Michael Jezz wrote:
I dont think Malthouse is the problem. The coach is the least of the issues. Infact given a half decent list he would deliver results. We are going that badly that we don't see, he is the best thing going for us. The core of the problem is the lack of football people on the board and a president who has vision to drive the club. The irony is the best recruiting of the last 15 years was done in the last 2 and that isnt saying much with questions over bokehurst at pick 19. The same people who wanted a change of culture are bemoaning the loss of Waite, Garlett and Robinson. The same people who didnt want us to hand out long term contracts criticise the loss of betts. In hindsight we should of kept him but he kicked 20 goals the year before and Thomas style was more of what we needed. Was the problem with the medical assessment. The same people who criticised our lack of 23 to 28 year old spend more time panning everitt, docherty etc instead of the root cause which was a bust on every draft from 2002 to 2011.
Best post I have read in this thread by far!!
Everyone is so blinded in their desire for immediate success that they want drastic action to be taken on the coach, I get that. But for the same people calling for Malthouse's head - when does it get to the point where history repeating itself is considered the worst way forward for the Club?
I, for one do not want another coach sacked until the Club agrees to do a full EOI and interview process with the best candidates in the Country, regardless of experience. Sacking Malthouse during this season will only force the Club to make another ill-fated decision on hiring whomever is available at the time. I can't handle seeing this happen again. It's like Groundhog Day.