Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jun 15, 2025 4:33 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 98 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Jun 01, 2013 10:30 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
mosquito.. i know what im talking about...

i dont hinge and mortgage the clubs future on a pipedream.

i suppose thats where we differ..as well as i do know about football....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 01, 2013 10:41 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
Synbad wrote:
mosquito.. i know what im talking about...

i dont hinge and mortgage the clubs future on a pipedream.

i suppose thats where we differ..as well as i do know about football....


Stuck in the 90's Synners.

Can't release yourself from the pain of whats gone before..

It's all Sticks and stuff and nothing good can happen from anything.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 01, 2013 10:42 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
aerodyte wrote:
Synbad wrote:
aerodyte wrote:
Synbad wrote:
aerodyte wrote:
Because it's our home, it gives supporters a sense of place and of our history. It makes you feel like you're part of a club.
You don't get that at docklands. It's a soulless, empty room. You don't feel like you're supporting a club but a franchise.

You want your kid to be a Carlton supporter for life? Let them have a kick on PP after a win.



Are you serious ?



What parts of my comment do you dispute Synbad?

And Argo, we're not talking about playing every home game there. Say 4 games a year against the expansion sides and the lowly Melbourne clubs. If (and I mean IF, I've already acknowledged how impractical it would be) you could fill Princess Park to the rafters surely that's better than a 1/3 capacity at Docklands.

Are you serious???? :lol:

Have a bit of a think so you can be up to speed and then we can debate this......

Its just soooooooo difficult for me to even begin to take you seriously mate!!!

Go away with Surrey and do some brain storming.. make sure you think about it very carefully.. and tell me when your ready to discuss this.....

" 4 expansion teams and say Melbourne?" :lol:
"Kids need it to make sure they stay Carlton members"??? :lol: :lol:
Capacity?
How will it be funded.?
Who will play home games there?
What will happen to that huge development where the old social cllub / heatley stand used to be?
Car parking?
Residents?
MCC?
Gardiner stand and the heritage on it.?

Theyre just a few things you can get back to me with .... think about those very carefully cos im going to ask you to address them and a few other things that im keeping up my sleeve... and lets have a discussion.. i love discussions...!!!

And have some answers please??.... dont just say "I dunno".....
Remember SmorgyVille???

Most importantly ... why is it needed?

What do you mean what "part" i dispute???... i dispute everyyyyyything... im not leaving out any part of what you think in laughing ....

Now do some homework... and tell me when your ready...!!!



I'll give you an answer you halfwit.
I already conceded it's unrealistic and it won't happen. I conceded it twice, acknowledging everyone of the points you made.
All I was saying was that IF it were possible it would come with immeasurable benefits.

I also never said '4 expansion clubs' and I never said kids 'need' it. You're lying to suit your argument. But given how frequently you do that around here it shouldn't surprise me :hitcomputer:


So you come up with a post on what we should be doing to hold on to history.. members.. save our offsping even...imeasurable benefits.....................................................................but then concede its unikely .....

hold my hat im going to shag Miranda Kerr ...aerodyte... dunno where she is... dunno her... doubt she even likes me.....

what the hell am i dealing with here????

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 01, 2013 10:45 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
cimm1979 wrote:
Synbad wrote:
mosquito.. i know what im talking about...

i dont hinge and mortgage the clubs future on a pipedream.

i suppose thats where we differ..as well as i do know about football....


Stuck in the 90's Synners.

Can't release yourself from the pain of whats gone before..

It's all Sticks and stuff and nothing good can happen from anything.

eh???

:lol:

another cimm classic post.

has all the points of a circle

:sly:

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 01, 2013 10:46 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:25 am
Posts: 356
King Kenny wrote:
Synbad wrote:
King Kenny wrote:
Synbad wrote:
murraycray wrote:
Carlton playing at Princes Park ? Do it!!!

Games moved on.... and yeah maybe 25k would go.....

Not sure if people have been to Visy lately.. or now the ins and outs of what were alowed to do at the park.... and what it wuld cost.. yeah but people can dream i suppose... im mean spirited for brinhing in reality into the debate and pointing out what a bunch of wankers we have at the club for using deflections like this...and the 60,000 members sign up and were at the G last week... and the 20 by 20 2020..and the 3 flags in 5 years..... but thats what we are these days....popuist bullshit when nothing else works...


