Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Wed Jun 25, 2025 12:59 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 61 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Positives
PostPosted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 7:41 pm 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
molsey wrote:
DownUnderChick wrote:
Kaptain Kouta wrote:
DownUnderChick wrote:
I had one negative from the game and that is that no-one made any effort to belt the bejesus out of that runt Harvey. :mad:

Flower I hate the little s&^t.


Not worth the effort. Didn't hurt us, and only chimed in with a goal when it was too little, too late.


But he needed to be hurt when he smothered Jamo's kick in the first. :mad:


Yeah but that was the play after we actually gang tackled him when he went the side-step, drawing the Holding the Ball Free. I couldnt stop smiling that we'd actually tackled Harvey - first quarter of the year no less - which is either a sign of better teamwork, better tackling, or we've earmarked the little nob for attention. Either way I'm happy.


But it was all that good work and gang tackling the little runt that got ruined with the smother.

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Positives
PostPosted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:07 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 1:20 pm
Posts: 589
Positives
1. We thrashed North, even in the preseason this is a good thing.
2. All the new players added something to the side - mucho kudos to the too often maligned recruiting staff.
3. Bulk heaps goal kickers.
4. Robinson's mentalism. Garlett making Skinny look fat.
5. Not getting thrashed in the ruck, particularly against the strong North ruck division.

Negatives
1. We still don't make the most of our oppurtunities. We should have beaten them by more.
2. Still Fev-centric, but their are worse problems to have.
3. North supporters claiming that Fev kneed Pratt in the back with intent, and should be reported.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Positives
PostPosted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:17 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
septembergurl wrote:
3. North supporters claiming that Fev kneed Pratt in the back with intent, and should be reported.


That's a ludicrous claim, even by those turkeys.

To really piss them off, you should tell any North supporters that Pratt wasn't really hurt, and he went off in this:
Image

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Positives
PostPosted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 9:02 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:38 pm
Posts: 7640
yes we still seem to have two standards in respect of disposal -one for Russell and Carrazzo and one for the rest of the team -Neither are superstars but both are good honest senior players who for the most part dispose of the ball more than adequately - imagine if russell had shanked the 30 metre kick right in front of goal like Wiggins did - imagine the hysteria - I told the people I was sitting with that Wiggo would more than likely miss but that doesnt mean I dont rate him

What is good now about russell is that his team mates trust him in terms of disposal and positioning -also on Friday night wasnt getting the cheap kicks as the hit up forward where he gets a lead on his man and gets it out front -was linking through the corridor or on the back flank- was cool in his disposal and his confidence is rising

My negatives were

Still FEV conscious -need alternatives


Dont really go for Stevo on the backline -great offensively but doesnt have touch at all on his opponent - a Rioli et al might have taken him to the cleaners - cant seem to get in the right position to take an overhead mark

Only a NAb Cup game but Juddy news more protection from our other midfielders - he is going to be very sore if he does that workload all year extracting the ball as well as getting poleaxed every time he goes for the ball - need some real grunt apart from Juddy thats why I like grigg in there

Bentley played well but disposal a bit iffy


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Positives
PostPosted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 9:17 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16979
Location: Melbourne
Pros:
4 Quarter workrate by all that played
Proactive in running to space (fat side) to give an option when the ball went inside defensive 50 preparing for the rebound if it happened.
General Skills
Fitness
Intensity
Attitude
Clokes 1%ers - Crashing the packs, blocking for Fev/Wiggo, providing a big target.
18 man defensive set ups that pushed them wide.
Playing for each other.
Light at the end of the tunnel is no longer a train.
Having Houls back fit and healthy.

Cons:
Duck egg for this time of year in a 1st NAB game.

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Positives
PostPosted: Mon Feb 23, 2009 3:16 am 
Offline
Laurie Kerr
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 12:30 am
Posts: 133
Location: Beautiful 1 day, premiership the next !!
To those who think that we were too Fev-centric, your joking right ???

He kicked 6 of 18 goals, that's only 1/3 of our goals. We had 2 other multiple scorers and 11 goal scorers in total.

Now how on earth can you call that too Fev-centric ??? :? :confused:

After all, Fev is still our no 1 forward, its his job to kick goals. If he wasn't getting more of it than most we would all be accusing him of not doing his job well enough !!!!!

