Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jun 13, 2025 5:44 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 346 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2014 9:30 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:03 pm
Posts: 4251
Location: Around the Corner
Gibbs 80%, BS?

Huge lift from him if that's the case.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2014 10:35 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 4:57 pm
Posts: 24
Blue Sombrero wrote:
Win or lose I'm already over 2014.
I spent six months thinking we had a reasonable list that could make the top eigh with a bit of luck with injuries and then we started with such a whimper I was deflated from the very beginning.
The Melbourne loss was a kick in the guts for me as it was for many of us. The players seemed to react OK for two weeks and then last week's debacle again.
Mathematically we can make the finals I suppose but based on current form and what seems from the other side of the world to be a lack of consistency of effort makes me think we should cut our losses and see what we've got.
Parko's comment about Armfield being a C grader who's busted his gut to become a b grader is telling. he comes in this week and we know he'll give 100% and maybe kick a few goals but he's still a fringe player in a team sitting 16th on the ladder.
Cripps and the others have to have a run.
Cachia maybe. Graham, Lucas and Watson. We already know Carazzo can play but he won't be around for long. Cut Juddy and offer Gibbs $500-600 take it or leave it. Tell Yarran he has to meet certain KPI regarding his defensive game or he's gone.
At the end of the year, we have to look at our ladder position and cut deep and ruthlessly and trade into the draft in the hopw we will have a decent team following behind GC and GWS. There's nothing more for it.
The result of this game means nothing other than someof the kids will play in a winning side. We can finish the season off strongly from here and finish maybe 11-13. For what? If we don't decide to play the kids a couple at a time consistently and see what we have available this season will just be another lost year.
I think we will win and I'll get up at 0430 to watch but only because I'm so rusted on I can't bring myself to sleep in and watch the replay.
I used to care. I used to get so angry after a weak loss that I'd take my frustration out on the lawn. We used to have such a nice lawn once. Mowed to within an inch of it's life, sometimes twice after a game in the fading light.
Now I have a gravel garden and just shrug off a loss.
After almost 60 years of being an active supporter and many of those as a member, especially through the post salary cap belting we took, that's what it's come down to for me.
We shouldn't have to get used to this shit.
Carlton by a few miserable points in a low scoring, lacklustre game. Armfield to give 100% and Gibbs 80.


This sums up my feelings exactly....very sad really but right now this is what is has come to. I've only been following the Blues for 45 years though.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2014 11:01 pm 
Offline
Bob Chitty

Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 8:08 pm
Posts: 813
for those of you always going on and on about playing the kids, how many do you want to see in the team at same time? at moment we have buckley , menzel and docherty . how many more do u want?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2014 11:08 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24633
Location: Kaloyasena
Springsteen wrote:
for those of you always going on and on about playing the kids, how many do you want to see in the team at same time? at moment we have buckley , menzel and docherty . how many more do u want?




There aren't any. :wink:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2014 11:37 pm 
Offline
Bob Chitty

Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 8:08 pm
Posts: 813
well we hear about graham and cripps , so if they come in we have 5 kids and levi, rowe and white with very little senior footy between em. not good i wouldnt think.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2014 12:16 am 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
17th Premiership wrote:
I'd be surprised if we play Yarran. With a hamstring twinge, he has the opportunity to have 4 wks and miss only 2 matches. Why risk bringing him back early on a dodgy hammy?


I thought he was taken from the field for precaution ate reasons because they did try him back on the ground before they pulled the trigger.
Ditto last week.

the MC or medical staff Erred on the side of caution for 3 weeks IMO.
Who knows if he had injured his hammy or just tightness in a spot as before.
Give the MC the benefit of the doubt. They have looked awful in recent history.


..feels like déjà vu..

... all over again.

_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!

After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit http://fromthemoshpit.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2014 10:48 am 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:37 am
Posts: 770
AGRO wrote:
Springsteen wrote:
for those of you always going on and on about playing the kids, how many do you want to see in the team at same time? at moment we have buckley , menzel and docherty . how many more do u want?




There aren't any. :wink:




I'm ok with that, as long as they then don't start dropping those guys for carrots, Judd , Waite etc, and we then have the same old players again. The more they play this year, the better they are next year. It doesn't hurt then to play another kid when he deserves it , as a sub or for a game or two.

