Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jun 15, 2025 6:41 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6401 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246 ... 321  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 11:06 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
Yeah, I don't reckon many players say they hate the coach.

In life, forget what they say and look at what they do.

MM says we can't attract players, but it's also the case that we can't hold onto to some that we want to keep. Why is that? Where's the love.

As BV points out, we also can't attract top quality assistants. The best assistants would look as much at how the position will affect their senior coaching aspirations as closely as location and money.

Everitt seemed to take in the MM message pretty well, but we can't wait around till the end of the season every year to organize a cup of tea and a biscuit with MM and every recruiting target.

MM's charms one on one might work, but a Dylan Shiel can only look at the club from the outside, the feedback from other players and how the team looks to be playing. Right now I don't think he'd be dreaming of wearing a monogrammed navy jumper.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 11:21 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34520
Location: The Brown Wedge
Never read so much sooking.

Malthouse has been there for 2 years and has recruited some very good footballers, but they're still very young. They won't have an impact for another year or two.

Look at what St Kilda and Richmond do when their coaches don't deliver a flag in three years and do the exact opposite.

_________________
end of message


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 11:28 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 23921
Get Blue VAin

_________________
That’s not a political statement — it’s a harsh reality, and we must act,” she said. “He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free. I support impeachment.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 12:17 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25092
Location: Bondi Beach
Blue Vain wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
The big question is whether MM has the GP for the modern game. If not, do we keep him because the players love him and he will attract good footballers to the club during this rebuild?


Forget the nonsense Bondi about the players loving him. When the ball is bounced on Saturday, the players will perform to how they are trained, how their instincts are developed and how they react to the opposition pressure and strategies.
Love for a coach won't make one bit of difference. Anyone who has spent substantial time in a football environment will know players may have an affinity with a coach but once he's sacked, they quickly move on to the next regime.

Good coaches create an environment where players develop and learn. Players will respect that knowledge and skill. They're the aspects we should be judging the coaches on. Not how much affection the players have for them.
As for attracting good footballers. Let's attract quality assistant coaches and create a program that develops players instead of chasing players who have been developed. That's the sustainable long term solution.
And while you're at it, ask yourself why Carlton can't get strong minded, ambitious,quality assistant coaches. That is impeding our player development as much as anything.


I don't buy 'the players like him' line.

Firstly I don't see the players bleeding for their coach MM but more importantly players should be professional enough to respect themselves and want success regardless of who the coach may be.

The big question mark for me is his game plan, but you do raise an important consideration when judging MM the coach and that is what his success is with development of players and his recruitment of quality innovative assistant coaches to give us the edge. I don't see evidence of either of those.

I don't have the answers, just perception.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 12:21 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
The Duke wrote:
Never read so much sooking.

Malthouse has been there for 2 years and has recruited some very good footballers, but they're still very young. They won't have an impact for another year or two.

Look at what St Kilda and Richmond do when their coaches don't deliver a flag in three years and do the exact opposite.


The Tigers are holding onto their guy wayyyyyyyyyy too long.

He's a pumpkin.

Scott Watters? Dill.

Not sure a 60+ coach @ $1.0m a year is just what we need now that we are a re-build club.

A $500 a year coach with more money for better assistants or recruiting staff or fitness staff would be the way to go now.

Particularly recruiting.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 12:55 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:14 pm
Posts: 5991
Location: Melbourne
cimm1979 wrote:
The Duke wrote:
Never read so much sooking.

Malthouse has been there for 2 years and has recruited some very good footballers, but they're still very young. They won't have an impact for another year or two.

Look at what St Kilda and Richmond do when their coaches don't deliver a flag in three years and do the exact opposite.


The Tigers are holding onto their guy wayyyyyyyyyy too long.

He's a pumpkin.

Scott Watters? Dill.

Not sure a 60+ coach @ $1.0m a year is just what we need now that we are a re-build club.

A $500 a year coach with more money for better assistants or recruiting staff or fitness staff would be the way to go now.

Particularly recruiting.


It is strange how people say we shouldn't chop and change coaches. What club in any sport keeps a guy for 10 years when they are having no success? Should of Richmond stayed the course with Francis Bourke until the 90s?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 1:18 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 23921
the key point is..
when we change this coach
we need to change the last of the 'no gooders' at the same time.
whoever they are.
how is it to be done without a board spill?
who has the answers & who has the power, vision & guts to implement the changes that give our club back to us?
gotta do it all at once, don't we?

