Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jun 16, 2025 4:03 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 705 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 ... 36  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 12:43 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Oh and Richo isnt important re Malthouse if the appointments were done properly in the first place... and in the last place...

MM didnt want Richo.. McKay was part of the procedure to bring MM in.. if it was above him.. then he is a patsy footy manager.. and shouldnt be in it.. cos they dont take his appointment seriously...

he is fundemantally involved in and in charge of everything football ... the buck stops with him....

Thats his job..... thats his job discription cimm...

if people blame malthouse for off season trading and ist management.. its ust as much mckays field and even more so if malthouse came in to help clear out the rot for him....he should know it better

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 12:46 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
Synbad wrote:
cimm1979 wrote:
Synbad wrote:
cimm i need to know what it is about mckay that has you confident..

start with the coaches and contracts.. extensions and sackings and then the pay out.. and the new appointments.
VFL coaches
development setups etc

how is barker and capuano going???


No, Synners.

Your the one with the statements.

You tell me how they are going. Obviously you have a hotline to MM and his evaluation of the coaching staff.
What do you think of the coaches?

You can't make an assessment of them in your slippers!!!

If they are no good they'll be gone I would think after a year with MM.

Richo is considered a fantastic assistant but he's gone, why didn't MM want him?

Truth is, we don't know.



Of course YOU dont know......!!!

But with eyes open and half a brain ....you can see results...

:lol:

average average average...average club.


Consider the coaching situation.... just as starters.. the VFL job debacle...

Is that good for a footy club??

Who are the people responsible???


But you told me it was McKay.

You mean it might not be all McKay or that maybe it was McKay but he was operating under instruction.

I don't get it Synners.

You tell me it's McKay but

a) you can't point to the things he's done or
b) your not sure if he did them.

You might have to take the slippers off and put on some shoes and go have a look.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 12:50 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
Synbad wrote:
Oh and Richo isnt important re Malthouse if the appointments were done properly in the first place... and in the last place...

MM didnt want Richo.. McKay was part of the procedure to bring MM in.. if it was above him.. then he is a patsy footy manager.. and shouldnt be in it.. cos they dont take his appointment seriously...

he is fundemantally involved in and in charge of everything football ... the buck stops with him....

Thats his job..... thats his job discription cimm...

if people blame malthouse for off season trading and ist management.. its ust as much mckays field and even more so if malthouse came in to help clear out the rot for him....he should know it better


Face it Synners, you just don't know what the hell is going on but you've found a bone to gnaw on and it's called McKay.

:lol:

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 12:51 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
c imm ... ur not following

its mckays job.. if he isnt reponsible for his own job his another empty suit isnt he???

hard to swallow isnt it???.. but thats how it works...

problem number 1 with this footy club is the lack of accountability at every level.....

president unaccountable
ceo same
coaches same
recruitment same
footy manger same

equals to players same...

thats where its wrong to have guys from the 95 team in key posts around the club....

theyre not keeping each other accountable

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 12:53 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
Synbad wrote:
c imm ... ur not following

its mckays job.. if he isnt reponsible for his own job his another empty suit isnt he???

hard to swallow isnt it???.. but thats how it works...

problem number 1 with this footy club is the lack of accountability at every level.....

president unaccountable
ceo same
coaches same
recruitment same
footy manger same

equals to players same...

thats where its wrong to have guys from the 95 team in key posts around the club....

theyre not keeping each other accountable



But what about McKay Synners, what about the Vet?

What exactly has he stuffed up?, he must have a litany of sins you can point too. Not just one or two.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 3:15 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10575
Welcome to the "sinners" club McKay.....must have something to do with the 1995 premiership side....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 4:34 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2646
Pafloyul wrote:
redback wrote:
99prelim wrote:
We were told by the coach...who has since been sacked cos he was shit. Obviously not shit enough to bamboozle some here that we were ready to challenge with a decent list

We lacked in what area?



The current coach also commented that the list is good enough to challenge. :donk:

Are we bamboolzed to believe him also or not? :roll:


I suggest you make up your own mind. Someone can be a good coach and still be full of it. Jeez, why can't people get it in their heads that it's not about assumptions or perception but about reality. :banghead:


You’re right pafloyul it is about reality.
Reality and fact is we haven’t beaten anyone of substance this year and have lost to teams we were ahead of last year.

When we start beating teams of substance this year and consistently I will admit that we have improved under MM.
Making the eight is a borderline pass mark and a prelim is an improvement.

Until that time it’s a big negative any which way you look at it.

Next year the bar is raised again because of the year MM had in charge.
If he can’t make any headway with the list he is given this year then he’s not worth the money or the adulation he is extended. Next year is a totally different set of circumstances.
It’s hard to admit but that is the reality he is faced with and what he is judged on.

