Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu Jun 26, 2025 12:01 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2019 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 ... 101  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 7:23 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
Juddy&theKruezers wrote:

I agree and this season I'm only judging Ratten on the aim he set and that was finals. But you have to admit there are some major question marks over our match day strategies and his ability to inspire the players to perform consistently.

The obvious issue being the apparent lack of any strategy at all. Also we were a 5 minute here and a 5 minute there burst team last year and we still are. This is where Ratts has not shown anything at all so far and in the end this is what will determine his longevity.


If the benchmark is finals, then how about we leave any slagging of him until there's no possibility of making finals?

Let the season end, that's the only realistic way to assess whether Ratts has taken the team forward. We're not going to be able to make a realistic assessment until then.

Sure, talk about alternatives, possibilities etc before then, but don't be so keen to cremate Ratten now.

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 7:36 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2008 11:59 am
Posts: 536
Location: Melbourne
Synbad wrote:
PD'sPC wrote:
^

99Prelim, what makes you think this isn't the case? I'll go out on a limb (or maybe not!) and say Ratts is not only growing with the group but also learning the caper himself, as a manager and as a tactician, all in the one breath. With Riley, Monty, Harvey amongst others, I'm assuming he's getting critical feedback into his progress- it's not like he would not be immune to their thoughts and critical anaylsis. The question has to be asked: is a staggered review more appropriate for Ratten, given he's under review from the players, the media and from the supporters? I like your concept of an positional review in an organisational context; however, the CFC is no ordinary organisation (as are the other 15 AFL clubs).

Let's not forget Ratts' been in the big chair for 18 months and he's done an admirable job balancing the growing maturity of a young, talented group emerging from a very dark period in the club's history, along with a developing game plan. So, have faith- we'll get there.



We cant afford to have Ratts growing 'from ground zero'.....

We need a guy that will guide the kids expertly...

As a matter of fact a gun young kids father is livid with the way some of our kids are exposed in the fight.. and how there is little cover and help..

If you think we can afford to have a guy wet behind the ears not drilling them to work and support each other with blocks and screens as well as commitment.. you have your head in the sand....!!!!


Synbad, I agree with you on the above points; however, apart from cameos (Wiggins' block for Judd against PA last year), we don't do the sacrificial acts that define "teammanship" often enough- my question is: is that solely Ratts' responsibility? What about the players, especially the leaders? Maybe, the senior players (with the exception of Judd) have been in survival mode up till 18 months ago and have not learnt quickly enough? Maybe, there is a consequence to such "selfish" and/or self preserving acts- Stevens and Scotto being dropped, for instance? This is a culture we're talking about- the art of looking out for your mates and that includes doing selfless acts.......

I will say this, it is concerning when you say a father of one of our young guns is disappointed with the lack of teamhood......... :cry:

_________________
Be positive to all those @ TC- the wait is almost over!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 7:41 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19478
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
I think Ratten wasn't responsible for the way we started but he still has many faults which we are all aware of.

We often seem to not be switched on in the first quarter playing interstate. We have our A-team in the middle and they can't get their hands on the ball.

I don't know what actual set up could do this but I would have liked us to force a ball up at each centre bounce which would then allow us to send a lot of players around the ball. Slow their movement out of the stoppage.

They were winning the clearances with ease and hitting up McPharlin. He bombed it in and the scoreboard ticked over. The way it was coming in no defence could handle it.

It all comes back to our midfield and the team in general not being switched on. I don't know how you can possibly blame Ratten for that.

IMO you can blame Ratten for some of the ball movement and the way we waste our inside 50s. Kicking it to Fevola with Grover or someone else continually dropping in front of him. Why would you logically do that? Setanta is 200cm, it's not as though you can't see him!

Very few of our players were front and square, the ball was rebounded with ease. Yet you see them bomb it long and Ballantyne continually waited front and square while his opponent (Johnson?) went up in the contest. If you are going to go up as a third man you have to clear the ball from the area or you're [REDACTED]!

In the second half we spread brilliantly from the middle, in particular Carrazzo, Gibbs and Simpson. Hopefully they along with the other midfielders realise that running hard from the contest puts the opposition under pressure and creates space for other midfielders to have running shots on goal.

One area we did well in was protecting their kickouts in the second half. They had to bomb it long and we had enough players at ground level to send it back into play.

We finally had a zone in place on an opposition kickout. :grin:

Kreuzer in particular shows his football smarts when the ball is bombed from these kickouts; watch him palm/spoil the ball down for our smaller players to rove. His TOG has been reduced in recent weeks, with 65% last week and 58% yesterday.

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 7:49 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Effes wrote:
I think Ratten wasn't responsible for the way we started but he still has many faults which we are all aware of.

