Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jun 24, 2025 8:02 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6991 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182 ... 350  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Jul 07, 2018 9:40 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8214
Blue Monday wrote:
Happy to keep Bolts at the helm but how about rats as either Mackay or Neil Craig’s replacement to provide some additional discipline and leadership?


If you're going to get experience in to help, might as well get them to coach.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 07, 2018 11:02 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:41 pm
Posts: 4629
jim wrote:
Blue Monday wrote:
Happy to keep Bolts at the helm but how about rats as either Mackay or Neil Craig’s replacement to provide some additional discipline and leadership?


If you're going to get experience in to help, might as well get them to coach.
Agree and agree....
Mentoring is an important thing we've lost this season AND I think it is showing

Go Blues

_________________
“Every single element of the Club has to be the best in the league, meticulously and methodically, and only by doing this will we be elite and challenge for number 17.”
Greg Lee


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2018 7:04 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 7272
Blue Vain wrote:
That's a great effort. In the 13 years I've been on this site, I haven't read as much unsubstantiated, uninformed rubbish jammed into the one post. Congratulations. That must have been quite an effort.
As for a Plan A or B, we've had plenty of games where we've worked our way back into the contest. Today they started winning the ball and we couldn't go with them.
But hey, continue with the creative, fictional writing, I'm sure someone will swallow it.



look, i don't want to call you a peanut, but you're making it very hard for me.

... what games did we work our way back into the contest? and what were the results of those said games, please?

hint: we didn't.

we're 1-14. bolton is outcoached every week. his game selections are horrible, his matchups even worse, and so far he's too reluctant/ stubborn to move from his strategy within a game when it's not working.

like throwing weitering forward and leaving jones down back on an island (against the Suns) while lynch had what, 6, 7 goals at HT?

like declaring Rowe as our defensive organiser, yet yday when phillips is injured he throws rowe forward? by bolton's own logic, jones should have moved forward and into the 2nd ruck and left our defensive organiser to do what he does best.

Curnow is triple teamed. and it never occurs to bolton to change up his forward line structure, re-direct the forward 50 entry to counter that?

dane beams has 27 disposals at half time. it didn't seem relevant for bolton to switch curnow onto beams, while the game was still in the balance?

these scenarios play themselves out week in, week out. bolton is too slow to counter and too stubborn/ bereft of ideas to move to a plan b.


i hope on top of hope he's sacked, and soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2018 8:05 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18035
Braithy wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
That's a great effort. In the 13 years I've been on this site, I haven't read as much unsubstantiated, uninformed rubbish jammed into the one post. Congratulations. That must have been quite an effort.
As for a Plan A or B, we've had plenty of games where we've worked our way back into the contest. Today they started winning the ball and we couldn't go with them.
But hey, continue with the creative, fictional writing, I'm sure someone will swallow it.



look, i don't want to call you a peanut, but you're making it very hard for me.

... what games did we work our way back into the contest? and what were the results of those said games, please?

hint: we didn't.



See, this is where you retain no credibility whatsoever. You make stupid outlandish claims and when they're countered, you move the goalposts and head off on another tangent completely.
Yesterday you said-

Quote:
just about every game this year (only GC & melbourne blew us out early) bolton starts out great. using the tape sessions to pick apart teams mid week. but as soon as his opposing coach moves to plan b or makes some adjustments bolton is shot. he has no counter.


So according to you, Bolton can come up with ideas from looking at tapes etc but once the game starts and the opposition change strategies, he's lost. The reality is there have been numerous games this year where other teams have countered us during games or started better and we have arrested back the momentum through tactics or structures. (Richmond, Sydney, Geelong, Collingwood, Eagles, Bulldogs, Crows) But no, this morning it only counts if we went on to win the game! :lol:

I'm happy for Bolton to be open to scrutiny (even by vultures like you) but let's be factual in our criticism. Just making up shit or throwing out the usual "plan A, plan B" rubbish by posters who wouldn't know a structure if one popped out of their Coco Pops just makes you look like even more of a fool. By all means he should be accountable for strategies etc but only if the criticisms of them have some semblance of fact related to them.

If you want to direct your anger, look at the personnel he has available to him. Yesterday his backline consisted of Jack Silvagni, Jed Lamb, Marc Murphy, Dale Thomas and at times SPS. Before this season, how many games would you suggest those players had spent together as a defensive unit? The AFL average for marks inside 50 is around 8 per game. Yesterday Brisbane had 24. For every second inside 50 they marked the ball.