A club and coach is judged by its win/loss ratio and that is as simple as anyone can put it to.
We are judged on the final result of a game, season and ladder position.
Anyone can argue a deflection as they have in the past and will in the future,
but the coach’s final reality is in the result as was Rattens.

The beauty of this year is that there hasn’t been any big movement in the player list so we can judge worth of a experienced, successful and expensive coach with a rookie.

Malthouse will be judged by the logical and impartial moderator as Ratten was, no more no less.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 4:37 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
God, I hope the interview McKay gave last year on the Carlton website was his weary way of showing his dissatisfaction with the situation because it wasn't pretty. :sly:

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 5:21 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
redback wrote:
Pafloyul wrote:
redback wrote:
99prelim wrote:
We were told by the coach...who has since been sacked cos he was shit. Obviously not shit enough to bamboozle some here that we were ready to challenge with a decent list

We lacked in what area?



The current coach also commented that the list is good enough to challenge. :donk:

Are we bamboolzed to believe him also or not? :roll:


I suggest you make up your own mind. Someone can be a good coach and still be full of it. Jeez, why can't people get it in their heads that it's not about assumptions or perception but about reality. :banghead:


You’re right pafloyul it is about reality.
Reality and fact is we haven’t beaten anyone of substance this year and have lost to teams we were ahead of last year.

When we start beating teams of substance this year and consistently I will admit that we have improved under MM.
Making the eight is a borderline pass mark and a prelim is an improvement.

Until that time it’s a big negative any which way you look at it.

Next year the bar is raised again because of the year MM had in charge.
If he can’t make any headway with the list he is given this year then he’s not worth the money or the adulation he is extended. Next year is a totally different set of circumstances.
It’s hard to admit but that is the reality he is faced with and what he is judged on.

A club and coach is judged by its win/loss ratio and that is as simple as anyone can put it to.
We are judged on the final result of a game, season and ladder position.
Anyone can argue a deflection as they have in the past and will in the future,
but the coach’s final reality is in the result as was Rattens.

The beauty of this year is that there hasn’t been any big movement in the player list so we can judge worth of a experienced, successful and expensive coach with a rookie.

Malthouse will be judged by the logical and impartial moderator as Ratten was, no more no less.


Of course but through the reality of the list and the competition as a whole. I don't know if I even think we have 'improved' under Malthouse, but that's using your waited definition.

The point is that he can only do so much. I think we are in a better position to improve. Are we where I thought we would be, no, but then again, I naively thought some of our tall forwards would burst on to the scene and the likes of Bell would have an impact. Add some of our 'stars' stepping up a notch and there you have it. However, even Malthouse can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear. And, yes, I do think the club brought him in for immediate results but they got it wrong.

I just think you are pointing your angst in the wrong direction.

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 6:16 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:50 am
Posts: 1231
McKay was appointed after Rattens extension and after all the assistant coaches were contracted in late 2011. He did not sign any of Collins, Joseph, Davies etc to long term deals which hamstrung us from getting rid of some or all of them at end of 2012.

Agree with Synbad re our recruiting, which has been average at best. Particularly the draft trade period at end of 2010, where none of our trades or recruits played last week and only Mciness looks capable of 150 games.

But McKay needs to given time before judgement is made. It may be time we don't have, but he cannot be blamed for decision made before he arrived.

_________________
Go Blues


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 6:27 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:35 am
Posts: 2125
I see the Synbad show is still in full force. We all have interesting things to say, but they don't get more interesting the more times we repeat them. Yes I know I can ignore the repetitive 'you said' 'he said' 'I said' posts, but when you see an extra few pages, you expect new content not the same old stuff in slightly different words.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 6:32 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
sticksaftersiren87 wrote:
McKay was appointed after Rattens extension and after all the assistant coaches were contracted in late 2011. He did not sign any of Collins, Joseph, Davies etc to long term deals which hamstrung us from getting rid of some or all of them at end of 2012.

Agree with Synbad re our recruiting, which has been average at best. Particularly the draft trade period at end of 2010, where none of our trades or recruits played last week and only Mciness looks capable of 150 games.

But McKay needs to given time before judgement is made. It may be time we don't have, but he cannot be blamed for decision made before he arrived.


Cimm youre funny...!!!.. i asked you to tell me what McKay has done thats been any good??
You cannot..

OK.. explain the Robert Hyde appointment and set up.....

He didnt haav e anything to do with that??.... development for a season.. flushed down the toilet...
DEVELOPMENT... a season....!!!

Gone!!!

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 6:43 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35879
Location: Half back flank
Errrr......

