Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jun 14, 2025 10:57 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 294 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Aug 04, 2013 11:56 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
club29 wrote:
MIL wrote:
Navy Blue Horse wrote:
cimm1979 wrote:
People bagging Gibbs' efforts tonight must have never seen Chris Mayne play and don't know how important he is to Freo.

Great effort by Gibbs tonight.



I just doubt that having Gibbs play a role like that is a luxury we can afford


+1. No. 1 draft picks are NOT lock down players. Gibbs is not no. 1 draft pick standard.


You have to forget about the no 1 bit. It will cloud your thinking.


Does that same logic apply to how we assess whether he is trade-able at the right price or not? I thought not. :cool:

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 05, 2013 5:30 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:58 am
Posts: 2130
Blues87 wrote:
Dodo27 wrote:
And there goes our Finals hopes-With Port Winning by kicking 4 Goals in 4 Minutes ( It was more like Adelaide game fixed the result for the sake of SA being present in the Finals ).


Time to play the Kids.

Chad Wingard represents everything you want in a player (along with Dangerfield). Tough and skillful but most importantly a competitor who wants to win and is happy to take the responsibility for winning the game. We have too many contributors and not enough winners.

The other point being that players like this are hard to find.


Exactly.

I 100% admire Port Adelaide. Chad Wingard - now that is the type of player I enjoy watching. Port are the complete package - play tough footy, contested footy but beat you with speed and precision and skill out of the midfield.

When Westoff hammered Watson with a hip and shoulder a few weeks back- it made a statement that this team is a team of intent. When was the last time a Carlton player legitimately hurt an opponent with muscle? I can't think of the last time. Carlton is "too nice". A legitimate legal hip and shoulder is a rarity, a tackle that enforces your intent. Rarely happens.


Port will beat Carlton when they meet them in the last round as they play as a team, have a mission and adhere to it.
They are one of the teams I enjoy watching - Port, Sydney, Geelong and Hawthorn - play complete footy and are more enjoyable to watch than teams such as Carlton, which is "in transition". There is a toughness and resilience to these teams. I think that is what I like most about them.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 05, 2013 7:33 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18022
Pickle wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Synbad wrote:
club29 wrote:
Murphy has had an interrupted two years. Shoulder, face, knee and groins. Has had very limited pre season last two seasons. This is why his form is rubbish. He is trying to be a leader and playing on anyway but his body is not letting him. He is best sitting it out and getting set for next year. In 2011 form he can build himself into a good leader but while he is down and out and doubting himself he is no good to at all as a leader.

We know he can play. Lets get him right.

yes but hes no captain....


That's why Mick shouldnt have made the decision to make him captain,
The players know their peers better than a new coach coming in.


Did Mick make the decision? I have a feeling there was some influence.


According to Mick, he decides the captaincy.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 05, 2013 8:30 am 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 8:14 am
Posts: 577
tap in 79 wrote:
Blues87 wrote:
Dodo27 wrote:
And there goes our Finals hopes-With Port Winning by kicking 4 Goals in 4 Minutes ( It was more like Adelaide game fixed the result for the sake of SA being present in the Finals ).


Time to play the Kids.

Chad Wingard represents everything you want in a player (along with Dangerfield). Tough and skillful but most importantly a competitor who wants to win and is happy to take the responsibility for winning the game. We have too many contributors and not enough winners.

The other point being that players like this are hard to find.


Exactly.

I 100% admire Port Adelaide. Chad Wingard - now that is the type of player I enjoy watching. Port are the complete package - play tough footy, contested footy but beat you with speed and precision and skill out of the midfield.

When Westoff hammered Watson with a hip and shoulder a few weeks back- it made a statement that this team is a team of intent. When was the last time a Carlton player legitimately hurt an opponent with muscle? I can't think of the last time. Carlton is "too nice". A legitimate legal hip and shoulder is a rarity, a tackle that enforces your intent. Rarely happens.