Now I'm not saying Bolton is the answer but the best coaches in history couldn't make a solid defensive unit from what he has available to him at the moment.
We are decimated and we'll rightly cop shit this week but turning on the club with uninformed rubbish doesn't help at all.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2018 8:27 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:42 pm
Posts: 2469
Location: Princess Park
Blue Vain wrote:
Braithy wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
That's a great effort. In the 13 years I've been on this site, I haven't read as much unsubstantiated, uninformed rubbish jammed into the one post. Congratulations. That must have been quite an effort.
As for a Plan A or B, we've had plenty of games where we've worked our way back into the contest. Today they started winning the ball and we couldn't go with them.
But hey, continue with the creative, fictional writing, I'm sure someone will swallow it.



look, i don't want to call you a peanut, but you're making it very hard for me.

... what games did we work our way back into the contest? and what were the results of those said games, please?

hint: we didn't.



See, this is where you retain no credibility whatsoever. You make stupid outlandish claims and when they're countered, you move the goalposts and head off on another tangent completely.
Yesterday you said-

Quote:
just about every game this year (only GC & melbourne blew us out early) bolton starts out great. using the tape sessions to pick apart teams mid week. but as soon as his opposing coach moves to plan b or makes some adjustments bolton is shot. he has no counter.


There have been numerous games this year where other teams have countered us during games or started better and we have arrested back the momentum through tactics or structures. (Richmond, Sydney, Geelong, Collingwood, Eagles, Bulldogs, Crows) But no, this morning it only counts if we went on to win the game! :lol:

I'm happy for Bolton to be open to scrutiny (even by vultures like you) but let's be factual in our criticism. Just making up shit or throwing out the usual "plan A, plan B" rubbish by posters who wouldn't know a structure if one popped out of their Coco Pops just makes you look like even more of a fool. By all means he should be accountable for strategies etc but only if the criticisms of them have some semblance of fact related to them.

If you want to direct your anger, look at the personnel he has available to him. Yesterday his backline consisted of Jack Silvagni, Jed Lamb, Marc Murphy, Dale Thomas and at times SPS. Before this season, how many games would you suggest those players had spent together as a defensive unit? The AFL average for marks inside 50 is around 8 per game. Yesterday Brisbane had 24. For every second inside 50 they marked the ball.

Now I'm not saying Bolton is the answer but the best coaches in history couldn't make a solid defensive unit from what he has available to him at the moment.
We are decimated and we'll rightly cop shit this week but turning on the club with uninformed rubbish doesn't help at all.


You both make some valid points, don't know what to believe any more.

I'll continue to buy a membership until the day I die but I work to hard during the week to waste time watching Carlton play. It ruins my weekend, like most the CFC spoiled me in my early days but now it's
just so sad to see how irrelevant and insignificant we have become.

Pagan and Malthouse both premiership coaches couldn't turn it around, then Bolton gave us some hope. So once again we start to focus on the draft and trade period looking for saviours.

One thing for sure we were the most successful VFL team and we have been the worst performing AFL team.

It would be nice just to be competitive again and have a little respect in the football world.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2018 9:01 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2651
No one can possibly defend yesterday’s performance, whether we had injuries or not. Everyone has injuries and everyone has bad days but we didn’t give ourselves a real chance from the beginning.
Our selections all year have been questionable along with playing under done and mediocre players. The lack of flexibility in our coaching and player movement is questionable and the constant return to that !@#$% zone defence, possession and boundary play is astonishing.
If they don’t want to win the game fair enough, play the kids and get on with it but let them play to enjoy their skill and enjoy their time.
If you want to try something for next year then move Cripps to the forward line so not to damage him and rotate the kids in the middle and give the spectators something to look forward to next year because this shit is getting tiresome.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2018 9:10 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
redback wrote:
No one can possibly defend yesterday’s performance,
I don't think a single person here is.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2018 9:21 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6427
Hey Blue Vaun
Why would play 2 rucks
Why not play Jones on Hipwood
Why would you play Murphy and Lang in defence
Why would you play Graham on a wing
Why would you play Curnow as the only
Key forward when we had Kerr Mac Jay and Casboult twiddling their thumbs
Somewhere else
Why would you play Marchbank after an 8 week layoff
Without giving him an extra week then play him in
The twos to get match fitness
Why play Polson at all when he has shown nothing
Why play Silvangi purely as a defender when we have tried him at
VFL level as mid when Cripps clearly is buggered
And could have played up forward to help
Curnow out
And most importantly why change your game style
From one that has at least has made us competitive

