Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jun 24, 2025 6:12 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 92 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: 'DEADWOOD'
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2009 5:31 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:32 pm
Posts: 3021
Army and Aaron try and break the lines.

Love it when Aaron gets his chance he will try to tap the ball forward because he knows he has the pace to then run onto it and then run away with it. Army is similar but different. He brings his rugby approach to it, tries to break the lines that way.

Only issue with army is his hands can be messy.

_________________
It's a small world, but I wouldn't want to paint it


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'DEADWOOD'
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2009 5:31 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 3510
Location: East Brunwick
Carlton 'deadwood' They tease us............. then flop


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'DEADWOOD'
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2009 5:32 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 2:03 am
Posts: 493
Location: 57 Mt. Pleasant St
OUT: Wiggins, Edwards
IN: Swearengen, Farnum

_________________
"The Wigg's big in 08!" - Chris Judd


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'DEADWOOD'
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2009 5:47 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 15848
We should have a structures thread

_________________
"I had to eat"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'DEADWOOD'
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2009 5:59 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
Cyclonus wrote:
OUT: Wiggins, Edwards
IN: Swearengen, Farnum


No way! He'd just p*** the umpires off!

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'DEADWOOD'
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2009 6:13 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426
dannyboy wrote:
AJ Jammo Bower
Grigg Austin Johnson
Army Gibbs Murphy
Yarran Kruiser Waite
Robbo Fev Betts

Warnock Judd Walker

Simmo Hammer Garlett Wiggo

em. Ando Russell

is not a bad side but its young. People are getting ahead of where we are at. Play that side and we will be bottom 4, but as these kids develop they will replace some of the older guys and we will get better. Murph today is twice what he was 2 years ago. You cannot hurry time, not even for the really good ones.


I agree with all of it except Wiggins...the guy has no idea.

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul"     — Lauro Aguirre


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'DEADWOOD'
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2009 7:11 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:50 pm
Posts: 2123
Massive over-reaction here but probably to be expected on an internet forum.

We have won 3 games by a total of 145 points and lost 4 by a total of 32 points. Percentage is usually a reliable indicator as to how a team is travelling. We have a healthy percentage. I would argue that we could easily be at least 5-2, and have had more than enough chances to win all seven games to date. We are not making the most of our opportunities when they present themselves; we are often in control of games but are unable to fully exploit the momentum when we have it.

I don't know if I am the only one who feels this way, but it feels like we make most of the play but the opposition picks us off too easily on the counter-attack. A prime example of this is the second quarter against Hawthorn; we dominated the quarter from start to finish yet won it by one point. We should have led Sydney by five goals at quarter time, not five points. We have to do better than that because you don't get a million chances against better teams.

So I think we are doing a lot of things right. We have structural problems, to which others have alluded. But we are winning enough of the footy. We are creating enough opportunities to win games. We are not capitalising to an acceptable extent. The only time where we were ruthless in our execution was against the Bulldogs, who many consider to be a top 4 side. Yet we beat them by 43 points which I believe flattered the Bulldogs. So we know that we can play. I believe our best is up there with that of the better teams. We need to just relax a bit and have some faith that things aren't really that bad. It'd be really concerning if we were getting thrashed, but we aren't.

_________________
Formerly Blues-Back2003.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'DEADWOOD'
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2009 7:30 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
Synbad wrote:
budzy wrote:
Structures are useless if certain players are inconsistant in effort.

Inconsistant players = deadwood



Players are inconsistent if theyre are undrilled to do what needs to be done under a set group of circumstances usually...

If you think our bottom 6 are more useless than Essendons Sydneys and Freos .. God help us!!!

You play within structures to allow you to play closer to your strengths and to maximise efforts and miinimise negatives...
No structures .. it all comes tumbling down at the bottom end...especially...

Thats obvious...

Same with everything in life...


Totally agree. look at collingwood over the last few years
BTW....I see absolutely nothing in Anderson and I've got doubts on Grigg

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'DEADWOOD'
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2009 7:37 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426
99prelim wrote:
Synbad wrote:
budzy wrote:
Structures are useless if certain players are inconsistant in effort.

Inconsistant players = deadwood



Players are inconsistent if theyre are undrilled to do what needs to be done under a set group of circumstances usually...

If you think our bottom 6 are more useless than Essendons Sydneys and Freos .. God help us!!!

You play within structures to allow you to play closer to your strengths and to maximise efforts and miinimise negatives...
No structures .. it all comes tumbling down at the bottom end...especially...

Thats obvious...

Same with everything in life...


Totally agree. look at collingwood over the last few years
BTW....I see absolutely nothing in Anderson and I've got doubts on Grigg


What about Collingwood?

