Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jun 15, 2025 4:05 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 130 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Flat Track Bullies
PostPosted: Mon Jul 01, 2013 10:27 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21538
Location: North of the border
This is where the argument goes off line - A posters notes that the 3 players albeit indigenous go missing when the heat is on and it turns into a race argument - I have been saying for a long time that 3 small forwards is not the way to go as small forwards should be cream of the crop to the be all and end all -

These boys do go missing at times and often to much - there is no doubting their individual brilliance but we see that all to infrequently - But they are not the only ones in this team that goes missing but they stand out more so than others because their best is far better than any of the other players in the team . so when they are not on song it really effects the whole side performances .

It is not too different from when we had Fev- His brilliance was there to be hold but when he was off he was really off and it effected the team - Good teams have consistent players that turn up each week

These boys don't

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Flat Track Bullies
PostPosted: Mon Jul 01, 2013 1:32 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Sydney Blue wrote:
This is where the argument goes off line - A posters notes that the 3 players albeit indigenous go missing when the heat is on and it turns into a race argument - I have been saying for a long time that 3 small forwards is not the way to go as small forwards should be cream of the crop to the be all and end all -

These boys do go missing at times and often to much - there is no doubting their individual brilliance but we see that all to infrequently - But they are not the only ones in this team that goes missing but they stand out more so than others because their best is far better than any of the other players in the team . so when they are not on song it really effects the whole side performances .

It is not too different from when we had Fev- His brilliance was there to be hold but when he was off he was really off and it effected the team - Good teams have consistent players that turn up each week

These boys don't

again who turns up every week and plays a high brand of footy for us?

why them??? :sly:

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Flat Track Bullies
PostPosted: Mon Jul 01, 2013 1:51 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
..players will have their off days, but there's a few that the majority of the time try hard and compete with everything they've got even if the team is being smashed.. ..these are the finals type footy players we have.. ..just not enough of them..

..we should start a list and see which players we think make the grade..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Flat Track Bullies
PostPosted: Mon Jul 01, 2013 2:23 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21538
Location: North of the border
Synbad wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
This is where the argument goes off line - A posters notes that the 3 players albeit indigenous go missing when the heat is on and it turns into a race argument - I have been saying for a long time that 3 small forwards is not the way to go as small forwards should be cream of the crop to the be all and end all -

These boys do go missing at times and often to much - there is no doubting their individual brilliance but we see that all to infrequently - But they are not the only ones in this team that goes missing but they stand out more so than others because their best is far better than any of the other players in the team . so when they are not on song it really effects the whole side performances .

It is not too different from when we had Fev- His brilliance was there to be hold but when he was off he was really off and it effected the team - Good teams have consistent players that turn up each week

These boys don't

again who turns up every week and plays a high brand of footy for us?

why them??? :sly:


Because you notice their absence more - Their good is very very good bordering on spectacular but when they are off you notice- Other players don't have the highs these guys have and their impact on games is less noticeable - If the likes of Robbo has a bad game you don't notice it because his good games are not that good - Same applies to Simpson Cachia Scotland Gibbs and more .
These blokes are game changers their impact is immense

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Flat Track Bullies
PostPosted: Mon Jul 01, 2013 2:26 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
..our team isn't good enough to carry more than a few passengers.. ..and we don't have enough players that regularly do the hard stuff.. ..this is the year that MM's sorting it all out.. ..he's already tightened us up but there still needs a list working over.. ..he'll have his own list of finals footy types and the rest need to get on board or lookout..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Flat Track Bullies
PostPosted: Tue Jul 02, 2013 8:31 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 7:36 pm
Posts: 557
Location: In the coach's box
Synbad wrote:
ridiculous!!!.... barrass... you should work on your threads and put some thought into them... seriously!!!

:roll:

thats seriously one messed up thread.... its wrong in so many ways..!!!

waite kicked 7 against Essendon*.. so hes not a flat track bully.... but eddie who has missed almost the entire season .. and yarran who played a quarter are flat track bullies???

Look.. just stop..... we have a flat track bully team... thats why we dont win big games... stop confining your negative attacks to the indigenous boys... when it comes to flat track bullies.. cos it would mean... you believe the others are big match players!!!

Do you???

if you dont... why single them out??? :yikes:


Now Bill you know all about negative attacks and confining them to a couple of players. I'll indulge you Bill... speaking of bullies and amateur hour psychology.

Now listen up again... it's not about last Fri, or this year... it's an observation over a number of years. I single them out because they can win us games of footy... Armfield's a warrior but no match winner, Bootsma no match winner. Tell me a big game against top quality opposition over the past 3 years where any of the three I have mentioned have stood up??

