Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun May 25, 2025 8:30 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6401 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 321  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Sack Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 12:41 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 5:15 pm
Posts: 7320
Blueboy74 wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
marcou wrote:
What for? When the guy went to Coll, he saw what they had, then started clearing the deadwood. Clearly he will do the same here, Why blame the coach?



Great thinking. By that criteria, he'll be 72 when he coaches us to a flag.
Ring me in 2025.


Or you could say 62 when we make consecutive GF's. :razz:

He'll become the next Bummer Thomson... just you wait and see

_________________
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ― Richard Feynman


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sack Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 12:42 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:18 am
Posts: 1321
Location: Melbourne
kingkerna wrote:
Some good points clear, I don't think many want him sacked, just wish we never got him. Put simply, he doesn't get the best out of the group.... Easy out to say we have a shit list.


:thumbsup:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sack Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 12:45 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 5:15 pm
Posts: 7320
kingkerna wrote:
Some good points clear, I don't think many want him sacked, just wish we never got him. Put simply, he doesn't get the best out of the group.... Easy out to say we have a shit list.

Sometimes you need an outsider to tell you what you secretly know deep down inside but are afraid to admit...

_________________
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ― Richard Feynman


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sack Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 12:46 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19321
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
Everyone said Port had a shit list at the end of last year. Look at what a new pres, new fitness man and a properly appointed coach can do.

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sack Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 12:59 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24852
Location: Bondi Beach
CarltonClem wrote:
Anyone who thinks that Malthouse has failed this year has probably not:

- bought into the expectations created by the club at the end of last year and the beginning of this year;
- realised that if a footy club does not go forward year to year, it goes backwards;
- realised that we were too reliant on "X-factor" players whose difference between their worst and their best was as wide as the Pacific Ocean;
- realised that our poor drafting in midfield in our search for talls over the last couple of years particularly has come to bite us;

I could go on.

Put it this year, we started playing finals in 2009 but how did we improve the list in 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012? Reality is we didn't. Our development of the assets we did have was woeful. We expected to naturally improve but took no steps to do so.

Do the supporters who want Malthouse gone really think we were that good against the Geelongs, the Sydneys, the Hawthorns of the AFL? Seriously? Did they watch the way we kept getting monstered by those teams?

I think it's a reality check for our club who has finally employed someone from outside the man cave that is Carlton and its boys' club and is upfront and honest enough to say exactly what we need to hear.

How has Sydney done what they've done without the top draft picks we've had? Paul Roos' answer is culture and team-oriented behaviours. Don't see any of that at Carlton and Malthouse is the first coach we've had in a while to challenge the "Carlton Way".

I thought his comments in the Age this week were spot on. Flame me and Malthouse all you like but the footy world perceives us as flashy, inconsistent and talented but we sure aren't perceived as tough or physical.

Time for some players at our club to realise that supporters are hungry for premierships not highlight reels every couple of weeks and pain the others. The thing that hurts is that we have talent, it's just it hasn't been harnessed or developed properly. That's the problem when we take a myopic, overinflated view of ourselves.

The executive administration are included in this.

We haven't earnt the right to be arrogant but somehow strut around like so. Carlton has been arrogant in the past but we had a right to be. We sure as heck don't right now.


Well said CC.

We have an inflated view of ourselves and this flashy list.....I love the point about the highlights reel.

We need to develop a team first culture...and there's plenty of teams we can learn from now as we have had over the last 10 years.

We saw what the Dogs did to us in the midfield, to our midfielders (exception being Judd). Monstred us...nothing to do with MM.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sack Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 1:00 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24852
Location: Bondi Beach
Effes wrote:
Everyone said Port had a shit list at the end of last year. Look at what a new pres, new fitness man and a properly appointed coach can do.


I wanted us to seriously consider Hinkley before Ratten....our loss.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sack Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 1:00 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2645
Effes wrote:
Everyone said Port had a shit list at the end of last year. Look at what a new pres, new fitness man and a properly appointed coach can do.



A point missed on MM's admires.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sack Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 1:03 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
Effes wrote:
Everyone said Port had a shit list at the end of last year. Look at what a new pres, new fitness man and a properly appointed coach can do.


True.

Don't underestimate the effect Darren Burgess has had on that squad. Look how they run out games.

What do we have to compare to Boak (Leader), Hartlett, Wingard, Wines, Pittard, Ebert, Gray, Butcher, Trengrove, Jonas etc??

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sack Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 1:06 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10379
Location: Coburg
Sack Sticks.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sack Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 1:06 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:57 pm
Posts: 5338
Location: Melbourne
FFS?!
This thread is a joke.

