Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jun 23, 2025 6:03 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6139 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205 ... 307  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 3:03 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 11:12 am
Posts: 915
This could all end up being disastrous for us if you think about it

Just say we lost that game in the last round to port, we could have ended up with Pick 6 in the draft. Instead we move down 6 places in the entire draft.

Lets say Dale Thomas decides to stay a collingwood player.

So we could end up losing.....

Eddie Betts
Dale Thomas
Pick 6
Jeremy Laidler a quality individual and solid player

Instead we get
Pick 12
Late second round compensation for Betts


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 3:08 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24645
Location: Kaloyasena
I have no more confidence in us getting Pick 6 right as we have in getting Pick 12 right, but hey I never let facts get in the way of a good story either. :wink:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 3:08 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:20 pm
Posts: 6923
We never had Thomas, we never had pick 6. Ergo, we haven't "lost" them.

_________________
BLUES 2010: PAV AND JUDD = FLAGS. DOING IT FOR THE LOVE OF DICK PRATT.

HAVE YOU SIGNED UP FOR TALKINGCARLTON SUPERCOACH 2009 YET?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 3:09 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2013 6:05 pm
Posts: 358
ThePsychologist wrote:
I must admit I'd be tempted to go down the draft route.

If we got Thomas effectively for Betts that's okay but it wouldn't concern me if we didn't.

There isn't much out there worth chasing that possibility can't be replaced on the cheap.

Guys like Staker, Cross etc may be good short term solutions to help out and wouldn't cost much.

Others such as Weller, Ellis, Lambert, Garlett etc can also be gotten for no loss of picks or players.

If we purely traded any players for picks we may do okay.

Can we get second round picks for Lucas, Yarran, Garlett, Hampson, Robinson?

Maybe a 4th for Laidler or a swap for Delaney? Again not much of a cost.

We could easily have approx. pick 12, 25, 28, 30, 35, 40, 56. Is that enough and the draft may lack some depth?

Be great to get Pick 1 or 9 from GWS but can't see it happening.


Thought we would get 9 as our 1st pick or am I missing something here :sly:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 3:10 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
The Rhino wrote:
We never had Thomas, we never had pick 6. Ergo, we haven't "lost" them.


Nor does losing Laidler or not getting Thomas have any relationship with beating Port.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 3:10 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24645
Location: Kaloyasena
The Rhino wrote:
We never had Thomas, we never had pick 6. Ergo, we haven't "lost" them.



Do you think Ergo will fall to us with our second round draft pick?

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 3:11 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:20 pm
Posts: 6923
moshe25 wrote:
The Rhino wrote:
Is the "if one Aboriginal player leaves, then all three have to leave because Aboriginals only ever talk to other Aboriginals at a footy club" line of logic now the new "He's from South/West Australia therefore Port/Crows/Eagles/Dockers will pay ridiculous amounts to get him back because those clubs only get players from WA/SA"?

:clap: LAND RIGHTS FOR AMIGOS!!


GET VINCENT LINGIARI

_________________
BLUES 2010: PAV AND JUDD = FLAGS. DOING IT FOR THE LOVE OF DICK PRATT.

HAVE YOU SIGNED UP FOR TALKINGCARLTON SUPERCOACH 2009 YET?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 3:13 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:20 pm
Posts: 6923
AGRO wrote:
The Rhino wrote:
We never had Thomas, we never had pick 6. Ergo, we haven't "lost" them.



Do you think Ergo will fall to us with our second round draft pick?


It's not a dirty word.

_________________
BLUES 2010: PAV AND JUDD = FLAGS. DOING IT FOR THE LOVE OF DICK PRATT.

HAVE YOU SIGNED UP FOR TALKINGCARLTON SUPERCOACH 2009 YET?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 3:19 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 11:58 pm
Posts: 4058
Location: South Yarra
trublu wrote:
This could all end up being disastrous for us if you think about it

Just say we lost that game in the last round to port, we could have ended up with Pick 6 in the draft. Instead we move down 6 places in the entire draft.

