Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jun 23, 2025 6:28 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6991 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217 ... 350  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2018 8:21 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 7253
Rod Waddell wrote:
Sidefx wrote:
The Duke wrote:
I feel super happy for people who are okay with where we're at right now, but at the same time I feel sorry for them. This isn't good - not by any measure.


And this is why you're still not understanding us "people".

None of us are happy with were we're at right now but at the same time there is a logical reason for it outside blaming the coaching panel.

When you have appx 13 injuries each round and some to key players in a shallow team you're going to get the following results:
- Lack of continuity amongst the playing group
- This leads to lack of time to build player trust in positions with the way they play
- This then leads to game plans being virtually useless
- This then leads to loss of games by large margins
- This can then lead to zone playing to help reduce the loss (no good when the opposition can carve you up through basic skill errors, players fault)
- This then leads to loss in confidence and more skill errors
- This then leads to perceived/real loss of passion or fight.

So it's no wonder the games are tough to watch this season, but no matter who the coach is or president for that matter we can't escape the injuries in such a full scale rebuild. But I believe it will all pay off in the end, you just got to hang in there and give them the 5 years before the typical Carlton lynching begins.


As a matter of interest why is it 5 years? It may be 7 or 8 years.

In any case wasn’t it a 66 games rebuild to start with. Has this now changed?


7-8 years for all this to get right, just isn't plausible, imo ...

• a 7 or 8 year rebuild will pretty much be Cripps' entire career (given his size and how he plays the game, longevity may not be in his stars). at the end of that 7-8 years, we'll actually start turning over the list for the next rebuild. like we did with the last rebuild with our vaunted slew of number one picks which never made a prelim final.

• another 7 or 8 years like these last 3, would more than likely see us struggle for members & sponsorship to remain viable. fitzroy folded for far, far less.

• I'm all for the rebuild ... but real world time just won't afford us that long to get things right here. the fact we're bottoming out into year three of the rebuild and are so much worse right now than years one and two, are a little cause for concern on the whole 'are we executing this thing right?' front.


fwiw – me personally, i think we're totally on the right path building this list and drafting. our recruiting is suspect with some of the retreads we've got going around. but on the whole we're building this to be in the finals by 2020.

i am 110% convinced bolton is not head coach material and persevering with him, is delaying our rebuild time and eating into the prime years of our number 9.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2018 8:49 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 2:16 pm
Posts: 14662
Location: Sydney
I'm not sure the soviet analogy works when the paupers of two years ago have busted out of the gulag and are smashing it while the oligarchs are barely clinging to relevance, but we need a good conspiracy theory to paper over our canyon sized cracks so let's roll with it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2018 9:07 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
Donstuie wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
You keep telling a group that winning doesnt matter then after a while it doesn't.

Still waiting for a SINGLE example of anyone at the club saying this.


You'll be waiting a long time!!

I'm still waiting to hear how Richmond, Collingwood, WB, Geelong, Freo, StK (all teams that have played in GFs over the last decade) have exploited the system or found loopholes

What you won't be waiting a long time for is the next bombastic post from SB

Better go...I'll be accused of stalking

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2018 9:26 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
Wojee wrote:
You can understand the team’s current situation without being happy about it.


I understand the injuries, the list, the talent, but I don’t understand the mindset at the start of games that sees shots from 10 or 20m out so badly missed or targets in general play so badly missed or just the lack of urgency in general.
It’s an attitude that’s the result of poor culture.... which I had hoped was gone.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2018 9:31 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
Wojee wrote:
You can understand the team’s current situation without being happy about it.


Players unavailable for selection yesterday
SOJ

Kruezer
Jones
Docherty
Plowman
Weitering
Fisher
Cunningham
Williamson
Phillips
ASOS


Players interrupted significantly with preseason/injuries
Murphy
Kennedy
Lang
Marchbank
Pickett
Byrne

Players on the cusp but restricted by injury
Macreadie
LeBois
Schumacher

Unfortunately, some just CAN'T understand the situation

Richmond last year had one major injury, yes one, you heard me right, just ONE...Nathan Drummond

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2018 11:02 am 
Online
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21570
Location: North of the border
99prelim wrote:
Donstuie wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
You keep telling a group that winning doesnt matter then after a while it doesn't.

Still waiting for a SINGLE example of anyone at the club saying this.


You'll be waiting a long time!!

I'm still waiting to hear how Richmond, Collingwood, WB, Geelong, Freo, StK (all teams that have played in GFs over the last decade) have exploited the system or found loopholes

What you won't be waiting a long time for is the next bombastic post from SB

Better go...I'll be accused of stalking


another quote to back the earlier one up

“Our expectations are not about win and loss,” Bolton said.

