BlueMark wrote:
SB, I think 'Tank' Theory is dead
We are in a catch 22. We do not have the finances to attract good assistants or even administrators to assist to be successful and yet we need success to attract such people.
purpose, it would appear that there are one or two factions working
The comment that we have been battling just to stay afloat is correct and a lot of people have done yeoman work in doing this.
Having had a chat to a couple of people today, I sense the problem at the club is not neccessirily leadership as such or even finances but direction. Ie everybody pulling in the same direction working for the common against each other and quite frankly that is not good enough. There are rumours of some sort of challange against the board and I find this dissappointing. What I am hoping is that everyone realises that they should be working toward the one goal and put aside thier differences to acheivce that end. If we continue to infight and have people activly working against each other we will continue to be a rabble on and off field.
BM...hit nail on the head.
Now why are we getting factions and not everyone working towards the one goal? Unfortunately, we need to wipe the place clean again. As bad as it sounds, this administration was NOT strong enough and united as one to take up the challange. Collo .....(will get shot down again but stiff).... is an Elliott clone but more financially savvie and not nearly as marketable savvie.
CarltonOne have been extremely disappointing in a lot of ways, except getting the finances back on track which is what Collo does best.