Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Mar 14, 2026 6:18 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4357 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 214, 215, 216, 217, 218  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Mar 06, 2026 7:03 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 7483
Bookie wrote:
Traveller86 wrote:
Docherty with the not so subtle dig at Voss and our midfield setup on the Dan Does Footy podcast today.


Heard a snip of the Doc phone in, with regard the contest off problem he mentions i guess Leigh Adams now has to address it, but it feels like a personnel thing with lack of pace, no spread/two way run after losing the contest? Is he saying we get to inside the contest and if we lose the first contest (e.g. we lost 3rd qtr contested -10) the oppo get out and we have no outside cover and sag back too deep in defence and make acres of unmanned space for them to run into between the mids and backs? We seem to have no plan for this and Swans/Lions etc type sides toy with us.



our list has holes. 100%.

but the way we play is also horrible. the same mids tore the comp apart in 2023 with run and desire, and playing fast. that game Vs the pies was what we could be, if we took the shackles off, imo. we outplayed them at their own game, and ran them off the park. the ball moves faster than the foot.

the game Vs the cats was still maybe the best game i've seen us play since the 99 prelim.

we just moved the ball at all costs. backed each other up and ran with dare and belief. this list could play that way. we won't win a flag, probably won't make the 8. but it'd be an engaging season.

watching them serve up what they did after HT last night is exactly what they've served up since 2023. it's not good. it doesn't work and it's crazy we haven't added one single wrinkle since then.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 07, 2026 2:54 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 2:16 pm
Posts: 15731
Location: Sydney
Braithy wrote:

our list has holes. 100%.

but the way we play is also horrible. the same mids tore the comp apart in 2023 with run and desire, and playing fast. that game Vs the pies was what we could be, if we took the shackles off, imo. we outplayed them at their own game, and ran them off the park. the ball moves faster than the foot.

the game Vs the cats was still maybe the best game i've seen us play since the 99 prelim.

we just moved the ball at all costs. backed each other up and ran with dare and belief. this list could play that way. we won't win a flag, probably won't make the 8. but it'd be an engaging season.

watching them serve up what they did after HT last night is exactly what they've served up since 2023. it's not good. it doesn't work and it's crazy we haven't added one single wrinkle since then.


I missed a chunk of Q3 while putting the kids to bed - although that was the stretch between Curnow's 1st and Pitto's 3rd where we actually broke even - and my take was the opposite of yours: I could see we were still committed to fast ball movement, and we did score 4.2 in the Quarter from Hell where in past seasons we would have scored 0.1, but my frustration was that for all the talk of the short passing game (Brisbane-inspired?) we'd developed over the summer, we never once tried to take the pace out of the game and chip it around for a while, save for one switch back and forth across the D50 that ended with Saad attempting an impossible angled daisy-cutter into the corridor that got swallowed up for a turnover goal. I know many fans have said they don't mind us taking a spanking or two as the price for us developing a bold, fast-moving game plan, but in times of abject humiliation you should be able to stem the bleeding.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 07, 2026 4:58 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 11062
Location: Australia
DocSherrin III wrote:
Simmo wouldn't have the cattle. If you think a change of coach is doing anything, you're extremely mistaken. It's a bottom third side. The sooner you all accept that, the better off you'll be.


Sorry but have to disagree, the difference was the lack of pace and agility from Cripps, Hewett, Walsh and Lord vs Gulden, Heeny, and Warner. Our top six was the problem, not our bottom six. Oh and Grundy vs Pittonet/Reidy


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2026 9:51 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 11084
sinbagger wrote:
DocSherrin III wrote:
Simmo wouldn't have the cattle. If you think a change of coach is doing anything, you're extremely mistaken. It's a bottom third side. The sooner you all accept that, the better off you'll be.