I have tried to stay positive about Bolton
And SOS and MLG but yesterday I felt different

I got home from work watched the third quarter
Then my wife and I went for a coffee

Sort of felt I’m over this
Either the coaching staff are clueless
The players don’t give a @#$%&!
Or we clearly didn’t want to win the game
I reckoned we tanked
Of course you can’t prove that

You can blame a lack of personal
All you like

There is still something wrong with the culture
Of the club
We have been putrid four times now


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2018 9:29 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
MarkNo3 wrote:
jim wrote:
WOW wrote:
So who thinks Bolton will be sacked in the next 12 months?

Gawn if no improvement next year

Silvagni to follow?


No issue with SOS. Drafting has been ok. You can only bring good players to the club, it's up to the coach and his staff to develop them properly.

Bet if all those draft picks went to Sydney they'd near all turn out good players knowing exactly what their role is.


Thats rubbish if things were equal. Swans develop and protect their recruits in general by allowing them to develop in the NEAFL until their bodies are ready. We dont have that luxury. Bolts inherited a basked case thanks to Madhouse. Injuries have killed our year - a coach can only do so much with injuries like ours.

Said many of us about the final Ratts year.
Just saying.

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2018 9:31 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2651
keogh wrote:
Hey Blue Vaun
Why would play 2 rucks
Why not play Jones on Hipwood
Why would you play Murphy and Lang in defence
Why would you play Graham on a wing
Why would you play Curnow as the only
Key forward when we had Kerr Mac Jay and Casboult twiddling their thumbs
Somewhere else
Why would you play Marchbank after an 8 week layoff
Without giving him an extra week then play him in
The twos to get match fitness
Why play Polson at all when he has shown nothing
Why play Silvangi purely as a defender when we have tried him at
VFL level as mid when Cripps clearly is buggered
And could have played up forward to help
Curnow out
And most importantly why change your game style
From one that has at least has made us competitive

I have tried to stay positive about Bolton
And SOS and MLG but yesterday I felt different

I got home from work watched the third quarter
Then my wife and I went for a coffee

Sort of felt I’m over this
Either the coaching staff are clueless
The players don’t give a @#$%&!
Or we clearly didn’t want to win the game
I reckoned we tanked
Of course you can’t prove that

You can blame a lack of personal
All you like

There is still something wrong with the culture
Of the club
We have been putrid four times now



If we did tank Keogh (and i'm that way inclined after yesterday's performance) what does that say about our building a winning culture with this new hierarchy?
Do we really need to tank?
What impression do we have of everything else they have been spitting out?
Have we sold our souls again (what's left of them) for a ridiculous speculative #1 pick again?
Didn't we go through this with Pagan?
Extending his contract to tank for #1 picks, history repeating?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2018 9:39 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18035
keogh wrote:
Hey Blue Vaun
Why would play 2 rucks
Why not play Jones on Hipwood
Why would you play Murphy and Lang in defence
Why would you play Graham on a wing
Why would you play Curnow as the only
Key forward when we had Kerr Mac Jay and Casboult twiddling their thumbs
Somewhere else
Why would you play Marchbank after an 8 week layoff
Without giving him an extra week then play him in
The twos to get match fitness
Why play Polson at all when he has shown nothing
Why play Silvangi purely as a defender when we have tried him at
VFL level as mid when Cripps clearly is buggered
And could have played up forward to help
Curnow out
And most importantly why change your game style
From one that has at least has made us competitive

I have tried to stay positive about Bolton
And SOS and MLG but yesterday I felt different

I got home from work watched the third quarter
Then my wife and I went for a coffee

Sort of felt I’m over this
Either the coaching staff are clueless
The players don’t give a @#$%&!
Or we clearly didn’t want to win the game
I reckoned we tanked
Of course you can’t prove that

You can blame a lack of personal
All you like

There is still something wrong with the culture
Of the club
We have been putrid four times now


You're right. It's not about personnel.
I should have played Docherty, Simpson, Williamson, Alex Silvagni, Byrne, Plowman or Macreadie in defence before Murphy, Lang or Jack Silvagni. I don't know what he was thinking. Not to mention playing Marchbank in preference to them.
Just out of interest, who would you have played as defenders in their place?

