Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu Jun 19, 2025 7:08 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 375 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon May 02, 2011 10:45 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 1:12 pm
Posts: 1291
Location: Sydney
Had a quick look and don't think this has been posted anywhere. Worth sharing:

Sydney Swan Adam Goodes talks up Carlton superstar Chris Judd


Adam Goodes:

"He is the hardest opponent I've ever played on," Goodes said. "I remember watching him when he first burst on to the scene, I actually would look at him as someone I wanted to base my game around. His speed, his accuracy with his skills, his contested football. It's just fantastic."


:thumbsup:

_________________
When Dick became President, it was as if everyone at Carlton came out of the hailstorm and into the sunshine - Stephen Kernahan

YARRAN!!





.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 10:12 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:52 pm
Posts: 2289
Location: Geelong
Bluebernz wrote:
Had a quick look and don't think this has been posted anywhere. Worth sharing:

Sydney Swan Adam Goodes talks up Carlton superstar Chris Judd


Adam Goodes:

"He is the hardest opponent I've ever played on," Goodes said. "I remember watching him when he first burst on to the scene, I actually would look at him as someone I wanted to base my game around. His speed, his accuracy with his skills, his contested football. It's just fantastic."


:thumbsup:


Accuracy with skills????
I think man-love has blinded him.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 10:16 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:31 am
Posts: 17893
Lets just say that maybe Carlton have done their own planning and decided that spending time and resources trying to convert kids in Sydney into members isn't a valuable exercise and isn't the best use of resources. In that case, they did what they have decided is the best course.

Just saying.

_________________
T E A M


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 10:28 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25225
Location: Bondi Beach
buzzaaaah wrote:
Lets just say that maybe Carlton have done their own planning and decided that spending time and resources trying to convert kids in Sydney into members isn't a valuable exercise and isn't the best use of resources. In that case, they did what they have decided is the best course.

Just saying.


Maybe. Probably not the case.

I suspect that the club hasn't conducted due diligence at growing the brand interstate.

I do believe the club recognises that there's still a lot of improvement required down under in Victoria though.
There must be about 10000 supporters who were CFC members in other years but have not bought their memberships in 2011.

There's good reason why Jeannie is to head the membership department...and when she's up and running, she may look at all possible channels for growing our membership base: interstate....and hopefully internationally.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 10:28 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
buzzaaaah wrote:
Lets just say that maybe Carlton have done their own planning and decided that spending time and resources trying to convert kids in Sydney into members isn't a valuable exercise and isn't the best use of resources. In that case, they did what they have decided is the best course.

Just saying.


Well, if that's the case, then Carlton will remain a 3rd-tier power in football circles for well beyond the foreseeable future. False economy.

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 10:28 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
buzzaaaah wrote:
Lets just say that maybe Carlton have done their own planning and decided that spending time and resources trying to convert kids in Sydney into members isn't a valuable exercise and isn't the best use of resources. In that case, they did what they have decided is the best course.

Just saying.


A very conservative line of thinking if they did decide that.

We need to nurture the great support we currently have in all states and make sure that the young sons and daughters of those supporters continue on the tradition and grow the base.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 10:41 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 12:30 pm
Posts: 4183
Have we ascertained if anything was done or are we just assuming that nothing was done?

[youtube]tKlWGZHEO7Q[/youtube]


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 11:08 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
Juanita Jones wrote:
Have we ascertained if anything was done or are we just assuming that nothing was done?

[youtube]tKlWGZHEO7Q[/youtube]



Yes, I've spoken to the club.

Now I'm just angry.

Not only was I spoken to in a fairly curt manner, I was told that all events that the Club does interstate are effectively forced on the club by the AFL.

Then I was asked "The players went up there on Thursday and played Friday, what else could we possibly have done?", and "The players were back in Melbourne Saturday night", and that even though there was a longer break until the next match, The AFL would not let any other event take place and the AFL arranges and organises every event.