Sorry but have to disagree, the difference was the lack of pace and agility from Cripps, Hewett, Walsh and Lord vs Gulden, Heeny, and Warner. Our top six was the problem, not our bottom six. Oh and Grundy vs Pittonet/Reidy


Yep. We played 2 of Cripps, Hewett and Lord in there at the same time. Talk about doubling down. :banghead:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2026 10:23 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 7483
GreatEx wrote:
Braithy wrote:

our list has holes. 100%.

but the way we play is also horrible. the same mids tore the comp apart in 2023 with run and desire, and playing fast. that game Vs the pies was what we could be, if we took the shackles off, imo. we outplayed them at their own game, and ran them off the park. the ball moves faster than the foot.

the game Vs the cats was still maybe the best game i've seen us play since the 99 prelim.

we just moved the ball at all costs. backed each other up and ran with dare and belief. this list could play that way. we won't win a flag, probably won't make the 8. but it'd be an engaging season.

watching them serve up what they did after HT last night is exactly what they've served up since 2023. it's not good. it doesn't work and it's crazy we haven't added one single wrinkle since then.


I missed a chunk of Q3 while putting the kids to bed - although that was the stretch between Curnow's 1st and Pitto's 3rd where we actually broke even - and my take was the opposite of yours: I could see we were still committed to fast ball movement, and we did score 4.2 in the Quarter from Hell where in past seasons we would have scored 0.1, but my frustration was that for all the talk of the short passing game (Brisbane-inspired?) we'd developed over the summer, we never once tried to take the pace out of the game and chip it around for a while, save for one switch back and forth across the D50 that ended with Saad attempting an impossible angled daisy-cutter into the corridor that got swallowed up for a turnover goal. I know many fans have said they don't mind us taking a spanking or two as the price for us developing a bold, fast-moving game plan, but in times of abject humiliation you should be able to stem the bleeding.



everything you say, is leading where i was going.

it's not as much the players, as the player's instructions from the coaching group. we are poorly coached. we've barely added anything to the gameplan since 2023. that isn't on the playing group, but the minds behind it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2026 1:02 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2688
Braithy wrote:
GreatEx wrote:
Braithy wrote:

our list has holes. 100%.

but the way we play is also horrible. the same mids tore the comp apart in 2023 with run and desire, and playing fast. that game Vs the pies was what we could be, if we took the shackles off, imo. we outplayed them at their own game, and ran them off the park. the ball moves faster than the foot.

the game Vs the cats was still maybe the best game i've seen us play since the 99 prelim.

we just moved the ball at all costs. backed each other up and ran with dare and belief. this list could play that way. we won't win a flag, probably won't make the 8. but it'd be an engaging season.

watching them serve up what they did after HT last night is exactly what they've served up since 2023. it's not good. it doesn't work and it's crazy we haven't added one single wrinkle since then.


I missed a chunk of Q3 while putting the kids to bed - although that was the stretch between Curnow's 1st and Pitto's 3rd where we actually broke even - and my take was the opposite of yours: I could see we were still committed to fast ball movement, and we did score 4.2 in the Quarter from Hell where in past seasons we would have scored 0.1, but my frustration was that for all the talk of the short passing game (Brisbane-inspired?) we'd developed over the summer, we never once tried to take the pace out of the game and chip it around for a while, save for one switch back and forth across the D50 that ended with Saad attempting an impossible angled daisy-cutter into the corridor that got swallowed up for a turnover goal. I know many fans have said they don't mind us taking a spanking or two as the price for us developing a bold, fast-moving game plan, but in times of abject humiliation you should be able to stem the bleeding.



everything you say, is leading where i was going.

it's not as much the players, as the player's instructions from the coaching group. we are poorly coached. we've barely added anything to the gameplan since 2023. that isn't on the playing group, but the minds behind it.


correct $100 he makes the same mistakes next week


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2026 1:15 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17486
sinbagger wrote:
DocSherrin III wrote:
Simmo wouldn't have the cattle. If you think a change of coach is doing anything, you're extremely mistaken. It's a bottom third side. The sooner you all accept that, the better off you'll be.


Sorry but have to disagree, the difference was the lack of pace and agility from Cripps, Hewett, Walsh and Lord vs Gulden, Heeny, and Warner. Our top six was the problem, not our bottom six. Oh and Grundy vs Pittonet/Reidy


Yeah - I believe that's called agreeing with me. Sack Voss and it doesn't change the list just because there's a coaching change. The list was built for an antiquated brand of football and will take time to remedy. So many people saw the writing on the wall and no one at the club did. The very reason I do not buy a membership.

