Megaman wrote:
kingkerna wrote:
I don't want a host who does not present his true view on an issue.
Maybe he is - maybe he doesn't think Essendon** has done anything wrong
Either way, it reflects poorly on him, he's a douchebag
Interesting discussion, one thing i would like explained is how it reflects poorly upon him if he believes that
Essendon* did something wrong or not? How does holding that opinion mean that he is not a good Carlton supporter?
Did i miss the memo that said to be a true Carlton supporter you must hold a certain point of view when it comes to this issue?
I have followed Carlton all my life and been a member since 1974, as much as i love to hate certain teams ( Collingwood, Richmond, Essendon* in that order) it doesn't define a stance i take on every issue related to their clubs.
Personally, i believe Essendon* has done plenty wrong in this matter and should cop their fair whack but i have seen nothing to make me believe they intentionally went out to cheat where drugs are concerned. Their processes sucked and in their determination to take things as close to the edge as they could they crossed the line.
I won't call them drug cheats and from the start of this i have always hoped that their players weren't penalised for the stupidity of those who they entrusted to look out for their best interests. These are the ones who failed them and are the ones who should cop the penalties.
If all of this makes me not a 'True Carlton Supporter' in any of your minds then so be it, i make my own mind up on situations, i don't subscribe to mob rule and whatever you think of Maher personally, his personal take on the Essendon* saga is really irrelevant.
If you are saying remove him because you don't believe he does a good job in the role he is asked to perform that's a valid argument, if it's based on his opinion on Essendon* it's totally invalid.