We often seem to not be switched on in the first quarter playing interstate. We have our A-team in the middle and they can't get their hands on the ball.

I don't know what actual set up could do this but I would have liked us to force a ball up at each centre bounce which would then allow us to send a lot of players around the ball. Slow their movement out of the stoppage.

They were winning the clearances with ease and hitting up McPharlin. He bombed it in and the scoreboard ticked over. The way it was coming in no defence could handle it.

It all comes back to our midfield and the team in general not being switched on. I don't know how you can possibly blame Ratten for that.

IMO you can blame Ratten for some of the ball movement and the way we waste our inside 50s. Kicking it to Fevola with Grover or someone else continually dropping in front of him. Why would you logically do that? Setanta is 200cm, it's not as though you can't see him!

Very few of our players were front and square, the ball was rebounded with ease. Yet you see them bomb it long and Ballantyne continually waited front and square while his opponent (Johnson?) went up in the contest. If you are going to go up as a third man you have to clear the ball from the area or you're !@#$%&!

In the second half we spread brilliantly from the middle, in particular Carrazzo, Gibbs and Simpson. Hopefully they along with the other midfielders realise that running hard from the contest puts the opposition under pressure and creates space for other midfielders to have running shots on goal.

One area we did well in was protecting their kickouts in the second half. They had to bomb it long and we had enough players at ground level to send it back into play.

We finally had a zone in place on an opposition kickout. :grin:

Kreuzer in particular shows his football smarts when the ball is bombed from these kickouts; watch him palm/spoil the ball down for our smaller players to rove. His TOG has been reduced in recent weeks, with 65% last week and 58% yesterday.



Ratten is the last man to address them before the fist bounce.
He instructs them
They play in his reflection.

We had water girls giving away 50s.
We had a 20 year old giving a free kick away and publicly getting his head taken off in public.

Ratten is confused and feeling the heat...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 7:58 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Quote:
I will say this, it is concerning when you say a father of one of our young guns is disappointed with the lack of teamhood......... :cry:


I truly believe that in life you improve and evolve if a) you really want to b) you have the correct instruction.

There is a sense of confusion, apathy, ineptedness,

The bit where Armfield is running past for a handball receieve.................. if thats what we have been working towards.................. :screwy:

Now we have had all preseason last year.... the season last year.... pre season this year... and 14 games to have Army being the quarterback??????

I love Army... dont blame him for his mistakes... it shouldnt have been him doing what he was doing....he doesnt have the decision making or the execution skills yet......
He never should have made thise mistakes because he never should have been in the playmakers position...

But hey!!!... thats where were at with our gameplan.. and structures...after all this time............ not much improvement.. a muddled mucking mess.. in so many areas...

Thats just an example...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Last edited by Mrs Caz on Mon Jul 06, 2009 8:44 pm, edited 2 times in total.
quotes fixed


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 8:00 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:49 pm
Posts: 27793
Location: Southbank.
What proof has anyone got that Buckley will make a great Coach?.....what are his coaching credentials?

The most major football associated decision he has ever made is to leave Brisbane for Collingwood so that he can play in Finals; and by doing so......missed out on being a part of 3 Premierships.

It was a bad decision showing poor judgement of the state of the competition at the time.

OK......he won a Brownlow......but Bob Skilton and Ian Stewart each won 3 Brownlows; and both champions failed as a Coach.

_________________
No ones listening till you make a mistake.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 8:04 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9108
Location: Nth Fitzroy
Quote:
Quote:


Because we were getting smashed out of the centre. That had nothing to do with numbers. You can only have 4 players in the square.
If we gained the ascendency or at least broke even, then you can play the game on your terms and push your players up the ground.
I'm not here to defend Ratts at all costs. He makes some decisions that puzzle me and his ability to honestly analyse his own performance appears to be lacking, however we stemmed the flow and neutralised Freos ascendancy. It was the correct decision IMO.



BV the whole of the 30 minutes in the first quarter was not played in the centre square with bounces.

Thats about 1.20 seconds...



Synbad ,I see what you are saying with trying to attack and have it be the best form of defence. ie Bowers using it to get even with Rewaldt , but you have to agree that most great sides are based around defence first. I am not talking about back 6 either. Putting players behind the ball to stem momentum is hardly a tactic only used by Rattan. It could be argued the tactic worked.


Last edited by Mrs Caz on Mon Jul 06, 2009 8:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
quotes fixed


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 8:07 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:25 am
Posts: 356
Like most supporters I haven't agreed with a few decision but I think he's done a pretty good job to be honest. You can't fast track maturity and experience. If we kicked a bit straighter we'd probably be looking at a top 4 spot right now. The coach is always an easy target for supporters who let emotion and impatience cloud their judgement. Now there are some astute criticisms of Ratten in this thread but they're few and far between. Ross Lyon for comparisons sake inherited a reasonably well developed list and still took a couple of years to get them playing the style he wanted.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 8:09 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:25 am
Posts: 356
Warby wrote:
What proof has anyone got that Buckley will make a great Coach?.....what are his coaching credentials?

