Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jun 17, 2025 3:27 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 348 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 1:19 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
Synbad wrote:


haha

win 3 of your next 5 mr sticks kernahan... have your best footballer go to another club and have 5 or 6 lpayers retire.. and then crow all you like after achieving what they did.

Or you can win 3 wooden spoons bring in chris judd.. have unprecedented access to umber 1 picks.. and still be treading water... and then laugh at them.

I know who the moron is.... :screwy:




I was only having a laugh. Should have but one of those smiley faces on it. Slipped up.

Still they lost a couple of players and few oldies lost form and they have fallen away. That from one of the greatest teams ever. A team with a winning culture, great recruiting and developing.

With that it must be in the realms of possibility that with Waite, Murphy, Henda, Kruezer, Laidler ,Yaz and Carrazzo out we will be a lesser team.

PS Who mentioned the word moron?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 1:35 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 2:30 pm
Posts: 4584
Location: Blisstonia.
Blue Vain wrote:
jim wrote:
27 fit players, 8 of your top 13 out, one can't be expecting to beat sides like Geelong. Geelong should've, would've expected alot better than a two goal win. Lucky for them we kicked 2.9 in the last qtr otherwise they would've had a heap to scream about if they lost.

Our supporter's expect miracles but they don't often happen. As long as we don't get the crap from the previous week in Adelaide.


8 of our best 13 out!!!
That's a valid excuse.

Just remind me, who are they?


Question should proabaly be directed at the Captain, and not jim as it's a direct quote from an interview last Monday.

At the time he was talking about Carrazzo, Murphy, Kreuzer, Henderson, Duigan, Waite, Laidler and I assume could have included Scotland even though he played Saturday. (hopefully not White and Davies as the coach does).

The debate should be whether or not it's a valid excuse for a) our current medocrity, b) whether having such a long injury list can be attributed to poor player/injury management, training, pre-season etc c) whether it's covering up largely problems that dont seem to have changed even with these guys in the side, d) is our depth strong enough and have we drafted/traded/developed in previous years correctly etc, rather than whether we were or were not missing these players.

_________________
"They're [REDACTED]'


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 1:58 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18024
Blueboy74 wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
jim wrote:
27 fit players, 8 of your top 13 out, one can't be expecting to beat sides like Geelong. Geelong should've, would've expected alot better than a two goal win. Lucky for them we kicked 2.9 in the last qtr otherwise they would've had a heap to scream about if they lost.

Our supporter's expect miracles but they don't often happen. As long as we don't get the crap from the previous week in Adelaide.


8 of our best 13 out!!!
That's a valid excuse.

Just remind me, who are they?


Question should proabaly be directed at the Captain, and not jim as it's a direct quote from an interview last Monday.

At the time he was talking about Carrazzo, Murphy, Kreuzer, Henderson, Duigan, Waite, Laidler and I assume could have included Scotland even though he played Saturday. (hopefully not White and Davies as the coach does).


Half of them played on Friday so using it as an excuse against geelong is foolish.
We lost because we didnt take our chances. Pure and simple. Drpopped marks that should be taken, more scoring shots, more inside 50s. You have good weeks in front of goal (freo game) and you have bad ones.

Injuries aren't the reason we lost.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 2:02 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 5:15 pm
Posts: 7360
Watched the first qtr last night... such missed goals... had them on the ropes... their two goals from our turnovers

Such a wasted chance...

Couldn't bare to watch the rest of the game :banghead:

_________________
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ― Richard Feynman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 2:09 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 8:58 pm
Posts: 394
Location: Melton
Moshe

Where are the assumptions?
As far as paying the relevant salaries is concerned, that's a pretty cheap get out considering your quite happy to have an opinion otherwise, why when you are challenged to come up with something constructive other than potshots do you come up with such a pissweak reply, could it be that like me you are sitting on the outside with no real understanding of what is going on in the club.

I also pay my membership but I don't consider it to give me the right to take potshots just because I am pissed off with the way things are going, I have those emotions during the game and say and think things that in hindsight are wrong and unreasonable, it is amazing how we can be the greatest coaches and tacticians sitting in the stands under no pressure.

I can't come up with a plan to fix the problem as I am not in the inner sanctum and don't know everything that is going on, nor do I suspect do you.

I do know however that a lot of different things have hit us at once which has limited options of what we can do.

I have never at any stage stated that we are improving or that we need another 5 years.

I also don't know if Ratten is going to be able to take us to the next step, but I do know that he is contracted and should be entitled to see at least next season out before we knife him to death and i t pisses me off no end to see how easily we turn on our own, without being prepared to look at all of th e circumstances.

_________________
We are the maybe blues


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 2:12 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 2:30 pm
Posts: 4584
Location: Blisstonia.
Blue Vain wrote:
Blueboy74 wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
27 fit players, 8 of your top 13 out, one can't be expecting to beat sides like Geelong. Geelong should've, would've expected alot better than a two goal win. Lucky for them we kicked 2.9 in the last qtr otherwise they would've had a heap to scream about if they lost.