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul"     — Lauro Aguirre


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'DEADWOOD'
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2009 8:56 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 7:36 pm
Posts: 557
Location: In the coach's box
It's about individuals who are prepared to sacrifice and play a role for the team, not FIGJAM's. I believe we have enough individuals on our list who exhibit this, they just need to be given the opportunity.

For example, who do you think would be more prepared to 'pay the price' for their teammates

- Joe Anderson or Heath Scotland?
- David Ellard or Nick Stevens?
- Setanta or Cam Cloke?
- Sean Grigg or Richard Hadley
- Bret Thornton or anyone else on our list
- Dare I say Fevola or anyone else on our list?

Maybe Ratten has the game plan, just individuals that aren't prepared to toe the line or follow team disciplines.

_________________
17 4 10


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'DEADWOOD'
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2009 8:59 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 11:58 pm
Posts: 4058
Location: South Yarra
DownUnderChick wrote:
SuperCoach is better Sailor Man - Dreamteam is for people who don't know a thing about football.


I think the point was that too many of our players are better Dreamteam than Supercoach players.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'DEADWOOD'
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2009 9:09 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 11:58 pm
Posts: 4058
Location: South Yarra
Cyclonus wrote:
OUT: Wiggins, Edwards
IN: Swearengen, Farnum


SWEJIN!

Deadwood - bring it back!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'DEADWOOD'
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2009 9:14 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 11:58 pm
Posts: 4058
Location: South Yarra
99prelim wrote:

I see absolutely nothing in Anderson and I've got doubts on Grigg


Grigg isn't a 100% dead cert but I've seen enough that I'd expect him to be a gun player. He has weapons and the right aggressive, attacking approach.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'DEADWOOD'
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2009 9:54 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Blues2005 wrote:
Massive over-reaction here but probably to be expected on an internet forum.

We have won 3 games by a total of 145 points and lost 4 by a total of 32 points. Percentage is usually a reliable indicator as to how a team is travelling. We have a healthy percentage. I would argue that we could easily be at least 5-2, and have had more than enough chances to win all seven games to date. We are not making the most of our opportunities when they present themselves; we are often in control of games but are unable to fully exploit the momentum when we have it.

I don't know if I am the only one who feels this way, but it feels like we make most of the play but the opposition picks us off too easily on the counter-attack. A prime example of this is the second quarter against Hawthorn; we dominated the quarter from start to finish yet won it by one point. We should have led Sydney by five goals at quarter time, not five points. We have to do better than that because you don't get a million chances against better teams.

So I think we are doing a lot of things right. We have structural problems, to which others have alluded. But we are winning enough of the footy. We are creating enough opportunities to win games. We are not capitalising to an acceptable extent. The only time where we were ruthless in our execution was against the Bulldogs, who many consider to be a top 4 side. Yet we beat them by 43 points which I believe flattered the Bulldogs. So we know that we can play. I believe our best is up there with that of the better teams. We need to just relax a bit and have some faith that things aren't really that bad. It'd be really concerning if we were getting thrashed, but we aren't.



One of the teams we thrashed hardest is a doormat ...

And we have been expected to win every game so far....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'DEADWOOD'
PostPosted: Tue May 12, 2009 10:17 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:36 pm
Posts: 2960
Location: Oak Park
There is no other way to put it but to say we have been a massive disappointment AFAIC. And a lot comes down to aspects we are yet to properly rectify like proper application and attitude. Selection process and game structure also need to be looked at but I want to see proper effort on the park. Not laziness!

_________________
C'mon Blueboys!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'DEADWOOD'
PostPosted: Tue May 12, 2009 10:35 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34533
Location: The Brown Wedge
aramari wrote:
99prelim wrote:

I see absolutely nothing in Anderson and I've got doubts on Grigg


Grigg isn't a 100% dead cert but I've seen enough that I'd expect him to be a gun player. He has weapons and the right aggressive, attacking approach.


I agree Ando is looking shaky, Grigg is a 50/50 whether he'll make 100 games.

_________________
end of message


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'DEADWOOD'
PostPosted: Tue May 12, 2009 11:15 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
Juddy&theKruezers wrote:
99prelim wrote:
Synbad wrote:
budzy wrote:
Structures are useless if certain players are inconsistant in effort.

Inconsistant players = deadwood



Players are inconsistent if theyre are undrilled to do what needs to be done under a set group of circumstances usually...

If you think our bottom 6 are more useless than Essendons Sydneys and Freos .. God help us!!!

You play within structures to allow you to play closer to your strengths and to maximise efforts and miinimise negatives...
No structures .. it all comes tumbling down at the bottom end...especially...

