AIRCAV wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
AIRCAV wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
Juddy&theKruezers wrote:
[quote="Sydney Blue"]Teams on average take 4 players in the draft.
Carlton has taken 16 in the last 3 years and yet turned over 42 players.
We do more recycling than Visy the only difference is Visy turns their recycled rubbish into a profit most of ours just ends up in landfill
Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk
Which players would you have kept ? ...
Get with the program.
Its all about cohesion and synergy. How in the hell are you supposed to achieve that by turning over 14 players a year
Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk
So which players would you have kept to keep this cohesion?
KJ Holman Gowers and Buckley to start with
I would have also kept Palmer and Smedt Boakhurst White
None of them world beaters
But neither is Shaw Mullet Oshea and Garlett and Lobbe
Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk
Really? You reckon we’d be better off with that swag of list cloggers? And I wanted KJ and Boek to work as much as the next guy but they didn’t and they wouldn’t.
If we’d kept that bunch we’d be in just as much poo and I dare say you’d be demanding all of their heads plus the heads of those who kept them on.[/quote]List cloggers are list cloggers
What's the point in changing like for like
As I said if it is all about cohesion and synergy how do you achieve that by changing out 6 to 8 list cloggers per year and replacing them with other list cloggers.
They keep stating they are rebuilding through the draft but have only had 1 additional pick over and above the AFL average. The rest has been trying to find diamonds in the rough
Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk