Punter22 wrote:
bosman wrote:
Punter22 wrote:
bosman wrote:
Punter22 wrote:
Malthouse will be lucky to be given 5 minutes to collect his personal effects before being escorted off the premises.
don't think the club has the money to pay him out... don't think they can afford to get rid of him..
lets see what happens..
Micks salary is already in the budget. Nothing additional there (nor with any other loyal assistant who walks with him). The only additional cost would be any additional salary to Laidley to step up from assistant to senior coach.
He might be 100% accurate in everything he said this morning, but he has to be out of the club today for trashing the board and Trigg.
in the budget doesn't mean its in the bank. budget for money coming in and money going out and with the gate receipts being crap I would say more money going out than coming in...
I'm not sure you understand the concept of "can't afford".
If it's in the budget, one way or the other they are paying that amount. Or are you suggesting that the club could go to the coaches later in the year and ask them to take a pay cut because gate receipts are down? Interesting concept.
There's a fixed amount Carlton will be paying its coaches this year. Sacking Mick now or letting him coach out doesn't change that amount, except if they had to pay an assistant slightly more to step up.
Can Carlton "afford" to pay Mick out, no. Paying out 500K mid way thru the year would have not been in the budget, paying 500K over 6 months would have been. The amount paid was never going to change. The club is in massive debt, membership down, gate receipts down, they might have 500K lying around that was allocated to something else in the budget but to terminate Mick's contract now, they wouldn't have budgeted on it. Its just going to hurt other parts of the business.
Maybe they might just keep Mick on the books for the next 6 months, problem solved.