Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jun 17, 2025 2:45 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 606 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 ... 31  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 10:17 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 9:43 pm
Posts: 4745
Effes wrote:
Why do people talk about Waite as though he is a best 22 player?

The stats show he barely figures for more than half a season every year, having played 43 out of 86 games from 2009 until now.

The club needs to move on and build the forward line around someone more durable and more disciplined.

Stop pinning our hopes on someone who isn't out on the park often enough!


Most over-priced contract ever given at this Club ? Disgraceful to give him 3 years - shows how desperate we are for any key possie players, even if they rarely get on the park :screwy:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 10:31 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 9:43 pm
Posts: 4745
grrofunger wrote:
Bower Russell Thornton !!


the old firm :thumbsup:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 10:40 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 2:30 pm
Posts: 4584
Location: Blisstonia.
MIL wrote:
grrofunger wrote:
Bower Russell Thornton !!


the old firm :thumbsup:


Yep. It's like the 'in case of emergency break glass' in's.

Would have thought Thornton might have been handy last week, rather than Duigan forward, and Henderson back but anyway....

Any news of Tuohy? According to Ratts he was sore during last week, but then deemed right to go, and as we all know a late withrdrawl so perhaps more serious (or just as serious, but only just acknowledged) as first thought?

Good luck to the new boys. Hopefully they are given more than a week to show their worth especially considering the circumstances they have been selected under.

_________________
"They're [REDACTED]'


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 10:40 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10576
Waite
Judd
Jamison

Are the most important players in 2012.
The fact we have no true backup for Waite probably makes him even more so than the others.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 10:46 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 9:43 pm
Posts: 4745
I'm second in the work tipping comp - 1st prize is a Gorilla. This game is a nightmare....Sedat reckons the Dogs can't beat anyone......most of us reckon we can't win with this team.

FMD :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 10:51 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:26 am
Posts: 14730
Location: Comparing orange boners with Hirdy
draw

_________________
Greg Swann wrote:
Essendon* cheated, simple as that


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 11:02 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 9:43 pm
Posts: 4745
Megaman wrote:
draw


Thanks :|


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 11:08 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8206
SurreyBlue wrote:
I have never been so flat before a game - ever.


Olympics on next week, can take my mind off the footy. Make the season feel like it goes faster.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 11:12 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
SurreyBlue wrote:
Waite
Judd
Jamison

Are the most important players in 2012.
The fact we have no true backup for Waite probably makes him even more so than the others.


..we have back-up, and moving ahead he's actually a far better prospect.. ..so, naturally, we play him down back..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 11:27 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8206
AGRO wrote:
rooboy wrote:
AGRO wrote:
Ratten has had his prints all over list management, he is the one who drove the McLean deal, he was the one who approved us going for Rowe with a second round draft pick (bye bye Jordan Murdoch).

Playing Henderson Kreuzer when not right instead of Bower and Thornton - Ratten again.

Appalling use if Kane Lucas - Ratten again.

Our run of injuries has been bad but it has also exposed our lack of depth, player development and poor injury management.

I will concede that Ratten is not responsible for injury management but as I said before he's got his paws all over the other two.

Am I relieved??? No but i am pretty pissed off.




Drove the McLean deal? Greg Swann / Steven Icke and Wayne Hughes all drove that deal, including the coach. Obviously it is a bad position but to lay blame purely on the coach again is accepting mediocrity. I actually think the philosophy to get McLean was the right one - we needed another a-grade midfielder. Unfortunately who ever was in charge of the medical must have done a terrible job. If there was one???

[color=#FF0000] Ratten was the one who wanted him and Swann did the deal - 3 weeks out from the draft and then after shaking hands wanted to add steak knives.
:roll:

Not even going to sit here and debate whether we should play Bower or Thornton as neither can take us forward. Obviously this week they were forced to play them... i would prefer, going forward, not to bother.

If Henderson and Kreuzer are not right (and they arent) then I would rather a fit Bower and Thornton playing in the short term to safeguard the long term future of Kruezer and Henderson when our Premiership Window next opens (about 5 years) :roll:

Sam Rowe? He has cancer. How can you possibly blame anyone for that right now. A key position forward recruited into the club - ready to go - mature body and we are pointing fingers - that is incredible that anyone could criticise that? And what did we desperately need this year more than anything???? do you think him showing faith in the recruiters who got us Nick Duigan last year he was wrong to assume they could find him a player ready to go in an important position?

