Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jun 13, 2025 5:34 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 349 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 10:01 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:02 am
Posts: 1770
I just want big Levi to smash (legally) the Melbourne players who drop back into the holes. I hope Carlton kick it nice and high above their heads and big Levi takes a hanger over them leaving the Melbourne players very sore. Hopefully tomorrow we find a forward who clicks and becomes the player we have been searching for :thumbsup:

_________________
It is not as bad as you are lead to believe.......it is %$#^& worse!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 10:08 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:29 am
Posts: 6418
Location: Casa Da Carlton - The Place to Be
abit from left field ....

we constantly bemoan how bad our kicking is, but we need to look no further than Thouy (though he hasn't had a great year to date), as to how someone can improve their skills quickly. He is one of the better kicks at our club. why arent we using him as a standard approach and have all our players going through the same process as him and what he did to pick up the kicking skills in such a short period of time? It might take a year, it might take 18 months, but until we get out kicking sorted, we could have all the players in the world, ad we will still lose if we kicked like we have been the last few weeks.

The article about how we concede many goals from poor kicking out of defence is something that is easily fixed, combine that with out terrible kicking in front of goal and the season could be in a very different position as we currently sit. We should have blown Port out of the water in the first quarter, we should have beaten Richmond in the 2nd game. Waite, Garlett have probably been our biggest offenders at this, with Bell, Robbo and Walker not far behind them.

I can quickly think of about 10 goals between Waite/Garlett/Bell that should have been kicked that wasn't, and I don't mean iffys, I mean absolute sitters, that should never have been missed. Throw in Warnocks attempts and you start to see the picture. Some of Walkers kicking out of defence has been disgusting so he can think himself very lucky in my opinion.

forget all the rubbish about players being better than others or not, but the hard facts are, that unless the kicking is up to standard (which its not) then we will struggle. until we get the kicking sorted, we are going nowhere.

get a footy into the hands of every player, every day, 200 kicks a day, 300 kicks a day, practise, practise, practise. IF a player can not reach a level of efficiency considered acceptable, then they shouldn't be getting a game. And there should be no expcetion to this rule.

that is the minimum that should be expected of any player and until they are achieving the minimum expectation they should not be getting a game. no exceptions.

_________________
Got to love the stare Down by Setanta on Llyod :)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 10:18 am 
Offline
formerly King Kenny
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 20076
Clayman wrote:
I just want big Levi to smash (legally) the Melbourne players who drop back into the holes. I hope Carlton kick it nice and high above their heads and big Levi takes a hanger over them leaving the Melbourne players very sore. Hopefully tomorrow we find a forward who clicks and becomes the player we have been searching for :thumbsup:


Problem is we kick it over Casboult's head so he has no chance to mark it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 10:20 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 6:29 am
Posts: 13689
SS, there are two problems with your argument:

1. Native Aussie Rules players have had their technique ingrained for the better part of 15 years. The irish lads start from scratch when they get here. It'll take longer to re-program an aussie for this reason alone.

2. The fitness/conditioning guys limit the repetitions of the players to avoid injury

I personally think what you propose can be done, but it would take time. Golfers re-invent their swing, but it takes thousands and thousands of repetitions to do so.

The average time on an AFL list is something like 4 years so spending 2 years improving their kicking is a bit of a waste of time. Better to make sure that they can kick when we draft them and making kicking practice an important part of the weekly skills sessions.

_________________
The measure of a life is a measure of love and respect
So hard to earn, so easily burned
In the fullness of time
A garden to nurture and protect

#DopeThenStash


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 11:19 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 1:29 pm
Posts: 5913
Location: Melbourne
DocSherrin wrote:
BrianSetzer1 wrote:
Thought Rowe might go before Waite!


Rowe vs Waite...Carlton's own landmark decision that legalizes abortion in the first 4 rounds.


:lol: :clap:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 11:31 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:02 am
Posts: 1770
If Waite did not have a dad named Vinnie he would:
- not be on our list now
- not have been given 3 year contract

Waite is the most over rated player to wear the Carlton jumper for a very long time.

This is not about Rowe vs Waite, however I will say that Rowe has played much better than Waite this year. Waite has done SFA. Waite is high on reputation and has not come near what people thought he promised.

If Rowe's last name was Hunter, people would all of a sudden give him respect.