Lets say Dale Thomas decides to stay a collingwood player.

So we could end up losing.....

Eddie Betts
Dale Thomas
Pick 6
Jeremy Laidler a quality individual and solid player

Instead we get
Pick 12
Late second round compensation for Betts


No. YOU think about it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 3:22 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 11:12 am
Posts: 915
Im justing saying it could turn out to be a nothing year for this club once again.

If we fail to lure those players
If others decide to walk out
and
the decision not to tank it will hurt us.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 3:26 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2013 6:05 pm
Posts: 358
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
SnickerS wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
SnickerS wrote:
Robinson is a good player to move on IMO.

Would have reasonable trade value to a team that is pushing/filling gaps.... and i reckon you've seen the best of his abilities.... no more upside.


..just can't agree with this sort of arguement.. ..there's always upside with every player, until they're just about ready to retire.. ..greater fitness and experience will improve a player.. ..the idea that a player can have 'peaked' by early 20's is just flawed to my thinking.. .... ..and this is proven pretty much every year, by players improving upon previous years, regardless of age..


And thats fine, thats why i wrote "IMO".
Because in my opinion, he's a spud. Sorry to be so matter-of-fact.

No doubt his conditioning, experience and fitness will improve.
Will it change his decision making enough to be a top liner??? Will he stop bombing the ball at every opportunity without thinking? Will it improve his decision making and awareness?


Not so sure


..more disagreeing with the idea that experience and fitness won't improve a player.. ..awareness and decision making, they will improve with experience and fitness.. ..experience to learn from mistakes, fitness to think clearly and not stumble thru fatigue.. .... ..how much they will improve is the question, but players do improve.... ..and this doesn't mean i'm for or against trading Robbo, more just the arguements that a player [any player] has no upside.. ..its just, how much the upside will be..

..i think calling him a spud is harsh... ..he's better than a spud..

I think Stitch Robinson has shown some good signs at times but I've seen him fade away as the game wears on, Mick has dealt with meat heads and turned them into something. Hell look at Heath Shaw at Collingwood one of the biggest boof heads in the game since Mick left he's discipline has seemed horrible. Point is I think we'll know next season if he ain't traded this year if he's staying.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 3:31 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21570
Location: North of the border
Why do so many posters have this obsession for trading players for draft picks
Since when has carlton been any good at using draft picks , with the exceptions of the number 1's and 2's we suck at using draft picks
The club couldn't pick its nose when it came to using draft picks you would be hard pressed to find one player who with have successfully brought into the team via drafting with picks
So we trade one dud we used a draft pick on for another pick to pick another dud
Doesn't make sense to me

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 3:43 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 11:58 pm
Posts: 4058
Location: South Yarra
Sydney Blue wrote:
Why do so many posters have this obsession for trading players for draft picks
Since when has carlton been any good at using draft picks , with the exceptions of the number 1's and 2's we suck at using draft picks
The club couldn't pick its nose when it came to using draft picks you would be hard pressed to find one player who with have successfully brought into the team via drafting with picks
So we trade one dud we used a draft pick on for another pick to pick another dud
Doesn't make sense to me


LOL. There's a stirring motto...

"We're shit, so why bother trying?"

It's 2013, not 1993.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 5:20 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 12:30 pm
Posts: 2864
A thought to ponder...

How many small forwards, who haven't have the ability to run through the midfield (specialist small forwards), have played in a Premiership? I can think of one - Phil Matera. Can't think of any others.

We have three who have been played mostly as specialist small forwards. Betts has had some runs through the midfield, especially in the last month of the season. Garlett has very brief stints there. Yarran can play a role across half back, but Malthouse seems to want to use him forward.

I could see us playing all three if Yarran played across half back (where I think he should play, and be taught the defensive element. He's too good to be getting 10 possessions in the forward line, he needs to be getting 20+ possessions each week), Betts played 30-40% midfield and Garlett could up his midfield time similarly.

Which of them will be there next year is another question.