Port will beat Carlton when they meet them in the last round as they play as a team, have a mission and adhere to it.
They are one of the teams I enjoy watching - Port, Sydney, Geelong and Hawthorn - play complete footy and are more enjoyable to watch than teams such as Carlton, which is "in transition". There is a toughness and resilience to these teams. I think that is what I like most about them.



Robbos hit on Ablett was solid but few and far between I agree. This is where Tom Bell steps in. He is a wrecking ball, give him an extended stay in seniors and let him adapt.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 05, 2013 8:47 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:52 am
Posts: 1588
Location: My social club stand, Princes Park
Players who lack skill but have the necessary grunt need to be in the team.

i.e. Robbo, Bell.

But they need to be given clear instructions, that they only hold their place in the side if they show the required mongrel.

Yes, we need a few hitmen to target the opposition while also protecting Murphy at al.

_________________

************************************************************
NOW YOU'RE JUST SOME CLUB THAT I USED TO KNOW.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 05, 2013 8:59 am 
Offline
Serge Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 10:36 am
Posts: 983
George Harris wrote:
Players who lack skill but have the necessary grunt need to be in the team.

i.e. Robbo, Bell.

But they need to be given clear instructions, that they only hold their place in the side if they show the required mongrel.

Yes, we need a few hitmen to target the opposition while also protecting Murphy at al.

this is essentially our problem. we have too many players that have one or the other, not both.

_________________
i don't wanna spend my life explaining myself. Either you get it, or you don't- Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 05, 2013 12:56 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 8:25 pm
Posts: 925
Stefchook wrote:
Headcutter wrote:
If I can make a small suggestion (for the 1 millionth time)......... STOP PLAYING THE 3 SMALL FORWARDS IN THE SAME TEAM - IT WILL NEVER WORK ON A CONSISTENT BASIS ESPECIALLY AGAINST A QUALITY OPPOSITION. Not only does it fail 8 out of 10 times but it means that we are playing effectively 1 or 2 players down because we are have 3 of essentially the same player who cant really have an impact anywhere else on the ground.


And yet Freo's 3 small forwards (Walters, Ballantyne, Neale) effectively won them the game. Ran harder. Applied far more pressure. And were far more damaging offensively.

And Geelong playing Christensen, Stokes and Motlop (with Varcoe thrown in) doesn't seem to be a problem...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 05, 2013 12:59 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 8:25 pm
Posts: 925
Stefchook wrote:
Blue Sombrero wrote:
The use of Gibbs concerns me. Not just tonight. I still think a player of his skill should be the one hunted and not the hunter. He did a pretty good job on Maine but why should his effectiveness be measured by the effectiveness of his man?
When can he be allowed to be the one making the play and breaking free to do his thing? Was he recruited at #1 to be a tagger?


I agree. Not sure why the early season midfield experiment has stopped? It was always going to take some time to reprogram him.

Get Bootsma back into the side. Too many of our class midfielders are playing in defence at the moment (Simmo, Scotland and Gibbs).

I agree. Love to know the detail of what MM is thinking and working towards...it seemed so obvious to try Gibbs in the midfield in the 2nd half but we stayed with the same defensive set-up.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 05, 2013 1:11 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 8:25 pm
Posts: 925
club29 wrote:
King Kenny wrote:
grrofunger wrote:
things will look very different next year


That's why this year has been good. We have a new coach who has seen what players can and can't do, who can now make decisions to improve us.


If you sat down with MM after a book signing last September and were asked what each player can and can't do I am sure you could have told him what seems to have worked out now. All of us could. Even a herald sun reporter could have told him.

Does anyone here really believe that Malthouse's ego didn't get a hold of him ? He thought he could turn them all around. Fix the unfixable.

Bit of a waste of time this year.

