Pafloyul wrote:
redback wrote:
99prelim wrote:
We were told by the coach...who has since been sacked cos he was shit. Obviously not shit enough to bamboozle some here that we were ready to challenge with a decent list
We lacked in what area?
The current coach also commented that the list is good enough to challenge.
Are we bamboolzed to believe him also or not?

I suggest you make up your own mind. Someone can be a good coach and still be full of it. Jeez, why can't people get it in their heads that it's not about assumptions or perception but about reality.

You’re right pafloyul it is about reality.
Reality and fact is we haven’t beaten anyone of substance this year and have lost to teams we were ahead of last year.
When we start beating teams of substance this year and consistently I will admit that we have improved under MM.
Making the eight is a borderline pass mark and a prelim is an improvement.
Until that time it’s a big negative any which way you look at it.
Next year the bar is raised again because of the year MM had in charge.
If he can’t make any headway with the list he is given this year then he’s not worth the money or the adulation he is extended. Next year is a totally different set of circumstances.
It’s hard to admit but that is the reality he is faced with and what he is judged on.
A club and coach is judged by its win/loss ratio and that is as simple as anyone can put it to.
We are judged on the final result of a game, season and ladder position.
Anyone can argue a deflection as they have in the past and will in the future,
but the coach’s final reality is in the result as was Rattens.
The beauty of this year is that there hasn’t been any big movement in the player list so we can judge worth of a experienced, successful and expensive coach with a rookie.
Malthouse will be judged by the logical and impartial moderator as Ratten was, no more no less.