_________________
That’s not a political statement — it’s a harsh reality, and we must act,” she said. “He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free. I support impeachment.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 1:18 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16949
Location: Melbourne
cimm1979 wrote:
The Duke wrote:
Never read so much sooking.

Malthouse has been there for 2 years and has recruited some very good footballers, but they're still very young. They won't have an impact for another year or two.

Look at what St Kilda and Richmond do when their coaches don't deliver a flag in three years and do the exact opposite.


The Tigers are holding onto their guy wayyyyyyyyyy too long.

He's a pumpkin.

Scott Watters? Dill.

Not sure a 60+ coach @ $1.0m a year is just what we need now that we are a re-build club.

A $500 a year coach with more money for better assistants or recruiting staff or fitness staff would be the way to go now.

Particularly recruiting.


Yayyyyy :clap: :clap: :clap:

Payrise :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

"I started of with nothin and I still got most of it left"

:lol: :lol:

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 1:20 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34520
Location: The Brown Wedge
Ten years is a little different to 2.

We tried the $500k coach and he was useless. We gave him 5 years which I think was fair. He wasn't considered good enough to get a job at any of the 17 other clubs so it seems we made the right call.

All I say is give him at least 5. We have some good kids on the way up, and salary cap sponges on the way out.

As I've said before, I cry myself to sleep over Jacobs, but don't lose a wink over Eddie, Jeffy and Robbo.

_________________
end of message


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 1:53 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2645
The Duke wrote:
Ten years is a little different to 2.

We tried the $500k coach and he was useless. We gave him 5 years which I think was fair. He wasn't considered good enough to get a job at any of the 17 other clubs so it seems we made the right call.

All I say is give him at least 5. We have some good kids on the way up, and salary cap sponges on the way out.

As I've said before, I cry myself to sleep over Jacobs, but don't lose a wink over Eddie, Jeffy and Robbo.



ratten wasn't exactly useless, he got us to the finals on several occasions, he did also get a job with another club and so far has tasted some success

micky has on the other hand transformed the playing list (which I gather you improve of) over the last three years and seems to be going in the opposite direction of rattens so called downhill skiers :eek:

lets get rid of micky and then we will see if anybody else picks him up :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 2:20 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34520
Location: The Brown Wedge
Unfortunately not all things are equal. Mick has been left with a fairly ordinary list after ageing, retirements and sackings.

You could debate whether it was a good idea to get Thomas - but I think he is worth the risk. You could argue we shouldn't have picked up Jones, Tutt, Jaksch etc but I think it's too early to tell.

We need a ruckman!! Until we sort that issue we're kidding ourselves.

We had probably the best ruckman in the comp and we told him he was #4.

_________________
end of message


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 2:23 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:57 pm
Posts: 5338
Location: Melbourne
Quite the conundrum....
Its a hard decision, and Parkin was right in a way.
Get rid of Mick, and who else is there who can do the job ? Mick was given time, and rebuilt Collingwood... twice.
We ve gone down the unproven coach path before and it backfired. We can pick out one of the best assistants in the caper, but there's no guarantee he ll be good enough when in the main coaching seat. Guess s a difference this time could be, that a coach from a successful AFL environment, who has had enough time to develop in the AFL system (eg. Hinkley, Walsh, Scott, Longmire), is a lot different then what we did when we went with Ratts, which was pluck a guy who was coaching in the suburbs, who had aprox a year of experience as an AFL assistant (in a losing environment under Den Den mind you).
Interesting times ahead....

The Duke wrote:
You could debate whether it was a good idea to get Thomas - but I think he is worth the risk. You could argue we shouldn't have picked up Jones, Tutt, Jaksch etc but I think it's too early to tell. .


Reckon Jacksh is a great get and will prove that in time.
Doc now starting to sow what a good pick up he was after a slow start last year.
Everritt also a good get.
Tutt cost us virtually nothing so no big deal.
Ditto Jones (swap for pick 46), who I feel sorry for as the delivery into the forward line has been disgraceful.
Thomas will prove his worth in time... you ll see.

_________________
James Hird and Essendon* FC - #FOREVERDRUGCHEATS


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 2:34 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
redback wrote:
The Duke wrote:
Ten years is a little different to 2.

We tried the $500k coach and he was useless. We gave him 5 years which I think was fair. He wasn't considered good enough to get a job at any of the 17 other clubs so it seems we made the right call.

All I say is give him at least 5. We have some good kids on the way up, and salary cap sponges on the way out.