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Last edited by Blue Vain on Sun Jul 08, 2018 9:45 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2018 9:44 am 
Offline
formerly King Kenny
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 20076
Rowe and Jones were in on the tank. Some well disguised turnovers for Lion goals yesterday. Rowe in particular was awesome in his attempts to defend Rafa.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2018 9:49 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 5:15 pm
Posts: 7389
If playing a game plan that has failed us miserably all year is evidence of tanking... then Bolts is a @#$%&! genius.
I question why we're playing a zone defense that's dependent on pressure from players up the ground, when we have the worst midfield group in the comp. I question our forward set up that almost always sees us bombing to an outnumbered forward... I actually felt sorry for Charlie yesterday.

In reality I wish we were good enough to tank.

I'm not in favour of sakcing the coach yet, but we desperately need to do something about his support staff and see what evolves from there.

_________________
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ― Richard Feynman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2018 9:59 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
Our backline was 'makeshift'. So why weren't they instructed to simply play man on man using basic defensive fundamentals, rather than a zone defence system they're not used to ?

Simplicity.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2018 10:04 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2651
Hornet wrote:
If playing a game plan that has failed us miserably all year is evidence of tanking... then Bolts is a @#$%&! genius.
I question why we're playing a zone defense that's dependent on pressure from players up the ground, when we have the worst midfield group in the comp. I question our forward set up that almost always sees us bombing to an outnumbered forward... I actually felt sorry for Charlie yesterday.

In reality I wish we were good enough to tank.

I'm not in favour of sakcing the coach yet, but we desperately need to do something about his support staff and see what evolves from there.



I'm so !@#$ trying to figure out what they are trying.
We know that zone defence is redacted, but we still go to it.
We know our mids are young and Cripps needs help yet he plays the wrong personnel through there.
We know we play a drab game style and we are picked off constantly/
We know our forward entries lack speed and diversity and to our disadvantage but persist with it.
We know we play under done and average players but continue to do so.
What other outcome could there be?

Before I hear it's injuries we have lost Doc and Gibbs from last year and every team has injuries. That doesn't explain the lack of effort, selections and game plan.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2018 10:11 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 6:23 am
Posts: 1697
Location: Smorgyland Village North Carlton
Is it shit teams who get more injuries or teams are shit because they have more injuries or both?

_________________
Green Shooter


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2018 10:24 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6427
Fair point you make about our defence BV


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2018 10:47 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2651
keogh wrote:
Fair point you make about our defence BV


Yep fair point.
Then why go a zone defence with makeshift defenders who are limited in that position?
We also had Rowe, Marchbank, Jones.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2018 11:07 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:39 pm
Posts: 1002
redback wrote:
Hornet wrote:
If playing a game plan that has failed us miserably all year is evidence of tanking... then Bolts is a @#$%&! genius.
I question why we're playing a zone defense that's dependent on pressure from players up the ground, when we have the worst midfield group in the comp. I question our forward set up that almost always sees us bombing to an outnumbered forward... I actually felt sorry for Charlie yesterday.

In reality I wish we were good enough to tank.

I'm not in favour of sakcing the coach yet, but we desperately need to do something about his support staff and see what evolves from there.



I'm so !@#$ trying to figure out what they are trying.
We know that zone defence is redacted, but we still go to it.
We know our mids are young and Cripps needs help yet he plays the wrong personnel through there.
We know we play a drab game style and we are picked off constantly/
We know our forward entries lack speed and diversity and to our disadvantage but persist with it.
We know we play under done and average players but continue to do so.
What other outcome could there be?

Before I hear it's injuries we have lost Doc and Gibbs from last year and every team has injuries. That doesn't explain the lack of effort, selections and game plan.


If injuries are no excuse, then why is last years Grand Finalists getting of scott free in the media and on this site and yet a team that has copped probably a worse injury hit getting blasted from pillar to post?

We have won 5 fewer games than last year and yet adelaide have won 8 fewer games thus far.

I hate comparing ourselves against other teams as a rationale to make an argument, however I feel this thread needs some perspective.

I can fully agree with some arguments around team selection and can't understand why McKay isn't getting a game, however there are allot of players that are carrying injuries because there is not enough fit players to cover them


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2018 11:25 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8214
Rexy wrote:
Our backline was 'makeshift'. So why weren't they instructed to simply play man on man using basic defensive fundamentals, rather than a zone defence system they're not used to ?

Simplicity.



You're right there. Playing 4 talls in defence then expecting to play a zoning, offensive game, just doesn't make sense.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6991 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182 ... 350  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 46 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group