8 of our best 13 out!!!
That's a valid excuse.

Just remind me, who are they?


Question should proabaly be directed at the Captain, and not jim as it's a direct quote from an interview last Monday.

At the time he was talking about Carrazzo, Murphy, Kreuzer, Henderson, Duigan, Waite, Laidler and I assume could have included Scotland even though he played Saturday. (hopefully not White and Davies as the coach does).


Half of them played on Friday so using it as an excuse against geelong is foolish.
We lost because we didnt take our chances. Pure and simple. Drpopped marks that should be taken, more scoring shots, more inside 50s. You have good weeks in front of goal (freo game) and you have bad ones.

Injuries aren't the reason we lost.


I actually agree BV, just saying that jim was only quoting Juddy, but he was incorrect in the fact that the reference (8 of best 13) was prior to the Geelong game, not after, as we got three of those guys back.

From Friday night it was Murphy, Carrazzo, Laidler, Waite, Scotland vs JPod, Menzel, Christensen, Varcoe and Vardy for 'Best 22' players missing.

Some might think that Vardy is a stretch (but more valid than some of us throwing in Mitchell, Casboult and Rowe), but was coming along nicely last year and would be playing in front of Stephenson IMO if fit.

We were still worse off, but not as much as some might think.

_________________
"They're [REDACTED]'


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 2:16 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8206
Blue Vain wrote:
Blueboy74 wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:


8 of our best 13 out!!!
That's a valid excuse.

Just remind me, who are they?


Question should probaly be directed at the Captain, and not jim as it's a direct quote from an interview last Monday.

At the time he was talking about Carrazzo, Murphy, Kreuzer, Henderson, Duigan, Waite, Laidler and I assume could have included Scotland even though he played Saturday. (hopefully not White and Davies as the coach does).


Half of them played on Friday so using it as an excuse against geelong is foolish.
We lost because we didnt take our chances. Pure and simple. Drpopped marks that should be taken, more scoring shots, more inside 50s. You have good weeks in front of goal (freo game) and you have bad ones.

Injuries aren't the reason we lost.


Had a few more fit and available we win. Kick straight and we win, take marks and we win etc.... Take our choice with that. In many respects it's not such a great refection on Geelong right now. If the roles were reversed what would we be saying...."we only beat an injury riddled sides by 2 goals that dropped marks, couldn't kick straight, more scoring shots, more inside 50's etc...". We'd still be bagging the side. The only good side to it was despite all that we lost to the reigning premiers (admittedly not at their best) by just 2 goals. It was no excuse the week before as the lack of effort wiped out any excuse.

I went with the "quote" a week late but we still have quite a few who lost pre-season's hence well short of their best, a couple who "first up" after a short injury break, one or two that are carrying injuries, like Kreuzer, who simply shouldn't be playing, then it doesn't help to have a couple who can't get a kick in a stampede right now.


Last edited by jim on Mon Jun 11, 2012 2:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 2:23 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18024
Yep, we agree.
8 of our best 13 out is a crock of shit and had nothing to do with Fridays result. :razz:
we just werent good enough on the night.

Looking at the positives, if we can get Scotland and Carrazzo back this week, we should approach the game with plenty of confidence.
West Coast are far more affected by injury and we traditionally play well at Subiaco.
I wont be at all surprised to see us get up.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 2:46 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 2:06 pm
Posts: 1098
Sen were discussing Carlton today and brought up a fact. Carlton has too many players that only play in one position. Players mentioned were Betts, Garlett, Scotland, Duigan, Yarran, and a few others that i cant remember. Dermie mentioned that is too easy to plan for Carlton as you know what positions most players will be playing in. They mentioned that Betts, Garlett and Yarran had to improve their fitness to run through the midfield and this was a fault of the coach for not doing this.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 2:50 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19419
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
J Hunt can accept $1350 sanction for standing on E Betts

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 2:53 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 2:06 pm
Posts: 1098
Effes wrote:
J Hunt can accept $1350 sanction for standing on E Betts

What a joke.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 2:54 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2012 6:52 am
Posts: 1197
Sunday Footy Show review

[youtube]zcsWLdS1QC4[/youtube]

_________________
http://www.youtube.com/user/Navyblue95 -
my youtube channel tracking carlton news on television and paytv


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 2:56 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:05 pm
Posts: 1005
Location: Raxacoricofallapatorius
Eddie wrote:
Sen were discussing Carlton today and brought up a fact. Carlton has too many players that only play in one position. Players mentioned were Betts, Garlett, Scotland, Duigan, Yarran, and a few others that i cant remember. Dermie mentioned that is too easy to plan for Carlton as you know what positions most players will be playing in. They mentioned that Betts, Garlett and Yarran had to improve their fitness to run through the midfield and this was a fault of the coach for not doing this.