While I agree we have a lot of players on our list that should not be on an AFL list (including Waite), unfortunately there is no mid season draft and it is not Super Coach where we can trade for Rowe & Waite for Roughhead this week.

I am sick of seeing people bagging players who are at least having a go and trying to win the football. By continuing to play Waite who clearly does not give a @#$%&! and dropping Rowe who is trying his heart out really does send the wrong message to the other players. I am happy to play a hard trying/working Rowe over a lazy, don't give a @#$%&! player any day. This is how you change culture.

_________________
It is not as bad as you are lead to believe.......it is %$#^& worse!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 11:34 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 9:21 pm
Posts: 1167
Location: molotoving AFL House
When in doubt our midfield should just kick the ball long to Thorp.


Last edited by THIRIODIS on Fri Apr 11, 2014 11:42 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 11:40 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:29 am
Posts: 6418
Location: Casa Da Carlton - The Place to Be
bluechucky wrote:
SS, there are two problems with your argument:

1. Native Aussie Rules players have had their technique ingrained for the better part of 15 years. The irish lads start from scratch when they get here. It'll take longer to re-program an aussie for this reason alone.

2. The fitness/conditioning guys limit the repetitions of the players to avoid injury

I personally think what you propose can be done, but it would take time. Golfers re-invent their swing, but it takes thousands and thousands of repetitions to do so.

The average time on an AFL list is something like 4 years so spending 2 years improving their kicking is a bit of a waste of time. Better to make sure that they can kick when we draft them and making kicking practice an important part of the weekly skills sessions.


re bold - its not working, so lets try something different.

I don't disagree with the first comment, but I do think that players can change, as you allude to with the golf swing analogy. Im not convinced that kicking "x" amount of balls everyday will make a player less or more prone to injury either, but we are fundamentally flawed if we would rather a player be fit and able to run 15kms a game, than one that can kick the ball consistently during the course of a game, and only cover 7kms a game. The quickest way to move a ball is not run with it, but to kick, and kick with purpose. A ball will travel quicker kicked over 50m than it will be in the arms of someone running with it for 50m etc..

but you are right, i.e. retraining exiting players, but I was more alluding to the fact of players that are new to club in the last few years, or those that have more than 5+ years at the club. I don't think you would invest time into Mclean, Judd, Scotland, Carazzo etc.. but players like Bell, Graham, Cripps etc.. i would be ensuring we do everything we can to ensure they are kicking at minimum effeciencies, and if after 3-4 years they cant do that, then move them on ... id say Bell is falling into this category over the next two years. He has enormous potential, but so did Hampson, and it never eventuated and i think we would have been better to keep Jacobs (had it been possible) than hold onto Hampson etc.. I think we should have let Hampson go two to three years ago and concentrate on someone else. Casboult, in my opinion is firmly in this category and if he cant make it this year, id cut him.

as good as carazzo has been for us (he has surprised me in becoming the player he has) there is a reason he wasn't able to cut it at Geelong, we have to get passed this, where okay is good enough.

_________________
Got to love the stare Down by Setanta on Llyod :)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 11:49 am 
Offline
formerly BlueRob
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:45 pm
Posts: 3073
The Bomb tactic is pure brilliance by Dr Strangelove but seriously, Casboult has to lead more ... as Cloke does for Collingwood.

_________________
I am as mad as hell and I'm not going to take it any more!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 12:38 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:05 pm
Posts: 1005
Location: Raxacoricofallapatorius
ScottSaunders wrote:
bluechucky wrote:
SS, there are two problems with your argument:

1. Native Aussie Rules players have had their technique ingrained for the better part of 15 years. The irish lads start from scratch when they get here. It'll take longer to re-program an aussie for this reason alone.

2. The fitness/conditioning guys limit the repetitions of the players to avoid injury

I personally think what you propose can be done, but it would take time. Golfers re-invent their swing, but it takes thousands and thousands of repetitions to do so.

The average time on an AFL list is something like 4 years so spending 2 years improving their kicking is a bit of a waste of time. Better to make sure that they can kick when we draft them and making kicking practice an important part of the weekly skills sessions.


re bold - its not working, so lets try something different.