_________________
#DonTheStash


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 6:47 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 9:52 pm
Posts: 1497
Location: THE BEACH
I'm convinced some of you guys don't have jobs :wink:

_________________
I see you watching me watching you.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 6:59 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
Synbad wrote:
sticksaftersiren87 wrote:
McKay was appointed after Rattens extension and after all the assistant coaches were contracted in late 2011. He did not sign any of Collins, Joseph, Davies etc to long term deals which hamstrung us from getting rid of some or all of them at end of 2012.

Agree with Synbad re our recruiting, which has been average at best. Particularly the draft trade period at end of 2010, where none of our trades or recruits played last week and only Mciness looks capable of 150 games.

But McKay needs to given time before judgement is made. It may be time we don't have, but he cannot be blamed for decision made before he arrived.


Cimm youre funny...!!!.. i asked you to tell me what McKay has done thats been any good??
You cannot..

OK.. explain the Robert Hyde appointment and set up.....

He didnt haav e anything to do with that??.... development for a season.. flushed down the toilet...
DEVELOPMENT... a season....!!!

Gone!!!


No Synners,

You explain it.

Tell us how it all went down.

Like you blamed McKay for Watson, Collins, Joseph, Davies but now it appears he didn't sign any of them.

This is '95 Premiership Paranoia.

Hoggy brings in bad weather, Spalding makes the weeds grow and Brad Pearce is the cause of odd socks .

You've finally lost it. :lol:

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 7:41 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
Blue Vain wrote:
99prelim wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
99prelim wrote:
Do you mean the new coach who had 5 minutes to assess the list and sell hope to the Carlton faithful...OR the old coach who had carte blanche for 5 years to construct, develop, nurture a list and make an informed judgement


No.
He's talking about the new coach who spent 3 weeks travelling around flogging his newly released book instead of assessing the list of his new club.


True, but completely rrelevant to this argument.



How is it irrelevant?

You cant make the excuse about Malthouse having insufficient time to evaluate the list when it was his and the clubs doing. Unfortunately he was travelling around promoting his book during the period the other clubs were assessing their lists.
Another poor decision by the club. They should have told Malthouse you're completely in or out from the start. That decision put our list development 12 months behind. 12 months we dont have.


Read the thread that led to my original comment, in which you then chimed in with your unrelated one. You're an intelligent person (and I'm not trying to be a smart arse here-I've made that assessment from your posts over the years). You'll work out the connections from the superflous.

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 7:48 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
cimm1979 wrote:
Dermie was asked last night who's the best candidate for the vacant Dee's position.

His choice, you guessed it, B. Ratten.

His reasoning.
He's been great for the Hawks.
Second time coach.
He'll get great support from a new admin with AFL support.

Asked why he hadn't been successful at Carlton. Carlton are the worst club in Victoria to coach because as soon as anything goes the slightest bit wrong the different "factions" and special interest groups start agitating.

Now, I don't think Ratts is a great coach, but I think there's some truth to the rest of it.


He also admitted he did not want to appoint Clarkson (after being on the selection panel)
He also said that tactically, Scott waters is the best coach going around
He also didn't rate Geelong in 2011

Dare I say it, Dermie's opinions don't come with a watertight, rock solid guarantee

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sun Jun 23, 2013 7:46 am 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 3:12 pm
Posts: 942
Synbad wrote:
c imm ... ur not following

its mckays job.. if he isnt reponsible for his own job his another empty suit isnt he???

hard to swallow isnt it???.. but thats how it works...

problem number 1 with this footy club is the lack of accountability at every level.....

president unaccountable
ceo same
coaches same
recruitment same
footy manger same

equals to players same...

thats where its wrong to have guys from the 95 team in key posts around the club....

theyre not keeping each other accountable

CEO only saved by change of coach otherwise he was gone


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sun Jun 23, 2013 12:49 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 2:30 pm
Posts: 4584
Location: Blisstonia.
http://boundforglorynews.com/an-afternoon-with-unclemick/

_________________
"They're [REDACTED]'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sun Jun 23, 2013 1:14 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
99prelim wrote:
cimm1979 wrote:
Dermie was asked last night who's the best candidate for the vacant Dee's position.

His choice, you guessed it, B. Ratten.

His reasoning.
He's been great for the Hawks.
Second time coach.
He'll get great support from a new admin with AFL support.

Asked why he hadn't been successful at Carlton. Carlton are the worst club in Victoria to coach because as soon as anything goes the slightest bit wrong the different "factions" and special interest groups start agitating.

Now, I don't think Ratts is a great coach, but I think there's some truth to the rest of it.


He also admitted he did not want to appoint Clarkson (after being on the selection panel)
He also said that tactically, Scott waters is the best coach going around
He also didn't rate Geelong in 2011

Dare I say it, Dermie's opinions don't come with a watertight, rock solid guarantee


Maybe Derm wants Ratts out of Hawthorn.... ?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 705 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 ... 36  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bender, Majestic-12 [Bot] and 54 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group