Thats obvious...

Same with everything in life...


Totally agree. look at collingwood over the last few years
BTW....I see absolutely nothing in Anderson and I've got doubts on Grigg


What about Collingwood?


ordinary list...always there and therabouts

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'DEADWOOD'
PostPosted: Mon May 25, 2009 10:01 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 12:06 pm
Posts: 2098
Too me this is becoming more and more prevelant.

We seem to look for little bits of excitment or potential in a lot of our players but they are simply not up to it.

Time for the club to make some tough decisions and get games into the kids. As much as I hate to admit it Essendon* are showing us the way by backing their kids and are playing exciting football.

Watch us and we are slow and boring. More like watching Sydney and I hate it. Sides are jumping all over it and we are playing into their hands. Stop Judd and we are stuffed.

Need to cut the crap and put a line through these gusy for the rest of the year.

Wiggins
Cloke
Bentley
Stevens
Edwards
Bentick
Houlihan
Fisher
Russell

Need to get games into the following over the rest of the year:

Anderson
Browne
Garlett
Yarran
Ellard
Bannister
Robinson
Johnson
Austin
Armfield
Pfieffer
Jamison
Joseph
Warnock
Hartlett
Setanta

We know what the top can do and they don't have it. Get games into the bottom list and give them an opportunity to prove themselves.

Also need to look at other options and try some things:

Thornton to the forward line
Kruezer to FF
Joseph & Robbo on the ball
Defence built around Browne, Anderson, Jamo, Austin & Bower and leave them there and let them get used to playing with each other.
Play Yarran, Betts & Garlett together on the forward line under Fev and Kruezer.
Jacobs/Hampson & Warnock to do the rucking.
If Hartlett is too play it is at FB
If Setanta is too play, play him in one position and give him a decent go.

Stop making too many bloody changes in a game and let the players settle. Does nothing for their development throwing them around.

Let the players run and carry and take the game on. Do not worry about mistakes because at the moment our football is reactive NOT proactive!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'DEADWOOD'
PostPosted: Mon May 25, 2009 10:14 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 3510
Location: East Brunwick
cj69 wrote:
Too me this is becoming more and more prevelant.

We seem to look for little bits of excitment or potential in a lot of our players but they are simply not up to it.

Time for the club to make some tough decisions and get games into the kids. As much as I hate to admit it Essendon* are showing us the way by backing their kids and are playing exciting football.

Watch us and we are slow and boring. More like watching Sydney and I hate it. Sides are jumping all over it and we are playing into their hands. Stop Judd and we are stuffed.

Need to cut the crap and put a line through these gusy for the rest of the year.

Wiggins
Cloke
Bentley
Stevens
Edwards
Bentick
Houlihan
Fisher
Russell

Need to get games into the following over the rest of the year:

Anderson
Browne
Garlett
Yarran
Ellard
Bannister
Robinson
Johnson
Austin
Armfield
Pfieffer
Jamison
Joseph
Warnock
Hartlett
Setanta

We know what the top can do and they don't have it. Get games into the bottom list and give them an opportunity to prove themselves.

Also need to look at other options and try some things:

Thornton to the forward line
Kruezer to FF
Joseph & Robbo on the ball
Defence built around Browne, Anderson, Jamo, Austin & Bower and leave them there and let them get used to playing with each other.
Play Yarran, Betts & Garlett together on the forward line under Fev and Kruezer.
Jacobs/Hampson & Warnock to do the rucking.
If Hartlett is too play it is at FB
If Setanta is too play, play him in one position and give him a decent go.

Stop making too many bloody changes in a game and let the players settle. Does nothing for their development throwing them around.

Let the players run and carry and take the game on. Do not worry about mistakes because at the moment our football is reactive NOT proactive!!!


You say we Need to cut the crap and put a line through these guys for the rest of the year: Stevens and Russell

but you wanna get games into the for the rest of the year: Bannister and Pfieffer???

Today is the 25th of May not the 1st of April


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'DEADWOOD'
PostPosted: Mon May 25, 2009 10:20 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16974
Location: Melbourne
you mean like this....

(From AFL website article)


Ratten was more upbeat about the promising youngsters on their way up through the Carlton ranks, despite the lack of consistency on field.

“It’s an interesting one I suppose and there is some hype, which we’ve also generated ourselves.

“We’re the youngest team in the AFL by experience on our list ... I think we’re averaging about 61 games per player.

“We’ve played seven kids under 15 or less games and we’ve had five kids that have debuted this year. We can grow as a group and move up the ladder, but we’re mindful that we need to develop our stocks from underneath.”


Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 92 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group