It's AFL driven Synbad.


So why does the AFL need it???

Ask yourself that.

Second... that means it will be a pooled stadium so not our home ground.


No idea.

I have no idea on most of what the AFL decide these days. They just confuse me.
From my understanding the situation at Etihad is costing certain clubs money or severely limiting their gate money which the AFL is then having to make up through the competitive balance fund or whatever it's called. They're attempting to buy out the rest of the Etihad contract in order to solve it but the owners want $250 million so the AFL are looking at alternatives. It really has very little to do with us or our home ground so the majority of the arguments in this thread are completely irrelevant.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 01, 2013 10:47 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
Synbad wrote:
what the hell am i dealing with here????


A question we ask almost daily.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 01, 2013 10:49 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
Synbad wrote:
has all the points of a circle

:sly:


Might use that one

:lol:

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 01, 2013 10:58 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
cimm1979 wrote:
Synbad wrote:
what the hell am i dealing with here????


A question we ask almost daily.

i seriously cant get around the way some people think through issues.

its not like you lot are usually right very often.........

anyway aerodyte ...to answer you and your questions re our history and children.....
we ust need to create a history into the future and stop trying to hold onto things in the past that have been draggig us down.

PP almost killed us... because we tried to cling onto it... and mortgaged our future for it

it cant exist into the future the way it used to ... once upon a time it was the best suburban home ground...

But in an era of pooling super stadiums.. corporates.. night games etc (please dont bring up whats ging in in other cities.. anyone who has played the game simcity would know why Geelong is handled differently// you dont need to be Einstein to work it out....) PP is finished .

as for clubs losing money... they probably are... when soccer clubs get bigger home crowds thats bound to happen.

ultimately the dome is an AFL baby.... and theyre not going to lose money on it by introducing other grounds that they will have to bankroll as well.. there is no sense in paying probably 100 mill for another ground.. and shifting games to that ground with a max of 25k..away from the Dome.. and lose money on the Dome too.

When PP is ever re developed.. (assuming it will).. the break even costs to play on that ground wont be cheap either... its basic economics.100 million plus running costs and interest will need to be repaid

u nless we play games there and dont touch it.... :lol:

people just need to understand that....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 01, 2013 11:11 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
Synbad wrote:
play on that ground wont be cheap either... its basic economics.100 million plus running costs and interest will need to be repaid



If this is the basis for your concern, its valid.

But Synners, here's how it work in reality.

The WA govt are going to build a new stadium. It's multi team/purpose/faceted blah blah, but really its a stadium for WCE and Freo fans.

Have a guess how much it's supposed to cost?

Now get that number and increase it by 50%. The latest estimate puts the final number at somewhere around 1.2 billion.

How much are the WCE and Freo paying? Have a guess.

Unfortunately your Elliot/Sticks fixation makes you think that we are stupid enough to try and pay for this thing ourselves AGAIN.

And, if we are then I agree with you, we should avoid it like the plague.

But I've no doubt the new deal has more in common with the Perth stadium than the Elliot plan.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 01, 2013 11:16 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10573
cimm1979 wrote:
Calling Surrey. Calling Surrey.


:lol: - I'm here mate just not get involved with he who knows best & all. :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2013 1:53 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 9:37 pm
Posts: 1378
cimm1979 wrote:
Synbad wrote:
play on that ground wont be cheap either... its basic economics.100 million plus running costs and interest will need to be repaid



If this is the basis for your concern, its valid.

But Synners, here's how it work in reality.

The WA govt are going to build a new stadium. It's multi team/purpose/faceted blah blah, but really its a stadium for WCE and Freo fans.

Have a guess how much it's supposed to cost?

Now get that number and increase it by 50%. The latest estimate puts the final number at somewhere around 1.2 billion.

How much are the WCE and Freo paying? Have a guess.

Unfortunately your Elliot/Sticks fixation makes you think that we are stupid enough to try and pay for this thing ourselves AGAIN.