If you try & say the rest of the team didn't contribute enough, let me suggest that if the rest of the team kicks 12 goals every game on top of whatever Fev kicks we will win most weeks. :wink:

_________________
1. Walker,
2. Menzel,
3. Murphy,
4. Gibbs,
5. Judd.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Positives
PostPosted: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:09 am 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
amers wrote:
To those who think that we were too Fev-centric, your joking right ???

He kicked 6 of 18 goals, that's only 1/3 of our goals. We had 2 other multiple scorers and 11 goal scorers in total.

Now how on earth can you call that too Fev-centric ??? :? :confused:

After all, Fev is still our no 1 forward, its his job to kick goals. If he wasn't getting more of it than most we would all be accusing him of not doing his job well enough !!!!!

If you try & say the rest of the team didn't contribute enough, let me suggest that if the rest of the team kicks 12 goals every game on top of whatever Fev kicks we will win most weeks. :wink:


Baring mind if Garlett had kicked straight that would have been 5 goals to him, if the Chief hadn't missed, 2 goals to him, if Houla hadn't missed, 2 goals for him.

That's 4 goals actually kicked instead 8!

The issue isn't that we are Fevcentric but rather he knows how to kick the flowering Sherrin thru the big sticks.

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Positives
PostPosted: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:11 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 6450
I agree Amers, even though he still got a lot of ball most of the time it was the players honouring perfect leads. There was far less kicking long to a contest than there had been previously.

He's the best full forward in the comp, he's going to get a lot of ball go through him because of that. As long as its hitting him on the tit from leads he's destroyed his opponent on i don't really care.

Its only a problem when we direct kick and hope balls his way continuously, and that happened Sweet FA.

_________________
"I will rejoice in their anguish, delight in their failure and revel in our success"

We are Carlton, @#$%&! the rest !!!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Positives
PostPosted: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:01 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:49 pm
Posts: 1080
Location: On A Sailing Ship To Nowhere Leaving Anyplace
amers wrote:
To those who think that we were too Fev-centric, your joking right ???

He kicked 6 of 18 goals, that's only 1/3 of our goals. We had 2 other multiple scorers and 11 goal scorers in total.

Now how on earth can you call that too Fev-centric ??? :? :confused:

After all, Fev is still our no 1 forward, its his job to kick goals. If he wasn't getting more of it than most we would all be accusing him of not doing his job well enough !!!!!

If you try & say the rest of the team didn't contribute enough, let me suggest that if the rest of the team kicks 12 goals every game on top of whatever Fev kicks we will win most weeks. :wink:


+1

There is no logic in the claim that we were too Fev Centric.

_________________
Hooked on The Blues


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Positives
PostPosted: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:11 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24645
Location: Kaloyasena
Noonamah Blue wrote:
amers wrote:
To those who think that we were too Fev-centric, your joking right ???

He kicked 6 of 18 goals, that's only 1/3 of our goals. We had 2 other multiple scorers and 11 goal scorers in total.

Now how on earth can you call that too Fev-centric ??? :? :confused:

After all, Fev is still our no 1 forward, its his job to kick goals. If he wasn't getting more of it than most we would all be accusing him of not doing his job well enough !!!!!

If you try & say the rest of the team didn't contribute enough, let me suggest that if the rest of the team kicks 12 goals every game on top of whatever Fev kicks we will win most weeks. :wink:


+1

There is no logic in the claim that we were too Fev Centric.



Based on last Friday's game it is certainly a DFO (Data Free Observation). :wink:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Positives
PostPosted: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:16 am 
Offline
Horrie Clover
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 8:16 pm
Posts: 303
Beautiful work in this thread regarding the Fevcentric rebuttals.

I felt Fev was only the target when he lead well or no-one else was offering anything, and this is exactly how a forward should play and how the rest of the team should honour him. When Fev takes off and has 5 metres clear of his opponent, you have to honour that. And when there isn't any real leads, just go to Fev cause he's the best mark.

I believe went always went for the best option. Murphy, Gibbs, Wiggins, Houla, Simo, Bentley, Betts, Cloke, Jacobs + more all had leads (making space) honoured and kicked to. What i think people have in their head straight away that we need another "sub-main" target ala Hawks and Brisbane. Say had Murph, Bentley and Simo not kicked their goals, instead Cloke got them, there will be no-one here saying we were Fevcentric.