The most major football associated decision he has ever made is to leave Brisbane for Collingwood so that he can play in Finals; and by doing so......missed out on being a part of 3 Premierships.

It was a bad decision showing poor judgement of the state of the competition at the time.

OK......he won a Brownlow......but Bob Skilton and Ian Stewart each won 3 Brownlows; and both champions failed as a Coach.


I like the way he sounds on tv


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 8:14 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Its logical to get your numbers in the midfield and put pressure on the opposition player with the ball..... like StKilda is...

By having players behind the ball... youre expecting the ball to come into your defensive fifty... which is not positive.. and if you do get the ball in your defensive fisty you need to get it through more opposition players to move it forward... and the way we move the ball thats not a good idea..
And a couple of weeks ago .. Ratts had Jospeph on a forward pocket when 2 midfielders cut us up badly...

The guy is too reactive and not bold enough to be a coach...

He coaches not to lose... not to win....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 8:17 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 6:27 pm
Posts: 4129
So Synbad - who would you want as a coach? I look at other teams and coaches and see them being up and down quite a lot. I see Bomber took 7 years to win a premiership, I see Lyon needing more then a year to mould a mature team with lots of talent. So who is the perfect coach? Any coach can be attacked if you blame them for every mistake or bad game.

I have said this before, but I think that this focus on the coaches is over the top. A football club has many cogs and they have to work together perfectly to produce a premiership. Look at the Hawks - a couple of "cogs" fail and see how they are going. I am sure I could find posts from last year saying how well Clarko has drilled the Hawks......

....sigh......

_________________
TC suffers from the social media illness - the death of respect and constructive discourse by keyboard.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 8:22 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:23 pm
Posts: 905
Is it just me, or does anyone else get the impression that if Synbad were a Saints supporter, he would've been calling for Ross Lyon's head before the Saints strung a few wins together towards the end of 2008? Ditto if he were a Hawks fan, he would've wanted Clarkson sacked in his 2nd year.

And since when does a coach start responding to the thoughts & desires of a young players Dad? Please...... :roll: :roll: :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 8:23 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 12:25 am
Posts: 456
Location: Kalgoorlie, WA
Synbad wrote:
99prelim wrote:
MEMO GREG SWANN
Throw some good money at Laidley to become our "Director Of Coaching" Coaches need to develop as well as players. Coaches need critical analysis throughout the year. Coaches need good role models, mentors and someone to oversee their short, medium and long term goals. Coaches need to be reflective, to be assessed (not in a punitive way, but with a view to developoment), coaches need to be observed and then debriefed etc. My model is not one of "a shadow hanging over the coaches to report back to the Board" My model is one of consentual intervention with the sole focus to improve their skill set.


We wont be getting Laidley.... as of a week or so ago this is FACT!!!!!...

Hes must be too qualified for our coaching dept...

That's a shame if true. I think he'd add some useful technical and analytical nous. I think Ratt's might make it but is still learning. Unfortunately, we don't have time to waste so we need that process to be speeded up. Adding a Laidley or someone of similar ilk would not only give us better results this year, but help Ratt's learning curve.

Irrespective of whether you think Ratten got appointed after due process or not, he's our coach and probably will be for all of 2010 too (barring a disastrous end to the season). So I'd just like to make sure that he has the support and personnel needed to give us the best chance of success.

_________________
I would like to thank Collingwood for helping me keep faith in my old man. He always told me that 'People are thick'.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 8:28 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
mikkey wrote:
So Synbad - who would you want as a coach? I look at other teams and coaches and see them being up and down quite a lot. I see Bomber took 7 years to win a premiership, I see Lyon needing more then a year to mould a mature team with lots of talent. So who is the perfect coach? Any coach can be attacked if you blame them for every mistake or bad game.

I have said this before, but I think that this focus on the coaches is over the top. A football club has many cogs and they have to work together perfectly to produce a premiership. Look at the Hawks - a couple of "cogs" fail and see how they are going. I am sure I could find posts from last year saying how well Clarko has drilled the Hawks......

....sigh......


Go through a process and get the best possible.. not just anybody...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 8:31 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
lucablue wrote:
Is it just me, or does anyone else get the impression that if Synbad were a Saints supporter, he would've been calling for Ross Lyon's head before the Saints strung a few wins together towards the end of 2008? Ditto if he were a Hawks fan, he would've wanted Clarkson sacked in his 2nd year.

And since when does a coach start responding to the thoughts & desires of a young players Dad? Please...... :roll: :roll: :roll:


Its the player thats getting smashed around the head....not Ratts....