“We’ll take win and loss, but our expectations are about being unified, about creating a learning environment, about having an ‘us’ not ‘me’ mentality both on and off the field.


and another

"It's a great chance for our group to build some resilience and work out other ways [of winning]. I look it as a strength and as an opportunity more than something you stress and worry about," Bolton said of the injuries. "But we won't be defined just on wins and losses."

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2018 11:55 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8214
99prelim wrote:
Wojee wrote:
You can understand the team’s current situation without being happy about it.


Players unavailable for selection yesterday
SOJ

Kruezer
Jones
Docherty
Plowman
Weitering
Fisher
Cunningham
Williamson
Phillips
ASOS


Players interrupted significantly with preseason/injuries
Murphy
Kennedy
Lang
Marchbank
Pickett
Byrne

Players on the cusp but restricted by injury
Macreadie
LeBois
Schumacher

Unfortunately, some just CAN'T understand the situation

Richmond last year had one major injury, yes one, you heard me right, just ONE...Nathan Drummond


Can we count the GWS players out in the last qtr? After yesterday injury excuse don't count. That was the most embarrassing thing I've seen in 55 years of watching footy and i'd say our worst ever loss given the circumstances. Despite outnumbering them we had no idea. We'd have spares out wide but kick down the line to an outnumbered situation, how is one outnumbered when your have 1-2 spares I don't know. Then GWS go forward to loose men every where in their forward 50 and kick goals as they please. They had 45 uncontested marks in that last qtr and outscore us 7 goals to 1. How does that happen? This is a side, after 3 years with this bloke, that had no idea,what they were supposed to do, How poorly drilled can a side get? Game plan so confusing, so poor, that we don't even know what to do when we outnumber a side by 2 players. It's not as if GWS are anything like Hawthorn 2013-15, or Geelong 2007-11. They laughed at us. They rotated off the bench still with 16-17 players treating us like incompetent idiots. That's a Monday morning sacking not an end of the year sacking as it is purely incompetent. either that or the players aren't playing for the coach. Going no-where right now.

So please don't anyone give us spin for that total embarrassment. We still had a number of very good to even a few outstanding young players out there as well as enough senior experience to at least stop such embarrassment like yesterday's like qtr happening. Anyone who thinks that is ok under any circumstances I'll laugh in their face. They live in a world where everything is forever rosy.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2018 12:35 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 6615
jim wrote:
99prelim wrote:
Wojee wrote:
You can understand the team’s current situation without being happy about it.


Players unavailable for selection yesterday
SOJ

Kruezer
Jones
Docherty
Plowman
Weitering
Fisher
Cunningham
Williamson
Phillips
ASOS


Players interrupted significantly with preseason/injuries
Murphy
Kennedy
Lang
Marchbank
Pickett
Byrne

Players on the cusp but restricted by injury
Macreadie
LeBois
Schumacher

Unfortunately, some just CAN'T understand the situation

Richmond last year had one major injury, yes one, you heard me right, just ONE...Nathan Drummond


Can we count the GWS players out in the last qtr? After yesterday injury excuse don't count. That was the most embarrassing thing I've seen in 55 years of watching footy and i'd say our worst ever loss given the circumstances. Despite outnumbering them we had no idea. We'd have spares out wide but kick down the line to an outnumbered situation, how is one outnumbered when your have 1-2 spares I don't know. Then GWS go forward to loose men every where in their forward 50 and kick goals as they please. They had 45 uncontested marks in that last qtr and outscore us 7 goals to 1. How does that happen? This is a side, after 3 years with this bloke, that had no idea,what they were supposed to do, How poorly drilled can a side get? Game plan so confusing, so poor, that we don't even know what to do when we outnumber a side by 2 players. It's not as if GWS are anything like Hawthorn 2013-15, or Geelong 2007-11. They laughed at us. They rotated off the bench still with 16-17 players treating us like incompetent idiots. That's a Monday morning sacking not an end of the year sacking as it is purely incompetent. either that or the players aren't playing for the coach. Going no-where right now.

So please don't anyone give us spin for that total embarrassment. We still had a number of very good to even a few outstanding young players out there as well as enough senior experience to at least stop such embarrassment like yesterday's like qtr happening. Anyone who thinks that is ok under any circumstances I'll laugh in their face. They live in a world where everything is forever rosy.


All your questions are answered by Bolton himself in his post match interview. :banghead:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2018 1:18 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
Sydney Blue wrote:
99prelim wrote:
Donstuie wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
You keep telling a group that winning doesnt matter then after a while it doesn't.

Still waiting for a SINGLE example of anyone at the club saying this.


