Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jun 03, 2025 8:56 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3239 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 158, 159, 160, 161, 162
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2025 7:00 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21508
Location: North of the border
It's the players he has to work with that is the issue. If the players weren't putting in and playing for Voss it would show up in the stats. It's we are lacking in some areas of the ground and it is mainly the forward half.
We have scored more than our opponents
We are +8 on inside 50
We have more contested possession
We have more uncontested possession
We have more clearances
We have more intercepts
We have the 2nd best defence in the comp
We have more meters gained
We have more contested marks
We have more tackles
We have more tackles inside 50
We have less turnovers
We have more marks.

None of this would be happening if Vossy couldn't coach or players weren't putting in.

The issue is and it is the only issue we can't convert those stats into scores. We have a dysfunctional forward line and it is going to cost us finals this year. There is no one in that forward 50 calling the shots and directing the traffic.

Sent from my SM-F956B using Tapatalk

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2025 8:16 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 7132
Sydney Blue wrote:
It's the players he has to work with that is the issue. If the players weren't putting in and playing for Voss it would show up in the stats. It's we are lacking in some areas of the ground and it is mainly the forward half.
We have scored more than our opponents
We are +8 on inside 50
We have more contested possession
We have more uncontested possession
We have more clearances
We have more intercepts
We have the 2nd best defence in the comp
We have more meters gained
We have more contested marks
We have more tackles
We have more tackles inside 50
We have less turnovers
We have more marks.

None of this would be happening if Vossy couldn't coach or players weren't putting in.

The issue is and it is the only issue we can't convert those stats into scores. We have a dysfunctional forward line and it is going to cost us finals this year. There is no one in that forward 50 calling the shots and directing the traffic.

Sent from my SM-F956B using Tapatalk



not necessarily. last year we were the worst defensive team in the 8. this year we are the worst scoring team - bcos we sured up the defense and it's cost us our attack. the list isn't helping, but last year these issues were present as well and we had jack martin, fantasia and owies who are all massive upgrades over the current vfl'ers running around in our F50

we still are woeful at defending stoppage and transition. so there's not been any coaching improvement there.

and most importantly, we're slipping on the ladder. winning 6 from the last 20 games is a woeful indictment on coaching. the trajectory we're on is heading back to the pack around 14th-10th on the ladder, in a year many decision makers at the club thought we had the list to go top 4.


that's all compelling evidence that coaching is letting us down, along with a list that has too many holes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2025 9:27 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24946
Location: Bondi Beach
Sydney Blue wrote:
It's the players he has to work with that is the issue. If the players weren't putting in and playing for Voss it would show up in the stats. It's we are lacking in some areas of the ground and it is mainly the forward half.
We have scored more than our opponents
We are +8 on inside 50
We have more contested possession
We have more uncontested possession
We have more clearances
We have more intercepts
We have the 2nd best defence in the comp
We have more meters gained
We have more contested marks
We have more tackles
We have more tackles inside 50
We have less turnovers
We have more marks.

None of this would be happening if Vossy couldn't coach or players weren't putting in.

The issue is and it is the only issue we can't convert those stats into scores. We have a dysfunctional forward line and it is going to cost us finals this year. There is no one in that forward 50 calling the shots and directing the traffic.

Sent from my SM-F956B using Tapatalk


You just described the basis of a GREAT team.

If you were a coach and you were asked to coach from that basis would your let your capability shy away from that opportunity?

Vossy is the basis of this.
From where Carlton has come from since 2002, this year's team has shown they are one of toughest team we have put out there ever.

Only last week, Vossy had TDK back from larynx injury.
He had already lost Jagga Newman Kemp for the year.
Then losing Silvagni, Boyd, Williams, Hollands, Cottrell and Cowan, can't say Vossy wasn't up against it.
I will always stick up for a coach in that sort of situation, till its obvious the players are not playing for the coach.

Carlton have to keep the pressure on the AFL Commission, along with all other major clubs, and demand that Head Coaches are off the soft salary cap at the end of 2025.