_________________
Mens sana in corpore sano.

Bring back the laurel wreath logo!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 5:40 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:49 pm
Posts: 27793
Location: Southbank.
Siegfried wrote:
A thought to ponder...

How many small forwards, who haven't have the ability to run through the midfield (specialist small forwards), have played in a Premiership? I can think of one - Phil Matera. Can't think of any others.
We have three who have been played mostly as specialist small forwards. Betts has had some runs through the midfield, especially in the last month of the season. Garlett has very brief stints there. Yarran can play a role across half back, but Malthouse seems to want to use him forward.

I could see us playing all three if Yarran played across half back (where I think he should play, and be taught the defensive element. He's too good to be getting 10 possessions in the forward line, he needs to be getting 20+ possessions each week), Betts played 30-40% midfield and Garlett could up his midfield time similarly.

Which of them will be there next year is another question.


Kevin Bartlett springs to mind immediately.....he broke our hearts many times with his speed and goal kicking ability....especially in Finals.

He kicked 778 goals in a great career.

_________________
No ones listening till you make a mistake.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 5:52 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 3:24 pm
Posts: 399
Chances are (apart from possibly Daisy) we won't be landing any big names.

Maybe we need to look at names like:

- Ricky Henderson & Andy Otten (Adel)
- Mitch Brown (Gee)
- Shane Savage (Haw)
- Luke Delaney (North)
- Aron Siposs (St.K)
- Fraser McInnes (WCE)
- Daniel Cross FA (Bulldogs)
- Dylan Addison FA (Bulldogs)
- Colin Sylvia FA (Melb)

_________________
HENDERSONALENKO......YOU BEAUTY!!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 6:01 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:27 am
Posts: 2345
trublu wrote:
This could all end up being disastrous for us if you think about it
Just say we lost that game in the last round to port, we could have ended up with Pick 6 in the draft. Instead we move down 6 places in the entire draft.
Lets say Dale Thomas decides to stay a collingwood player.

So we could end up losing.....

Eddie Betts
Dale Thomas
Pick 6
Jeremy Laidler a quality individual and solid player

Instead we get
Pick 12
Late second round compensation for Betts


I think you're underplaying what it means to play finals for the players and the club as a whole.

Anyway, your logic is flawed. Sorry.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 6:17 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:35 am
Posts: 2125
Sigfired (and Warby) wrote:
How many small forwards, who haven't have the ability to run through the midfield (specialist small forwards), have played in a Premiership? I can think of one - Phil Matera. Can't think of any others.


I think you are offbeam there boys. Matera was a gun wingman/midefielder not a small forward and KB was a gun first rover /midfielder who became a forward in the twilight of his career when he was about 35

Cyril Rioli barely runs thru the midfield, neither Lewis Jetta but both have flags, also Shannon Byrnes and Mat Stokes were small forwards in Cats flag sides. Let's go back a long way - Syd Jackson


Last edited by gerry atric on Fri Sep 20, 2013 6:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 6:20 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
gerry atric wrote:
Quote:
How many small forwards, who haven't have the ability to run through the midfield (specialist small forwards), have played in a Premiership? I can think of one - Phil Matera. Can't think of any others.


I think you are offbeam there boys. Matera was a gun wingman/midefielder not a small forward and KB was a gun first rover /midfielder who became a forward in the twilight of his career when he was about 35


I think you have the wrong Matera. :yikes:

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 6:21 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands

Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2006 8:57 pm
Posts: 452
Location: next to you in the outer
gerry atric wrote:
Sigfired (and Warby) wrote:
How many small forwards, who haven't have the ability to run through the midfield (specialist small forwards), have played in a Premiership? I can think of one - Phil Matera. Can't think of any others.


I think you are offbeam there boys. Matera was a gun wingman/midefielder not a small forward and KB was a gun first rover /midfielder who became a forward in the twilight of his career when he was about 35


Phil or Peter?
Peter was the gun winger, Phil the smaller player only a forward pocket.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6139 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205 ... 307  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 24 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group