And, if we are then I agree with you, we should avoid it like the plague.

But I've no doubt the new deal has more in common with the Perth stadium than the Elliot plan.


Different economics. WA needs a modern stadium & one to expand as the population does. SA needs a venue attractive/central to attend (hence the consolidation to Adelaide Oval city precinct).
Victoria does not need a new oval - Skilled, Etihad & the MCG can cover the games. AFL will be better off when Etihad becomes theirs (2025) or can negotiate a suitable buyout at the right price (which s why I assume there is talk off the boutique stadium as banther fodder).
If anything, Cricket Victoria needs a new home i.e. Junction Oval as a boutique domestic & training stadium - and that could be shared from April to Aug with the AFL for smaller crowds until Etihad is bought outright.
As we stand, the AFL would be better off subsidizing games at Etihad rather than spending XX amount of $$ upgrading a stadium that would need continual upgrades in years to follow. It's just not feasible.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2013 7:28 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:53 am
Posts: 17486
Location: Left Cuckistan
It would be an AFL venue. Would not be OUR home ground.

_________________
The only way for some people to understand is for them to be on the receiving end

Left wing moralists
In self serving denial
They shit me no end


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2013 8:15 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
Heavs wrote:
It would be an AFL venue. Would not be OUR home ground.


Took until the last post in the thread for me to find it.

If Princes Park gets re-developed, we would lose our home ground.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2013 8:21 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
cimm1979 wrote:
Synbad wrote:


But I've no doubt the new deal has more in common with the Perth stadium than the Elliot plan.


You have no doubt eh??? :lol:
Again cimm.. why does the Victorian govt need a new stadium ?
I can understand it if the state was swimmin g in cash... but in an era of black holes in budgets.... a govt sponsored stadium in a city already of stadiums doesnt sound right does it??

so you should have some doubt... because if you dont have any doubt it means youre not much of a thinker.

usually thinks need to make sense for them to be viable...viability rarely works if theyre not viable

Think of WA's and SA's facilities the same way as Kooyong tennis courts and go from there....

and yes HEavs and Brad get it...
if it was to be redeveloped (and it wont).. it wont be for Carlton

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2013 8:41 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 8:15 pm
Posts: 6748
Location: Echuca
In reality, all this talk of a Boutique Stadium is just that, talk. It's all about getting a better deal from the Etihad honchos. Not too long ago, building another stadium near Etihad on Footscray Rd was also mooted, but went nowhere.
Is Geelong a feasible option for some Melbourne teams, for a couple of games a year ?
For example, could the Dogs get a better deal from the Cats than they are getting at Etihad?
Easy train for their supporters to Geeelong.
Or would North be better off playing a game or 2 down there instead of Tassie or Ballarat ?

_________________
The problem with Socialism is, you eventually run out of other people's money.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2013 8:55 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
Possibly. Nobody seems happy with Collo's place.

Anyway, it would be great to see fixtures once again have PP (or OO or VP).

PP is starting to fall into disrepair, it would be great to see our great home in sparkling condition again.

Get it done Swanny!

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2013 9:32 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10573
Wonder how much we paid etihad for the privilege of playing our game yesterday?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2013 10:00 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 9:37 pm
Posts: 1378
SurreyBlue wrote:
Wonder how much we paid etihad for the privilege of playing our game yesterday?


See we're giving away tickets. Port had 10K free tickets to get new people along to the game & trying to fill it up. Carl vs Hawthorn was one of the games on a Living Social promotion for Etihad games. Strange that the Hawks (home) game does not sell out with our own supporters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2013 11:03 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
City Oval Ballarat would be better.
North relocates and plays most home games there and Port and Adelaide play away games there against all the small Vic teams who can't fill Etihad.

The Federal and State Govts and the Ballarat City Council foot most the bill in an election year and the AFL pays the rest.

The Adelaide people already stage at Ballarat when they come over.

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2013 11:10 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
murraycray wrote:
In reality, all this talk of a Boutique Stadium is just that, talk. It's all about getting a better deal from the Etihad honchos.


Yep, Princes Park is a pawn in a chess game, nothing more.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 98 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group