I don't disagree with the first comment, but I do think that players can change, as you allude to with the golf swing analogy. Im not convinced that kicking "x" amount of balls everyday will make a player less or more prone to injury either, but we are fundamentally flawed if we would rather a player be fit and able to run 15kms a game, than one that can kick the ball consistently during the course of a game, and only cover 7kms a game. The quickest way to move a ball is not run with it, but to kick, and kick with purpose. A ball will travel quicker kicked over 50m than it will be in the arms of someone running with it for 50m etc..

but you are right, i.e. retraining exiting players, but I was more alluding to the fact of players that are new to club in the last few years, or those that have more than 5+ years at the club. I don't think you would invest time into Mclean, Judd, Scotland, Carazzo etc.. but players like Bell, Graham, Cripps etc.. i would be ensuring we do everything we can to ensure they are kicking at minimum effeciencies, and if after 3-4 years they cant do that, then move them on ... id say Bell is falling into this category over the next two years. He has enormous potential, but so did Hampson, and it never eventuated and i think we would have been better to keep Jacobs (had it been possible) than hold onto Hampson etc.. I think we should have let Hampson go two to three years ago and concentrate on someone else. Casboult, in my opinion is firmly in this category and if he cant make it this year, id cut him.

as good as carazzo has been for us (he has surprised me in becoming the player he has) there is a reason he wasn't able to cut it at Geelong, we have to get passed this, where okay is good enough.


Both our field kicking and goal kicking are atrocious but any skill can be improved upon though it is not necessarily the quantity of practise but more the quality of practise.

Goal kicking SHOULD be the easier one to get right, especially set shot kicking, since the process can be assessed as a single piece that is separate from most externalities. Field kicking is more involved and typically needed to be done under time pressure with targets and opponents moving but this is no difference to a tennis shot played within a rally. If a solid technique is created then constant results should be returned.

The analogy between goal kicking and a golf shot is a good one. Many golfers have changed their swings over the course of their careers. What it takes is a lot of practise but this is always done with the guidance of a coach and iterative tweaking.

It absolutely amazes me that this has not been done with somebody like Levi who has been acknowledged for 4 years now as having some great attributes for a forward but also having a very bad kicking technique.

Maybe it has and Levi is too thick to listen but my guess is that if it has been done then it was in a very amateur fashion.

_________________
Carlton - Nothing's changed
I still love you, oh, I still love you
Only slightly, only slightly less
Than I used to, my love


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 1:16 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 9:43 pm
Posts: 4745
ScottSaunders wrote:
abit from left field ....

we constantly bemoan how bad our kicking is, but we need to look no further than Thouy (though he hasn't had a great year to date), as to how someone can improve their skills quickly. He is one of the better kicks at our club. why arent we using him as a standard approach and have all our players going through the same process as him and what he did to pick up the kicking skills in such a short period of time? It might take a year, it might take 18 months, but until we get out kicking sorted, we could have all the players in the world, ad we will still lose if we kicked like we have been the last few weeks.

The article about how we concede many goals from poor kicking out of defence is something that is easily fixed, combine that with out terrible kicking in front of goal and the season could be in a very different position as we currently sit. We should have blown Port out of the water in the first quarter, we should have beaten Richmond in the 2nd game. Waite, Garlett have probably been our biggest offenders at this, with Bell, Robbo and Walker not far behind them.

I can quickly think of about 10 goals between Waite/Garlett/Bell that should have been kicked that wasn't, and I don't mean iffys, I mean absolute sitters, that should never have been missed. Throw in Warnocks attempts and you start to see the picture. Some of Walkers kicking out of defence has been disgusting so he can think himself very lucky in my opinion.

forget all the rubbish about players being better than others or not, but the hard facts are, that unless the kicking is up to standard (which its not) then we will struggle. until we get the kicking sorted, we are going nowhere.

get a footy into the hands of every player, every day, 200 kicks a day, 300 kicks a day, practise, practise, practise. IF a player can not reach a level of efficiency considered acceptable, then they shouldn't be getting a game. And there should be no expcetion to this rule.

that is the minimum that should be expected of any player and until they are achieving the minimum expectation they should not be getting a game. no exceptions.


The irishman was a blank canvas. The locals have been kicking shite since they were in the u8s. A decade of bad habits can't be un-learnt in a hurry if at all.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 1:29 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17219
Clayman wrote:
If Rowe's last name was Hunter, people would all of a sudden give him respect.


:confused: :lol: No.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 1:34 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 2:54 pm
Posts: 2521
Clayman wrote:
If Waite did not have a dad named Vinnie he would:
- not be on our list now
- not have been given 3 year contract

Waite is the most over rated player to wear the Carlton jumper for a very long time.

