Sugarcane wrote:
If we believe the CFC didn't take the last 2 games against Haw and St.K totally seriously, then I personally will judge Ratten today on 3 fronts...
1. Player Motivation/Mind Set - I know the players should motivate themselves but it's also the role of the coach. Will they be switched on and play with a confidence befitting of the more superior team (which we are)? Or, will they be in their shell, like they were against Hawthorn in the first half? If it is the latter Ratten needs to take some heat.
2. Judd - Hawks and St.K rotated players on him last 2 games and Ess will do the same you'd think. What will Ratten orchestrate to combat this, to relieve his match winner? This is a tactical issue facing Ratten, and one he must win.
3. Rucks - With just one genuine ruck today, I expect Ryder to try to jump over Warnock/Hille at stoppages pushing the ball Ess's way. What will Ratten do to minimise this happening?
There are other tactical issues to be dealt with (such as freeing up space for Garlett/Betts/Walker) etc, but these are the main issues IMO given finals are won at stoppages.
Let's be realistic, Blues have improved this year lagely off the back of reducing scores against, and this has been due to a. a re-vamped backline (largely due to recruitment and re-deploying existing players in different spots - not all Ratten's doing) and b. copying the fwd press used by other clubs (not that hard for a coach to copy is it).
For mine, Ross Lyon and Al Clarkson are the best coaches going around and Ratten needs to show some serious tactical nous to be worthy of keeping his job. Today will be a big test.
Agreed SC. After today's win (just hoping), the newest game plan will be known as Ratten's Rings of Radiation. The game plan will have 10 players form 3 concentric rings of radii 15, 30 and 45m around the opposition. The first ring is the instant radiation zone where the heat is turned on and they are torched to the ground (Robinsion, Ellard and Setanta crunches).
Even if they make it through to the outer ring, they'll still cop some metaphorical sunburn (a soft tackle by Garlett and Betts).
Only one problem with this game plan. By my calculations, id we want three rings with 10 players in each ring, that's 30 players.......Do you think they'd notice if we had 30 players on the ground?????