_________________
cruise (Kreuze) missile:
a very accurate flying bomb.
SOURCE: http://library.thinkquest.org/3785/glossary.html


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Positives
PostPosted: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:36 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:36 pm
Posts: 2960
Location: Oak Park
Nice to get a win but lets not get carried away, i've seen more pressure at under 11 games than I did on Friday! :eek:

_________________
C'mon Blueboys!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Positives
PostPosted: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:44 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24645
Location: Kaloyasena
marciblue wrote:
Nice to get a win but lets not get carried away, i've seen more pressure at under 11 games than I did on Friday! :eek:



You're not used to seeing the defensive pressure applied by a Carlton Team. :wink:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Positives
PostPosted: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:57 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:36 pm
Posts: 2960
Location: Oak Park
AGRO wrote:
marciblue wrote:
Nice to get a win but lets not get carried away, i've seen more pressure at under 11 games than I did on Friday! :eek:



You're not used to seeing the defensive pressure applied by a Carlton Team. :wink:


That could be it. Hoops gave us an example or 2 again on Friday, God bless his cotton socks!

But the shitboners did not give a yelp in that area the other night so I have downgraded the win on that basis.

Still more than happy with the night and what I saw! Robbo, gotta love this kid… :smoking:

_________________
C'mon Blueboys!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Positives
PostPosted: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:59 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:05 pm
Posts: 1005
Location: Raxacoricofallapatorius
Our Fev-centricity is a fact but what is certainly up for contention is whether or not this is a bad thing.

I think until the Kruise is ready to take over at CHF Fev will always be the first option looked for but what I liked about the game on Friday night was that we rarely went to him when he was out-numbered or out of position.

The best measure of any improvement in our forward line structure (or good Fev-centricity) is by looking at the percentage of times shots at goal were generated for each Fev-focussed move into the forward line.

My assessment is not scientific so purely based on how it appeared to me but I thought we were very good at finding Fev and more willing to try other options when Fev wasn't appropriate.

On this basis Fev kicking 6 goals is a GOOD thing :thumbsup:

_________________
Carlton - Nothing's changed
I still love you, oh, I still love you
Only slightly, only slightly less
Than I used to, my love


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Positives
PostPosted: Mon Feb 23, 2009 10:09 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 1:48 pm
Posts: 1556
Location: Under the Earth`s Sun...now.
For the next NAB match we should rest Fev (and Juddy too) and explore other forward options such as Edwards,Hartlett or Austin. Would be good to know we can revert to plan B in the proper season if needed.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Positives
PostPosted: Mon Feb 23, 2009 10:26 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24645
Location: Kaloyasena
Looking forward to all the reports from any High School Age TCers out there (even Primary School Age ones if any) - who are doing the:


Carlton School Yard Strut

:wink:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Positives
PostPosted: Mon Feb 23, 2009 10:49 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
DownUnderChick wrote:
Kaptain Kouta wrote:
DownUnderChick wrote:
I had one negative from the game and that is that no-one made any effort to belt the bejesus out of that runt Harvey. :mad:

Flower I hate the little s&^t.


Not worth the effort. Didn't hurt us, and only chimed in with a goal when it was too little, too late.


But he needed to be hurt when he smothered Jamo's kick in the first. :mad:



Cheating oompa loompa jumped forward of the mark to effect that smother.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Positives
PostPosted: Mon Feb 23, 2009 10:54 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
septembergurl wrote:
Negatives
.
.
3. North supporters claiming that Fev kneed Pratt in the back with intent, and should be reported.


That's a positive. Opposition supporters whinging about stuff like that is awesome.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Positives
PostPosted: Mon Feb 23, 2009 11:00 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24645
Location: Kaloyasena
Wojee wrote:
septembergurl wrote:
Negatives
.
.
3. North supporters claiming that Fev kneed Pratt in the back with intent, and should be reported.


That's a positive. Opposition supporters whinging about stuff like that is awesome.



Yeah I'm with you - I couldnt work out how that could possibly anything other than positive. :wink:

:twisted: :twisted: :twisted:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 61 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group