RickJ wrote:
Collingwood goes to Arizona, Collingwood wins the Flag. BAAAAA BAAAAA
Hey, I'm all for stealing good ideas from others, but do it critically and look at some innovation.
Altitude training is completely overrated for AFL football, at least in terms of its sustained benefits for a significant proportion of the season. High altitude means less oxygen in the air. Hypoxic drive stimulates erythropoeitin release which increases haemoglobin concentration of the blood which leads to greater oxygen carrying capacity of the blood, which leads to greater aerobic capacity and better sustained exercise capacity. Biology 101. These effects at high altitude (or at simulated high altitude) take weeks to develop and are sustained for a period of weeks after return to sea level. Altitude training therefore is most beneficial when it is sustained for a period of weeks and for an athlete preparing for a single or limited run of closely spaced endurance events eg distance running, cycling swimming etc. Carlton players may have got fitter being in simulated high altitude in Abu Dhabi for a couple of weeks and this may have been sustained for a few weeks after return, but this is highly unlikely to have had any sustained benefit through the season.
I dont discount the placebo effect or the beneficial effect of being away together at a nice place for a couple of weeks, free of distractions etc. on sense of wellbeing and team morale
Personally I dont have a problem with the expenditure if we can afford it and benefits are clearly understood, which I'm sure they are.
However its been a long time since Carlton looked like it was innovating anything, whether it be game plan, lateral thinking around training, recruiting, player development or administrative management. (Not that 'd really know but that's how it seems from the outside)
The responsibility for that must rest with the executive and Board, and Sticks is the figurehead, thus the validity of the thread.
fear of failure ?