Got nothing to do with Sam Rowe's cancer - and I have discussed this at length elsewhere and wished him all the best. But to draft him where we did IS poor list management, and that is Ratten's responsibility (he got rid of Icke to get his way) (Ratten) let me repeat that a second round draft pick on him when we could have picked a young kid called Jordan Murdoch. We could have demoted White and a Kerr to the rookies list, making room for a few more players on our Senior List and take Rowe with a 3rd or 4th rounder.

Kane Lucas played 4 or 5 games in a row at VFL level - played at afl level and misses this week with some sort of injury - i am dumfounded how that is Ratten's fault.

The use of Lucas over the past 3 years has been a mismash of in - out, used as a sub. This guy is a first rounder should be treasured not treated as he has been, christ we gave Russell 3 years of senior games when he probably didnt deserve half of them.

Did anyone on here mention that he was the one who wanted Jeremy Laidler?

1 out of 3 aint bad I suppose. :roll:

We are a pathetic supporter base if we subscribe to the belief that Carlton's football department problems are soley due to Ratten as a coach.

Then again we are a club that has always gone for the bandaid approach - and no surprise - when or if a malthouse comes in, might be the right move to get a very good proven coach rather than give someone else a go, i am not in the position to judge, and Kreuzer, Waite, Hampson, Henderson's, Jamisons etc of the world get through a season - then of course we will improve. But a bloke who has had no spine all year due to a crippled list - doesn't deserve to get the ass - that is just a sensible view - i am more than happy to do what everyone other idiot who jumps on and off the train does and blame the coach. I have seen it before and i have seen it again at footy clubs. Melbourne have a bandaid approach - and see how well that serves them. Why not actually stick with a process for a while/ Stand for something as a club - rather than just say - non finals team - see you later coach. Actually address some cultural issues at the club - like Geelong did. I am sure Geelong supporters were as fickle if not more than what you guys are about Thompson before he delivered them 2 or 3 flags what ever it was.

[/color]



Ratten has had 5 years and we are barely better off than we were when he took over in 2007.

Yeah come back with the 1 finals win in 3 years yadda yadda yadda, come back with me with the gradual improvement.

Essendon*, Sydney, West Coast - zooming right past us at one million miles per hour.

I wish we were where Geelong was at in 2006 - but we are no where near it and if you think so then you are the deluded one.


It's why one doesn't take 50% of supporters seriously.

I think we need changes as much as anyone but this is crap.

5 years ago we were a basket case, a couple of months ago we were at least playing for top spot even if we did stuff it up. That's a bit more than barely don't you think. I think it's alot more. You know that, I know that. Anyone could see it's alot more. We won a final and lost 3 very narrowly interstate when we were big underdogs and finsihed below the side that beat us, last year 3 pts off a preliminary final with an injury hit side. Supporters though can spin anything to suit an argument though. Good thing I don't fall for crap.

Sides have good years and go past some then things change just as rapidly the next year. If you follow footy you'd know that happens. Basics are there and there's plenty to look forward to, but change is needed badly to bring out the next step. It's something we all agree on. Just a temporary blip. Just as long as we get the right changes to make sure it stays temporary.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 11:54 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:20 pm
Posts: 6923
Should we play our home games at Optus Oval next year?

_________________
BLUES 2010: PAV AND JUDD = FLAGS. DOING IT FOR THE LOVE OF DICK PRATT.

HAVE YOU SIGNED UP FOR TALKINGCARLTON SUPERCOACH 2009 YET?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 12:03 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:54 am
Posts: 2361
Location: September Baby!!!!
I read the team list and thought to myself - phew - at least we didn't lose McLean. :?

_________________
Ecclesiastes 1:4, "One generation passes away, and another generation comes: but The Blues abide forever."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 12:06 am 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 1:04 pm
Posts: 26
AGRO wrote:
Ratten was the one who wanted him and Swann did the deal - 3 weeks out from the draft and then after shaking hands wanted to add steak knives. :roll:

Please. Greg Swann, Wayne Hughes & Steven Icke all voted for Brock McLean to come to our club - to trade our high draft pick, along with the coach. They are ALL responsible for that decision. End of story? Even if you didn't vote for him on the panel - you are still responsible as you couldn't convince the others. Ask anyone at the club and they will tell you this is the facts.