And you idiots get on here and scream for Elijah. Can't kick, can't run. As clueless as the club.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2026 3:23 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 3447
DocSherrin III wrote:
sinbagger wrote:
DocSherrin III wrote:
Simmo wouldn't have the cattle. If you think a change of coach is doing anything, you're extremely mistaken. It's a bottom third side. The sooner you all accept that, the better off you'll be.


Sorry but have to disagree, the difference was the lack of pace and agility from Cripps, Hewett, Walsh and Lord vs Gulden, Heeny, and Warner. Our top six was the problem, not our bottom six. Oh and Grundy vs Pittonet/Reidy


Yeah - I believe that's called agreeing with me. Sack Voss and it doesn't change the list just because there's a coaching change. The list was built for an antiquated brand of football and will take time to remedy. So many people saw the writing on the wall and no one at the club did. The very reason I do not buy a membership.

And you idiots get on here and scream for Elijah. Can't kick, can't run. As clueless as the club.

A bit rich calling passionate Carlton supporters as idiots, when you can’t put your hand in your pocket and buy a membership


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2026 4:34 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17486
london blue wrote:
A bit rich calling passionate Carlton supporters as idiots, when you can’t put your hand in your pocket and buy a membership


We agree to disagree.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2026 5:34 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:43 pm
Posts: 1387
IMO a positive is the gameplan this pre-season has changed and we saw it in the practice matches and we saw it for a half in the OR : run, carry, play on, fast ball movement, spread at the contest was more focused and in addition to contested footy. Thats coaching led. Meaningless as two preseason matches wins were - THAT game plan won them..... Its a big lot of stuff yeah? Sooooo given the excellent support for Voss, implemented by our CEO, given this was clearly a defined focused gameday change to how we will play, then it seems clear the fitness/conditioning coaches/program was left behind?

So to me they need to be focusing here moving forward.

The list has had ALOT of changes which we have not seen much of yet. Maybe give them some time?

PS: We will Beat Tigers next week.....

_________________
Cripps is the man


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2026 9:12 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:40 pm
Posts: 8246
BluesRockMyWorld wrote:
IMO a positive is the gameplan this pre-season has changed and we saw it in the practice matches and we saw it for a half in the OR : run, carry, play on, fast ball movement, spread at the contest was more focused and in addition to contested footy. Thats coaching led. Meaningless as two preseason matches wins were - THAT game plan won them..... Its a big lot of stuff yeah? Sooooo given the excellent support for Voss, implemented by our CEO, given this was clearly a defined focused gameday change to how we will play, then it seems clear the fitness/conditioning coaches/program was left behind?

So to me they need to be focusing here moving forward.

The list has had ALOT of changes which we have not seen much of yet. Maybe give them some time?

PS: We will Beat Tigers next week.....


Yep , its not gonna click overnight .

_________________
All my dangerous friends


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2026 9:45 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 20579
Location: 父 父 父 父 父 父
A change of coach won't fix it.

But Voss's style of football has broken us and led to shit recruiting decisions.

I've been sick of him for a while.

_________________
Congratulations CK95


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2026 10:03 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 11084
I just want to add ONE thing to the statement we recruited the wrong people and traded the incorrect one's in. I agree 100% but, and there is a big BUT;

You don't build a list around 5 contested players with no run.
You build a list with all types, inside/ouside mids, fast wingers, good users, defensive mindset players, high IQ, talls, smalls, introverts, extroverts, etc. This includes trading in what you DON'T have - not what is available but is more of what you have!!!

We have NFI. We keep doing the same mistakes over and over and over again.


Last edited by SurreyBlue on Mon Mar 09, 2026 7:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 09, 2026 12:11 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 11062
Location: Australia
DocSherrin III wrote:
sinbagger wrote:
DocSherrin III wrote:
Simmo wouldn't have the cattle. If you think a change of coach is doing anything, you're extremely mistaken. It's a bottom third side. The sooner you all accept that, the better off you'll be.


