club29 wrote:
Rexy wrote:
Disagree. One on one Dawes will smash Thornton.
Opinion.
As Ratts stated in his interview with Mathews it rarely becomes a one on one where height becomes an issue in a game. He reminded us that it is more about the back six and how they work together. Its about the "heat" on the ball when entering defensive fifty.
I personally believe that we are better sticking with our defensive unit than bringing in a bloke who hasnt been apart of it because he is 3cm taller so may be able to stop shots at goal those rare occasions when size is a factor.
If we lose because Dawes outsizes someone on a couple of occasions then a number of our systems of play in our current gameplan have more than likely failed.
If playing a game of kick to kick with Dawes and Thornton at one end i agree that Dawes would smash Thornton.
The counterview is that the systems and structures you are referring to can't be maintained against an opponent of Collingwood's quality for 4 quarters under the current interchange rules, which is a large part of the reason Collingwood outscores everyone so comprehensively in the last quarter. In essence, it does become a game of kick to kick. Win the ball. Kick it long. Play on, kick it long again.
In a finals atmosphere where the intensity level is so much higher, it seems likely to me that the kick to kick could start as early as mid-way through the 3rd because a lot of petrol tickets will be spent early. I think you need to consider the possibility that our mids won't be able to cover the ground to take the heat of the ball in the second half, and the three-on-one you thought you were going to have is actually Dawes one-out.
It we don't have the right bodies in the back 6 to mitigate that contigency, then maybe we need to start settling a different back 6 now. Because footy has always been a game of inches and the 3 cms you are dismissing as theoretically irrelevant are a reasonable chance to cost us a flag.