cecil89 wrote:
tap in 79 wrote:
2012 draft - GWS and Gold Coast - 6 OF THE TOP 12 PICKS.
2013 draft - GWS and Gold Coast - 4 OF THE TOP 14 PICKS.
2014 draft - GWS and Gold Coast - 4 OF THE TOP 8 PICKS.
And yet one lousy extra pick for Carlton isn't warranted?
How does this make us any more deserving of a priority pick than any other team? Why don't the AFL just give 'one lousy extra pick' to each of the other 16 teams impacted by the creation of GWS & GC?
Equalisation via additional priority picks is a farce. We complain all year about our poor list management, drafting and development but then want the AFL to bail us out and save us from our own previous incompetence.. Screw that.
I'll accept us applying for it because I think it's merely a ploy to keep the AFL honest with the Kreuzer compo pick, but I don't think we, or any other team, should receive a priority pick. That whole scheme should be abolished.
Point 1 - how does it make us more deserving ?In my opinion, the introduction of GWS and GC have interrupted the natural flow of draft picks, so that previously let's say 2014 Carlton would have picked pick 7 but without those new teams it would have been pick 3 or 4 or whatever...which in turn would have made it unlikely Carlton would have done that swap for Whiley/etc.
Too many teams is my argument...Carlton's list would have been stronger if GWS and Gold Coast weren't in the competition...teams down the bottom have been adversely effected the most by their entry into the competition.
Point 2 - equalisation Equalisation has been piecemeal the whole time. Carlton deserves a bit of the equalisation pie more than any club. Been down the bottom of the ladder the longest etc.
If "equalisation" was
REALLY JUST then Hawthorn would have not received all the AFL largesse - such as been given the state of Tasmania as their plaything, plus bonuses for playing at the MCG etc. where do you begin and end with equalisation? Either do away with every piece of it...and that is never going to happen.
abolishing equalisation -
I agree with you in theory...but only if that means every single plank of equalisation is removed..this includes the extra funding for North Melbourne, the coaching assistance for Melbourne, taxing Carlton money to prop up other clubs...every single piece of it..all of it goes. That isn't going to happen though. It isn't a free market competition...
so that is why Carlton as it stands (having received its worst ever lost in its 160 year history, lowest percentage, four wins etc) deserves a piece of the equalisation pie more than any other club.