You'll be waiting a long time!!

I'm still waiting to hear how Richmond, Collingwood, WB, Geelong, Freo, StK (all teams that have played in GFs over the last decade) have exploited the system or found loopholes

What you won't be waiting a long time for is the next bombastic post from SB

Better go...I'll be accused of stalking


another quote to back the earlier one up



“Our expectations are not about win and loss,” Bolton said.

“We’ll take win and loss, but our expectations are about being unified, about creating a learning environment, about having an ‘us’ not ‘me’ mentality both on and off the field.


and another

"It's a great chance for our group to build some resilience and work out other ways [of winning]. I look it as a strength and as an opportunity more than something you stress and worry about," Bolton said of the injuries. "But we won't be defined just on wins and losses."



But where does he say that winning a game is not important?
And why was the win last week spoken about in terms of a positive and a smile and a reward for effort
Stop making shit up.

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2018 1:23 pm 
Online
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21570
Location: North of the border
99prelim wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
99prelim wrote:
Donstuie wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
You keep telling a group that winning doesnt matter then after a while it doesn't.

Still waiting for a SINGLE example of anyone at the club saying this.


You'll be waiting a long time!!

I'm still waiting to hear how Richmond, Collingwood, WB, Geelong, Freo, StK (all teams that have played in GFs over the last decade) have exploited the system or found loopholes

What you won't be waiting a long time for is the next bombastic post from SB

Better go...I'll be accused of stalking


another quote to back the earlier one up



“Our expectations are not about win and loss,” Bolton said.

“We’ll take win and loss, but our expectations are about being unified, about creating a learning environment, about having an ‘us’ not ‘me’ mentality both on and off the field.


and another

"It's a great chance for our group to build some resilience and work out other ways [of winning]. I look it as a strength and as an opportunity more than something you stress and worry about," Bolton said of the injuries. "But we won't be defined just on wins and losses."



But where does he say that winning a game is not important?
And why was the win last week spoken about in terms of a positive and a smile and a reward for effort
Stop making shit up.
If you state we won't be defined by wins and losses
You are stating winning doesn't matter.
Do you have a problem understanding that

Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2018 1:30 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34533
Location: The Brown Wedge
I agree with Syd - It's a weird approach to have. Particularly as we have a young team. I don't want them just blindly believing that the process will deliver results, because it won't. Plenty of teams have followed a process and failed.

_________________
end of message


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2018 1:33 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18035
We've been over this 100 times. He's not saying winning isn't important. What he's saying is we have to measure ourselves by effort and commitment.
As an example, IMHO, our effort against Richmond in Round 1 was far more commendable that our win against a piss poor Gold Coast last week. The effort was greater and the consistency of effort was better.
Bolton expects the players to give 100% effort and 100% commitment. If we can obtain that on a consistent basis, the results will look after themselves.
Yes it's coach-speak but we have to focus on the process and not outcome.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2018 1:50 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
'Get comfortable being uncomfortable'

No coach wants to 'lose' his playing group, but I hope he identifies those who look to be 'comfortable' just collecting their weekly match payments.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2018 1:51 pm 
Online
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21570
Location: North of the border
Blue Vain wrote:
We've been over this 100 times. He's not saying winning isn't important. What he's saying is we have to measure ourselves by effort and commitment.
As an example, IMHO, our effort against Richmond in Round 1 was far more commendable that our win against a piss poor Gold Coast last week. The effort was greater and the consistency of effort was better.
Bolton expects the players to give 100% effort and 100% commitment. If we can obtain that on a consistent basis, the results will look after themselves.
Yes it's coach-speak but we have to focus on the process and not outcome.



If you focus on the process and not the outcome because the process will lead to the desired outcome - then we can say that the players either do not get the process or the process is all wrong or the players are not trying

but ultimately football is about wins and losses and for a coach to say his team will not be measured by wins and losses is perplexing at best

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2018 2:12 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 3:51 pm
Posts: 546
can some1 send bolton this message for me .How can collingwood have 8 senior players missing and yet hit the front against syd. I tell you why they have a better game plan ,a better system and wen is bolts going to change our game style .I used to watch wen we kicked the ball to betts or fev with several opp against them now same thing happening again to curnow .


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2018 2:21 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25323
Location: Bondi Beach
Blue Vain wrote:
jim wrote:
They were smashing with us 16 players, that is pathetic at AFL level no matter then spin.


For the 10 or 20 seconds they had 16 players, they smashed us did they? By all means be critical but try to be remotely honest when you do. They played probably 10-12 minutes with 17 players.


Thanks for the reality check.

Most of the last there were 4 players on the GWS bench.