_________________
James Hird and Essendon* FC - #FOREVERDRUGCHEATS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sack Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 1:07 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 9:37 pm
Posts: 1378
CarltonClem wrote:
Anyone who thinks that Malthouse has failed this year has probably not:

- bought into the expectations created by the club at the end of last year and the beginning of this year;
- realised that if a footy club does not go forward year to year, it goes backwards;
- realised that we were too reliant on "X-factor" players whose difference between their worst and their best was as wide as the Pacific Ocean;
- realised that our poor drafting in midfield in our search for talls over the last couple of years particularly has come to bite us;

I could go on.

Put it this year, we started playing finals in 2009 but how did we improve the list in 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012? Reality is we didn't. Our development of the assets we did have was woeful. We expected to naturally improve but took no steps to do so.

Do the supporters who want Malthouse gone really think we were that good against the Geelongs, the Sydneys, the Hawthorns of the AFL? Seriously? Did they watch the way we kept getting monstered by those teams?

I think it's a reality check for our club who has finally employed someone from outside the man cave that is Carlton and its boys' club and is upfront and honest enough to say exactly what we need to hear.

How has Sydney done what they've done without the top draft picks we've had? Paul Roos' answer is culture and team-oriented behaviours. Don't see any of that at Carlton and Malthouse is the first coach we've had in a while to challenge the "Carlton Way".

I thought his comments in the Age this week were spot on. Flame me and Malthouse all you like but the footy world perceives us as flashy, inconsistent and talented but we sure aren't perceived as tough or physical.

Time for some players at our club to realise that supporters are hungry for premierships not highlight reels every couple of weeks and pain the others. The thing that hurts is that we have talent, it's just it hasn't been harnessed or developed properly. That's the problem when we take a myopic, overinflated view of ourselves.

The executive administration are included in this.

We haven't earnt the right to be arrogant but somehow strut around like so. Carlton has been arrogant in the past but we had a right to be. We sure as heck don't right now.


Well said, Clem. Changes need to be made. Arrogance is not worthy due to the administration's failures & not moving with the times & move away from the cheque book mentality.
Drafting & development need to be harnessed to improve under the current system.
Too much flashy, unaccountable football in the past. Downhill skiers, soft footballers often aligned with CFC of recent times. Time to harden up the troops & get the needed basics installed & work our way up.
Even if MM doesn't go beyond 3yrs, I'm hoping that the foundations are stronger as an AFL club moving forward - which may also include board/administration shake up of the boys club.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sack Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 1:09 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10379
Location: Coburg
funny thing is when Ratts was being called tyo be sacked some spoke of the need to look higher... Sticks as president seems like Tony Curtis in the great race - cream pies going everywhere but Sticks just keeps being missed.

I can't wait until the pie finally hits!

As for MM

don't care. Until the top is finally fixed the rest is just a merry-go-round - we could out Richmond Richmond, 30 years hell lets go for fifty!

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Sack Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 1:10 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
CarltonClem wrote:
Anyone who thinks that Malthouse has failed this year has probably not:

- bought into the expectations created by the club at the end of last year and the beginning of this year;
- realised that if a footy club does not go forward year to year, it goes backwards;
- realised that we were too reliant on "X-factor" players whose difference between their worst and their best was as wide as the Pacific Ocean;
- realised that our poor drafting in midfield in our search for talls over the last couple of years particularly has come to bite us;

I could go on.

Put it this year, we started playing finals in 2009 but how did we improve the list in 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012? Reality is we didn't. Our development of the assets we did have was woeful. We expected to naturally improve but took no steps to do so.

Do the supporters who want Malthouse gone really think we were that good against the Geelongs, the Sydneys, the Hawthorns of the AFL? Seriously? Did they watch the way we kept getting monstered by those teams?

I think it's a reality check for our club who has finally employed someone from outside the man cave that is Carlton and its boys' club and is upfront and honest enough to say exactly what we need to hear.

How has Sydney done what they've done without the top draft picks we've had? Paul Roos' answer is culture and team-oriented behaviours. Don't see any of that at Carlton and Malthouse is the first coach we've had in a while to challenge the "Carlton Way".

I thought his comments in the Age this week were spot on. Flame me and Malthouse all you like but the footy world perceives us as flashy, inconsistent and talented but we sure aren't perceived as tough or physical.

Time for some players at our club to realise that supporters are hungry for premierships not highlight reels every couple of weeks and pain the others. The thing that hurts is that we have talent, it's just it hasn't been harnessed or developed properly. That's the problem when we take a myopic, overinflated view of ourselves.

The executive administration are included in this.

We haven't earnt the right to be arrogant but somehow strut around like so. Carlton has been arrogant in the past but we had a right to be. We sure as heck don't right now.

