Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jun 29, 2025 9:26 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 71 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 9:43 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:22 pm
Posts: 4678
Location: Melbourne
Hmmmmmmmm, $350 is indeed a bit high.

Good on him for a great season but WOW! $350k?>???? WOW!

Ummm, yeah. Not too sure about this one guys.

Anyway, onto more important topics, why isn't Bower & Setanta signed up? I'd be considering them both my top priority.

_________________
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit"
- Aristotle


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 10:47 am 
Offline
Bert Deacon
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:51 pm
Posts: 522
Location: Darwin
$350K is fair enough for Carrots.

We have a lot of cap room at the moment and we do need to pay 95% of it. Lance is in for a pay cut, Koutas finished, Skinnys gone, we have the room.

Also the cap increases next year, I believe.

He is the Nichols medallist and deserves to be paid well for that effort. From a morale point of view this is important.

Finally, If its only a 2 year contract by the time our kids are up for renewal in a big way, we can renegioate. Ideally it will be front ended as well.

$350K is really not that big a figure in the scheme of things.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 11:47 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
92.5% actually.

Has anyone flagged the idea that these might just be the maximum figures for performance based contracts?

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 12:35 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:28 pm
Posts: 3768
Quote:
Love to know what the stats are for these two with regard to hand ball receives, hard ball gets and loose ball gets.

Carrazo 1, Scotland 2 for all 3.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 5:25 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
simonverbeek wrote:
If we pay him that much the club, and Steven Ike, are a just a joke, and we're well and truly screwed in coming years when Walker, Murphy, Gibbs and Kreuzer want 550k contracts.

I said this would happen three or four months ago re our list management in a few years and was severely bagged for it. The reality is already starting to bite, folks.
In three or four years we will have to offload someone we don't want to, just to keep a reasonable list together. It will be a Murphy/Gibbs/Kreuzer type who is worth a heap but we won't be able to match the other teams' offers because we have to pay everybody what they are seen to be worth. People were saying it on the 'Get Kosi' thread. Offer him the world so StK have to pay him more and stuff up their TPP.
Welcome to the future and a socialist AFL.

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 8:42 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am
Posts: 2662
Can you name one Murphy/Gibbs like talent that has been squeezed off a list in their prime due to salary cap constraints???


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 8:43 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
Blue Sombrero wrote:
simonverbeek wrote:
If we pay him that much the club, and Steven Ike, are a just a joke, and we're well and truly screwed in coming years when Walker, Murphy, Gibbs and Kreuzer want 550k contracts.

I said this would happen three or four months ago re our list management in a few years and was severely bagged for it. The reality is already starting to bite, folks.
In three or four years we will have to offload someone we don't want to, just to keep a reasonable list together. It will be a Murphy/Gibbs/Kreuzer type who is worth a heap but we won't be able to match the other teams' offers because we have to pay everybody what they are seen to be worth. People were saying it on the 'Get Kosi' thread. Offer him the world so StK have to pay him more and stuff up their TPP.
Welcome to the future and a socialist AFL.



..it won't be easy to keep 'em all together, but it is possible.. ..lions kept their stars together during their peak years, as have the eagles..and to a lesser extent the saints.. ..we just need to get creative..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 10:31 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 1:29 pm
Posts: 5913
Location: Melbourne
To keep our list together, we're going to have to exceed the salary cap. We can either do this the Brisbane way (getting AFL sanctioned salary cap relief) or do it the West Coast way and ensure our players have financial incentives that aren't **cough cough** included in the salary cap, to stay at the club.

Having said this, of course I fully understand that our club was the only one to have ever cheated the salary cap :garthp:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 10:43 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:28 pm
Posts: 3768
showbag wrote:
Can you name one Murphy/Gibbs like talent that has been squeezed off a list in their prime due to salary cap constraints???
Essendon* had to let go a few players a few years ago.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 10:48 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 6:31 pm
Posts: 24457
Location: Heartbroken
BlueWorld wrote:
showbag wrote:
Can you name one Murphy/Gibbs like talent that has been squeezed off a list in their prime due to salary cap constraints???
Essendon* had to let go a few players a few years ago.


Heffernan, Blumfield and Moorcroft were hardly elite though.

_________________
Richard Pratt - A Carlton legend.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 10:52 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18715
Location: threeohfivethree
There's a lot of panic about this stuff which seems a little misguided from where I'm sitting.

2005 - $100.8 million ($6,300,000 per club)
2006 - $103.6 million ($6,427,812 per club)
2007 - $111.1 million ($6,943,750 per club)
2008 - $118.9 million ($7,431,250 per club)
2009 - $123.3 million ($7,706,250 per club)
2010 - $127.4 million ($7,962,500 per club)
2011 - $131.6 million ($8,225,000 per club)

Carrazzo and Scotland's contracts are for the next three years. I've never been a fan of ridiculous player contracts (Kouta, Campo, Lance) but keep in mind the fact that the salary cap is up 7.3% this year, 7.0% in 2008, followed by 3.5%, 3.3% and 3.3% increases in the years 2009-2011, resulting in an overall increase in the salary cap of 27% over the five years to 2011.

