Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jun 24, 2025 9:59 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2019 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 ... 101  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 10:53 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 12:22 pm
Posts: 6272
Location: Lurking
Kaptain Kouta wrote:
Why the need to panic? I'm not saying that we're tracking brilliantly, but a result like last week needs to be viewed through the prism of a season, not a week or 2.

Well said.

_________________
I AM DISENFRANCHISED


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 10:55 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:55 pm
Posts: 2952
Location: Balwyn
IMO the biggest problem facing Ratts is The Fevola Show, Fevola's erratic performance on and off the field compounded by its effects on the rest of the team on and off the field.
None of Parko, Britts or Pago-Pago were able to deal with it when Fevola was a younger less influential player and the problems only get bigger over time. The mind boggles as to how things will go as Fevola slows down with age and we are already seeing the mounting effects of injuries. Fevola has been determined to play while manifestly unfit for a good part of this year.
Ratts has my full support.

_________________
Bawditawaba


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 11:07 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 3510
Location: East Brunwick
I think Greg Swann needs to conduct a thorough review of the football department from top to bottom. We need to beef up our football department and throw a bit of cash around if Brett Ratten is to continue as coach.

Im not calling for Ratten to be sacked. I think we need to strengthen up the team around him and bring in a Dean Laidley, Brenton Sanderson or a John Longmire who all been part of orchestrating premierships as assistants. Poach a figure like Neil Balme or Graeme Allan as football operations manager who have been part of a premiership winning formula.

No doubt changes need to be made and we need to surround our boys with the best and that includes our coach.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 11:15 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 12:22 pm
Posts: 6272
Location: Lurking
I would hope that all areas of Carlton are subject to a thorough review after every season, including the football department.

I would also like to strengthen the staff around Ratts, especially bringing in people with more experience.

I think Laidley would be a good addition in some capacity, but I wonder if would he accept a background role.

_________________
I AM DISENFRANCHISED


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 11:15 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
Melvey wrote:
I think Greg Swann needs to conduct a thorough review of the football department from top to bottom. We need to beef up our football department and throw a bit of cash around if Brett Ratten is to continue as coach.

Im not calling for Ratten to be sacked. I think we need to strengthen up the team around him and bring in a Dean Laidley, Brenton Sanderson or a John Longmire who all been part of orchestrating premierships as assistants. Poach a figure like Neil Balme or Graeme Allan as football operations manager who have been part of a premiership winning formula.

No doubt changes need to be made and we need to surround our boys with the best and that includes our coach.


That would have to be the best post you've ever made, Melvey.

I'm glad you're being a little more rational about things, too.

However, if Carlton ever hires a two-bit turd like Neil Balme, I'll go he.

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 11:25 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 5:04 pm
Posts: 1685
Melvey wrote:
I think Greg Swann needs to conduct a thorough review of the football department from top to bottom. We need to beef up our football department and throw a bit of cash around if Brett Ratten is to continue as coach.

Im not calling for Ratten to be sacked. I think we need to strengthen up the team around him and bring in a Dean Laidley, Brenton Sanderson or a John Longmire who all been part of orchestrating premierships as assistants. Poach a figure like Neil Balme or Graeme Allan as football operations manager who have been part of a premiership winning formula.

No doubt changes need to be made and we need to surround our boys with the best and that includes our coach.


:thumbsup:

_________________
STURDYISM!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 11:56 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:31 am
Posts: 17893
Melvey wrote:
I think Greg Swann needs to conduct a thorough review of the football department from top to bottom. We need to beef up our football department and throw a bit of cash around if Brett Ratten is to continue as coach.

Im not calling for Ratten to be sacked. I think we need to strengthen up the team around him and bring in a Dean Laidley, Brenton Sanderson or a John Longmire who all been part of orchestrating premierships as assistants. Poach a figure like Neil Balme or Graeme Allan as football operations manager who have been part of a premiership winning formula.

No doubt changes need to be made and we need to surround our boys with the best and that includes our coach.