Keep Voss as Head coach or "Dual" coach" with eg. a Simpson or a Pendlebury (GUF), for our benefit and to tel the AFL Commission's to GAGF and the control over us "nepo" teams are their problem, and therefore their cost.

With the newfound, former coach's, salary void we can reward the position to the best in business.

And, simultaneously, improve our list at the end of the year, to give us best chance for a Flag in 2026, or, 2027.

The Carlton Brand should not be underestimated. Vossy will fight for his job. Finals or ..... big changes.

What is it? 9 out of 13 games to make finals. 4 losses.

Nah

9 wins :beer:

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2025 9:36 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24946
Location: Bondi Beach
Braithy wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
It's the players he has to work with that is the issue. If the players weren't putting in and playing for Voss it would show up in the stats. It's we are lacking in some areas of the ground and it is mainly the forward half.
We have scored more than our opponents
We are +8 on inside 50
We have more contested possession
We have more uncontested possession
We have more clearances
We have more intercepts
We have the 2nd best defence in the comp
We have more meters gained
We have more contested marks
We have more tackles
We have more tackles inside 50
We have less turnovers
We have more marks.

None of this would be happening if Vossy couldn't coach or players weren't putting in.

The issue is and it is the only issue we can't convert those stats into scores. We have a dysfunctional forward line and it is going to cost us finals this year. There is no one in that forward 50 calling the shots and directing the traffic.

Sent from my SM-F956B using Tapatalk



not necessarily. last year we were the worst defensive team in the 8. this year we are the worst scoring team - bcos we sured up the defense and it's cost us our attack. the list isn't helping,.


yeah injuries don't help.

But it shows for some reason , and we dont know what's going on with line coaches, but the forwardline this year has not been in sinc with entrance....or...awww..its not that we can't fix that, because we've done it before.

We seem to go from one extreme, to perfect, then swing to the other extreme in our efforts. We aren't in the perfect stream long enough to make that habit. Injuries, over coaching, form???????

Whatever it is, we know our best is the best, but we definetely need more soldiers good enough to carry on duties for the injured and fallen.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2025 10:02 pm 
Offline
formerly Yazzamatazz
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:16 pm
Posts: 7552
Location: NowHere.....
Sydney Blue wrote:
It's the players he has to work with that is the issue. If the players weren't putting in and playing for Voss it would show up in the stats. It's we are lacking in some areas of the ground and it is mainly the forward half.
We have scored more than our opponents
We are +8 on inside 50
We have more contested possession
We have more uncontested possession
We have more clearances
We have more intercepts
We have the 2nd best defence in the comp
We have more meters gained
We have more contested marks
We have more tackles
We have more tackles inside 50
We have less turnovers
We have more marks.

None of this would be happening if Vossy couldn't coach or players weren't putting in.

The issue is and it is the only issue we can't convert those stats into scores. We have a dysfunctional forward line and it is going to cost us finals this year. There is no one in that forward 50 calling the shots and directing the traffic.

Sent from my SM-F956B using Tapatalk
What makes yiu think wr will play finals this year?

Long shit at best.

Sent from my SM-G998B using Tapatalk

_________________
Circumstance has no value. It is how one relates to a situation that has value. All true meaning resides in the personal relationship to a phenomenon, what it means to you.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2025 10:04 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24946
Location: Bondi Beach
Lace Out wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
It's the players he has to work with that is the issue. If the players weren't putting in and playing for Voss it would show up in the stats. It's we are lacking in some areas of the ground and it is mainly the forward half.
We have scored more than our opponents
We are +8 on inside 50
We have more contested possession
We have more uncontested possession
We have more clearances
We have more intercepts
We have the 2nd best defence in the comp
We have more meters gained
We have more contested marks
We have more tackles
We have more tackles inside 50
We have less turnovers
We have more marks.

None of this would be happening if Vossy couldn't coach or players weren't putting in.

The issue is and it is the only issue we can't convert those stats into scores. We have a dysfunctional forward line and it is going to cost us finals this year. There is no one in that forward 50 calling the shots and directing the traffic.

Sent from my SM-F956B using Tapatalk
What makes yiu think wr will play finals this year?