_________________
17 4 10


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Flat Track Bullies
PostPosted: Wed Jul 03, 2013 6:03 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 3:12 pm
Posts: 942
barass wrote:
Garlett.....

Betts.....

Yarrann....

Discuss.

Atleast these guys dominate sometimes we have a number 1 pick ruckman who never dominates


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Flat Track Bullies
PostPosted: Wed Jul 03, 2013 10:36 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
Bigredisback wrote:
barass wrote:
Garlett.....

Betts.....

Yarrann....

Discuss.

Atleast these guys dominate sometimes we have a number 1 pick ruckman who never dominates


..issat the same ruckman that was 5th in the B&F in his 2nd season..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Flat Track Bullies
PostPosted: Wed Jul 03, 2013 11:17 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 3:12 pm
Posts: 942
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
Bigredisback wrote:
barass wrote:
Garlett.....

Betts.....

Yarrann....

Discuss.

Atleast these guys dominate sometimes we have a number 1 pick ruckman who never dominates


..issat the same ruckman that was 5th in the B&F in his 2nd season..


The same one who has fired a shot since yep


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Flat Track Bullies
PostPosted: Wed Jul 03, 2013 11:21 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 11:42 pm
Posts: 283
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
Bigredisback wrote:
barass wrote:
Garlett.....

Betts.....

Yarrann....

Discuss.

Atleast these guys dominate sometimes we have a number 1 pick ruckman who never dominates


..issat the same ruckman that was 5th in the B&F in his 2nd season..



Well judging by some of those who placed highly that year i don't see the relevance of that to the current situation;

2009 Best and Fairest Count

1st Chris Judd 558
2nd Marc Murphy 451
3rd Bryce Gibbs 415
4th Brendan Fevola 390
5th Matthew Kreuzer 311
6th Jordan Russell 281
7th Paul Bower 279
8th Kade Simpson 254
9th Bret Thornton 225
10th Aaron Joseph 201

The other point i would make is that was 4 years ago, it proves nothing in 2013


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Flat Track Bullies
PostPosted: Thu Jul 04, 2013 7:56 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
barass wrote:
Synbad wrote:
ridiculous!!!.... barrass... you should work on your threads and put some thought into them... seriously!!!

:roll:

thats seriously one messed up thread.... its wrong in so many ways..!!!

waite kicked 7 against Essendon*.. so hes not a flat track bully.... but eddie who has missed almost the entire season .. and yarran who played a quarter are flat track bullies???

Look.. just stop..... we have a flat track bully team... thats why we dont win big games... stop confining your negative attacks to the indigenous boys... when it comes to flat track bullies.. cos it would mean... you believe the others are big match players!!!

Do you???

if you dont... why single them out??? :yikes:


Now Bill you know all about negative attacks and confining them to a couple of players. I'll indulge you Bill... speaking of bullies and amateur hour psychology.

Now listen up again... it's not about last Fri, or this year... it's an observation over a number of years. I single them out because they can win us games of footy... Armfield's a warrior but no match winner, Bootsma no match winner. Tell me a big game against top quality opposition over the past 3 years where any of the three I have mentioned have stood up??



Liste here Bill.. out of a team of 40 guys and over a few years of never winning big games .. and up and down form..you chose the 3 indigneous players as flat track bullies.
So i shall go deep into your mind and pull out what i think is a major reason.. and Bill... its a MASSIVE coincidence that you have targetted 3 indigenous players.
Syd does the same but reading Syds view on the world in Talking Stuff its no surprise.
My point is be aware of what youre saying.... you might not see it but there is a deep rooted reason why you chose 3 indigenous small forwards as flat track bulies from a side that is not known for its lets say ruthlesness.

We are a whole side of flat track bullies.

And bill.... take a number and wait in the waiting room till i call you next time.. no line jumping ok???
Ill get to the bottom of you yet...

You do realise you cherry picked our flat track bullies from our club and came up with the indigenous boys??

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Flat Track Bullies
PostPosted: Thu Jul 04, 2013 9:48 am 
Offline
Bert Deacon
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 7:36 pm
Posts: 557
Location: In the coach's box
Synbad wrote:
barass wrote:
Synbad wrote:
ridiculous!!!.... barrass... you should work on your threads and put some thought into them... seriously!!!

:roll:

thats seriously one messed up thread.... its wrong in so many ways..!!!

waite kicked 7 against Essendon*.. so hes not a flat track bully.... but eddie who has missed almost the entire season .. and yarran who played a quarter are flat track bullies???