Then, as a lovely turd on top of the cowpat cake I'd just been served, the person insisted that the club has ZERO input into fixturing, and Carlton just gets told where we will play and when. When I said "So you're telling me that Collingwood just gets told 'Hey guys, you're getting 16 MCG matches this year'?", her response was "Yes".

I got put through to that doyen of un-communications, Ian Coutts' voicemail after that and have left him a message (yes, it's polite....) and asked for him to call me back when it's convenient.


To sum up, it's actually worse than the way I portrayed it.

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 12:39 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
Zero input into fixturing? :lol:

No idea, and clearly no initiative on the part of the person you spoke to. That's horrifying that the individual doesn't even seem to grasp the basics of the industry she's in.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 12:42 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 6:42 pm
Posts: 2833
It looks like the AFL are trying to stop clubs promoting themselves up in Sydney to provide GWS maximium exposure. :mad:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 12:46 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
Kaptain Kouta wrote:
Juanita Jones wrote:
Have we ascertained if anything was done or are we just assuming that nothing was done?

[youtube]tKlWGZHEO7Q[/youtube]



Yes, I've spoken to the club.

Now I'm just angry.

Not only was I spoken to in a fairly curt manner, I was told that all events that the Club does interstate are effectively forced on the club by the AFL.

Then I was asked "The players went up there on Thursday and played Friday, what else could we possibly have done?", and "The players were back in Melbourne Saturday night", and that even though there was a longer break until the next match, The AFL would not let any other event take place and the AFL arranges and organises every event.

Then, as a lovely turd on top of the cowpat cake I'd just been served, the person insisted that the club has ZERO input into fixturing, and Carlton just gets told where we will play and when. When I said "So you're telling me that Collingwood just gets told 'Hey guys, you're getting 16 MCG matches this year'?", her response was "Yes".

I got put through to that doyen of un-communications, Ian Coutts' voicemail after that and have left him a message (yes, it's polite....) and asked for him to call me back when it's convenient.


To sum up, it's actually worse than the way I portrayed it.


Might be worth a phone call to AFL house to substantiate the claims of 'AFL control'.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 12:51 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
That's not necessary; the individual on the phone sounds like a muppet.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 04, 2011 7:59 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
Not surprised by any of that.

We don't control our website
We have little control over merchandise.
We submit a wish list for fixturing, we could request a game in Sydney each year, doesn't mean it'd be granted. Collingwood get 16 games at the MCG because crowds and other teams wanting to play a home game against them dictate that.

With regards to planning events, given the way the AFL control everything else...that woudn't surprise me one bit.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 04, 2011 9:07 am 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher

Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 8:20 pm
Posts: 84
buzzaaaah wrote:
I was at the SCG too. I'm not sure if the TV conveys how tough the conditions were.
We weren't brilliant in the first half, made some costly mistakes but the players were putting in a high effort. Sydney were playing the conditions very well and had some good fortune.
The 2nd half was as good a performance as I have witnessed. To be 3 goals down at the SCG in the slop against a smart, well-drilled team that thrives on stoppages and then win easily (their last 2 goals were the result of us loosening our grip) is a monumental effort.
I walked away believing this was one of those "line in the sand" moments.
Not to discount Judd's amazing performance but if you wanted to show a total team committment, this was the game. People who say Judd won the game on his own know nothing about footy.
I hope the players use this game as the standard they set for themselves and know that this is the committment level required week after week, quarter after quarter, play after play. Rather than saying "we should beat this mob", they should know if they give what they gave on Friday night, the results will come.


I agree with this. It was a great game by a great player but there is too much emphasis on it. I think the media do it because it's an easy story, familiar to everyone, easy to digest etc. And they probably don't want to admit that we've improved as a team and that we might actually be a contender. Such poor analysis in the press.

Sometimes I feel there is too much Judd lauding from people within the club too. It creates the impression of a man apart. I hope it's not the case. Bomber Thompson seemed to always be emphasising the team over any individual performance, especially from Ablett when that's all anyone wanted to talk about. That was obviously complex but i reckon voices from within Carlton should be doing more of that. We are too quick to single Judd out from the pack and it doesn't seem healthy to me.