Long shit at best.

Sent from my SM-G998B using Tapatalk


Its a long shit before Fianls Lace


9 wins and we are in.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2025 10:16 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21508
Location: North of the border
Lace Out wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
It's the players he has to work with that is the issue. If the players weren't putting in and playing for Voss it would show up in the stats. It's we are lacking in some areas of the ground and it is mainly the forward half.
We have scored more than our opponents
We are +8 on inside 50
We have more contested possession
We have more uncontested possession
We have more clearances
We have more intercepts
We have the 2nd best defence in the comp
We have more meters gained
We have more contested marks
We have more tackles
We have more tackles inside 50
We have less turnovers
We have more marks.

None of this would be happening if Vossy couldn't coach or players weren't putting in.

The issue is and it is the only issue we can't convert those stats into scores. We have a dysfunctional forward line and it is going to cost us finals this year. There is no one in that forward 50 calling the shots and directing the traffic.

Sent from my SM-F956B using Tapatalk
What makes yiu think wr will play finals this year?

Long shit at best.

Sent from my SM-G998B using Tapatalk
I said we wouldn't play finals.
We are no chance and haven't been since October last year

Sent from my SM-F956B using Tapatalk

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 02, 2025 9:54 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 20207
Location: 父 父 父 父 父 父
Honestly can't work out if Voss coaches for bash and crash contest slugfests because it's the style he wants, or because he feels it's all this list can do.

Have we recruited for this, or are we playing this way because the cupboard is bare of ball users.

Either way... Not great

_________________
Congratulations CK95


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 02, 2025 10:03 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 6445
Blue Vain wrote:
Sidefx wrote:
DesEnglish wrote:
I’ve asked a couple of times, what attributes does he have that makes people think he’s good enough?

Well for starters he has a record of 42-35-1, so he is winning more than he is losing.
While I dislike his need to only make small team variations after a loss, I understand that it is a very measured approach.
He seems to have the players on-board which is his main role, we haven't had too many players wanting to leave because of him, if any that are key players for that matter.
He is respected at the club and in the AFL, he has had premiership success as a player and understands the work and luck to win one.
The biggest hang up most people have of him is he doesn't make enough tactical changes during a game.
While I don't agree with this I also don't disagree.
He has made changes, some have worked and probably more have not.
On the sidelines we all have our opinions but it is he who knows his players best and what they can and can not do.
Plus our incredible run with injuries, lack of depth, lack of speed and skill and lack of A grade multi position players has really made a lot of tactical decisions not possible.
I mean we are on here talking about moving Saad up forwards because of lack of talent.
Our motto should be, We rob Peter to pay Paul.
Wright's first job is to add another ex-AFL coach, like the Pies and Melbourne have done.
Simpson would be great.

I think we also need a measured approach as a club, change some of the players, add depth and see what he can do with a healthy more versatile list.
Like I said before, I don't rate Chris Scott as a coach, but you can see what is possible with a list like he's had.
And Voss put him to the sword last game, he clearly out coached a premiership coach.


:thumbsup:

A well thought out response.

Cheers BV.
Sometimes I make sense........ :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 02, 2025 10:07 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 6445
bondiblue wrote:
Sidefx wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
Sidefx wrote:
Oh I do.
It's the impatience of the supporters and at times the club.
And as a result we have been in an endless loop of change, time for some stability, building and incremental adjustments until we get it right don't you think?
If Voss has proved anything it's not wholesale chop and changes and while it is not working at the moment, it is something we haven't done.
If we added several more senior players last draft to fill our needs rather than more kids, we probably wouldn't even be talking about this right now.


Hang on. Wasn’t the list depth (Kennedy, Owies, Martin, Marchbank, etc.) delisted last year to refresh the list with youth?
The thought was we had enough depth but now needed to refresh from bottom up as a next batch?
You can’t have it both ways to suit an argument. It was a plan and everyone wanted and felt we needed.

It’s like next year if we trade Harry, Walsh and lose TdK, like everyone has as a XMas list, we say we still expect to play finals and be a contender………

I'm not sure what you mean by have it both ways, but I'll try to explain.