Look.. just stop..... we have a flat track bully team... thats why we dont win big games... stop confining your negative attacks to the indigenous boys... when it comes to flat track bullies.. cos it would mean... you believe the others are big match players!!!

Do you???

if you dont... why single them out??? :yikes:


Now Bill you know all about negative attacks and confining them to a couple of players. I'll indulge you Bill... speaking of bullies and amateur hour psychology.

Now listen up again... it's not about last Fri, or this year... it's an observation over a number of years. I single them out because they can win us games of footy... Armfield's a warrior but no match winner, Bootsma no match winner. Tell me a big game against top quality opposition over the past 3 years where any of the three I have mentioned have stood up??



Liste here Bill.. out of a team of 40 guys and over a few years of never winning big games .. and up and down form..you chose the 3 indigneous players as flat track bullies.
So i shall go deep into your mind and pull out what i think is a major reason.. and Bill... its a MASSIVE coincidence that you have targetted 3 indigenous players.
Syd does the same but reading Syds view on the world in Talking Stuff its no surprise.
My point is be aware of what youre saying.... you might not see it but there is a deep rooted reason why you chose 3 indigenous small forwards as flat track bulies from a side that is not known for its lets say ruthlesness.

We are a whole side of flat track bullies.

And bill.... take a number and wait in the waiting room till i call you next time.. no line jumping ok???
Ill get to the bottom of you yet...

You do realise you cherry picked our flat track bullies from our club and came up with the indigenous boys??


As I suspected Bill... you deflect and don't answer the question I posed. But please, continue with the amateur Psych... it's MASSIVELY amusing.

I tell you one thing, if they come out and star tonight when we REALLY need them then I'll be happy to eat humble pie. When they are on song they are a joy to watch.

But to this stage they have not stood up once in a big game. Results count my friend.

_________________
17 4 10


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Flat Track Bullies
PostPosted: Thu Jul 04, 2013 11:36 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35876
Location: Half back flank
Which one of you is Bill?

_________________
#DonTheStash


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Flat Track Bullies
PostPosted: Thu Jul 04, 2013 3:02 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
Bigredisback wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
Bigredisback wrote:
barass wrote:
Garlett.....

Betts.....

Yarrann....

Discuss.

Atleast these guys dominate sometimes we have a number 1 pick ruckman who never dominates


..issat the same ruckman that was 5th in the B&F in his 2nd season..


The same one who has fired a shot since yep


..you reckon he's not had any good games since..?.. ..seriously.. ..in his 2nd season, he's 5th B&F.. ..a ruck, in 2nd season.. ..and you're not impressed.. ..meanwhile, neither Yarran nor Garlett have gotten even close to such a B&F standing, in all their years at the club.. ..and they've only been there 1 year less, and are smalls that should really come on far quicker than a ruckman.. ..neither of those have as many charlie votes either, of which Krooz has 2 BoG votings.. ..done post ACL i might add.. ..only betts has more charlie votes, though plenty of opportunity to have gotten more, timeline wise too..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Flat Track Bullies
PostPosted: Thu Jul 04, 2013 3:12 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
Gab wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
Bigredisback wrote:
barass wrote:
Garlett.....

Betts.....

Yarrann....

Discuss.

Atleast these guys dominate sometimes we have a number 1 pick ruckman who never dominates


..issat the same ruckman that was 5th in the B&F in his 2nd season..



Well judging by some of those who placed highly that year i don't see the relevance of that to the current situation;

2009 Best and Fairest Count

1st Chris Judd 558
2nd Marc Murphy 451
3rd Bryce Gibbs 415
4th Brendan Fevola 390
5th Matthew Kreuzer 311
6th Jordan Russell 281
7th Paul Bower 279
8th Kade Simpson 254
9th Bret Thornton 225
10th Aaron Joseph 201

The other point i would make is that was 4 years ago, it proves nothing in 2013


..the relevance is simple.. ..he stated krooz never dominates.. ..and it's a rubbish statement.. ..the B&F list of '09 is significant.. ..finished 7th, so not a spoon year so no 'crap list' comment.... ..and krooz as a ruck was only in his 2nd year.. ..discounting that achievement highlights ignorance.. ..that good in just his 2nd yr shows how much of a talent he was, giving good service right away. ...as opposed to the players rated against him as having more dominating games..

