division with no recognised ruck at the stoppages when he needed a spell, then just rotate him between FF & the centre bounce until he's ready to go back into midfield again. Rowe could have taken a bounce or five with Hendo in defence until Wood could come back on again.

Tonight we got 80% out of Wood and 72% out of Warnock; we've been consistently getting 78-84% out of Wood which is a good return, so you're looking at about 20 ruck contests, including up to 7 centre square stoppages based on tonights stats (24 goals plus the 4 opening bounces is probably a little behind the average centre stats).

Let's say we have Wood run solo, resting forward a little maximise his centre bounce contribution. You're looking at 70% around the ground, and 90% of centre bounce contests. Let's say it's about 90 ruck contests a game, with 32 centre bounces. So that's about 17 stoppages and 3-4 centre bounces Wood would miss.

Is this going to make or break a football match? It's a disadvantage sure, but what's the disadvantage of Warnock acquiring 8 possessions for a match, with 2 direct turnovers? He had about 3 at half time, when the contest was in full swing.


how did it come to this? we had 4 potentially good ruckman on our list during the Ratten era and now we are relying on a retread like Wood to lead our ruck division. Collingwood realised about 5 years ago that he wasn't up to it. We should start believing other teams' assessments when someone is no good (eg Jones). They are better at it than us.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2015 7:20 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 7205
yep ... the amount of retreads going around in this club. it's much more than a worry.

is it arrogance that we think we can turn them into something ... that their old club was wrong about the assessments?

... or is it blind desperation as our own internal stocks are so dried up, we're in the middle of a 15 year drought.

probs both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2015 7:21 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21541
Location: North of the border
WOW wrote:
jimmae wrote:
He plays decent footy, but we struggle as a team whenever he is out on the field. Wins a few taps, hits less of them to decent areas, runs on the spot.

Would have preferred to see Wood lead the ruck division with no recognised ruck at the stoppages when he needed a spell, then just rotate him between FF & the centre bounce until he's ready to go back into midfield again. Rowe could have taken a bounce or five with Hendo in defence until Wood could come back on again.

Tonight we got 80% out of Wood and 72% out of Warnock; we've been consistently getting 78-84% out of Wood which is a good return, so you're looking at about 20 ruck contests, including up to 7 centre square stoppages based on tonights stats (24 goals plus the 4 opening bounces is probably a little behind the average centre stats).

Let's say we have Wood run solo, resting forward a little maximise his centre bounce contribution. You're looking at 70% around the ground, and 90% of centre bounce contests. Let's say it's about 90 ruck contests a game, with 32 centre bounces. So that's about 17 stoppages and 3-4 centre bounces Wood would miss.

Is this going to make or break a football match? It's a disadvantage sure, but what's the disadvantage of Warnock acquiring 8 possessions for a match, with 2 direct turnovers? He had about 3 at half time, when the contest was in full swing.


how did it come to this? we had 4 potentially good ruckman on our list during the Ratten era and now we are relying on a retread like Wood to lead our ruck division. Collingwood realised about 5 years ago that he wasn't up to it. We should start believing other teams' assessments when someone is no good (eg Jones). They are better at it than us.

Collingwood also realised that about Malthouse, Swan, Buffiant, Laidley and Thomas

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2015 7:43 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:31 am
Posts: 17893
We don't need a new coach.
A psychiatrist would be much more useful.

_________________
T E A M


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2015 7:50 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 10:17 pm
Posts: 2058
Braithy wrote:
yep ... the amount of retreads going around in this club. it's much more than a worry.

is it arrogance that we think we can turn them into something ... that their old club was wrong about the assessments?

... or is it blind desperation as our own internal stocks are so dried up, we're in the middle of a 15 year drought.

probs both.


it probably stems from our arrogance as a club and not accepting that sometimes you need to take a step back to take two steps forward (quick fix mentality)

it's a socialist competition where the days of bullying or buying a premiership is over including off the field

if the last 15 years hasn't humbled the club then nothing will


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2015 7:56 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 7205
WOW wrote:

if the last 15 years hasn't humbled the club then nothing will



nothing can humble the rich men who own this club and use it as a personal "play thing." Their egos have no bounds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2015 8:11 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:52 am
Posts: 1588
Location: My social club stand, Princes Park
This is how it will play out...

