Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jun 16, 2025 2:27 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 705 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 ... 36  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Fri Jun 21, 2013 10:24 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
redback wrote:
99prelim wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
redback wrote:
Why should Malthouse be given 5 years?

He's a million dollar coach and Ratten wasn't.
He's a premiership coach and ratten wasn't.
His players respect him and play for him and Rattens don't.
He's a 30 year experience coach and Ratten wasn't.
He's a great tactician and Ratten wasn't.
He didn't take over a wooden spoon side to rebuild Ratten did.

Ross Lyon is a great coach too :roll: who hasn't won a premiership either and had the list at their prime then left them with a dilapidated list and nothing to show for it.
Is that the outcome of giving Malthouse 5 years or is it to rebuild the list that is very competitive and have improved by all accounts by Malthouse fans?
If we are so competitive and haven’t lost by more than 17 points to the best teams and Malthouse has only been in charge for 12 games and still learning the players then by the second half of the year we should be pushing top four and a premiership chance without the need of a rebuild.
That’s going by Malthouse's fans assumptions and the graphical improvement of the group over the past 7 rounds.


Couldn't agree more RB.
We know we have decent list to challange, we were told that by the club over the past 2 years.
We got a "premiership coach" because we felt we lacked in that area. No problems with that at all.
But don't make excuses now or come talk about taking us 3 years to build again!
Enough of the bullshit and StKilda mentality. :mad:


We were told by the coach...who has since been sacked cos he was shit. Obviously not shit enough to bamboozle some here that we were ready to challenge with a decent list

We lacked in what area?



The current coach also commented that the list is good enough to challenge. :donk:

Are we bamboolzed to believe him also or not? :roll:


I suggest you make up your own mind. Someone can be a good coach and still be full of it. Jeez, why can't people get it in their heads that it's not about assumptions or perception but about reality. :banghead:

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Fri Jun 21, 2013 10:31 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 9:27 pm
Posts: 5270
Pafloyul wrote:
Someone can be a good coach and still be full of it.


That's our Mick to a tee...he is most definitely full of it. But people, especially those who look up to him, seem to lap it up.

Nothing like an inspirational, animated and expressive bit of shit talk from a respected man to get the fire in the belly going. Ratten had as much charisma as my indoor plant....and I don't even own one!

_________________
The problem will be made. for the solution to be sold, to your face before your eyes, tolerance is now the new danger


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Fri Jun 21, 2013 10:35 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
club29 wrote:
Synbad wrote:
i suppose judd can now rei nvent himself and become an enforcer or something....ground to dust by ratten.

five years he had his hands on judd.... kiled him... aged 28 judd was lame..... :yikes: .... twenty eight... sad to watch actually...

hands up those who didnt fear that was going to happen!!!! :thumbsup:

:




If I believed that nonsense I would go into a hyper fit too everytime someone mentioned Ratts name too. Throw in the lollies and the closed sessions and I reckon I would throwing in the nervous :lol: :lol: :lol: all over the place.



still noone else will give him a head coach job will they???

u reckon cos its because he was unlucky with unjuries after being really good prior??? :lol:

so ur a good judge and 18 teams arent???? :eek: :eek:

wow!!!

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 12:01 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
TheBluesMuse wrote:
Pafloyul wrote:
Someone can be a good coach and still be full of it.


That's our Mick to a tee...he is most definitely full of it. But people, especially those who look up to him, seem to lap it up.

Nothing like an inspirational, animated and expressive bit of shit talk from a respected man to get the fire in the belly going. Ratten had as much charisma as my indoor plant....and I don't even own one!


Yeah, but you know what I'm getting at. We (as in the coach, people around the club) can say what we like, they can have all the plans in the world but if the reality doesn't stack up then it won't happen. I say we forget the immediate past and look at where we are at now. Let's also look where other clubs fit into the scheme of things. Yes, if everything went right and some things went wrong elsewhere, anything could happen but how likely is that?

You will notice (people in general, not BluesMuse) that we at least didn't (for whatever reason) make the required changes during the draft and trade period last season so that has put us on the back-foot for a start. Who knows what plans and changes opposition clubs have put in place, I mean, who has really studied and evaluated it? It's not us versus us, it's us versus some other bastards. Yes, Malthouse has made mistakes and I would have liked a few more wins but reality is reality. What I see is a side with struggling key forwards, aging stars and a bunch of glorified rookie players. I don't see an under-performed top-four side; at best that belongs to a past that is no longer relevant.

