TBB
Quote:
I'm never sure why people pick 3 talls across the full back line.
I mentiond the same thing in the earliest pages of this thread.
I remember Thornton played on the Hawks' Williams when Williams.
I'd suggest that Thornton did well that day because the passes to Williams on that day were delivered too high (and as a result favoured Thornton). But when Williams had the ball on the ground, Thornton was found wanting...Williams was too nimble. I don't think pace was Thornton's issue.
Personally, I like a BP player to be medium sized (around 185cm) with bit more pace than the Thorntons to play on the Davey, Farmer and Medhurst types...you know the flashy, turn on a sixpence types. The pace helps us create attacking options to clear the ball and break the lines from the backline.
I think we have several options for BP:
1 Carrazzo: proven BP and high possession one at that, and has a height advantage over the traditional smalls (but he's our RR, wasted as a BP)
2. Anderson: has height and a lot of pace and a proven tagger. Hamstring problem cut him short of developing in that role in 07. He looked the goods.
3. Pfieffer, Armfield and Browne: newboys, unproven but promising good options
4. Scotland: he could do it, but is more effective as a rebounding HB (I want him in the guts)
5 . Houlihan: see Anderson and add experience. A bit of a waste in the backline.
6. Walker: see Houlihan
7. Simpson: despite his height disadvantage, this guy can play any small man role (wasted at BP)
8. ditto...Stevenns, Gibbs, Murphy
Maybe Russell, and Wiggins could be considered, but I see them as HF types.
IMO, there's a battle going on the the BP position, like every position on the ground. I love it!