These two players' contracts will finish at the end of 2010 - a year in which the average player wage (for a 38 player list) will be $209,539 not allowing for veterans list etc.

Next year the average AFL player wage will be $195,559. Considering Carrazzo's just won the B&F, the fact that we have a large number of players on far less than the average due to their youth and the fact that we have to pay 92.5% I'm not sure who else deserves that sort of money more than Carrots.

In Scotland's case $400K seems a touch high but not completely out of the region of what he's worth and what we need to pay to comply with the 92.5% rule. If they come back to about $360-380K (and keep in mind that it appears the club's not happy with $400K) then it's probably about right.

Hopefully we're also looking at incentive based structures as part of these deals to offer the club and the player a little more flexibility.

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Last edited by GWS on Fri Sep 14, 2007 10:56 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 10:52 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
Deano Supremo wrote:
BlueWorld wrote:
showbag wrote:
Can you name one Murphy/Gibbs like talent that has been squeezed off a list in their prime due to salary cap constraints???
Essendon* had to let go a few players a few years ago.


Heffernan, Blumfield and Moorcroft were hardly elite though.


Caracella was average after leaving Windy Hill too.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 10:54 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 6:31 pm
Posts: 24457
Location: Heartbroken
Wojee wrote:
Deano Supremo wrote:
BlueWorld wrote:
showbag wrote:
Can you name one Murphy/Gibbs like talent that has been squeezed off a list in their prime due to salary cap constraints???
Essendon* had to let go a few players a few years ago.


Heffernan, Blumfield and Moorcroft were hardly elite though.


Caracella was average after leaving Windy Hill too.


I knew I'd missed one.

I kind of think the salary cap thing was Sheedy spin for getting rid of average (Heff, Blum, Moor) or injury prone (Caracelle) talent without looking like the bad guy.

_________________
Richard Pratt - A Carlton legend.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 11:11 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
Deano Supremo wrote:
Wojee wrote:
Deano Supremo wrote:
BlueWorld wrote:
showbag wrote:
Can you name one Murphy/Gibbs like talent that has been squeezed off a list in their prime due to salary cap constraints???
Essendon* had to let go a few players a few years ago.


Heffernan, Blumfield and Moorcroft were hardly elite though.


Caracella was average after leaving Windy Hill too.


I knew I'd missed one.

I kind of think the salary cap thing was Sheedy spin for getting rid of average (Heff, Blum, Moor) or injury prone (Caracelle) talent without looking like the bad guy.


Sheedy talks them up to all be superstars to maximise trade values but rarely has he let a genuinely good player go.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 11:22 am 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
Wojee wrote:
Deano Supremo wrote:
Wojee wrote:
Deano Supremo wrote:
BlueWorld wrote:
showbag wrote:
Can you name one Murphy/Gibbs like talent that has been squeezed off a list in their prime due to salary cap constraints???
Essendon* had to let go a few players a few years ago.


Heffernan, Blumfield and Moorcroft were hardly elite though.


Caracella was average after leaving Windy Hill too.


I knew I'd missed one.

I kind of think the salary cap thing was Sheedy spin for getting rid of average (Heff, Blum, Moor) or injury prone (Caracelle) talent without looking like the bad guy.


Sheedy talks them up to all be superstars to maximise trade values but rarely has he let a genuinely good player go.


Whilst guns like Henneman were kept to on the list for reasons yet to be explained.

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 11:34 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
DownUnderChick wrote:
Wojee wrote:
Deano Supremo wrote:
Wojee wrote:
Deano Supremo wrote:
BlueWorld wrote:
showbag wrote:
Can you name one Murphy/Gibbs like talent that has been squeezed off a list in their prime due to salary cap constraints???
Essendon* had to let go a few players a few years ago.


Heffernan, Blumfield and Moorcroft were hardly elite though.


Caracella was average after leaving Windy Hill too.


I knew I'd missed one.

I kind of think the salary cap thing was Sheedy spin for getting rid of average (Heff, Blum, Moor) or injury prone (Caracelle) talent without looking like the bad guy.


Sheedy talks them up to all be superstars to maximise trade values but rarely has he let a genuinely good player go.


Whilst guns like Henneman were kept to on the list for reasons yet to be explained.


Rumour is he has in his possession photos involving Sheedy, a sauna and a goat.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 12:51 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 2:21 am
Posts: 1684
Location: Parkville
GWS wrote:
There's a lot of panic about this stuff which seems a little misguided from where I'm sitting.

2005 - $100.8 million ($6,300,000 per club)
2006 - $103.6 million ($6,427,812 per club)
2007 - $111.1 million ($6,943,750 per club)
2008 - $118.9 million ($7,431,250 per club)
2009 - $123.3 million ($7,706,250 per club)
2010 - $127.4 million ($7,962,500 per club)
2011 - $131.6 million ($8,225,000 per club)

Carrazzo and Scotland's contracts are for the next three years. I've never been a fan of ridiculous player contracts (Kouta, Campo, Lance) but keep in mind the fact that the salary cap is up 7.3% this year, 7.0% in 2008, followed by 3.5%, 3.3% and 3.3% increases in the years 2009-2011, resulting in an overall increase in the salary cap of 27% over the five years to 2011.