No if Hawthorn didnt go through a process Dermie might have coached them
And on StKilda is they had a process they might have won a flag by now..... instead of the Thomas wasted years...

Trying to learn from history... im a keen student...

If you dont learn from the past ....................................................


We havent....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 8:34 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 6:27 pm
Posts: 4129
Synbad wrote:
mikkey wrote:
So Synbad - who would you want as a coach? I look at other teams and coaches and see them being up and down quite a lot. I see Bomber took 7 years to win a premiership, I see Lyon needing more then a year to mould a mature team with lots of talent. So who is the perfect coach? Any coach can be attacked if you blame them for every mistake or bad game.

I have said this before, but I think that this focus on the coaches is over the top. A football club has many cogs and they have to work together perfectly to produce a premiership. Look at the Hawks - a couple of "cogs" fail and see how they are going. I am sure I could find posts from last year saying how well Clarko has drilled the Hawks......

....sigh......


Go through a process and get the best possible.. not just anybody...



Thats a cop out. Process my backside - we have see a lot of coaches failing in spite of all kinds of process' . Come on, you are so detailed and persistent in your hammering of Ratts, mention a coach - a current coach - who you think would do a better job.

_________________
TC suffers from the social media illness - the death of respect and constructive discourse by keyboard.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 8:38 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
in8 wrote:
Warby wrote:
What proof has anyone got that Buckley will make a great Coach?.....what are his coaching credentials?

The most major football associated decision he has ever made is to leave Brisbane for Collingwood so that he can play in Finals; and by doing so......missed out on being a part of 3 Premierships.

It was a bad decision showing poor judgement of the state of the competition at the time.

OK......he won a Brownlow......but Bob Skilton and Ian Stewart each won 3 Brownlows; and both champions failed as a Coach.


I like the way he sounds on tv


Yep, because media performers always make awesome coaches. Isn't that right, Terry?

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 8:39 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Quote:
Synbad wrote:


Go through a process and get the best possible.. not just anybody...



Thats a cop out. Process my backside - we have see a lot of coaches failing in spite of all kinds of process' . Come on, you are so detailed and persistent in your hammering of Ratts, mention a coach - a current coach - who you think would do a better job.



Sorry mate... this is 2009 not 1975....

Its the AFL not the VFL

Its a professional competition now not an amateur competition....

The smart clubs now have a process....

There is no cop out....

Picking a guy to coach cos you dont understand the modern competition is a cop out...

You obviously are not a fan of doing things right...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Last edited by Mrs Caz on Mon Jul 06, 2009 8:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
quotes fixed


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 8:45 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:23 pm
Posts: 905
Synbad wrote:
lucablue wrote:
Is it just me, or does anyone else get the impression that if Synbad were a Saints supporter, he would've been calling for Ross Lyon's head before the Saints strung a few wins together towards the end of 2008? Ditto if he were a Hawks fan, he would've wanted Clarkson sacked in his 2nd year.

And since when does a coach start responding to the thoughts & desires of a young players Dad? Please...... :roll: :roll: :roll:


Its the player thats getting smashed around the head....not Ratts....

No if Hawthorn didnt go through a process Dermie might have coached them
And on StKilda is they had a process they might have won a flag by now..... instead of the Thomas wasted years...

Trying to learn from history... im a keen student...

If you dont learn from the past ....................................................


We havent....


You refer to "the process" as if it's a guarantee of ultimate success. And as if it's the only way to appoint a senior coach. I don't reckon Sydney followed "the process" you refer to when appointing Roos, same with Leigh Mattews at the Lions, Parkin 2nd time around at Carlton, Voss at Brisbane.

And Freo followed "the process" when appointing Connolly, Bailey appointment at Melbourne - not great great advertisements for "the process" to me.

I'm prepared to give Ratten more time, and am not prepared to write the bloke off 18 months in. We're likely to make finals for the first time in 8 years, that's at least a pass mark for me. If we're not pushing strongly for top 4 this time next year, my thoughts might change, but this time next year is still 12 months away.

BTW, you definately would've had Thompson sacked in his 3rd year if you were a Geelong supporter. Are you picking up on my theme? JIC - Players take time, coaches deserve some patience too............ :idea: :idea: :idea:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 8:50 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:25 am
Posts: 356
Synbad wrote:
Sorry mate... this is 2009 not 1975....

Its the AFL not the VFL

Its a professional competition now not an amateur competition....

The smart clubs now have a process....

There is no cop out....

Picking a guy to coach cos you dont understand the modern competition is a cop out...

You obviously are not a fan of doing things right...

Having worked for the state government for a number of years I would have to agree that following a process always leads to the desired result :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2019 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 ... 101  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 36 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group