sinbagger wrote:
I'm with Keogh on this one, getting rid of the coach will change very little, we could have easily kept him for most of the rest of the season, nothing will change with a new coach, or interim coach, or whatever. At best we will suffer dead cat bounce and win a bunch of games that make it really difficult to get full value from the draft.
We've changed every role in the club multiple times over the last 25 years with no good result, the only thing we haven't changed is the board. The board needs to acknowledge they haven't delivered access for the club, financial success is meaningless without onfield success, and they have failed in this regard just as much as any other role at the club, yet they haven't been held accountable. We need to turn over every board position in the next 12 months, otherwise we are very likely to repeat our last 25 years of history, and we will be back, sacking the coach again in 3-4 years time.
Be careful what you wish for sinners. How long have the current Board Members been on the Board? Not 25 years, not 15 years, not 10 years. Sayers was on the Board longest and last year was going to be his last.
I'm sure we have learned a lot of lessons from the last 2 decades. Pagan, Ratts, MM, Teague didn't have the cattle. Maybe they werent good enough. Maybe they were trying to save their skin. Who knows? We certainly couldnt attract talent to the club. How does that change with new Board Members.
We aren't getting rid of Vossy for the sake of removing Vossy. We are clearing the runway to give us longer to find the right candidate. Thats what has been stated. To give those looking elsewhere now, or not wanting to step on their mates' grave (Vossy) a clean canvas to canvas the vacancy.
We are not going to change the Board in 12 months, unless there's a huge spill, and that doesn't guarantee all board members go. Not sure if this is the answer TBH. I think its a football issue.
If you don't think Chris Davies and Graeme Wright, experienced and well regarded football people (by everyone outside this club at least), are NOT the right people to manage the challenge of finding the best coach for us, then why bother with the Board spill when you haven't got the right football people in the 2 most important Onfield roles at the club?
It's not the length of each board members tenure that is the issue, it's their commitment to football success for the club. We need a board full of people who are passionate about the club's success (and making money), and not just making money. I don't mean Matheison types either, I mean new blood, passionate about business and Carlton success.