When the writing's on the wall that the club will not be renewing his contract, then with the club's blessing, he'll announce his retirement with two games to go in the season.

He'll use health issues and the family as an excuse for not continuing.

His 3 year "anti-Collingwood" experiment has failed and I'm sure he's over it - unless his ego, or the fact that he's just doing it for the money, get in the way and so he thinks he'll continue.

_________________

************************************************************
NOW YOU'RE JUST SOME CLUB THAT I USED TO KNOW.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2015 8:15 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 12:30 pm
Posts: 4180
He won't be at the club next year.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2015 8:19 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 7205
hopefully he won't be at the club next week.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2015 8:26 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:35 pm
Posts: 2432
Last night said so much.
About the coach and so many of our players.
To the club and the coach. And the competition.
Nail in the coffin.

_________________
I just want my old club back ... (edit) maybe I have!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2015 9:01 am 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 11:12 am
Posts: 915
Lasts night game is what you call a coach killer.

Mick won't get sacked. The club is in no position to payout contracts and upgrade others as they are under going some serious cost cuttings across the entire club that includes football department.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2015 9:08 am 
Offline
formerly Yazzamatazz
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:16 pm
Posts: 7555
Location: NowHere.....
Lets bring in guy mckenna, hopefully he can bring in a loyal gold coast player or two..

_________________
Circumstance has no value. It is how one relates to a situation that has value. All true meaning resides in the personal relationship to a phenomenon, what it means to you.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2015 9:10 am 
Offline
Collingwood Supporter

Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2015 2:43 pm
Posts: 132
The media scrutiny on Mick this week will reach new levels. I suspect the media gave Mick their grace last night and will payback this week.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2015 9:12 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 7205
i feel bad for mick in a way ... b'cos in my opinion it's the benefactors & board, and then the players and then Mick. that's the order of where the scrutiny at carlton football club should be aimed.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2015 9:22 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:14 pm
Posts: 5991
Location: Melbourne
I think he looked like he knew it was done at the press conference. I agree we won't have to sack him, he will resign either now or towards the end of the year.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2015 9:24 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:20 pm
Posts: 6923
Lost me tonight. Completely classless in snubbing Buckley at the end of the game.

_________________
BLUES 2010: PAV AND JUDD = FLAGS. DOING IT FOR THE LOVE OF DICK PRATT.

HAVE YOU SIGNED UP FOR TALKINGCARLTON SUPERCOACH 2009 YET?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2015 9:27 am 
Offline
Collingwood Supporter

Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2015 2:43 pm
Posts: 132
The Rhino wrote:
Lost me tonight. Completely classless in snubbing Buckley at the end of the game.


I think Sam Landberger asked Mick last night if he had replied to Buckley's personal message of support during the week. Malthouse said he hadn't and blamed it on not wanting to send 255 text messages.

Malthouse is a classless individual.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2015 9:40 am 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
Braithy wrote:
i feel bad for mick in a way ... b'cos in my opinion it's the benefactors & board, and then the players and then Mick. that's the order of where the scrutiny at carlton football club should be aimed.


Yep. Says more about the club than the coach IMO. We have burnt Pagan, Ratten & now MM.

It's a culture issue. We are pathetic.

Time to change the whole club. Coaches, Players, Recruiters etc.

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2015 9:49 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:52 pm
Posts: 2044
Its players first second and third
The board or lack of football people on it second
The coach third.
I have been an avid supporter of malthouse. He wont be tbere next year. Don't bet a new coach will make a difference.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2015 10:01 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 7205
ThePsychologist wrote:
Braithy wrote:
i feel bad for mick in a way ... b'cos in my opinion it's the benefactors & board, and then the players and then Mick. that's the order of where the scrutiny at carlton football club should be aimed.


Yep. Says more about the club than the coach IMO. We have burnt Pagan, Ratten & now MM.

It's a culture issue. We are pathetic.

Time to change the whole club. Coaches, Players, Recruiters etc.


agree. change the whole club, front to back.

Carlton isn't quite a lost cause. We're hanging in there by a strand of hair. But the whole club at the admin & board level has to be assessed/ audited and changes made.

it's the only hope left for supporters, or they will lose us for a decade minimum, if not forever.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6401 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263, 264 ... 321  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 40 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group