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Last edited by Pafloyul on Sat Jun 22, 2013 12:27 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 12:25 am 
Offline
Garry Crane
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 07, 2013 5:13 pm
Posts: 243
Location: .?../*%$#@
Pafloyul wrote:
TheBluesMuse wrote:
Pafloyul wrote:
Someone can be a good coach and still be full of it.


That's our Mick to a tee...he is most definitely full of it. But people, especially those who look up to him, seem to lap it up.

Nothing like an inspirational, animated and expressive bit of shit talk from a respected man to get the fire in the belly going. Ratten had as much charisma as my indoor plant....and I don't even own one!


Yeah, but you know what I'm getting at. We (as in the coach, people around the club) can say what they like, they can have all the plans in the world but if the reality doesn't stack up then it won't happen. I say we forget the immediate past and look at where we are at now. Let's also look where other clubs fit into the scheme of things. Yes, if everything went right and some things went wrong elsewhere, anything could happen but how likely is that?

You will notice (people in general, not BluesMuse) that we at least didn't (for whatever reason) make the required changes during the draft and trade period last season so that has put us on the back-foot for a start. Who knows what plans and changes opposition clubs have put in place, I mean , who has really studied and evaluated it? It's not us versus us, it's us versus some other bastards. Yes, Malthouse has made mistakes and I would have liked a few more wins but reality is reality. What I see is a side with struggling key forwards, aging stars and a bunch of glorified rookie players. I don't see an under-performed top-four side; at best that belongs in the past that is no longer relevant.


I thought that early on, but I now believe we are not as far off a top 4 side (on capability at least) I expect 2nd half of the season to reflect that. And that's despite having around 25% of the list as almost having been confirmed as needing to be recycled.

And some of those rookies are proving to be genuine worthy performers, Cachia especially.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 6:50 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18022
99prelim wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
99prelim wrote:
Do you mean the new coach who had 5 minutes to assess the list and sell hope to the Carlton faithful...OR the old coach who had carte blanche for 5 years to construct, develop, nurture a list and make an informed judgement


No.
He's talking about the new coach who spent 3 weeks travelling around flogging his newly released book instead of assessing the list of his new club.


True, but completely rrelevant to this argument.



How is it irrelevant?

You cant make the excuse about Malthouse having insufficient time to evaluate the list when it was his and the clubs doing. Unfortunately he was travelling around promoting his book during the period the other clubs were assessing their lists.
Another poor decision by the club. They should have told Malthouse you're completely in or out from the start. That decision put our list development 12 months behind. 12 months we dont have.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 7:12 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:42 pm
Posts: 2465
Location: Princess Park
Blue Vain wrote:
99prelim wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
99prelim wrote:
Do you mean the new coach who had 5 minutes to assess the list and sell hope to the Carlton faithful...OR the old coach who had carte blanche for 5 years to construct, develop, nurture a list and make an informed judgement


No.
He's talking about the new coach who spent 3 weeks travelling around flogging his newly released book instead of assessing the list of his new club.


True, but completely rrelevant to this argument.



How is it irrelevant?

You cant make the excuse about Malthouse having insufficient time to evaluate the list when it was his and the clubs doing. Unfortunately he was travelling around promoting his book during the period the other clubs were assessing their lists.
Another poor decision by the club. They should have told Malthouse you're completely in or out from the start. That decision put our list development 12 months behind. 12 months we dont have.


Contracts in place and no $, what was he to do?

He could review as much as he liked but his hands were tied because of stupid decisions made before him. Maybe you should point the finger to his predecessor.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 7:59 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Blue Vain wrote:
99prelim wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
99prelim wrote:
Do you mean the new coach who had 5 minutes to assess the list and sell hope to the Carlton faithful...OR the old coach who had carte blanche for 5 years to construct, develop, nurture a list and make an informed judgement


No.
He's talking about the new coach who spent 3 weeks travelling around flogging his newly released book instead of assessing the list of his new club.


True, but completely rrelevant to this argument.



How is it irrelevant?

You cant make the excuse about Malthouse having insufficient time to evaluate the list when it was his and the clubs doing. Unfortunately he was travelling around promoting his book during the period the other clubs were assessing their lists.
Another poor decision by the club. They should have told Malthouse you're completely in or out from the start. That decision put our list development 12 months behind. 12 months we dont have.



But the obvious ones to go were always contracted.
Plus McKay is football manager.. and im sure they spoke.
Problem is contracting guys like Davies Joseph White etc for more than a year.
1) Who was going to poach them?
2) If anybody did poach them would it set the club back?