Lets also remember the 16 players on the field trump our 18 players on the field any day of the week for speed, maturity, stamina, development and age (peaking).

That's not an indictment on the kids: 19yo Dow, OBrien, 20yo SPS, McKay,Polson. Its just a fact of life. We had players out there who didn't have a preseason or serious injury locks during the year which has hindered their fitness and development: Marchbank, Byrne, Kennedy, Pickett, Lang, Rowe and Murphy. We have players who wouldnt be playing if our thin list was available: OShea, Rowe, Thomas, Graham, Lamb, and some of the kids who just are not ready.

They are a much better team than ours circa 2018 because they have many many more developed stars in their team.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2018 2:28 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 6615
jamespul65 wrote:
can some1 send bolton this message for me .How can collingwood have 8 senior players missing and yet hit the front against syd. I tell you why they have a better game plan ,a better system and wen is bolts going to change our game style .I used to watch wen we kicked the ball to betts or fev with several opp against them now same thing happening again to curnow .


Mate it's not actually that hard.......we have no midfield and we sure as shit don't have any depth in our midfield like Collingwood.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2018 2:30 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18035
jamespul65 wrote:
can some1 send bolton this message for me .How can collingwood have 8 senior players missing and yet hit the front against syd. I tell you why they have a better game plan ,a better system and wen is bolts going to change our game style .I used to watch wen we kicked the ball to betts or fev with several opp against them now same thing happening again to curnow .


You asked this question 3 weeks ago and the answer is still the same!

Blue Vain wrote:
jamespul65 wrote:
i know we have a lot of injuries ,but my question for bolts is our game plan .when are we going to change it,the system we have in place atm is no good.Bolts and co need to look at syd or coll with all there injuries they are still winning.


Look a bit deeper. Collingwoods top 7 in their B&F last year have missed a total of 8 games. Pendlebury, Sidebottom, Grundy etc etc, they're all fit and playing well every week. They lose Treloar, Dunn and Cox and what happens, they lose to West Coast in Melbourne. Key players out kill your system.

Look at our best players from last year. Murphy, missed a heap of games, Kreuzer, probably missed or failed to play out 6 or 7 games, Docherty, hasn't played a game. Gibbs, gone. Then look at our better defenders. Williamson, hasn't played a game, Marchbank, hardly played. Alex Silvagni, hasn't played. Plowman, out.


Collingwood are without Treloar, Dunn and Howe and they've lost 3 out of 4 games. It's not that @#$%&! difficult. Every team that suffers injuries to their best players are performing well below expectation.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2018 2:50 pm 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
jamespul65 wrote:
can some1 send bolton this message for me .How can collingwood have 8 senior players missing and yet hit the front against syd. I tell you why they have a better game plan ,a better system and wen is bolts going to change our game style .I used to watch wen we kicked the ball to betts or fev with several opp against them now same thing happening again to curnow .
Do you think he'll understand it?

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!

After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit http://fromthemoshpit.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2018 2:55 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18035
Sydney Blue wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
We've been over this 100 times. He's not saying winning isn't important. What he's saying is we have to measure ourselves by effort and commitment.
As an example, IMHO, our effort against Richmond in Round 1 was far more commendable that our win against a piss poor Gold Coast last week. The effort was greater and the consistency of effort was better.
Bolton expects the players to give 100% effort and 100% commitment. If we can obtain that on a consistent basis, the results will look after themselves.
Yes it's coach-speak but we have to focus on the process and not outcome.



If you focus on the process and not the outcome because the process will lead to the desired outcome - then we can say that the players either do not get the process or the process is all wrong or the players are not trying


What the game highlighted to me was the difference in class. I went yesterday and focussed on our structures and how GWS countered them.
As I mentioned on this board last night, they had probably 6 midfielders who would be better than our second best midfielder. They are better skilled and significantly better athletically. Coniglio and Whitfield cant get a start in the midfield group yet they'd easily be our second best if not best.
If we spoilt the ball, they athletically beat us to the fall of the ball. If they won the ball, several of our kids like O'Brien were brushed off like flies. The players were trying. The coaches were playing one on one footy which is exactly what the supporters have been calling for.
They just embarrassed us with the difference in class.

We are a developing team that is currently bottom 6 on the ladder at best with our full complement of players. With the players we have out, we're easily bottom 2 and quite a distance back.

As for Bolton knows, he knows he will be judged by wins and losses. But he doesn't want that to be the players focus.
They need small wins based on the things they can control. Effort, commitment to the contest, tackling etc. The rest is totally out of their control.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6991 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217 ... 350  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ByteDanceSpider, Google [Bot] and 50 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group