The positive I can take from all that is that at least he took the time to work out for himself where every player is at and for each of them to have a chance to show what they can do on a consistent basis (except Laids who he never gave a chance to). It is frustrating in the short term (ie this season) but is a better way to make decisions.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 05, 2013 1:20 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 8:25 pm
Posts: 925
grrofunger wrote:
everyone is in self preservation mode

they know cuts are coming

they know changes are afoot

there is no signs of playing as a team

its all me me me

some have already taken the easy way out and given up

selfish pricks most of them

I can see why you would think this... and I think it is also sapping their confidence and therefore their performance.
On the other hand, if you were playing for your career it could be assumed that you'd be showing a frenzy of effort til the last game. And this seems to be symptomatic of too many of our players - they don't stand up enough in tough situations.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 05, 2013 1:22 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 8:25 pm
Posts: 925
Blue Revival wrote:
George Harris wrote:
Players who lack skill but have the necessary grunt need to be in the team.

i.e. Robbo, Bell.

But they need to be given clear instructions, that they only hold their place in the side if they show the required mongrel.

Yes, we need a few hitmen to target the opposition while also protecting Murphy at al.

this is essentially our problem. we have too many players that have one or the other, not both.

This.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 05, 2013 2:26 pm 
Offline
formerly BlueRob
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:45 pm
Posts: 3073
So we never had a good side ... we never had the potential to make a Prelim or Grand Final ... this was a very ordinary group of players. Well ... if thats the case ... you can't have it both ways. We made finals 3 out of 5 years after dwelling for years at the bottom of the ladder. Once we came very very close to making a prelim ... we must have been so well coached to get a team of crap players to perform so well. :smile: :smile: :smile:

YOU CAN'T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS.

Malthouse made a statement at the start of the year of what he thought of the team he inherited ... has everyone forgotten that.

Now we have a crap side with little potential according to some posters.

Players that were in our best last year ... like Laidler and Yarran are suddenly not up to it and there is a reason for that. Murphy can't get his hands on the pill. Carrots is injured ... McLean is old ... Judd has had his day ... Waite is too injury prone etc etc etc. Injuries and poor talent suddenly become an excuse for poor man management ... weak tactical decisions and lack of forsight at the selection table.

We have a better squad than last year with less injuries ... and we probably won't make the 8 unless Essendon* get the chop.

Completely agree with Robert Walls about our situation ... different rules for different coaches.

Malthouse has made a big fat hash of things this year. Players have not responded to his coaching ... or he just has not got the message through and on top of that the MC have been hopeless and timid. Instead of moving forward ... we are moving backwards ... and a team which had potential has been marked for re-building. We had a chance to swing some changes to a side that had a number of players down ... and what did we do ... lambs to the slaughter ... pathetic.

_________________
I am as mad as hell and I'm not going to take it any more!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 05, 2013 2:30 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35876
Location: Half back flank
I'm still annoyed it wasn't us who were into Lyon a couple of years ago :lol:

_________________
#DonTheStash


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 05, 2013 2:40 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10573
BigBlueWave wrote:
So we never had a good side ... we never had the potential to make a Prelim or Grand Final ... this was a very ordinary group of players. Well ... if thats the case ... you can't have it both ways. We made finals 3 out of 5 years after dwelling for years at the bottom of the ladder. Once we came very very close to making a prelim ... we must have been so well coached to get a team of crap players to perform so well. :smile: :smile: :smile:

YOU CAN'T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS.

Malthouse made a statement at the start of the year of what he thought of the team he inherited ... has everyone forgotten that.

Now we have a crap side with little potential according to some posters.

Players that were in our best last year ... like Laidler and Yarran are suddenly not up to it and there is a reason for that. Murphy can't get his hands on the pill. Carrots is injured ... McLean is old ... Judd has had his day ... Waite is too injury prone etc etc etc. Injuries and poor talent suddenly become an excuse for poor man management ... weak tactical decisions and lack of forsight at the selection table.

We have a better squad than last year with less injuries ... and we probably won't make the 8 unless Essendon** get the chop.

Completely agree with Robert Walls about our situation ... different rules for different coaches.

Malthouse has made a big fat hash of things this year. Players have not responded to his coaching ... or he just has not got the message through and on top of that the MC have been hopeless and timid. Instead of moving forward ... we are moving backwards ... and a team which had potential has been marked for re-building. We had a chance to swing some changes to a side that had a number of players down ... and what did we do ... lambs to the slaughter ... pathetic.