Ratts and McKAy were responsible for this.....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 8:48 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:27 am
Posts: 2345
Synbad wrote:

But the obvious ones to go were always contracted.
Plus McKay is football manager.. and im sure they spoke.
Problem is contracting guys like Davies Joseph White etc for more than a year.
1) Who was going to poach them?
2) If anybody did poach them would it set the club back?

Ratts and McKAy were responsible for this.....


Nah it was just Ratts. McKay came aboard at that time without the ability to evaluate anything after Icke walked.

2 year contracts were afforded to Ellard, Davies and Joseph. I remember it well thinking.......why?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 9:01 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:14 pm
Posts: 5991
Location: Melbourne
Also if anyone thinks we could of traded any of the duds we no longer want, you are deluded.

If we know their crap so does everyone else.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 9:13 am 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
Adam Chatfield wrote:
Also if anyone thinks we could of traded any of the duds we no longer want, you are deluded.

If we know their crap so does everyone else.


I don't think anyone has spoken about trading our duds.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 9:35 am 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
Synbad wrote:
club29 wrote:
Synbad wrote:
i suppose judd can now rei nvent himself and become an enforcer or something....ground to dust by ratten.

five years he had his hands on judd.... kiled him... aged 28 judd was lame..... :yikes: .... twenty eight... sad to watch actually...

hands up those who didnt fear that was going to happen!!!! :thumbsup:

:




If I believed that nonsense I would go into a hyper fit too everytime someone mentioned Ratts name too. Throw in the lollies and the closed sessions and I reckon I would throwing in the nervous :lol: :lol: :lol: all over the place.



still noone else will give him a head coach job will they???

u reckon cos its because he was unlucky with unjuries after being really good prior??? :lol:

so ur a good judge and 18 teams arent???? :eek: :eek:

wow!!!


Wow - 18 teams ?? That was well thought out. :screwy: So if Malthouse was on the market know all clubs would be prepared to sack their coach to have him. You call me weird. :lol: :screwy:

I haven't said I wanted Ratts as head coach of Carlton or any of the other teams . Just pointing out he was getting good results early last year and at the time you were impressed. Not sure why this FACT gives you so much grief. We were playing football equal to what we played in the last two weeks if not better as we were actually winning. Chinned the pies and took out Freo in WA (they had only lost one game at that time to the swans by a goal and had beaten the cats - reigning premiers).

People say we were worked out but if we were worked out how did we still manage to chin the pies again and then smash the Dons who had worked us out?

Sure we went to crap and the coach copped it in the neck but there were a lot of circumstances beyond his control that contributed to the terrible result last year. This doesn't need to be argued. It makes no difference but for some reason people in a bid to talk up Malthouse are re writing history.

Mick is getting similar results to Ratts but seems to be doing it with a carefully designed system that gives us a more hope for the future...

I think that is all that needs to me said.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 9:56 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25157
Location: Bondi Beach
club29 wrote:
Synbad wrote:
club29 wrote:
Synbad wrote:
i suppose judd can now rei nvent himself and become an enforcer or something....ground to dust by ratten.

five years he had his hands on judd.... kiled him... aged 28 judd was lame..... :yikes: .... twenty eight... sad to watch actually...

hands up those who didnt fear that was going to happen!!!! :thumbsup:

:




If I believed that nonsense I would go into a hyper fit too everytime someone mentioned Ratts name too. Throw in the lollies and the closed sessions and I reckon I would throwing in the nervous :lol: :lol: :lol: all over the place.



still noone else will give him a head coach job will they???

u reckon cos its because he was unlucky with unjuries after being really good prior??? :lol:

so ur a good judge and 18 teams arent???? :eek: :eek:

wow!!!


Wow - 18 teams ?? That was well thought out. :screwy: So if Malthouse was on the market know all clubs would be prepared to sack their coach to have him. You call me weird. :lol: :screwy:

I haven't said I wanted Ratts as head coach of Carlton or any of the other teams . Just pointing out he was getting good results early last year and at the time you were impressed. Not sure why this FACT gives you so much grief. We were playing football equal to what we played in the last two weeks if not better as we were actually winning. Chinned the pies and took out Freo in WA (they had only lost one game at that time to the swans by a goal and had beaten the cats - reigning premiers).

People say we were worked out but if we were worked out how did we still manage to chin the pies again and then smash the Dons who had worked us out?

