I'm with Gerard Healy who just labelled Carlton a laughing stock and a debacle.

This day? Sorry, who designated this day as The Day? Is it because Mad Monday's off this year & we need something else? The club will make the call when it sees fit to do so. That might be in a few days. It obviously won't be in a few weeks.

At no stage in season 2021, has anyone from the club, or the review panel, specified that a decision on the head coaching job would be made & announced on the first Monday post round 23.

If that is too hard for some people to process, then stiff shit.

Sent from my SM-A115F using Tapatalk

The media are sooking because we didn't meet their timeline in sacking the coach.
They don't dictate the timelines. @#$%&! em'. Let's just focus on getting the right people in place. It's takes whatever time it does.
Why should we be rushed because Gerard and his mates dont like it. These are the same blokes who said last week that we should have put Teague out of his misery 4 weeks before. We were about to play GC to be half a game out of the 8 at that stage.
These flower speak without thinking first. It will make it even sweeter to stick it up them.

The media are sooking because we didn't meet their timeline in sacking the coach.
They don't dictate the timelines. @#$%&! em'. Let's just focus on getting the right people in place. It's takes whatever time it does.
Why should we be rushed because Gerard and his mates dont like it. These are the same blokes who said last week that we should have put Teague out of his misery 4 weeks before. We were about to play GC to be half a game out of the 8 at that stage.
These flower speak without thinking first. It will make it even sweeter to stick it up them.

Its not a Cripps v Teague problem.

They both lead team meeting, match committee meetings, list management and what not. Twagues problem is Cripps is not at his 2019 best and Cripps problem is he is surrounded by crabs.

Fairdinkum some of you act like 5 year olds.

Why is it Carlton’s Fault what loud mouths like Pickering and Healy have to say.

Vested interests, both of them. PaddyCripps you need to seriously get a grip.

The fact some on here fall for their rubbish beggars belief.

Regards Cazzesman

In fact it would be more disrespectful not to allow Teague to respond to the report
He needs to be able to challenge the report
The additional advantage of this is the board then can say they made their decision after not just getting the report but after hearing what the coach has to say in response ie in making the decisions they have all the information required including the response of the coach to the report and it’s findings

They can also say that a decision was not made until the had all evidence including the coaches presumably counter -arguments in response to the review

This is smart by Sayers and no amount of media baying for someone’s blood or Kingus hand wringing and Gerards moral compass bleatings detract from that

If the had any semblance of how these things should be done properly and according to due process they would be supporting Sayers approach

I'm reading this thread starting from the latest posts, and haven't seen the older posts yet, but I'm getting the picture.

I deliberately stayed away from the media today, knowing what the day would be like, and took advantage of 27 degrees C down at the Beach. Beautiful Day.

Blue Skies

Has anyone actually considered that these idiots may just be making stuff up to rattle our cage and force us to say something?

Our lips are sealed and it's pissing them off no end. Don't fall for it unless the facts say otherwise.

Admitedly I don't exactly how the soft cap works, but if we sack him, presumably his payout goes towards our soft cap.
If he resigns it doesn't? Maybe we are just trying to drag this out as painfully as possible for him (death by a thousand cuts) in the hope he'll just say stuff it, I resign and it wont go towards our soft cap?