Thats one of the most sensible posts I have read on this forum. My thoughts exactly. I feel our coaching structure is weak. Teague and Lappin as development coaches don't fill me with excitement. I see promise with Teague as a teacher and a hard nut but not lappin. Its too important an area to appoint 2 novices
Dean laidley as a tactical coach will complement the coaching staff perfectly.

But a thorough review analysing the performances of each person and each department and suggestions on how to improve the structures is needed. I think Swann could head it but I would get some outside experts to give an unbiased view.

_________________
T E A M


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 12:14 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
buzzaaaah wrote:
Melvey wrote:
I think Greg Swann needs to conduct a thorough review of the football department from top to bottom. We need to beef up our football department and throw a bit of cash around if Brett Ratten is to continue as coach.

Im not calling for Ratten to be sacked. I think we need to strengthen up the team around him and bring in a Dean Laidley, Brenton Sanderson or a John Longmire who all been part of orchestrating premierships as assistants. Poach a figure like Neil Balme or Graeme Allan as football operations manager who have been part of a premiership winning formula.

No doubt changes need to be made and we need to surround our boys with the best and that includes our coach.



Thats one of the most sensible posts I have read on this forum. My thoughts exactly. I feel our coaching structure is weak. Teague and Lappin as development coaches don't fill me with excitement. I see promise with Teague as a teacher and a hard nut but not lappin. Its too important an area to appoint 2 novices
Dean laidley as a tactical coach will complement the coaching staff perfectly.

But a thorough review analysing the performances of each person and each department and suggestions on how to improve the structures is needed. I think Swann could head it but I would get some outside experts to give an unbiased view.


that's a must or it'd be a waste of time.

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 12:24 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:03 pm
Posts: 4251
Location: Around the Corner
Lurker Blue wrote:
Kaptain Kouta wrote:
Why the need to panic? I'm not saying that we're tracking brilliantly, but a result like last week needs to be viewed through the prism of a season, not a week or 2.

Well said.


Really? last week wasn't one game' it was the FOURTH game we've been opened up by Essendon*. Those who don't learn from history are doomed... etc

If we can't get'it right in four cracks at a similar team then questions should be being asked. Have a review by all means. But let's not kid ourselves by saying this was a poor week in isolation. As a coaching staff it was ANOTHER poor week.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 12:36 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9108
Location: Nth Fitzroy
Melvey wrote:
I think Greg Swann needs to conduct a thorough review of the football department from top to bottom. We need to beef up our football department and throw a bit of cash around if Brett Ratten is to continue as coach.

Im not calling for Ratten to be sacked. I think we need to strengthen up the team around him and bring in a Dean Laidley, Brenton Sanderson or a John Longmire who all been part of orchestrating premierships as assistants. Poach a figure like Neil Balme or Graeme Allan as football operations manager who have been part of a premiership winning formula.

No doubt changes need to be made and we need to surround our boys with the best and that includes our coach.


Good post. I think the review will take place as it does all years. I think this year Swann and Icke will be a bit more ruthless and i think a good modern assistant will come in. THe names you mention sound good to me.
We need to keep the list growing and improving for the next few years before going for the throat in 2012-213
When you look at the top teams most of their guns players were drafted before 2004. We have only one or two gun players from before 2004. our core of young good players drafted since 2004 need to be developed into guns over the next few seasons so that when they are all around 24-26 years old they are all firing . If supported by good young players yet to breakthrough (or be drafted ) and led by Judd we can be a great side.

Until then surround them by good people and enjoy the ups and downs that come with building a gun side.

Go Blues !


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 12:42 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
Punter22 wrote:
Really? last week wasn't one game' it was the FOURTH game we've been opened up by Essendon*. Those who don't learn from history are doomed... etc

If we can't get'it right in four cracks at a similar team then questions should be being asked. Have a review by all means. But let's not kid ourselves by saying this was a poor week in isolation. As a coaching staff it was ANOTHER poor week.


Yes it was the fourth, but very different matches, over two seasons.

It's like saying that we haven't beaten Sydney for 7 matches, or maybe more, so we're just as bad now as we were when that streak started. You're taking the losses out of context with the season.

