blues8182 wrote:
Phsyc, I would be interested to hear your views as to why you think Kruzer couldn't be adapted to play a permanent forward role (if you have previously posted these thoughts I apologize for asking you to do it again) He does seem to have the ability to take a grab up forward and him mobility should also be an asset, I am not sure which way is right but it does have to be definitively sorted out before we consider letting any one of them go.
Its a completely different skill and mind set. The only similarity is that they are all tall. I have NEVER seen it work let alone make a side a top side. Even if you don't have a gun key forward you are better off playing someone who understands how to play the position. There is a such a great skill in knowing how to get to the right position, where to lead etc. It isn't easy and very hard to teach. With the game becoming more and more about structures and positioning it is even more vital.
Sam Reid for Sydney is a prime example. Really struggling to have an influence but he makes such a difference to the positioning and effectiveness of a forward line.
A Key forward also needs the mentality that they want the ball and can win the game. It's part of their DNA and CANNOT be faked. The greatest had it. Lockett, Dunstall, Ablett, Carey etc.
Kruezer is a ruckman. A potential gun ruckman. Its why he went No.1. He is a competitor, its where he feels comfortable. Why try and force something else on him? You will confuse them, effect their development and in some cases mentally scare their confidence. It will only confuse and disrupt improvement. Can he drop forward at times? Sure, and he will catch the opposition off guard.
Hampson, I saw as a 17 year old coming across to AFL on the Gold Coast. His athletic testing was awesome, he is an incredible athlete, and he took to the game really well. He was recruited as a ruckman and has played the game for only 8 years!!! I expected him to be a gun. Unfortunately over the past few years he has been forced to be a forward. IMO it has stunted his development and could easily kill his career. What a waste. He tries and he trains as hard as anyone at it. He has hard hands, is a poor kick for goal and his positioning is rarely to advantage. He should be running around the ground like NicNat but is confused. You can see it in his decision making.
IMO too many people get excited about 1 or 2 highlights but it doesn't make a career.
The best development of any group of players is to get the BEST out of each individual. Trying to make them something they are not, and not using their strengths will not work and restrict your list development. It is my greatest criticism of the past 5-8 years.
Kruezer is a Ruckman
Hampson is a Ruckman
McCarthy is a CHB
Walker is an endurance athlete
Waite is a defender
Gibbs is a Midfielder
Watson is a CHB etc etc.
It's really p1sses me off. Go to Geelong and look how they do it!!!
What astounds me is when I hear coaches say "we were looking at his junior career and found he was a forward, so we thought we'd move him there" FFS.
Imagine playing Betts as a defender?
Leigh Mathews always said that forwards are born not created. He also wanted gun ruckmen.
As such brought guys like Bradshaw, Leppitsch, Brown into sides early to get them ready. Mal Michael was recruited for that reason but after only a few games Mathews moved him to FB. Said he wasn't a forward. End of story. Its why Lynch, although not a great goalkicker was so vital to their structure. That's why I push for Jesse White. Is he a star. Not even close but he is a natural forward and he gets to the right spots and creates space and we will get him for nothing. It will also allow others to develop alongside.
For me we are trying to fit 3 into 1 and it doesn't work. Come second half of the year I hope we put time into Casboult, Mitchell & Rowe. They need to be given time to see if they are the future. If not we have to look elsewhere.