I think Brereton is speaking through his @rse

I reckon you could name any team and list just as many players that played a fixed role. Also, Yarran and Scotland could hardly be described as single position players. Though I agree that Betts, especially, should spend more time in the middle (rather than CHF :wink: ) as I think he has actually been ok there on the few occasions he has been put there

_________________
Carlton - Nothing's changed
I still love you, oh, I still love you
Only slightly, only slightly less
Than I used to, my love


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 3:07 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21541
Location: North of the border
Hunt $1350 fine for stomping on Betts hand

Should have got weeks for that piss weak act

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:10 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 9:02 pm
Posts: 13424
Location: Melbourne
Sydney Blue wrote:
Hunt $1350 fine for stomping on Betts hand

Should have got weeks for that piss weak act


most media commentators thought he was being clumsy and didn't mean it :roll: :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:11 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10576
Yeh - you just can't feel some-one's hand underneath your feet the first time, let alone the arm the 2nd time!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:38 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
So you don't get rubbed out for deliberate stomping.

We know what to do next time Josh "Courage" Hunt is on the ground. It's not a free or a suspension it's the equivelent of Juddy's shoulder tape bill for June.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:11 pm 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
blues8182 wrote:
Moshe

Where are the assumptions?
As far as paying the relevant salaries is concerned, that's a pretty cheap get out considering your quite happy to have an opinion otherwise, why when you are challenged to come up with something constructive other than potshots do you come up with such a pissweak reply, could it be that like me you are sitting on the outside with no real understanding of what is going on in the club.

I also pay my membership but I don't consider it to give me the right to take potshots just because I am pissed off with the way things are going, I have those emotions during the game and say and think things that in hindsight are wrong and unreasonable, it is amazing how we can be the greatest coaches and tacticians sitting in the stands under no pressure.

I can't come up with a plan to fix the problem as I am not in the inner sanctum and don't know everything that is going on, nor do I suspect do you.

I do know however that a lot of different things have hit us at once which has limited options of what we can do.

I have never at any stage stated that we are improving or that we need another 5 years.

I also don't know if Ratten is going to be able to take us to the next step, but I do know that he is contracted and should be entitled to see at least next season out before we knife him to death and i t pisses me off no end to see how easily we turn on our own, without being prepared to look at all of th e circumstances.

If you're going to ask me a question relating to something I said, then please use the QUOTE function. Otherwise, it's so hard to follow and makes it impossible to debate.

Anyway, you seem to assume that I'm saying something about getting rid of the coach during the year. I haven't done that at all, so you're arguing with a straw man.

If you want to debate my point - here it is ...... again:

- It's 16 years since we won a flag.
- It's 13 years since we played in a GF.
- It's 11 years since we finished in the top 4.
- In that time we've had 3 opportunities to pick a great coach;
- In that time, we've had 1 no2 pick, 3 no1 picks, 1 no6 pick, 1 no9 pick, 1 no12 pick PLUS Judd PLUS fluking Simmo and Robbo with (relatively) late picks;
- In that time, we've also had a bit of luck with some good rookie picks; eg Betts, Garlett, Thornton;
- In that time, 10 other teams have won flags (including basket cases like North Melbourne and Port Adelaide);
- In that time, Collingwood has managed to play in 2 losing GFs, bottom out, rebuild, win a flag, and stay on top;
- In that time WC has managed to bottom out, rebuild to win a flag, bottom out again after losing arguably the 2 best footballers in the country, and rebuild AGAIN to be near the top again.

I could go on, but the bottom line is that whether it's our recruiting, our development, our mentoring, our coaching, or some combination of these ....... Carlton seems to be a dud organisation. It's main mission is winning flags and it's failing miserably, while at the same time pissing off a large number of supporters.

I'm not sure why it's so hard to understand. This is all I'm saying.

But when you attack me for every little point that EVERYONE ELSE you disagree with is saying, it's hard to keep the debate on track.

WE ARE NOT DOING WELL. And, pointedly, we are definitely not improving. I'll accept (but still disagree with) that we're treading water, but to say we're improving, as some on this thread have suggested, is almost as funny as having a tattooed Vanessa Amarosi advertise Clear skin products (which I saw on TV today - no kidding!!!).

_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!

After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit http://fromthemoshpit.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:43 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
There are a few "in that time" 's you missed that may have balanced out other "in that time"'s.

- In that time one of our number 1 picks had a knee reco
- In that time we got banned from the early draft rounds.
- In that time the AFL realised that a no1 pick one year may be no10 any other year.

I hear what you are saying though but you were a bit selective with the points.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:48 pm 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
club29 wrote:
There are a few "in that time" 's you missed that may have balanced out other "in that time"'s.

- In that time one of our number 1 picks had a knee reco
- In that time we got banned from the early draft rounds.
- In that time the AFL realised that a no1 pick one year may be no10 any other year.

I hear what you are saying though but you were a bit selective with the points.

OMG!! Are you serious?

The draft pick penalties were 10 years ago!!! And are you saying that the other teams didn't have top players go down with injuries?

I don't actually understand your third point - please explain.

_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!

After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit http://fromthemoshpit.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 348 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group