Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jul 05, 2025 11:22 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 206 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 11  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 1:24 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10622
BV sometimes you confuse me.
I'm pretty sure you where one of the "apatchy" that where advocating "tanking", etc for the better of the club, yet your last post is completely the opposite. :?
Welcome aboard the winners/forward thinkers.....I think. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 1:33 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 6:31 pm
Posts: 295
CrazyJoeFevola wrote:
Why are we picking up the scraps again? No one wanted Libba either.

We need a youthful and dynamic footy dept, not budget veterans



Libba was wanted by a few clubs,he had just come of a GF win with the box hill hawks.

_________________
"Go blues"

Feel my love...............


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 1:34 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18059
SurreyBlue wrote:
BV sometimes you confuse me.
I'm pretty sure you where one of the "apatchy" that where advocating "tanking", etc for the better of the club, yet your last post is completely the opposite. :?
Welcome aboard the winners/forward thinkers.....I think. :lol:


This is about the future Surrey.
I'm glad we won 4.5 games instead of 5.5. To me that is forward thinking.

This topic is about creating a winning successful environment within the football department.
Terry Daniher has been sacked by 2 clubs in the past 3 years.
Does that not ring a bell to anyone?

If you were looking for an employee, would you hire someone who 2 of your more successful competitors sacked?

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 1:40 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 9:28 pm
Posts: 797
Location: Funky Town
Carlton will be better off with Dempsey and TD. Both successfull players who are respected. Time will tell to see if they were great pick ups but they both have had coaching experience. With each coaching experience they have seen improovement in the side!. TD has a personallity which could help the younger blokes to relate to him... Good Luck

_________________
"Dont count the games, make the games count"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 1:42 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 8:39 am
Posts: 7507
Location: Within the Tao except when I am here.
SB, I think 'Tank' Theory is dead :lol:

We are in a catch 22. We do not have the finances to attract good assistants or even administrators to assist to be successful and yet we need success to attract such people.

The comment that we have been battling just to stay afloat is correct and a lot of people have done yeoman work in doing this.

Having had a chat to a couple of people today, I sense the problem at the club is not neccessirily leadership as such or even finances but direction. Ie everybody pulling in the same direction working for the common purpose, it would appear that there are one or two factions working against each other and quite frankly that is not good enough. There are rumours of some sort of challange against the board and I find this dissappointing. What I am hoping is that everyone realises that they should be working toward the one goal and put aside thier differences to acheivce that end. If we continue to infight and have people activly working against each other we will continue to be a rabble on and off field.

_________________
A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty" -Winston Churchill

L.M 35-06


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 1:45 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 11:01 pm
Posts: 203
Blue Vain wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
BV sometimes you confuse me.
I'm pretty sure you where one of the "apatchy" that where advocating "tanking", etc for the better of the club, yet your last post is completely the opposite. :?
Welcome aboard the winners/forward thinkers.....I think. :lol:


This is about the future Surrey.
I'm glad we won 4.5 games instead of 5.5. To me that is forward thinking.

This topic is about creating a winning successful environment within the football department.
Terry Daniher has been sacked by 2 clubs in the past 3 years.
Does that not ring a bell to anyone?

If you were looking for an employee, would you hire someone who 2 of your more successful competitors sacked?


He was sacked by the Pies after a GRAND FINAL loss and by the Saints after they bailed out in a PRELIMINARY FINAL.. whatever he was doing wrong he mustnt have been doing it THAT wrong...

_________________
"Some people take delight in Carlton. " - Verbs


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 1:56 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10622
BlueMark wrote:
SB, I think 'Tank' Theory is dead :lol:

We are in a catch 22. We do not have the finances to attract good assistants or even administrators to assist to be successful and yet we need success to attract such people.
purpose, it would appear that there are one or two factions working
The comment that we have been battling just to stay afloat is correct and a lot of people have done yeoman work in doing this.

Having had a chat to a couple of people today, I sense the problem at the club is not neccessirily leadership as such or even finances but direction. Ie everybody pulling in the same direction working for the common against each other and quite frankly that is not good enough. There are rumours of some sort of challange against the board and I find this dissappointing. What I am hoping is that everyone realises that they should be working toward the one goal and put aside thier differences to acheivce that end. If we continue to infight and have people activly working against each other we will continue to be a rabble on and off field.


BM...hit nail on the head.
Now why are we getting factions and not everyone working towards the one goal? Unfortunately, we need to wipe the place clean again. As bad as it sounds, this administration was NOT strong enough and united as one to take up the challange. Collo .....(will get shot down again but stiff).... is an Elliott clone but more financially savvie and not nearly as marketable savvie.
CarltonOne have been extremely disappointing in a lot of ways, except getting the finances back on track which is what Collo does best.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 1:59 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10622
I'll just add this.
Collo should be the CFO of a company with a different MD.
That is the reason Elliott/Collo combination was so good, because two bulls would pelt each other day in day out but get the job done by keeping each other honest.
We don't have anyone tough enough to challange Collo in his day to day running of the company or atleast keep him honest with the tough questions.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 2:29 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18059
BlueMark wrote:
We are in a catch 22. We do not have the finances to attract good assistants or even administrators to assist to be successful and yet we need success to attract such people.