Sure we went to crap and the coach copped it in the neck but there were a lot of circumstances beyond his control that contributed to the terrible result last year. This doesn't need to be argued. It makes no difference but for some reason people in a bid to talk up Malthouse are re writing history.

Mick is getting similar results to Ratts but seems to be doing it with a carefully designed system that gives us a more hope for the future...

I think that is all that needs to me said.


Good post club

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 9:57 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 10:24 am
Posts: 40291
Location: seaside
I love Mick.......!


kindest regards tommi






oooh.....rhyming slang.....!

_________________
that'siti'mnotchangingthistagain......!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 10:07 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
Dermie was asked last night who's the best candidate for the vacant Dee's position.

His choice, you guessed it, B. Ratten.

His reasoning.
He's been great for the Hawks.
Second time coach.
He'll get great support from a new admin with AFL support.

Asked why he hadn't been successful at Carlton. Carlton are the worst club in Victoria to coach because as soon as anything goes the slightest bit wrong the different "factions" and special interest groups start agitating.

Now, I don't think Ratts is a great coach, but I think there's some truth to the rest of it.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 10:15 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 11:06 am
Posts: 1826
Blue Vain wrote:
99prelim wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
99prelim wrote:
Do you mean the new coach who had 5 minutes to assess the list and sell hope to the Carlton faithful...OR the old coach who had carte blanche for 5 years to construct, develop, nurture a list and make an informed judgement


No.
He's talking about the new coach who spent 3 weeks travelling around flogging his newly released book instead of assessing the list of his new club.


True, but completely rrelevant to this argument.



How is it irrelevant?

You cant make the excuse about Malthouse having insufficient time to evaluate the list when it was his and the clubs doing. Unfortunately he was travelling around promoting his book during the period the other clubs were assessing their lists.
Another poor decision by the club. They should have told Malthouse you're completely in or out from the start. That decision put our list development 12 months behind. 12 months we dont have.

Why would you say that,we have seen more development from our draft picks in the last 6 months ,than in the past 5 years.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 10:19 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
cimm1979 wrote:
Dermie was asked last night who's the best candidate for the vacant Dee's position.

His choice, you guessed it, B. Ratten.

His reasoning.
He's been great for the Hawks.
Second time coach.
He'll get great support from a new admin with AFL support.

Asked why he hadn't been successful at Carlton. Carlton are the worst club in Victoria to coach because as soon as anything goes the slightest bit wrong the different "factions" and special interest groups start agitating.

Now, I don't think Ratts is a great coach, but I think there's some truth to the rest of it.


So Dermie chosed Ratts and also wanted Ayers at Hawthorn and not Clarkson.

Ummmmmmm ok... give it to Ratts!!! :lol:

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 10:22 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
and cimm.. i wouldnt have guessed it but it doesnt surprise me.. the powers at hawthorn told dermie to stick to media and dont comment about the club...
Dermie is hardly a smart guy.. and yes i know..people like baz baz will tell me he has played AFL and i havent...... :lol:
As if only intelligent people have played AFL and the rest of the world is dumb.....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 10:28 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
Synbad wrote:
cimm1979 wrote:
Dermie was asked last night who's the best candidate for the vacant Dee's position.

His choice, you guessed it, B. Ratten.

His reasoning.
He's been great for the Hawks.
Second time coach.
He'll get great support from a new admin with AFL support.

Asked why he hadn't been successful at Carlton. Carlton are the worst club in Victoria to coach because as soon as anything goes the slightest bit wrong the different "factions" and special interest groups start agitating.

Now, I don't think Ratts is a great coach, but I think there's some truth to the rest of it.


So Dermie chosed Ratts and also wanted Ayers at Hawthorn and not Clarkson.

Ummmmmmm ok... give it to Ratts!!! :lol:


Just telling you what he said Synners.

Looks to be some truth in there.

And I have nominated that Ratts isn't a great coach.

How you going with McKay's repsonsibilities?

Got the dates right yet? :lol:

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 11:33 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
When did McKay start exactly Cimm?
And if we didnt have a footy manager youd think that was Ratts doing completely.. which makes it all the more damning against him i would have thought?
Which also means Dermie is a bigger imbecile than previously thought.. or Dermie just hates Melbourne....

Cos if i got my dates wrong.. Ratten is the negligent fool that just keeps costing more than we always thought.. so hardly bringing up what Dermie wrote as any kind of credit...
Right???? :thumbsup:

Anyway.. you give me McKays starting date... and ill let you know if my dates are jumbled.

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 705 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 ... 36  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 45 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group