As I've said before, I cry myself to sleep over Jacobs, but don't lose a wink over Eddie, Jeffy and Robbo.



ratten wasn't exactly useless, he got us to the finals on several occasions, he did also get a job with another club and so far has tasted some success

micky has on the other hand transformed the playing list (which I gather you improve of) over the last three years and seems to be going in the opposite direction of rattens so called downhill skiers :eek:

lets get rid of micky and then we will see if anybody else picks him up :lol:



yeah all the clubs are beating down rattens door



how was his final year at carlton???

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 2:38 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18022
The Duke wrote:
Ten years is a little different to 2.

We tried the $500k coach and he was useless. We gave him 5 years which I think was fair. He wasn't considered good enough to get a job at any of the 17 other clubs so it seems we made the right call.



And then we picked up another coach who wasn't considered good enough to get a job by any of the other 17 clubs.
Great logic.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Last edited by Blue Vain on Wed Apr 22, 2015 2:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 2:46 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18022
Dominator_7 wrote:
Quite the conundrum....
Its a hard decision, and Parkin was right in a way.
Get rid of Mick, and who else is there who can do the job ? Mick was given time, and rebuilt Collingwood... twice.
We ve gone down the unproven coach path before and it backfired. We can pick out one of the best assistants in the caper, but there's no guarantee he ll be good enough when in the main coaching seat. Guess s a difference this time could be, that a coach from a successful AFL environment, who has had enough time to develop in the AFL system (eg. Hinkley, Walsh, Scott, Longmire), is a lot different then what we did when we went with Ratts, which was pluck a guy who was coaching in the suburbs, who had aprox a year of experience as an AFL assistant (in a losing environment under Den Den mind you).
Interesting times ahead....

The Duke wrote:
You could debate whether it was a good idea to get Thomas - but I think he is worth the risk. You could argue we shouldn't have picked up Jones, Tutt, Jaksch etc but I think it's too early to tell. .


Reckon Jacksh is a great get and will prove that in time.
Doc now starting to sow what a good pick up he was after a slow start last year.
Everritt also a good get.
Tutt cost us virtually nothing so no big deal.
Ditto Jones (swap for pick 46), who I feel sorry for as the delivery into the forward line has been disgraceful.
Thomas will prove his worth in time... you ll see.


How much is Everitt on? If he's getting 500k, is he still a good get?
If we could have used that money to retain Betts, is he still a good get?

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 2:48 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
Surely Everitt is not on $500k

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 3:11 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34520
Location: The Brown Wedge
Blue Vain wrote:
Dominator_7 wrote:
Quite the conundrum....
Its a hard decision, and Parkin was right in a way.
Get rid of Mick, and who else is there who can do the job ? Mick was given time, and rebuilt Collingwood... twice.
We ve gone down the unproven coach path before and it backfired. We can pick out one of the best assistants in the caper, but there's no guarantee he ll be good enough when in the main coaching seat. Guess s a difference this time could be, that a coach from a successful AFL environment, who has had enough time to develop in the AFL system (eg. Hinkley, Walsh, Scott, Longmire), is a lot different then what we did when we went with Ratts, which was pluck a guy who was coaching in the suburbs, who had aprox a year of experience as an AFL assistant (in a losing environment under Den Den mind you).
Interesting times ahead....

The Duke wrote:
You could debate whether it was a good idea to get Thomas - but I think he is worth the risk. You could argue we shouldn't have picked up Jones, Tutt, Jaksch etc but I think it's too early to tell. .


Reckon Jacksh is a great get and will prove that in time.
Doc now starting to sow what a good pick up he was after a slow start last year.
Everritt also a good get.
Tutt cost us virtually nothing so no big deal.
Ditto Jones (swap for pick 46), who I feel sorry for as the delivery into the forward line has been disgraceful.
Thomas will prove his worth in time... you ll see.


How much is Everitt on? If he's getting 500k, is he still a good get?
If we could have used that money to retain Betts, is he still a good get?


Given we got him and pick 39 for pick 32 - I seriously doubt he's on halfa. If he is, I demand answers.

_________________
end of message


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 3:12 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
..ratten finals' years were built upon the individual brilliance, and super human effort of C.Judd 3 votes.. ..and the only high season finish was 2011, a season where only about five or six teams were competitive in the whole year, one of the most lopsided seasons I can remember.. ..and we still didn't string a good run of form together.. ..and we were two and a half games behind 4th, which also happened to be the previous year's wooden spooners..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 3:18 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:29 pm
Posts: 7074
Everitt is on peanuts


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 3:35 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 05, 2013 10:48 pm
Posts: 939
If Everitt is on peanuts, I'll have two bags please :razz:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6401 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246 ... 321  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group