Got nothing to do with Sam Rowe's cancer - and I have discussed this at length elsewhere and wished him all the best. But to draft him where we did IS poor list management, and that is Ratten's responsibility (he got rid of Icke to get his way) (Ratten) let me repeat that a second round draft pick on him when we could have picked a young kid called Jordan Murdoch. We could have demoted White and a Kerr to the rookies list, making room for a few more players on our Senior List and take Rowe with a 3rd or 4th rounder.

Well that is your philosophy - what i am saying is its impossible to argue with the clubs PHILOSOPHY based on the fact that he hasn't played or had the ability to play due to cancer. he would have filled a necessary hole in structure in a year that they have desperately needed to fill it before the Casboults / Mitchells of the world MIGHT be ready. Given that the entire list from a-graders to d-graders have been injured the whole thing has fallen to bits. We all say we have no depth but its hard to have 'depth' when they are injured as well.

The use of Lucas over the past 3 years has been a mismash of in - out, used as a sub. This guy is a first rounder should be treasured not treated as he has been, christ we gave Russell 3 years of senior games when he probably didnt deserve half of them.

I've watched Kane Lucas closely in the VFL and he doesn't deserve to wear the Navy Blue on a consistent basis based on his overall softness as a player. He doesn't win contested footy and until he does that he isn't taking us anywhere as a side - if u can't do it in september then don't both. Russell no doubt would have got 3 years but thats when the club was in a complete rebuild - completely different position to where we are now. As a supporter I don't want our club to gift games to players that don't deserve them. Lucas from what I have seen was REALLY good over the last couple of weeks at VFL level and sure enough he got his chance the other night. Now he is injured again. Playing someone as a sub gives players the opportunity to say @#$%&! you i'll show you bastards what I can do as a player. If they don't grasp it - oh poor bugger me - they are stuffing with there heads - no, i have seen david ellard come on as a sub and kick 3 goals, i saw lucas do it early in the yr and secure the win v richmond, i saw joseph v adelaide last yr tackle the shit out of the oppo, you can impact, u just need to be competitive enough to want it. Lucas will be a good player - but we are doing no one favours from a cultural perspective of gifting him a game over say a McLean who isn't taking us anywhere but at least week-to-week he is physical, has a crack and applies himself the way we want Carlton players to apply themselves.

Ratten has had 5 years and we are barely better off than we were when he took over in 2007.
Yeah come back with the 1 finals win in 3 years yadda yadda yadda, come back with me with the gradual improvement.
Essendon*, Sydney, West Coast - zooming right past us at one million miles per hour.
I wish we were where Geelong was at in 2006 - but we are no where near it and if you think so then you are the deluded one.


5 years taken us from the basket case, laughing stock of the competition, where we through every bit of credibility that we had as a club out the door. And he has taken us from there to making finals 3 yrs in a row - we probably will miss this yr (WHY) - Why the change? Because he can't coach??? Maybe?? Quite fickle because history suggests he can... players around him all seem to sign up...maybe the consistent injuries that have hit since the start of pre-season to even this very week - none i have ever seen before at any other club - has something to do with it? Sydney have one injury - we have what, 8 of our best players out and 1 suspended right now this week.... they have been fantastic. So have North... no injuries. Adelaide... none.... Essendon* have - not to the same extent but lets see if they can continue to play catchup, West Coast - injuries to one area... not there cornerstone of dangerous ruck, midfield and defence thats built there success...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 12:09 am 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 1:04 pm
Posts: 26
Blue Vain wrote:
rooboy wrote:
Drove the McLean deal? Greg Swann / Steven Icke and Wayne Hughes all drove that deal, including the coach. Obviously it is a bad position but to lay blame purely on the coach again is accepting mediocrity. I actually think the philosophy to get McLean was the right one - we needed another a-grade midfielder. Unfortunately who ever was in charge of the medical must have done a terrible job. If there was one???


Did anyone on here mention that he was the one who wanted Jeremy Laidler?




Thanks for that.
So, in summary. Everyone else is responsible for the bad trades but Ratts is responsible for the good ones.


Everyone in list management is responsible for everything that happens. But blaming the coach for everything bad that happens if it was his sole fault is just incorrect logic and would only incur on a footy forum. Should take Pagan's advice if you argue with fools for long enough you soon become one.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 12:12 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
You should try another colour.....