Questions should not be asked just because we lose four matches to the same opposition. That's like Essendon* fans calling for Sheedy's head after their loss to the Bulldogs in 2000, and taking it out of context with the season.

Of course questions have to be asked, but not just because of one loss of this magnitude, especially given that this season has had some big wins over genuine top 8 teams (WB, Brisbane, Collingwood), failing to beat last year's premiers because of a coat of paint on the goalpost, and pushing an undefeated team to within 2 kicks.

People are accusing Ratten of making knee-jerk reactions in dropping Scotland etc, but the very same posters are being even more knee-jerk in going all Chicken Little over this last match.

Like I said, we're not travelling as well as anyone involved with the club would remotely like, but let's see how the reast of the season pans out. Reactionary changes of course would damage our season far worse now than correcting slightly. Think of it this way: When a plane takes off from Tullamarine and heads to Sydney, if it hits crosswinds and turbulence and gets blown off path, the pilot doesn't turn the plane around and start again. The pilot will correct and manage the issues at the time and end up back on track. Ratts is our pilot, the time to assess whether he's taken us too far off course to be able to safely correct is round 22, not round 13.

Remember the old joke about Collingwood, and not being able to tip them in June? I don't recall Collingwood fans slashing wrists or jumping off the West Gate bridge when they went through so many years dropping matches in June that they should have won.

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 12:47 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 12:22 pm
Posts: 6272
Location: Lurking
Kaptain Kouta wrote:
Punter22 wrote:
Really? last week wasn't one game' it was the FOURTH game we've been opened up by Essendon*. Those who don't learn from history are doomed... etc

If we can't get'it right in four cracks at a similar team then questions should be being asked. Have a review by all means. But let's not kid ourselves by saying this was a poor week in isolation. As a coaching staff it was ANOTHER poor week.


Yes it was the fourth, but very different matches, over two seasons.

It's like saying that we haven't beaten Sydney for 7 matches, or maybe more, so we're just as bad now as we were when that streak started. You're taking the losses out of context with the season.

Questions should not be asked just because we lose four matches to the same opposition. That's like Essendon* fans calling for Sheedy's head after their loss to the Bulldogs in 2000, and taking it out of context with the season.

Of course questions have to be asked, but not just because of one loss of this magnitude, especially given that this season has had some big wins over genuine top 8 teams (WB, Brisbane, Collingwood), failing to beat last year's premiers because of a coat of paint on the goalpost, and pushing an undefeated team to within 2 kicks.

People are accusing Ratten of making knee-jerk reactions in dropping Scotland etc, but the very same posters are being even more knee-jerk in going all Chicken Little over this last match.

Like I said, we're not travelling as well as anyone involved with the club would remotely like, but let's see how the reast of the season pans out. Reactionary changes of course would damage our season far worse now than correcting slightly. Think of it this way: When a plane takes off from Tullamarine and heads to Sydney, if it hits crosswinds and turbulence and gets blown off path, the pilot doesn't turn the plane around and start again. The pilot will correct and manage the issues at the time and end up back on track. Ratts is our pilot, the time to assess whether he's taken us too far off course to be able to safely correct is round 22, not round 13.

Remember the old joke about Collingwood, and not being able to tip them in June? I don't recall Collingwood fans slashing wrists or jumping off the West Gate bridge when they went through so many years dropping matches in June that they should have won.

POW!

_________________
I AM DISENFRANCHISED


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 12:49 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
Kaptain Kouta wrote:
...

People are accusing Ratten of making knee-jerk reactions in dropping Scotland etc, but the very same posters are being even more knee-jerk in going all Chicken Little over this last match.

...


A touch condescending...

I think a lot of criticism regarding the continous nature of Essendon* beating us over the last 2 years with their run through the middle and us not being able to counter that, is fair .

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 12:55 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48548
Location: Prison Island
if questions werent being asked after last fridays debacle i would be concerned

the pressure is on and rightfully so

the noose should tighten if we see a few more efforts like last week

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 12:58 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
budzy wrote:
Kaptain Kouta wrote:
...