I'm a believer it's not always about the result ( at this stage , considering how we are going), if we haven't gained anything for next year.

If Doc, Bucks and Menzel keep going the way they have been, they will own those spots, and hopefully get a couple of games into a couple of others.

Of course it's about balance, but lets not drive forward with the handbrake on .


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2014 11:02 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25073
Location: Bondi Beach
Blue Sombrero wrote:
Win or lose I'm already over 2014.
I spent six months thinking we had a reasonable list that could make the top eigh with a bit of luck with injuries and then we started with such a whimper I was deflated from the very beginning.
The Melbourne loss was a kick in the guts for me as it was for many of us. The players seemed to react OK for two weeks and then last week's debacle again.
Mathematically we can make the finals I suppose but based on current form and what seems from the other side of the world to be a lack of consistency of effort makes me think we should cut our losses and see what we've got.
Parko's comment about Armfield being a C grader who's busted his gut to become a b grader is telling. he comes in this week and we know he'll give 100% and maybe kick a few goals but he's still a fringe player in a team sitting 16th on the ladder.
Cripps and the others have to have a run.
Cachia maybe. Graham, Lucas and Watson. We already know Carazzo can play but he won't be around for long. Cut Juddy and offer Gibbs $500-600 take it or leave it. Tell Yarran he has to meet certain KPI regarding his defensive game or he's gone.
At the end of the year, we have to look at our ladder position and cut deep and ruthlessly and trade into the draft in the hopw we will have a decent team following behind GC and GWS. There's nothing more for it.
The result of this game means nothing other than someof the kids will play in a winning side. We can finish the season off strongly from here and finish maybe 11-13. For what? If we don't decide to play the kids a couple at a time consistently and see what we have available this season will just be another lost year.
I think we will win and I'll get up at 0430 to watch but only because I'm so rusted on I can't bring myself to sleep in and watch the replay.
I used to care. I used to get so angry after a weak loss that I'd take my frustration out on the lawn. We used to have such a nice lawn once. Mowed to within an inch of it's life, sometimes twice after a game in the fading light.
Now I have a gravel garden and just shrug off a loss.
After almost 60 years of being an active supporter and many of those as a member, especially through the post salary cap belting we took, that's what it's come down to for me.
We shouldn't have to get used to this shit.
Carlton by a few miserable points in a low scoring, lacklustre game. Armfield to give 100% and Gibbs 80.



Saddens me to read this post.
As mentioned earlier I know a lot of Carlton supporters who dont give a shit anymore. Lots.
I'm rusted on, but those who have dropped off were too. In fact they were tragics who over time have been hurt and disrespected.

Whether its losing their family reserved seating and lied to by the members dept, or the failed promise of the return and rise of the Carlton FC, they cant take being lied to by political animals trying to keep the hype going.

To tell the truth I'm lucky my 10yo and 6yo love being Carlton supporters despite the fact they have cried on numerous occassions because the character of those on and off the field failed to deliver. They like the heritage. It does get hard for them knowing Sydney kids barrack for Sydney Hawthorn or Geelong because they have been successful continuously for over a decade, where we peaked in 2011 to 8th and have seen us slide since.

The Black Hole. I actually hate those running Carlton since 1996....and one day I hope to check their scalp to find the 3 numbers 666 hidden under there. Absolute disgrace,

It will be an absolute disgrace if we lose on Monday, unless we are unofficially tanking.

The fact we wont reach 50000 in this 150th Anniversary year tells me we have already peaked and going backwards in that department too.

:confused:

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2014 11:14 am 
Offline
formerly King Kenny
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 20076
Springsteen wrote:
well we hear about graham and cripps , so if they come in we have 5 kids and levi, rowe and white with very little senior footy between em. not good i wouldnt think.


How are we going not playing kids?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2014 11:28 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 1:54 pm
Posts: 2251
King Kenny wrote:
Springsteen wrote:
well we hear about graham and cripps , so if they come in we have 5 kids and levi, rowe and white with very little senior footy between em. not good i wouldnt think.