Green is kind of sickly to read.

And the coach at our club passes the buck.
Its everybody else but the coach.

Sometimes its cordy
Sometimes its Hampson
Sometimes its Curnow
Sometimes its god.

But its never Ratts

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 12:13 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
Too .......many.......colours.…causing… seizure …

H
E
L
P

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 12:25 am 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:25 am
Posts: 356
Does every %#@!ing thread have to turn into another circular argument about Ratten?

Ratten is not responsible for our every failure. You know how I know that? Because it's common sense. We don't employ assistant coaches, development staff, recruitment staff, football managers, medical staff and all the other off field staff only to leave every single decision up to the head coach.

Does Ratten need to take some responsibility for our failures? Absolutely and he'll be out the door very shortly as a result.

Will replacing him fix everything? No and if you believe that you've got a lot to learn about what it takes to be a successful club.

Can we talk about the game now?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 12:26 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 9:49 pm
Posts: 1508
cimm1979 wrote:
Too .......many.......colours.…causing… seizure …

H
E
L
P


Not wrong there mate.

_________________
We are eternal, all this pain is an illusion.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 2:11 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:50 pm
Posts: 2123
jim wrote:
5 years ago we were a basket case, a couple of months ago we were at least playing for top spot even if we did stuff it up. That's a bit more than barely don't you think. I think it's alot more. You know that, I know that. Anyone could see it's alot more. We won a final and lost 3 very narrowly interstate when we were big underdogs and finsihed below the side that beat us, last year 3 pts off a preliminary final with an injury hit side. Supporters though can spin anything to suit an argument though. Good thing I don't fall for crap.

Sides have good years and go past some then things change just as rapidly the next year. If you follow footy you'd know that happens. Basics are there and there's plenty to look forward to, but change is needed badly to bring out the next step. It's something we all agree on. Just a temporary blip. Just as long as we get the right changes to make sure it stays temporary.


rooboy wrote:
5 years taken us from the basket case, laughing stock of the competition, where we through every bit of credibility that we had as a club out the door. And he has taken us from there to making finals 3 yrs in a row - we probably will miss this yr (WHY) - Why the change? Because he can't coach??? Maybe?? Quite fickle because history suggests he can... players around him all seem to sign up...maybe the consistent injuries that have hit since the start of pre-season to even this very week - none i have ever seen before at any other club - has something to do with it? Sydney have one injury - we have what, 8 of our best players out and 1 suspended right now this week.... they have been fantastic. So have North... no injuries. Adelaide... none.... Essendon* have - not to the same extent but lets see if they can continue to play catchup, West Coast - injuries to one area... not there cornerstone of dangerous ruck, midfield and defence thats built there success...


Good to see that some people can still think things through clearly and with common sense.

From 2008-2011, Carlton improved every year under Brett Ratten's watch:

2008: 10 wins, 10th
2009: 13 wins, 7th (a nine win improvement inside two seasons)
2010: 11 wins, 8th (fewer wins and same stage exit BUT achieved finals in first year post-Fevola when most supporters and media doubted team's ability to adjust)
2011: 14 wins 1 draw, 5th

3-0 and premiership favourites after Round 3, 2012; 5-1 and playing for top spot in Round 7, 2012. Not bad for a side that was "barely better off than when Ratten took over in 2007." :eek: :lol:

Things have fallen apart since. Carlton now sits in 12th position, unlikely to play finals in 2012. This seems a bit odd, given that it contradicts the upwards-trending trajectory on which the team has found itself since 2008. Something has to account for such an abrupt, sharp decline - things don't just change so violently without good cause.

It could just be that Ratten can't coach - but history shows that the team has improved every year while he has been the coach and, in any event, this could hardly account for such a breakneck fall.

On the other hand, there is a more likely explanation: a crippling and constant run of injuries to key structural components (and, on top of this, many of those players' potential replacements), depriving the side not only of its best players but also of much needed continuity. Other than (very) bad luck with injuries, there is no reasonable basis upon which to claim that that Carlton was going to tumble down the ladder as it has. The only thing that could have precipitated such a sudden reversal of fortunes was what happened: injuries.

_________________
Formerly Blues-Back2003.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 6:12 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 12:30 pm
Posts: 4180
So yeah. Carlton to win by 36 points.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 606 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 ... 31  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 47 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group