DownUnderChick wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
woof wrote:
Head to Head
Knights 2 v Ratten 0.
Head to head
Ratten 2 v Malthouse 0.
Great theory.
Malthouse has a team of duds in the finals....
10 years in the job and he has built a team of "duds".
I'm not impressed.

Yeah but theyre doing ok...
They dont have the luxury of a Judd...a Fev and a handfull of pick 1s...
They dont have rucks..
They dont have 'no name' defenders.... Harry O and Goldsack etc...i named them but thats cos i know footy...
They cant even boast about their midfield... yet theyre there........!!!...... again!!!!
They have even dropped their best player and their ball carrying half back flanker....
impressive...
Always looking to place a bit of an elbow into Ratts head, aren't you Sailor Man?
You crack me up everytime.

Ratts is a big boy.. he can handle me .. easily....!!!!
BUT.. can he handle the job of coaching a pretty good.. but inexperienced list in a VERY WEAK competition????
So far he cant..... cos were still doing the same things we did ... 6 months ago.... and getting done each time...
My favourite analogy for doing the same thing over and over and copping it was the Larry Holmes left hand jab....
If he was allowed to jab jab jab you in the face.....round after round.... he wouldnt knock you out with a massive hook or anything... but youd come out with a missing right eye......
So the moral of the Larry Holmes jab was do something to not get continually hit by it round after round or youre going to go down by it....
A smart coach would invent something to counter the Larry Holmes jab....not let him do it round after round....