These two players' contracts will finish at the end of 2010 - a year in which the average player wage (for a 38 player list) will be $209,539 not allowing for veterans list etc.

Next year the average AFL player wage will be $195,559. Considering Carrazzo's just won the B&F, the fact that we have a large number of players on far less than the average due to their youth and the fact that we have to pay 92.5% I'm not sure who else deserves that sort of money more than Carrots.

In Scotland's case $400K seems a touch high but not completely out of the region of what he's worth and what we need to pay to comply with the 92.5% rule. If they come back to about $360-380K (and keep in mind that it appears the club's not happy with $400K) then it's probably about right.

Hopefully we're also looking at incentive based structures as part of these deals to offer the club and the player a little more flexibility.


Top post GWS. I love seeing facts to put things in perspective. I still think Carrots is asking a little much given he has only played one good year, but at least we know its not over the top. I think a base of $250k with incentives if he reaches certain KPIs would be the way to go. ie top 5 B&F = $100k, top 10 (6-10) = $50k. But I guess Icke would have all that covered and we should just let them do their job and stop interfearing and making wild assumptions.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 2:42 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 1:38 pm
Posts: 762
GWS wrote:
There's a lot of panic about this stuff which seems a little misguided from where I'm sitting.

2005 - $100.8 million ($6,300,000 per club)
2006 - $103.6 million ($6,427,812 per club)
2007 - $111.1 million ($6,943,750 per club)
2008 - $118.9 million ($7,431,250 per club)
2009 - $123.3 million ($7,706,250 per club)
2010 - $127.4 million ($7,962,500 per club)
2011 - $131.6 million ($8,225,000 per club)

Carrazzo and Scotland's contracts are for the next three years. I've never been a fan of ridiculous player contracts (Kouta, Campo, Lance) but keep in mind the fact that the salary cap is up 7.3% this year, 7.0% in 2008, followed by 3.5%, 3.3% and 3.3% increases in the years 2009-2011, resulting in an overall increase in the salary cap of 27% over the five years to 2011.

These two players' contracts will finish at the end of 2010 - a year in which the average player wage (for a 38 player list) will be $209,539 not allowing for veterans list etc.

Next year the average AFL player wage will be $195,559. Considering Carrazzo's just won the B&F, the fact that we have a large number of players on far less than the average due to their youth and the fact that we have to pay 92.5% I'm not sure who else deserves that sort of money more than Carrots.

In Scotland's case $400K seems a touch high but not completely out of the region of what he's worth and what we need to pay to comply with the 92.5% rule. If they come back to about $360-380K (and keep in mind that it appears the club's not happy with $400K) then it's probably about right.

Hopefully we're also looking at incentive based structures as part of these deals to offer the club and the player a little more flexibility.


Great post GWS.

I must admit that I forgot about the cap increases, and therefore it is difficult to callibrate one's mind to assess a player's worth as the cap increases.

Even with your info, I'd still be disappointed if Carazz got 350k. In my opinion he's max 275k, 300k if he's lucky.

I'd rather chuck an extra 100k on Gibbs and Murphy's contracts foir next year, get them to invest it safely and tell them to remember our gift at future contract negotiations.

_________________
They will know that they've been playing against the famous old dark blues


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 3:02 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 1:29 pm
Posts: 1566
Location: Melbourne
Molly wrote:
Doc Sherrin and I were the only ones on here calling for a Scotland trade last year...

I am betting that if he asks for $400,000 over three years that there will be more than one poster joining the official 'trade Scotland now' group


Where do I sign to join the group? :evil:

$400K a year for 3 years? Pfffffffttttttt...

As someone said, if he wants to head down that path, he will have a new jumper next year.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:28 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 8:24 pm
Posts: 2821
Location: In The Boot Of Brendan Fevola Car
nytdog wrote:
Tractor Boy wrote:
Effes wrote:
Well said Blues2005


true


Excellent post B2005. Scotland doesn't deserve the crap that gets writting on TC. When you get to your late 20s, you're not only compensated for future service but also good performance in past service - which Scotland has provided. $400k is too steep, but somewhere around $300-$350k is justifiable IMO. And I think that's where it will end up. As for Carrots, he's dreaming if he expects $350k. One year of good service doesn't justify that sort of pay hike. Show some consistency over 2-4 years (ala Scotland) and then you can start asking for that.

Player contracts are about paying a player what he is worth now, plus compensating him for loyalty and strong past service. Other players on the list see that and then understand what they can expect to receive after providing good service for a few years. I'm sure many of us get paid more now in our jobs and do less work because we are more senior. Its reward for past service and hard work.

Didn't Voss get paid this year by the Lions and he wasn't even playing?!
Didn't Thornton have trouble making $300 000 a year after 4 great years or so.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 71 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group