This is not about Rowe vs Waite, however I will say that Rowe has played much better than Waite this year. Waite has done SFA. Waite is high on reputation and has not come near what people thought he promised.

If Rowe's last name was Hunter, people would all of a sudden give him respect.

While I agree we have a lot of players on our list that should not be on an AFL list (including Waite), unfortunately there is no mid season draft and it is not Super Coach where we can trade for Rowe & Waite for Roughhead this week.

I am sick of seeing people bagging players who are at least having a go and trying to win the football. By continuing to play Waite who clearly does not give a @#$%&! and dropping Rowe who is trying his heart out really does send the wrong message to the other players. I am happy to play a hard trying/working Rowe over a lazy, don't give a @#$%&! player any day. This is how you change culture.


People need to accept Waite for what he is. It's not his fault he's over rated. He's produced the same standard of footy for several years now. Supporters should question themselves for why year after year they've expected Jarrad to produce a season that is far better than any season he's had before. It won't happen..

Waite is an exceptional athlete who has played key position roles at both ends of the field. He's capable of some very exciting footy, he can take a strong mark, kick some freakish goals and excite the fans. He can also make some shocking errors. That's his game. Has been that way for years.

We can't take it out on him that some supporters have continually failed to take notice of his limitations. The fact that he hasn't lived up to the unrealistic expectations of a success starved supporter base shouldn't take away from the fact that he's been a very good player for this club over a long period of time. No matter who his father was, Jarrad has clearly been of AFL standard and is head and shoulders above a battler like Rowe. To compare the 2 is absurd.

Feel free to criticise Waite's attitude in the last fortnight, but lets not diminish his achievements as a player.

_________________
@cecil_anderson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 1:39 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 15848
Agree. I feel for Waite. Since Fev left he has been asked to fill a role beyond his capabilities. Put him in a forward line with a more than decent FF and CHF and he'd be a very difficult match up. In our forward line, he's a sitting duck.

_________________
"I had to eat"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 2:16 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10569
Waite has been double and tripled teamed in the 1st three rounds. Not his fault we setup or even deliver badly into the forward line. He has been our only focal point and the only one looking like being able to cause any headaches for the opposition.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 2:29 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:38 pm
Posts: 7640
waite and garlett need to kick goals - they continue to miss easy ones when we need to put scoreboard pressure - these two primarily cost us against Richmond with their inept kicking for goal -as senior players need to do much better - that's not to absolve the rest of the team from blame but with their experience and skill should kick those goals


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 3:19 pm 
Offline
formerly BlueRob
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:45 pm
Posts: 3073
Levi needs a few games in a row. Little point in bringing him back for 1 week ... then dropping.

_________________
I am as mad as hell and I'm not going to take it any more!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 3:25 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 1:06 pm
Posts: 3995
Location: Steven Seagal's Martial Arts Academy
frank dardew wrote:
waite and garlett need to kick goals - they continue to miss easy ones when we need to put scoreboard pressure - these two primarily cost us against Richmond with their inept kicking for goal -as senior players need to do much better - that's not to absolve the rest of the team from blame but with their experience and skill should kick those goals



If I had to guess, this is why I think they've been dropped this week.
Probably also because their forward pressure needs to lift.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 3:26 pm 
Offline
formerly King Kenny
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 20076
BigBlueWave wrote:
The Bomb tactic is pure brilliance by Dr Strangelove but seriously, Casboult has to lead more ... as Cloke does for Collingwood.


How's Cloke going?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 3:52 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 10:48 am
Posts: 2367
Location: Riyadh
Hornet wrote:
Blue Sombrero wrote:
idle wrote:
Though I pretty much agree with everyone's sentiments regarding players being dropped as in Waite, Garlett, and bringing in players such as Lucas and even Scottland, I will probably upset some people saying if there is anyone who should have been dropped, it should have been Bryce Gibbs.

The coach has said Gibbs is untouchable. Nothing further needs to be said.

The club must believe that by dropping GIbbs, he'll spend that time packing his bags. So we have to accept 22 games for Gibbs this year regardless of form... and then he'll pack his bags anyway.



In fairness, there were plenty who were worse than Gibbs last Sunday. For the first three quarters he was one of our more productive players, but that's not saying much.

_________________
"The old believe everything, the middle-aged suspect everything, and the young know everything." Oscar Wilde


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 349 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Mickstar, piquet and 37 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group