Sorry but have to disagree, the difference was the lack of pace and agility from Cripps, Hewett, Walsh and Lord vs Gulden, Heeny, and Warner. Our top six was the problem, not our bottom six. Oh and Grundy vs Pittonet/Reidy


Yeah - I believe that's called agreeing with me. Sack Voss and it doesn't change the list just because there's a coaching change. The list was built for an antiquated brand of football and will take time to remedy. So many people saw the writing on the wall and no one at the club did. The very reason I do not buy a membership.

And you idiots get on here and scream for Elijah. Can't kick, can't run. As clueless as the club.


Ah sorry I misread “ It's a bottom third side”, as “ It's the bottom third of the side”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 09, 2026 6:16 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 5:15 pm
Posts: 7659
bluehammer wrote:
A change of coach won't fix it.

But Voss's style of football has broken us and led to shit recruiting decisions.

I've been sick of him for a while.

This is year 5 of Voss... it's his list and his (slightly modified for '06) game plan. He needs to make it work this year.

_________________
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ― Richard Feynman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 09, 2026 7:33 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 20579
Location: 父 父 父 父 父 父
Yeah that's what I mean I think. The coach is entitled to influence the recruiting decisions to enable his game style.

But his shit game style has always been 'one or two players' away.

You could put the top 5 draft picks from the past ten years in this side under that game style and they would break, they would be exhausted, they would hate their time at the club and leave.

I was over it and I'm over it again.

I want to be wrong. But I don't think I will be.

_________________
Congratulations CK95


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2026 2:23 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 26313
Location: Bondi Beach
BluesRockMyWorld wrote:
IMO a positive is the gameplan this pre-season has changed and we saw it in the practice matches and we saw it for a half in the OR : run, carry, play on, fast ball movement, spread at the contest was more focused and in addition to contested footy. Thats coaching led. Meaningless as two preseason matches wins were - THAT game plan won them..... Its a big lot of stuff yeah? Sooooo given the excellent support for Voss, implemented by our CEO, given this was clearly a defined focused gameday change to how we will play, then it seems clear the fitness/conditioning coaches/program was left behind?

So to me they need to be focusing here moving forward.

The list has had ALOT of changes which we have not seen much of yet. Maybe give them some time?

PS: We will Beat Tigers next week.....


YES

Maybe....

The swans played their unicorn and it was one of those games that the ball bounced their way, for the whole of the 3rd Qtr. It looked that way. Swans players were really playing Russian Roulette running away from the contest ahead of the ball.

Lets let things settle.

Maybe Vossy is giving blocks of games to the newboys Chesser and reidy, Byrne and Young.F
Maybe the loss of Haynes O'Farrell, Newman, Carroll, Cowan, Wilson Evans and Cerra has forced us to play players to fill their holes. Robbing Peter to play Paul.
I havent even mentioned forgetten man Cottrell who was an auto selection since 2022.

Williams looked good in the guts during praccy games, despite playing training with HB all preseason.

Let things settle.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2026 2:27 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 26313
Location: Bondi Beach
Hornet wrote:
bluehammer wrote:
A change of coach won't fix it.

But Voss's style of football has broken us and led to shit recruiting decisions.

I've been sick of him for a while.

This is year 5 of Voss... it's his list and his (slightly modified for '06) game plan. He needs to make it work this year.


I think everyone agrees with this comment, even Vossy. He needs it to work.

Not sure if its his list. I'm sure he'd like TDK as his first ruck, O'Farrell at CHB, Williams in the midfield with Smith, but I agree he's had input and shaped the list.

Regardless, youre correct Hornet, he needs to make it work THIS YEAR.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 12, 2026 9:36 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 1:06 pm
Posts: 4049
Location: Steven Seagal's Martial Arts Academy
What do you think about Boak?
Would he want to stay if Voss got the ass?

Not sure why we need 2 x leadership consultants

We have 12 more games until we play Richmond again.
Out of those 12 we will be lucky to win one (roos).

Wright and Davies will have a tricky job to set a pass mark for Voss.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 12, 2026 9:40 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:26 am
Posts: 14868
Location: Comparing orange boners with Hirdy
Boak sitting on the bench looking on tonight must have been questioning his life choices

_________________
Greg Swann wrote:
Essendon* cheated, simple as that


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4357 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 214, 215, 216, 217, 218  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 110 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group