Walsh wrote:
Well if you think the midfield isn't pea hearted and good enough then that's your opinion.
They will never collectively be able to compete in clearances against top eight sides. I think the stats prove it and I don't think it's fair to depend on Cripps and Walsh
SPS, Dow, LOB, Fisher are not good enough.
The midfield weren't pea hearted against St Kilda were they? Yes we have a personnel issue in midfield but for you to ignore that part of the issue is a coaching problem, and more particularly, a development problem undermines any argument you might want to make.
I have serious questions over their development. Unfortunately, that comes back to the coach. It's up to the coach not enforcing standards and letting passengers take up privileged positions. If it's ok for a senior player to go half-in, then it's ok for a junior. Why play a guy like Murphy when he wasn't showing any form and there were kids banging the door down in the Magoos? Setterfield getting games when he was playing very poorly for weeks in a row.
Then we haven't even touched on the way our team defence was handled. We were rightly lambasted by commentators. Far too loose, not understanding the "stand" rule and the quicker ball movement meaning that a zone defence unless, absolutely well drilled that reacts within split seconds means we were getting belted on the rebound. Sure we butchered the ball at times, but the system being played cannot rely on perfection. Where is the insurance policy if the ball is turned over? There was none.
There are players with talent here. A coach is supposed to get the best out of them. I don't think David has. I'm sure he's a nice guy and he wants the best for the club. He was originally recruited as an assistant and fell into the head coach position mainly through player power, a coach who didn't crack the whip hard enough but very likeable.
We need someone tough but fair. Malthouse was seemingly tough but unfair. We need a coach who will give us a culture shift but who is tactically savvy and/or has assistants who can handle that part of it. How many of our assistants are talked about for being in the mix for roles elsewhere? If they are tactically savvy and have been shot down by a decision by the head coach, then there's another problem there.
Where am I going with this? The problem is multi-faceted. To simply blame the players as being pea hearted is reductionist and fails to consider the nuances and issues that plague this club at the moment.