Great post :thumbsup:

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sack Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 1:26 pm 
Offline
Bob Chitty

Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 9:46 pm
Posts: 832
I think it's time for Sticks to step aside and all board positions to be up for nomination. I am not sure what our constitution states as far as board changes go but there needs to be an overhaul. As for Mick you guys must be joking. Its about time the players took some responsibility for their gutless approach on the footy field. I know things have changed from years gone by and we've got to treat them with kid gloves, but when players are shirking contests or just can't be stuffed get rid of them. A lot of us know who they are and the same ones always let us down when physical or mental pressure is applied to them. Maybe we should give them their rostered day off during the week instead of the weekend. I went to the game yesterday and we are weak. Not all but a helluva lot show no passion what so ever. Being not good enough doesn't mean you don't try and if they were trying we're [REDACTED].


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sack Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 1:30 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 2:30 pm
Posts: 4582
Location: Blisstonia.
redback wrote:
Effes wrote:
Everyone said Port had a shit list at the end of last year. Look at what a new pres, new fitness man and a properly appointed coach can do.



A point missed on MM's admires.


Not all. Get Koch and Burgess.

_________________
"They're [REDACTED]'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Sack Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 1:48 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 3:12 pm
Posts: 942
redback wrote:
All he has achieved this year is to fragment an already instable player mentality by resorting to public temper tantrums and individual condemnation.

He will turn the list over and get what in return?

Yes now we have to rebuild because he has made sure the current senior players will never again play the games they can under him.

What a pathetic exercise this has been.

He will turn the list over and get players to play his structure


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sack Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 2:20 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 2:56 pm
Posts: 2477
dannyboy wrote:
Sack Sticks.


No

Sack the entire Board.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sack Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 2:32 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17970
99prelim wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Blueboy74 wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
marcou wrote:
What for? When the guy went to Coll, he saw what they had, then started clearing the deadwood. Clearly he will do the same here, Why blame the coach?



Great thinking. By that criteria, he'll be 72 when he coaches us to a flag.
Ring me in 2025.


Or you could say 62 when we make consecutive GF's. :razz:


I know you're only joking BB but lets be serious. I dont recall too many people here reminiscing about our 1986 and 1993 and 99 runner up efforts.
Unlike St Kilda, we're here for flags. Everything else is failure and rightly so.


So Ratten's stellar elimination losses and dare I say it, that "heartbreaking loss in the semi...boohoo, how long will we cling onto that one" are abject failures. I'm sure you've used a contrary argument in the past when comparing the achievements of MM with BR.


You're showing your ignorance again. It has nothing to do with Ratten.
I agree he was a poor appointment and it set the club back.

Making another poor appointment however doesnt cancel it out. It just shows we're a club looking for short cuts AGAIN and we're unable to make decent decisions.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Last edited by Blue Vain on Sun Aug 11, 2013 2:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 2:32 pm 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
BluesRockMyWorld wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
Your kidding. Complete lack of understanding of the game to call for MM sacking after less than a season. Sounds like Richmond over the past 30 years. Ratten was given 5-6 years MM should be afforded a similar period.

He has taken over a list full of "downhill skiers" and has tried to implement a finals game style and the players have struggled with it.

For whatever reason we have a list full of lazy and overrated footballers. They don't work in numbers or defensively.

Our best players are aging and past their best and our drafting & development has been disgraceful.

At the end of the year major changes will happen and so they should. It took MM a couple of seasons at Collingwood to get the list right and we are in the same position.


:clap: that is the best post I have read on here the whole season. I agree 100%

Really?? You haven't read any of the "they're f*&#*d" posts in the Essendon* thread? Get a life dude...... :wink:

_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!

After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit http://fromthemoshpit.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sack Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 2:35 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2645
Bigredisback wrote:
redback wrote:
All he has achieved this year is to fragment an already instable player mentality by resorting to public temper tantrums and individual condemnation.

He will turn the list over and get what in return?

Yes now we have to rebuild because he has made sure the current senior players will never again play the games they can under him.

What a pathetic exercise this has been.

He will turn the list over and get players to play his structure




Don't understand what structures you supporters are banging on about?

His 'structures"/"game plan" are pathetic and easily demolished.

No player can withstand these methods of play.

He has an defenceless and highly pressured game plan no matter how much he talks about defence.
His boundary line and pocket attack has been workout and moved on from.

He needs to teach his players the fine art of when to play one on one defence, when to support and then when to spread and attack in a quick, direct and to a well balanced structured forward line.

You can’t chop and change different types of players and think they will up hold the same structures or game plan for one team to another.
It’s not the list that is over rated it’s Micks ability to adapt.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6401 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 321  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], snakehips, windy and 806 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group