..in regards to 2009 vs 2013.. ..he blew his knee out mid 2010, comeback mid 2011 and right away carrying 1st ruck again until reinjured prior to finals.. ..early 2012 tears meninscus, plays out the season getting fluid drained from knee most weeks.. ..2013 fit again, moving well, breaks thumb badly round 3.. ..back after 3 weeks off, soon after carrying ruck again.. ..too young, carrying injuries, he's still good enough to carry the ruck..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Flat Track Bullies
PostPosted: Thu Jul 04, 2013 7:50 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 3:12 pm
Posts: 942
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
Bigredisback wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
Bigredisback wrote:
barass wrote:
Garlett.....

Betts.....

Yarrann....

Discuss.

Atleast these guys dominate sometimes we have a number 1 pick ruckman who never dominates


..issat the same ruckman that was 5th in the B&F in his 2nd season..


The same one who has fired a shot since yep


..you reckon he's not had any good games since..?.. ..seriously.. ..in his 2nd season, he's 5th B&F.. ..a ruck, in 2nd season.. ..and you're not impressed.. ..meanwhile, neither Yarran nor Garlett have gotten even close to such a B&F standing, in all their years at the club.. ..and they've only been there 1 year less, and are smalls that should really come on far quicker than a ruckman.. ..neither of those have as many charlie votes either, of which Krooz has 2 BoG votings.. ..done post ACL i might add.. ..only betts has more charlie votes, though plenty of opportunity to have gotten more, timeline wise too..

I agree in his second season he did well and looked like becoming a gun

Since then however he has been at best a good average player


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Flat Track Bullies
PostPosted: Thu Jul 04, 2013 7:52 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 3:12 pm
Posts: 942
Gab wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
Bigredisback wrote:
barass wrote:
Garlett.....

Betts.....

Yarrann....

Discuss.

Atleast these guys dominate sometimes we have a number 1 pick ruckman who never dominates


..issat the same ruckman that was 5th in the B&F in his 2nd season..



Well judging by some of those who placed highly that year i don't see the relevance of that to the current situation;

2009 Best and Fairest Count

1st Chris Judd 558
2nd Marc Murphy 451
3rd Bryce Gibbs 415
4th Brendan Fevola 390
5th Matthew Kreuzer 311
6th Jordan Russell 281
7th Paul Bower 279
8th Kade Simpson 254
9th Bret Thornton 225
10th Aaron Joseph 201

The other point i would make is that was 4 years ago, it proves nothing in 2013

So he just beat Russell and bower in a b and f


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Flat Track Bullies
PostPosted: Thu Jul 04, 2013 9:24 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
Bigredisback wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:

..you reckon he's not had any good games since..?.. ..seriously.. ..in his 2nd season, he's 5th B&F.. ..a ruck, in 2nd season.. ..and you're not impressed.. ..meanwhile, neither Yarran nor Garlett have gotten even close to such a B&F standing, in all their years at the club.. ..and they've only been there 1 year less, and are smalls that should really come on far quicker than a ruckman.. ..neither of those have as many charlie votes either, of which Krooz has 2 BoG votings.. ..done post ACL i might add.. ..only betts has more charlie votes, though plenty of opportunity to have gotten more, timeline wise too..

I agree in his second season he did well and looked like becoming a gun

Since then however he has been at best a good average player


..and yet since his did his knee, he's had 2 BoG performances.. ....you keep under rating krooz, and yet he's had dominating games, which according to you he never has.. ..and this is post knee.. ..meanwhile, neither garlett nor yarran have had 2 BoG games.. ..so if krooz is avg, what are they..?..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Flat Track Bullies
PostPosted: Thu Jul 04, 2013 9:27 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
Bigredisback wrote:
Gab wrote:

Well judging by some of those who placed highly that year i don't see the relevance of that to the current situation;

2009 Best and Fairest Count

1st Chris Judd 558
2nd Marc Murphy 451
3rd Bryce Gibbs 415
4th Brendan Fevola 390
5th Matthew Kreuzer 311
6th Jordan Russell 281
7th Paul Bower 279
8th Kade Simpson 254
9th Bret Thornton 225
10th Aaron Joseph 201

The other point i would make is that was 4 years ago, it proves nothing in 2013

So he just beat Russell and bower in a b and f


..and yet in all their time on the list, krooz still has that high finish.. ..what about the others..?.. ..sure, make fun that krooz 'just beat' russell and bower.. ..but what do the others' B&F track as?.. ..i mean, even russell and bower have had good finishes, why not them..?

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Flat Track Bullies
PostPosted: Thu Jul 04, 2013 9:29 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
..mind you not meaning to heap it on the small fwds..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 130 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group