Blue4ever wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Dominator_7 wrote:
Williams has took us backwards in stopages this year, and Riley has been a dud who for some reason, Ratts believed actually was of use.
See ya to both of them!
Pathetic post.
Riley may not be your cup of tea but he's been a commited member of the coaching staff and well regarded within the industry.
Its a shame the club cant be as selective about its "supporters"
Its obvious Brown and Barker have been told they're safe whilst the others have been kept in the dark. Yes they "may" get a full payout (which is the subject of debate at the moment) but they're also entitled to chase other employment. If they're getting the arse, just tell them.
Another piss poor effort from a half arsed administration.
I agree, not sure if Riley, Williams or Richardson are good coaches but the club must let them know of their intentions. The club knew MM was coming and this should have been sorted out ASAP and possibly announced at the press conference or immediately after. Makes the club look really unprofessional. The club knows if they are required or not, why not tell them so we can all move on.
Don't think I agree with this.
Malthouse is entitled to have more than a few days to decide which assistants he wants to keep, just as they have the right to look elsewhere for a job.
What's the rush? They will still get paid out if they're given the sakc next week or next month, and other clubs will still be looking around for good coaches in October as much as they maybe are now.
If the people in question aren't told of their futures until December, then that's a problem, but for now it's just a negotiating beat-up.