How are we going not playing kids?


while you cant gift games saints will field 8 or 9 guys 21 and under on Monday night.
it was a good chance for us to give some more of our younger guys a run.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2014 11:54 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 9:43 pm
Posts: 4745
Dominator_7 wrote:
The fact so many people still pick a side whose just been pumped by 145 points to beat us, shows just how little respect we've got in the footy world at the moment. Pretty sad...


2 from 26 in the paper. Yep, heaps and heaps :grin:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2014 11:55 am 
Offline
formerly King Kenny
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 20076
doofdoof wrote:
King Kenny wrote:
Springsteen wrote:
well we hear about graham and cripps , so if they come in we have 5 kids and levi, rowe and white with very little senior footy between em. not good i wouldnt think.


How are we going not playing kids?


while you cant gift games saints will field 8 or 9 guys 21 and under on Monday night.
it was a good chance for us to give some more of our younger guys a run.


We gift games to Senior players. Who has the most upside?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2014 12:22 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
Springsteen wrote:
for those of you always going on and on about playing the kids, how many do you want to see in the team at same time? at moment we have buckley , menzel and docherty . how many more do u want?

That's a very good question. The answer IMO is this. Buckley has cemented his spot so he's OK. Menzel ditto. Docherty has experience so even though they're kids, the three of them, they can hold their own in any company.
Cripps is a big bodied kid who has played at senior level so he doesn't count. play him.
Bell, play when fit.
Levi ditto.
Lucas ditto.
Bootsma ditto.
Until we know they are never going to make it. Or they are.
Bring Giles in for a week just for the hell of it.
That gives us something like eight kids playing at the same time. They'll learn the same way the kids at GWS and GC are learning. They'll cop several hidings and play some good games along the way with the rest of the team helping out. Maybe they'll win the odd game. But we will know whom we have to release at the end of the year.

Didn't Collingwood have eight players against us with less than 50 games average? It can be done.

There is no value in Scotland, as good as he is, an injured Carazzo, a half fit Judd maybe even after this season. Thank them and play them every now and then when the kids need a break from the intensity. Put Garlett in the twos for another spell to get his mojo back.

A wise man once said: If you make no changes, things will just stay the same.

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2014 12:56 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
We know the current list won't win us a Premiership. We need to play the kids, either give them experience or really assess where they are at AFL Level by year's end to whether we keep them or not.

One reason we are in this mess as we have hung on to average players for too long.

This year needs to be about assessing and/or getting experience into:

Watson
Menzel
Giles
Holman
Bootsma
McInnes
Cripps
Temay
Graham
Lucas
Buckley
Casboult
Johnson
Reynolds
Cachia
Wood

Not a great list BUT the rest we know about. This list is what needs to be assessed for us to move forward. I don't care whether we win or lose for the rest of the season (although that generally changes when the game starts) I am about building our next great side.

Also, DO NOT play the kids as subs. Achieves nothing positive and is generally not good for confidence especially in a struggling side. Carrots & Scotland are the bets for subs as they can provide some leadership and poise when our kids need it most.

Maybe even try a few different things. Buckley to defence has worked and Rowe at FB has shown some positive signs. Maybe Watson forward or Bootsma on a wing, Temay in the BP :wink: Menzel on the ball, Graham getting a full game in the middle. You just never know and what have we got to lose?

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2014 1:50 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:20 pm
Posts: 6923
+1.

I have faith in this being done properly. Pies 2005 was done right. http://finalsiren.com/Fixture.asp?Seaso ... esc#player

Maxwell = 20 games in second year
Julian Rowe = 16 games, delisted at end of 2006 (2 that year)
Cloke = 15 games, first year
Swan = 14 games
Chris Egan = 13 games (err, maybe not so much, stuck around for another 3 years)
David Fanning = 13 games (1 the next, then delisted)
Cameron Cloke = 12 games (2 the next, then delisted)
Richard Cole = 8 games (gone at end of year)
Tristen Walker = 8 games (gone at end of year)
Ben Davies = final four games of year (delisted at end of 2006)
Heath Shaw = final six games of the year
Harry O'Brien = final four games of year
Matthew Lokan = final two games of year (delisted at end of year)

Unearthed Shaw, Maxwell, Cloke, Swan, O'Brien in the end of the year. Made the right and definite calls on Lokan, Davies, Walker, Cole, Cloke, Fanning and Rowe. Only real blunder was Chris Egan.