If that is the philosophy and mindset of our decision makers, we are in more trouble than I thought.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 3:00 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 9:20 pm
Posts: 789
Location: Melbourne
I think TD will be a great acquisition. He has been at two other clubs who have been successful with finals appearances in the last five years and must have picked up some insights in to the other teams, their players, their tactics and how to expose them. Given the young age of our list and TD's hand on approach he may be the perfect conduit between them and Dennis.

Dempsey was a great tap ruckman who was also able to use his body at throw ins to direct the ball to the advantage of his midfielders. I would expect a big improvement from DeLuca Bryan Batson under Dempsey.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 3:15 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:59 am
Posts: 1971
The idea of our draft penalties was to make us unsuccessful for a long period of time. Add to this the woeful finances and previous poor list management. We are a sailing boat stuck at sea with no wind. We all have to work in the same direction and highlight the areas that we can improve.
1. Recruiting.
2. Development of a young list.
3. Marketing & delivery to Carlton fan base, hard when your not wining games.
4. Sponsorhip, hard when your not winning games and haven't got free to air tv coverage.
5. Improvement in player facilities.
6. Getting people on the board & in the football department who can achieve these things.
Make the changes to get people in who can achieve these goals as best we can whilst offering us some stability. The reality is nothing much dynamic is going to be happening at Carlton for the next five years. Fight it if you want, but in my opinion it ain't going to achieve any miraculous results.


Last edited by 79Vintage on Fri Oct 21, 2005 3:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 3:16 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:50 am
Posts: 1237
SurreyBlue wrote:
I'll just add this.
Collo should be the CFO of a company with a different MD.
That is the reason Elliott/Collo combination was so good, because two bulls would pelt each other day in day out but get the job done by keeping each other honest.
We don't have anyone tough enough to challange Collo in his day to day running of the company or atleast keep him honest with the tough questions.


Surrey, have you ever met Ian Collins? Because this pop psychology is absolute rubbish. I often work with MSL and Collo is actually quite a reasonable bloke who knows a afir but about footy clubs. He is under no illusions as to the challenge faced by the Club - both on and off the field.

_________________
Go Blues


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 3:17 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
It's obvious the finances are extremely tight when you look at how we only cut non-contracted players and didn't trade for high quality current players.

If TD and Dempsey came at bargain basement prices we've done okay I reckon.

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 3:44 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10622
sticksaftersiren87 wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
I'll just add this.
Collo should be the CFO of a company with a different MD.
That is the reason Elliott/Collo combination was so good, because two bulls would pelt each other day in day out but get the job done by keeping each other honest.
We don't have anyone tough enough to challange Collo in his day to day running of the company or atleast keep him honest with the tough questions.


Surrey, have you ever met Ian Collins? Because this pop psychology is absolute rubbish. I often work with MSL and Collo is actually quite a reasonable bloke who knows a afir but about footy clubs. He is under no illusions as to the challenge faced by the Club - both on and off the field.


Pop Psychology!!! :shock:
Where did you get this conclusion from my CFO statement? :?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 3:47 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:15 pm
Posts: 209
Location: Set of Boogie Nights
I think it was a mistake appointing Dempsey. A younger fresh blooded Scott Wynd would have been a better choice (depending on whether he was available).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 3:47 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18740
Location: threeohfivethree
Does one need to be popular to engage in pop psychology...? :?

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 3:53 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18740
Location: threeohfivethree
Brock Landers wrote:
I think it was a mistake appointing Dempsey. A younger fresh blooded Scott Wynd would have been a better choice (depending on whether he was available).


No offence to Scott Wynd who was better than handy but if you had to find a fast bowling coach would you go for Brett Lee over Dennis Lillee because he's "younger" and "fresh blooded"?

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Last edited by GWS on Fri Oct 21, 2005 4:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 3:54 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10414
Location: Coburg
no, just consume a lot of baked beans

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 4:01 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:29 pm
Posts: 534
GWS wrote:
Brock Landers wrote:
I think it was a mistake appointing Dempsey. A younger fresh blooded Scott Wynd would have been a better choice (depending on whether he was available).


No offence to Scott Wynd who was better than handy but if you had to find a fast bowling coach would you go for Brett Lee over Dennis Lillee because he's "younger" and fresh blooded"?


What about Glenn McGrath v Dennis Lillee ? Which would compare to Jason Ball, Sean Renn or Primus v Dempsey.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 4:27 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18740
Location: threeohfivethree
jbee wrote:
GWS wrote:
Brock Landers wrote:
I think it was a mistake appointing Dempsey. A younger fresh blooded Scott Wynd would have been a better choice (depending on whether he was available).


No offence to Scott Wynd who was better than handy but if you had to find a fast bowling coach would you go for Brett Lee over Dennis Lillee because he's "younger" and fresh blooded"?


What about Glenn McGrath v Dennis Lillee ? Which would compare to Jason Ball, Sean Renn or Primus v Dempsey.


McGrath would probably be fine (same goes for Lee) but that doesn't mean Dennis Lillee isn't the finest fast bowling coach in the world.

There seems to be a theory around these parts that Dempsey isn't what we need because he played the game a long time ago.

Lillee is proof that's crap and considering Dempsey's been coaching ruckmen on and off for about 20 years I'd say those who've employed him must have seen something in what he does for him to be able to remain employed in such a specialist field for such a long period.

If you can coach you can coach and Dempsey should be judged on what he does rather than dismissed because a "younger fresh blooded" more recent ex-player might have got the job.

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 206 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 11  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Maxwell Smart and 27 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group