:clap:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 05, 2013 3:22 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 1472
SurreyBlue wrote:
BigBlueWave wrote:
So we never had a good side ... we never had the potential to make a Prelim or Grand Final ... this was a very ordinary group of players. Well ... if thats the case ... you can't have it both ways. We made finals 3 out of 5 years after dwelling for years at the bottom of the ladder. Once we came very very close to making a prelim ... we must have been so well coached to get a team of crap players to perform so well. :smile: :smile: :smile:

YOU CAN'T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS.

Malthouse made a statement at the start of the year of what he thought of the team he inherited ... has everyone forgotten that.

Now we have a crap side with little potential according to some posters.

Players that were in our best last year ... like Laidler and Yarran are suddenly not up to it and there is a reason for that. Murphy can't get his hands on the pill. Carrots is injured ... McLean is old ... Judd has had his day ... Waite is too injury prone etc etc etc. Injuries and poor talent suddenly become an excuse for poor man management ... weak tactical decisions and lack of forsight at the selection table.

We have a better squad than last year with less injuries ... and we probably won't make the 8 unless Essendon*** get the chop.

Completely agree with Robert Walls about our situation ... different rules for different coaches.

Malthouse has made a big fat hash of things this year. Players have not responded to his coaching ... or he just has not got the message through and on top of that the MC have been hopeless and timid. Instead of moving forward ... we are moving backwards ... and a team which had potential has been marked for re-building. We had a chance to swing some changes to a side that had a number of players down ... and what did we do ... lambs to the slaughter ... pathetic.


:clap:


Very short sighted analysis


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 05, 2013 3:27 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 11:39 am
Posts: 30269
Location: riding shotgun on Agros Karma Train
very short sighted appointment you mean

_________________
Between our dreams and actions lies this world


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 05, 2013 4:38 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
Terrible appointment.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 05, 2013 7:25 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 7182
This season can't end soon enough.

I'm astonished at how many players have taken several steps back from last year.

Laidler can't even get a game? Murphy plays like a menstruating school girl. Yarran and Betts are terrible. Kreuzer is inconsistent. Oh hang on, Kreuzer has only ever turned up one week a month. Carry on ...

The club better cancel its B&F night. To award anyone in this team anything, seems like a kick in the balls to each and every member that pays money for this tripe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 05, 2013 7:40 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 11:06 am
Posts: 1826
Braithy wrote:
This season can't end soon enough.

I'm astonished at how many players have taken several steps back from last year.

Laidler can't even get a game? Murphy plays like a menstruating school girl. Yarran and Betts are terrible. Kreuzer is inconsistent. Oh hang on, Kreuzer has only ever turned up one week a month. Carry on ...

The club better cancel its B&F night. To award anyone in this team anything, seems like a kick in the balls to each and every member that pays money for this tripe.

Because they have been asked to get out of their comfort zone and step up to the level needed to be a premiership side and they cannot or will not conform.So the next step is to get rid of the non conformists for the good of the club.They know who they are and so does mm.Their will only one winner out of this and it will not be the non conformists.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 05, 2013 8:47 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2645
Trigger wrote:
Braithy wrote:
This season can't end soon enough.

I'm astonished at how many players have taken several steps back from last year.

Laidler can't even get a game? Murphy plays like a menstruating school girl. Yarran and Betts are terrible. Kreuzer is inconsistent. Oh hang on, Kreuzer has only ever turned up one week a month. Carry on ...

The club better cancel its B&F night. To award anyone in this team anything, seems like a kick in the balls to each and every member that pays money for this tripe.

Because they have been asked to get out of their comfort zone and step up to the level needed to be a premiership side and they cannot or will not conform.So the next step is to get rid of the non conformists for the good of the club.They know who they are and so does mm.Their will only one winner out of this and it will not be the non conformists.



Yes micky never takes responsibility.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 294 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ByteDanceSpider, Google [Bot] and 39 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group