Yes, that is what they did.
I can see why they did it, but for me we were in our window and you don't go that hard at the draft if you are IMO.
Kennedy - We have plenty of slow inside mids, what we don't have is fast line breaking goal kicking ones.
Owies - I thought we should've kept him but the club backed Motlop and Durdin, Owies had his ceiling as a player but I think we miss his on-filed leadership more than expected.
Martin - Injured, had to go.
Marchbank - Injured, had to go also.

Our list was and is still always injured and our results are directly because of this.
A slow team and one that also lacks skill only has one style to play, contested football and then that leads to injuries.
If we were slow and players could kick like Pies and Hawks players last night, we'd be a different side.
This isn't as liner as some would like to think, our coaching has its faults but our list is way out of balance first and foremost.

If TDK leaves, we can't do anything about that. He is a player we need though.
If we trade Harry, then I hope it is for an A grade ready made player to address our weaknesses in the middle and F50.
If we trade Walsh, which I hope not then it should be for a player like above.
I would hate us to lose that much talent for kids, that would not be building at all IMO.
I really doubt Wright would do that though, but time will tell.


I read your posts at footy last night Sidex. Loved both recent responses. Spot on.

Its going to be difficult to Trade any Harry or Charlie whilst in contract.
Its a bit different to the Grundy situation. Grundy was prepared to look at options.
Harry and his manager have dug their heals in before.
Why would they want to go to Sydney? Harry is happy in Middle Park, and Charlie has his new business.

I can see Wright allowing TDK to walk to saints.
I can also see SOS pulling the ridiculous offer, after successfully disrupting the calm at Carlton.
Walsh is the one coming out of contract next year, and Wright doesn't have to offer him a good contract. Ditto TDK.

Its going to be an interesting watch post bye what the players dish up, and come seasons end to see the changes.

It will be interesting to see, I would love to keep both Harry and Charlie but I'd rather us win premierships more.
I still feel it's our midfield that is more the issue than the 2 talls, but we need currency at some point to address that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 02, 2025 10:35 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 6445
DesEnglish wrote:
Sidefx wrote:
DesEnglish wrote:
I’ve asked a couple of times, what attributes does he have that makes people think he’s good enough?

Well for starters he has a record of 42-35-1, so he is winning more than he is losing.
While I dislike his need to only make small team variations after a loss, I understand that it is a very measured approach.
He seems to have the players on-board which is his main role, we haven't had too many players wanting to leave because of him, if any that are key players for that matter.
He is respected at the club and in the AFL, he has had premiership success as a player and understands the work and luck to win one.
The biggest hang up most people have of him is he doesn't make enough tactical changes during a game.
While I don't agree with this I also don't disagree.
He has made changes, some have worked and probably more have not.
On the sidelines we all have our opinions but it is he who knows his players best and what they can and can not do.
Plus our incredible run with injuries, lack of depth, lack of speed and skill and lack of A grade multi position players has really made a lot of tactical decisions not possible.
I mean we are on here talking about moving Saad up forwards because of lack of talent.
Our motto should be, We rob Peter to pay Paul.
Wright's first job is to add another ex-AFL coach, like the Pies and Melbourne have done.
Simpson would be great.

I think we also need a measured approach as a club, change some of the players, add depth and see what he can do with a healthy more versatile list.
Like I said before, I don't rate Chris Scott as a coach, but you can see what is possible with a list like he's had.
And Voss put him to the sword last game, he clearly out coached a premiership coach.


Thanks for taking the time, I do appreciate it.

My issue with Voss is that we lack a hard edge, which is what I expected from him. Too often our players are manhandled and there’s zero response. That’s a standard and I expect him to drive that (given what he was like as a player).

I also worry that the side doesn’t seem to be able to get all aspects to work, we constantly over correct and finish up exposed in an area that was formerly a strength. I get he’s not responsible for the individual plays, but he is accountable for how we play, and we suck.

Some of it is definitely the players and those available but I don’t accept that he has no say in the types that we recruit and the players, and in turn the way we play is a result of his vision.