Find our list in 2010 very similar to theirs in 2005 actually.

_________________
BLUES 2010: PAV AND JUDD = FLAGS. DOING IT FOR THE LOVE OF DICK PRATT.

HAVE YOU SIGNED UP FOR TALKINGCARLTON SUPERCOACH 2009 YET?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2014 2:54 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 23921
moshe25 wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
17th Premiership wrote:
I'd be surprised if we play Yarran. With a hamstring twinge, he has the opportunity to have 4 wks and miss only 2 matches. Why risk bringing him back early on a dodgy hammy?


I thought he was taken from the field for precaution ate reasons because they did try him back on the ground before they pulled the trigger.
Ditto last week.

the MC or medical staff Erred on the side of caution for 3 weeks IMO.
Who knows if he had injured his hammy or just tightness in a spot as before.
Give the MC the benefit of the doubt. They have looked awful in recent history.


..feels like déjà vu..

... all over again.

hang on,
I feel like Ive read that response before

_________________
That’s not a political statement — it’s a harsh reality, and we must act,” she said. “He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free. I support impeachment.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2014 3:08 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
..if we play smart, hendo to kick 6+..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2014 4:58 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
ThePsychologist wrote:
We know the current list won't win us a Premiership. We need to play the kids, either give them experience or really assess where they are at AFL Level by year's end to whether we keep them or not.

One reason we are in this mess as we have hung on to average players for too long.

This year needs to be about assessing and/or getting experience into:

Watson
Menzel
Giles
Holman
Bootsma
McInnes
Cripps
Temay
Graham
Lucas
Buckley
Casboult
Johnson
Reynolds
Cachia
Wood

Not a great list BUT the rest we know about. This list is what needs to be assessed for us to move forward. I don't care whether we win or lose for the rest of the season (although that generally changes when the game starts) I am about building our next great side.

Also, DO NOT play the kids as subs. Achieves nothing positive and is generally not good for confidence especially in a struggling side. Carrots & Scotland are the bets for subs as they can provide some leadership and poise when our kids need it most.

Maybe even try a few different things. Buckley to defence has worked and Rowe at FB has shown some positive signs. Maybe Watson forward or Bootsma on a wing, Temay in the BP :wink: Menzel on the ball, Graham getting a full game in the middle. You just never know and what have we got to lose?


Great post Psych

My sentiments exactly. As much as we believe that players like Temay, Cripps et al aren't ready, this season is shot. Be bold and adventurous...one or two diamonds will be found in the rough.

And yes, try some different positions. Watto to FF is a must as an experiment. I don't want to hear why it won't work. I want to see him play there for 6 weeks then assess it. Same with Temay and Graham.

How often do players play so differently when thrown in at the deep end? (eg assume the #1 ruck position becauase the other ruckman is injured).

Give us something FFS.

I'm feeling exactly the same a BS in a previous post. Complete indifference to the CFC

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2014 5:41 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 12:11 pm
Posts: 1654
Same. My concern is what will be MMs agenda. He's saying we are re-building but then, will he? I worry he will be as concerned about his legacy, or coaching for an extension of contract. This is where the board and CEO have to give a clear signal and I'm not confident of that, and a more likely distracted, jockeying for their own positions


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2014 6:21 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
It's actually one of the reasons I think MM is the right person for us especially now. He is not worried about legacy's or getting extensions etc. He will be offered a new contract by the end of the year I have no doubt.

MM will stand up for what he believes is best. He has rebuilt clubs before. He knows what it takes to build a successful club and will be driven to do it and most importantly will stand up to anyone who gets in his way of making that happen. He will have more influence than most on getting the right people in List Management, Recruiting, Coaching, Fitness and Development. A lot has happened already.

A weak minded or inexperienced coach would let the board run all over him. Can't see that happening with MM, thank goodness given our current board.

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 346 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ByteDanceSpider, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 39 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group