People are accusing Ratten of making knee-jerk reactions in dropping Scotland etc, but the very same posters are being even more knee-jerk in going all Chicken Little over this last match.

...


A touch condescending...

I think a lot of criticism regarding the continous nature of Essendon* beating us over the last 2 years with their run through the middle and us not being able to counter that, is fair .


It's fair and not fair at the same time, IMO. It absolutely shits me to distraction that no matter how good our list, or how well we're playing that we come up against Essendon* and lose our mojo. Have they really beaten us every time doing the same thing? Moot point, I guess.

Contrary to that is that we've been the same to them in the past. And over Collingwood and WB over the last couple of years.

I think a partial explanation of this phenomenon is that the players are human. They make mistakes. Try too hard, and get the yips. It happens.

I didn't think I was being condescending, and I apologise if it came across that way to you, but I do see the reactions to last week's match as being overreactions in a lot of cases.

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 12:59 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
grrofunger wrote:
if questions werent being asked after last fridays debacle i would be concerned

the pressure is on and rightfully so

the noose should tighten if we see a few more efforts like last week


QFT

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 1:06 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
Kaptain Kouta wrote:
budzy wrote:

A touch condescending...

I think a lot of criticism regarding the continous nature of Essendon* beating us over the last 2 years with their run through the middle and us not being able to counter that, is fair .


It's fair and not fair at the same time, IMO. It absolutely shits me to distraction that no matter how good our list, or how well we're playing that we come up against Essendon* and lose our mojo. Have they really beaten us every time doing the same thing? Moot point, I guess.

Contrary to that is that we've been the same to them in the past. And over Collingwood and WB over the last couple of years.

I think a partial explanation of this phenomenon is that the players are human. They make mistakes. Try too hard, and get the yips. It happens.

I didn't think I was being condescending, and I apologise if it came across that way to you, but I do see the reactions to last week's match as being overreactions in a lot of cases.


Fair enough to hold that opinion, no probs ..I just don't like the term 'chicken little' being directed at posters just because they form a certain opinion.


edit - this 2 quote maximum thingy is annoying! :hitcomputer:

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 1:08 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 5:15 pm
Posts: 7389
Lurker Blue wrote:
Kaptain Kouta wrote:
Why the need to panic? I'm not saying that we're tracking brilliantly, but a result like last week needs to be viewed through the prism of a season, not a week or 2.

Well said.

Most of us that doubt (me included) Ratten's coaching ability have built that doubt over the whole season.

Therefore it's a simplistic point of view from those that claim an over reaction to one game.

I've been largely quiet on this topic mainly in the hope (pray) that things will come around by the end of the season but I do understand and support most of the criticism.

_________________
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ― Richard Feynman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 1:12 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 11:58 pm
Posts: 4058
Location: South Yarra
Kaptain Kouta wrote:
Melvey wrote:
I think Greg Swann needs to conduct a thorough review of the football department from top to bottom. We need to beef up our football department and throw a bit of cash around if Brett Ratten is to continue as coach.

Im not calling for Ratten to be sacked. I think we need to strengthen up the team around him and bring in a Dean Laidley, Brenton Sanderson or a John Longmire who all been part of orchestrating premierships as assistants. Poach a figure like Neil Balme or Graeme Allan as football operations manager who have been part of a premiership winning formula.

No doubt changes need to be made and we need to surround our boys with the best and that includes our coach.


That would have to be the best post you've ever made, Melvey.

I'm glad you're being a little more rational about things, too.

However, if Carlton ever hires a two-bit turd like Neil Balme, I'll go he
.


I suppose everyone's rationality has it's limits eh? :smoking:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 1:13 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
aramari wrote:
Kaptain Kouta wrote:
That would have to be the best post you've ever made, Melvey.

I'm glad you're being a little more rational about things, too.

However, if Carlton ever hires a two-bit turd like Neil Balme, I'll go he
.


I suppose everyone's rationality has it's limits eh? :smoking:


:clap: :clap: :lol: :lol:

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2019 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 ... 101  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Mickstar and 31 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group