ThePsychologist wrote:
TomAlvin'sWig wrote:
MM last night was interviewed on tv. About Kreuzer he said he was a short ruck these days, and needed to keep developing as a forward as well.
I agree. Needs to develop another string to his bow, be able to play in another position. Rest there if nothing else. Like all our forwards their biggest issue will more be quality of delivery.
I heard that as well. Seemed to have written him off as a No.1 ruck. More of a Key forward second ruck role.
This is not going to end well. Seem to be heading down the Hampson as a key forward role. Never ever works. He is not a key forward. Doesn't have the skills.
Are we seriously going to use our No.1 pick as a back up ruck, pinch hit forward?
..most likely, until knockers breaks down.. ..it was always written on the wall once we traded in 206, a year after we recruited krooz and he kicked some goals we thought our kpf future was solved.. ..we're geniuses..
..thing is champ data says that during krooz purple patch lays year after recovering from broken thumb an playing as sole ruck, he was the best all round ruck from rounds 10 to 18, that is a third of the season.. ..factor in he spent another third as fwd ruck relief, and you can imagine how good he could be if given the first ruck outright, for good.. ..which is why we recruited him at pick one, then we complicate it all with trading in knockers on longterm big coin at high trade value , which expedited the loss of Jacobs, a rookie pick so unfortunate but not costly, and then hammer, a late teens pick which is a loss.. ..now, a pick one..which believe was a sound pick, but you don't undo it only a year later to bring in knockers, why? He as less developed than krooz!!..,
Login
Register
FAQ