I don’t think he’ll turn it around and I’m not confident that he’ll take advice or change his ways.


Voss was a contested beast, but I don't really recall him getting in there to fight other players, that was your Scott brothers, Akermanis, Pike (both wingers mind you) etc. IIRC.
He was a hard nut and if you watch Crippa, Hewett, Cerra and Walsh, they're all tough players that put their bodies on the line.
I must admit, it does annoy me also when we let the kids get manhandled with little to no response.
But is that the type of players we have? You can't just make someone become a person that sees red and loses it.
That is learnt in your formative years and is very hard to change as an adult, without experiencing some traumatic event.
Maybe that is what we need to do......................just joking.

This gets bought up a lot that last season we were great in attack and this season we are great in defence.
Firstly, JSOS has been moved down back, his IQ is severely underrated as well as his on-field leadership.
Secondly we lost Owies, a smart defensive footballer who also had great on-field leadership.
Fantasia, another smart footballer has not played yet.
Martin, a very smart footballer is not at the club.
Elijah has had his issues and is another smart footballer with skills.
That is a lot of mature leadership that is missing in the F50.
We then have Charlie and Harry who are both great footballers and forwards but are not leaders, Jeremy Cameron has this in spades over the both of them.
And as Voss has stated himself, you can work all week to get the players ready for the game but once they cross that line you can't do too much.
At some point the payers need to take the reins.

Like myself, Bondi and others have been saying, if we have little to no injuries we are in for a chance.
This alone speaks of our lack of depth, everyone knows it inside the AFL.

As for Voss changing his ways, I don't actually think he needs to.
He does need better depth and support around him though.
Killing coaches is what we do best and until he is proven to not have the players on side then he is doing his job IMO.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 02, 2025 10:39 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 6445
Hornet wrote:
17th Premiership wrote:
It really annoys me when I see the Swans getting smashed at home and GWS nearly falling for the Tigers in the weeks after we made a meal of both matches.
Everything we do seems so hard.

It's like going on a road trip and you have to pull over to the side of the road because you car is throwing out a dozen fault codes... watching every other car you passed earlier driving right passed you with their kids pointing and laughing at you from the back seat.

Voss may have a 'winning record' but his record over the past 12 months is what matters... especially in his 4th year.

We can throw out as many excuses as we want but the light at the end of the tunnel seems to be getting dimmer... that it's demoralizing to realise that we might have to start again, the extent of that is unknown. Meanwhile out best players ain't getting any younger.

Right or wrong (I honestly don't know), the next 4 weeks is crucial to whether we can fix our fault codes, at least enough to get to our destination... or be forced to trade in for a new model.

True, but maybe you think we are driving a Ferrari and not a clapped out Mazda with flash rims, a body kit and a spoiler.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 02, 2025 10:45 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 6445
Braithy wrote:
listening to belichek talk about the nfl draft in the tom brady years is similar.

they drafted the best possible player at that pick, regardless of their depth in that position. if they worked out, they had a cheaper alternative to the expensive vet, and would trade them out for team needs where teams usually pay overs for a ready made vet. they drafted regardless of their off field issues and backed their culture and the leadership group to iron them out.

he went on to become the most SB winningest coach ever with that philosophy


how we can only draft private school, clean cut "good guys" and expect that not to go tits up is beyond me. and we look around the HT huddle and wonder where the mongrel is gonna come from ...

Belichick was the man.
But he also had some great luck.
Tom Brady was a steal, no one predicted he'd be as good as he was.
When Tom left everything changed and Tom's Superbowl win at the Bucks says a lot.
Who is our Tom Brady?
Crippa tries but in the past has lacked the polish to turn games.
Him going forward is what we need, but he also needs to be a team player more often and look at ways of getting other players into the game instead of doing it all himself. Great leaders do this.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 02, 2025 11:06 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 6445
Braithy wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
It's the players he has to work with that is the issue. If the players weren't putting in and playing for Voss it would show up in the stats. It's we are lacking in some areas of the ground and it is mainly the forward half.
We have scored more than our opponents
We are +8 on inside 50
We have more contested possession
We have more uncontested possession
We have more clearances
We have more intercepts
We have the 2nd best defence in the comp
We have more meters gained
We have more contested marks
We have more tackles
We have more tackles inside 50
We have less turnovers
We have more marks.

