Rexy wrote:
maybe the addition of Hammer could be seen as proactive in that it may require NicNat to be more accountable and take away some of his attacking mindset ?
would Hammer provide more impact and require greater attention than say Davies ? I reckon he would
Davies is a negative stock.
He isnt there to be attended to but to attend to someone in the opposition.
You have to compare apples with apples not pineapples.
They have their X factor players and Y factor players and so do we.
Im unsure what kind of game Hammer is meant to play in his first game in 8 odd weeks and be a success.
Maybe just a structure player in the forward line?.... but then he really would have to take some marks and kick a couple of goals.
They have one genuine A grader in my opinion.
Thats Cox
And there is a cloud over him with a back and an ankle.. hardly the kind of preparation for a ruckman in the final.
Sure they can pump him up with painkillers.. but really youd think he shouldnt play his best game of his career.
Their defence is abit on the slow side.. and overall the personel flavour is slightly Jurasic parkish ... all those big tall players trying to mark one pill...its kind of weird... its worked for them thus far...but it only takes abit of imagination to knock that gameplan over..
And thats not by us throwing more talls onto the ground....
Talls have worked for them this year.
Speed has worked for us.
Lets back what we have against what they have...cos if you begin to go against the formula youre shouting for a catstrophe.
We do what we do best and in my opinion the battlefield suits us not them
Miss me Surrey???:)