Maybe it's not an issue on the inside, I wouldnt know. Just an outsider's observation.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 04, 2011 9:27 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:31 am
Posts: 17893
I watched the 2nd half again. I think Judd's influence has been overstated.
Our fightback started in the 3rd and he wasn't instrumental in that.
In the last he was getting clearance after clearance but of our 4 goals, he had no influence on 2 of them and had a participation that was important in the other 2.

The way commentators portray it, without him we would have lost. He takes up 12-15% of our salary cap. If he wasn't there, there'd be another handy player or 2.

_________________
T E A M


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 04, 2011 9:32 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 9:02 pm
Posts: 13430
Location: Melbourne
Well the AFL wants us to believe that there is no bias whatsoever in the fixture, so I wouldn't think it to be a huge surprise someone from an AFL club is telling you that they have zero input in their club's fixture.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 04, 2011 9:38 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:31 am
Posts: 17893
I'm going to upset the cart here.

The club can do at most 1 session in Sydney. At their own cost.

GWS and Sydney are funded to do 100s. They probably have an employee who co-ordinates school and club visits full time.

It'll be like pouring a bottle of red food dye in Sydney Harbour and waiting for the colour to change. We are better off concentrating our resources in Victoria, the return will be far higher. The AFL want all uncommited fans in NSW to go GWS or Sydney. I think you'll find even Colonwood and Essendum won't be doing anything anymore.

_________________
T E A M


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 04, 2011 9:42 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
When you boil it down, the AFL is a product, like a camera. The Clubs are all selling us a similar product. One club is Canon, another Nikon and another again Pentax etc.

One of the cardinal rules of sales is product knowledge. The Club/s are failing if they don't inform and educate their staff with product knowledge, so they can then sell the product to the public and members. Even going to the length of having some standard answers ready for FAQs asked by callers about a wide range of things involving the club and the viewing/buying public.

We keep being told that the AFL is a professional game now, and that clubs are multi-million dollar companies. If so, why is that supposed professionalism not reflected by the staff? That then gives a very poor and amateur reflection on the club, IMO.

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 04, 2011 9:49 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
buzzaaaah wrote:
I'm going to upset the cart here.

The club can do at most 1 session in Sydney. At their own cost.

GWS and Sydney are funded to do 100s. They probably have an employee who co-ordinates school and club visits full time.

It'll be like pouring a bottle of red food dye in Sydney Harbour and waiting for the colour to change. We are better off concentrating our resources in Victoria, the return will be far higher. The AFL want all uncommited fans in NSW to go GWS or Sydney. I think you'll find even Colonwood and Essendum won't be doing anything anymore.


Fair points about the Swans and GWS and their funding, which comes from the NSW/ACT AFL.

But pour a bottle of food dye in the harbour and no the colour won't change, but pour one now, then another in a little while, and so on, and then before you realise you'll notice a change. Add to that adding more colour via club affiliation, and results will happen more readily than you might think.

So far the attitude is "It's all too hard, so let's not even bother trying". It's just the absolutely wrong way to go about it.

It's like "How do you eat an elephant? One bite at a time"

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 04, 2011 9:51 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
buzzaaaah wrote:
I'm going to upset the cart here.

The club can do at most 1 session in Sydney. At their own cost.

GWS and Sydney are funded to do 100s. They probably have an employee who co-ordinates school and club visits full time.

It'll be like pouring a bottle of red food dye in Sydney Harbour and waiting for the colour to change. We are better off concentrating our resources in Victoria, the return will be far higher. The AFL want all uncommited fans in NSW to go GWS or Sydney. I think you'll find even Colonwood and Essendum won't be doing anything anymore.


Thats fair enough but surely we should be nurturing our own current support so the baton is passed to their next generations ?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 375 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Blue Vain and 13 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group