None of this would be happening if Vossy couldn't coach or players weren't putting in.

The issue is and it is the only issue we can't convert those stats into scores. We have a dysfunctional forward line and it is going to cost us finals this year. There is no one in that forward 50 calling the shots and directing the traffic.

Sent from my SM-F956B using Tapatalk



not necessarily. last year we were the worst defensive team in the 8. this year we are the worst scoring team - bcos we sured up the defense and it's cost us our attack. the list isn't helping, but last year these issues were present as well and we had jack martin, fantasia and owies who are all massive upgrades over the current vfl'ers running around in our F50

we still are woeful at defending stoppage and transition. so there's not been any coaching improvement there.

and most importantly, we're slipping on the ladder. winning 6 from the last 20 games is a woeful indictment on coaching. the trajectory we're on is heading back to the pack around 14th-10th on the ladder, in a year many decision makers at the club thought we had the list to go top 4.


that's all compelling evidence that coaching is letting us down, along with a list that has too many holes.

Sydney is spot on.

Braithy what you are describing is a lack of depth and poor trading at the end of the year. Not a coaching issue.

We get killed in transition by quicker teams more so than slower ones that can get sucked into our contested game.
I'm not sure how I can make it any more clearer that our list is too slow and causes a downhill flow of other issues, like clangers, kicking to packs, putting players bodies on the line all the time because we can't hit a target, this leads to injuries.
And injuries with a shallow list will hurt us more than a team with a deeper list.
As a result of this lack of depth and speed we rely too much on key players and when they are down the whole team goes down.
Don't you find it somewhat coincidental that when our list is healthy we win games.

For me putting the coach before our list holes is ass about.
If Voss has a full list (including adding some players with speed) and we can't win games or he has lost the players, then I'm more than happy to look at blaming him.
Like I keep saying, recruiting took a huge risk putting all our draft capital on 1 pick to fix a glaring issue that needed ready made talent.
You focus on SC issues so you know it's a depth issue first and foremost.
Voss can only do with what he has and the last 20 games it has not been a lot with injuries.
As you said, our list has holes and our confidence is low, not really a good place to be.
Hopefully this run of 4 games can kickstart something in the team.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 02, 2025 11:23 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 4:04 pm
Posts: 7561
Location: Bendigo
Sidefx wrote:
Voss was a contested beast, but I don't really recall him getting in there to fight other players.

Universally revered as the deadliest sniper of his era.

None were spared, not even his own brother.

_________________
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter" - Winston Churchill.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 02, 2025 12:41 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24946
Location: Bondi Beach
Crusader wrote:
Sidefx wrote:
Voss was a contested beast, but I don't really recall him getting in there to fight other players.

Universally revered as the deadliest sniper of his era.

None were spared, not even his own brother.


So true.

183cm brick shithouse.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 02, 2025 1:33 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 6445
Crusader wrote:
Sidefx wrote:
Voss was a contested beast, but I don't really recall him getting in there to fight other players.

Universally revered as the deadliest sniper of his era.

None were spared, not even his own brother.

But did he go in and fight for other players or did he just touch them up during normal play?
Like I said, I don't really recall.
Either way, I doubt he'd get away with either in the current game.

He was a unit, that is for sure.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 02, 2025 4:28 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 2:10 pm
Posts: 2850
Sidefx wrote:
DesEnglish wrote:
Sidefx wrote:
DesEnglish wrote:
I’ve asked a couple of times, what attributes does he have that makes people think he’s good enough?

