nytdog wrote:
So I guess you're saying that Greg Williams wouldn't get a game for the blues in 2007? And Sam Mitchell should quit right now for the Hawks? I could name a few more if you don't get the point!
Footy, just like life, isn't black and white. Fast doesn't mean the end of Lance. You can't have 22 fast players and no smart/creative/skillfull players. You are so focused on his negatives and are forgetting his positives. He is a great positioner, marker of the footy, has good disposal and is an excellent on field leader and director.
Fast just means we have a game plan that plays to our strengths. And Lance has plenty of those. I'm happy to take a wager with you that Lance will bounce back and be a very good contributer this year. Interested?
So i guess youre comparing Lance Whitnall to Greg Williams???
Look mate.. we will never know about Williams playing in 2007.. but try to use abit of logic............ now just pay attention ok?
1)Lance will never be a Williams...
2) Lance is playing at the moment and he is TOO SLOW....
Nothing you say can change those two ever... ever.... no matter how you wanna word things... no matter how you twist and turn.....
Whats a good contrubuter???Wanna put that in some dimmensions for the wager???
will he do good jobs on Jonathon Brown types??..
Will he kick more than 40 goals???
Will he play accountable football and stay with his man??
Or are we talking a season where he plays the odd good game... gets away and kicks the odd bag cos Kennedy is holding down CHF aged 19..??
Or Setanta has to play on Hall... ??
What kind of contribution are you talking about??
Want to outline the contribution youre expecting from him???