Well for starters he has a record of 42-35-1, so he is winning more than he is losing.
While I dislike his need to only make small team variations after a loss, I understand that it is a very measured approach.
He seems to have the players on-board which is his main role, we haven't had too many players wanting to leave because of him, if any that are key players for that matter.
He is respected at the club and in the AFL, he has had premiership success as a player and understands the work and luck to win one.
The biggest hang up most people have of him is he doesn't make enough tactical changes during a game.
While I don't agree with this I also don't disagree.
He has made changes, some have worked and probably more have not.
On the sidelines we all have our opinions but it is he who knows his players best and what they can and can not do.
Plus our incredible run with injuries, lack of depth, lack of speed and skill and lack of A grade multi position players has really made a lot of tactical decisions not possible.
I mean we are on here talking about moving Saad up forwards because of lack of talent.
Our motto should be, We rob Peter to pay Paul.
Wright's first job is to add another ex-AFL coach, like the Pies and Melbourne have done.
Simpson would be great.

I think we also need a measured approach as a club, change some of the players, add depth and see what he can do with a healthy more versatile list.
Like I said before, I don't rate Chris Scott as a coach, but you can see what is possible with a list like he's had.
And Voss put him to the sword last game, he clearly out coached a premiership coach.


Thanks for taking the time, I do appreciate it.

My issue with Voss is that we lack a hard edge, which is what I expected from him. Too often our players are manhandled and there’s zero response. That’s a standard and I expect him to drive that (given what he was like as a player).

I also worry that the side doesn’t seem to be able to get all aspects to work, we constantly over correct and finish up exposed in an area that was formerly a strength. I get he’s not responsible for the individual plays, but he is accountable for how we play, and we suck.

Some of it is definitely the players and those available but I don’t accept that he has no say in the types that we recruit and the players, and in turn the way we play is a result of his vision.

I don’t think he’ll turn it around and I’m not confident that he’ll take advice or change his ways.


Voss was a contested beast, but I don't really recall him getting in there to fight other players, that was your Scott brothers, Akermanis, Pike (both wingers mind you) etc. IIRC.
He was a hard nut and if you watch Crippa, Hewett, Cerra and Walsh, they're all tough players that put their bodies on the line.
I must admit, it does annoy me also when we let the kids get manhandled with little to no response.
But is that the type of players we have? You can't just make someone become a person that sees red and loses it.
That is learnt in your formative years and is very hard to change as an adult, without experiencing some traumatic event.
Maybe that is what we need to do......................just joking.

This gets bought up a lot that last season we were great in attack and this season we are great in defence.
Firstly, JSOS has been moved down back, his IQ is severely underrated as well as his on-field leadership.
Secondly we lost Owies, a smart defensive footballer who also had great on-field leadership.
Fantasia, another smart footballer has not played yet.
Martin, a very smart footballer is not at the club.
Elijah has had his issues and is another smart footballer with skills.
That is a lot of mature leadership that is missing in the F50.
We then have Charlie and Harry who are both great footballers and forwards but are not leaders, Jeremy Cameron has this in spades over the both of them.
And as Voss has stated himself, you can work all week to get the players ready for the game but once they cross that line you can't do too much.
At some point the payers need to take the reins.

Like myself, Bondi and others have been saying, if we have little to no injuries we are in for a chance.
This alone speaks of our lack of depth, everyone knows it inside the AFL.

As for Voss changing his ways, I don't actually think he needs to.
He does need better depth and support around him though.
Killing coaches is what we do best and until he is proven to not have the players on side then he is doing his job IMO.


If you can teach someone to be a killer on the battlefield, you can teach someone to stick up for themselves and their mates on a football field.

I will give Voss some credit for calling out the incident with Boyd, although I wish it would be dealt with onfield.

I’m not sure Martin, JSoS and even Fantasia contributed a lot last year. I do think we miss Owies and more so Kennedy. I think dealing those 2 out has had a much bigger impact on our culture than people acknowledge. I also wonder if there are trust issues among the group after the way Kennedy was treated in the EF.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 02, 2025 8:11 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10538
If you want another example of how our coach is failing, please see what Cox did with Sydney in an early morning sessions and what we have done with McGovern faceing *.

The guy was fully embarrassed last week by his opponent(s), yes plural and not the first time ffs, yet we have him marketing this game as a leader.

Just make the change all ready, I can’t do this anymore and I was backing Voss in a month ago.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3239 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 158, 159, 160, 161, 162

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 52 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group