Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jun 17, 2025 6:16 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 469 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 ... 24  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 12:15 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 9:43 pm
Posts: 4745
j.scarponi wrote:
Well it seems we may have made anohter super recruitment blunder with Watson McCarthy Mitchell and no mids in there...can understand the thinking at the time. Hindsight says it was a blunder of perhaps epic proportions. 1 of them at least should be treading 20 games now I would have thought. Apart from the potential of Bell we have nothing coming through from NB - that hurts the most.


At least we got the Meerkat :thumbsup:

Watson is by far the most dissapointing of that mob. Mitchell is our version of Gumbleton.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 12:17 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
teknodeejay wrote:
dominc fotia wrote:
Bryce Gibbs needs to be dropped. His form this year has been poor. He gives us nothing off half back (no run), he never looks tired or spent like he's not willing to pay a price for victory. His disposal is unacceptable. For his last 50 games he's been cruising. Dropping him makes a statement and shows that nobody is safe if they don't perform.


I think this is an over reaction saying he has been cruising for 50 games. So for the last 2 years he has been cruising? I disagree. I thought he was quite good last season, particularly toward the end of it and he was missed in the WCE final.

I just think this season he is disappointing to say the least. Maybe dont drop him this week, but he needs a talking to. Maybe a shift in position would be suitable for him. But there's no more excuses for Gibbs.

He shouldn't be in the "contributed" section of the team. He should be in the "won the match" section of the team with his other highly regarded team members.


3 out of his last 4 weeks have been bad but he was very good against Richmond, Brisbane, Collingwood and Freo.

Terrible last night, no good against the Bombers and had a good second half against GWS and an average 1st half.
He wont get dropped. He will be asked to find something and lift after last night. He will be a professional and knuckle down and work hard to try to recapture his early season form.
I am betting he will have plenty more top games this season.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 12:17 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 9:43 pm
Posts: 4745
Eddie wrote:
Agree about Thornton, at least he is a marking option. Something we didnt have last night. Waite played too far up the ground yet again and when the ball did come into our forward line, which was more often than St Kilda did, there was noone to mark or make a contest. He must be pretty frustrated.


It speaks volumes that we are all crying for the return of T-Bird as a saviour. This is a guy that most have wanted gone for many years :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 12:28 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10400
Location: Coburg
Bad, bad loss, mainly because it shows the improvement is not as much as I'd hoped. I suspect that until we have a CHF and an extractor or two in the midfield to help Judd and Murph we will struggle to take the next step. That Brock has not been able to fill that role as the extractor and the talls we recruited have not become CHF's (yet?) means while I think many things about this side are better, the weaknesses are the same as last year and the year before. I'd be happy to take a step or two back, play some players other than the same 25 we rotate through, and try and find the answers.

I understand that the injuries to talls mean we may be stuck without a CHF but lets try some things that are different. Give some other players a chance. Perhaps try to develop players we need to play them - even those we think not ready etc.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 12:29 pm 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher

Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 8:20 pm
Posts: 84
club29 wrote:
teknodeejay wrote:
dominc fotia wrote:
Bryce Gibbs needs to be dropped. His form this year has been poor. He gives us nothing off half back (no run), he never looks tired or spent like he's not willing to pay a price for victory. His disposal is unacceptable. For his last 50 games he's been cruising. Dropping him makes a statement and shows that nobody is safe if they don't perform.


I think this is an over reaction saying he has been cruising for 50 games. So for the last 2 years he has been cruising? I disagree. I thought he was quite good last season, particularly toward the end of it and he was missed in the WCE final.

I just think this season he is disappointing to say the least. Maybe dont drop him this week, but he needs a talking to. Maybe a shift in position would be suitable for him. But there's no more excuses for Gibbs.

He shouldn't be in the "contributed" section of the team. He should be in the "won the match" section of the team with his other highly regarded team members.


3 out of his last 4 weeks have been bad but he was very good against Richmond, Brisbane, Collingwood and Freo.

Terrible last night, no good against the Bombers and had a good second half against GWS and an average 1st half.
He wont get dropped. He will be asked to find something and lift after last night. He will be a professional and knuckle down and work hard to try to recapture his early season form.
I am betting he will have plenty more top games this season.


I reckon Gibbs plays really when when given a job to do on someone (see Goodes). It focusses him and you really see his determination that is sometimes not evident. We have clearly missed Carrazzo's lock down role terribly, why not give Gibbs the job on, say, Dal Santo? Tell him to focus on shutting him down and then running hard the other way. I think this would do him the world of good.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 12:29 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
dominc fotia wrote:
Really no surprises with that performance.

Once again showed the problems that are holding us back, no it's not the coach.

Key factors

-Mindset, too flat too often. Not playing the precentages. Too lazy. No chasing.

-Soft, no other word for it. Essendon* set the tone, Hawthorn have done it to us for years, bottom line, we're scared and a statement needs to be made. Nothing stupid or "Line in the Sand" type all-in (Although it might not hurt) but at least show you won't be pushed around

-Talk is cheap. All week we heard about how filthy they were with the performance against GWS, we hear about "cracking in" and "raring to go" Who cares? Show it on the field!

-Selection. The same guys are going to be dropped and that leads to the complacencey. We know that Russell, Bower and Joseph will get dropped because they're always the first out (Along with Thornton). Bryce Gibbs needs to be dropped. His form this year has been poor. He gives us nothing off half back (no run), he never looks tired or spent like he's not willing to pay a price for victory. His disposal is unacceptable. For his last 50 games he's been cruising. Dropping him makes a statement and shows that nobody is safe if they don't perform.
Thornton is in our best 22, he can play both ends, he presents well and he's got good hands.

- Small things, A key moment in the game last night, Rhys Stanley took a mark on the 50 and Hampson told Judd to stand the mark so he could go to the goal line. Judd refused and stood doubled over taking a breather about 10 metres away. Not good enough from the captain and sets a very bad example. Judd was our best last night but no excuse for that no matter how tired you are. Small things that don't appear on stats sheets like standing the mark with one hand on your hip (Gibbs again), or running to close to the man on the mark when shooting for goal, point to a poor attitude.

Another concern long term is the lack of draft picks 30-70 from recent drafts who look like long term prospects. Our luck with the rookie list has masked some ordinary recruiting in recent years.


Welcome. Good first post. :beer:

I don't mind the drop Gibbs theory. I believe a clear statement needs to be made to the group.

Dropping Bryce may or may not be the place to start, but the coaching staff need to show the players, somehow and unambiguously, that the efforts we saw against Essendon* and St Kilda are not acceptable.

Speaks volumes that Ellard, with his limited game time, was one of our better players last night.

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 12:31 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 9:43 pm
Posts: 4745
Stone Free wrote:
Can someone please tell Kruze and Hammer to actually tap it to one of their own players? The number of times their hit outs went straight into Haye's or Del Santo's hands was laughable; hence why we won the hit-out stat, but failed the clearance stat. If our strength is in our speed, then sometimes we need to think about the strategy that Fremantle employ with Sandi where he just punches the ball forward 20-30m into space where there is no congestion. I noticed we only did that a couple of times last night when we should've done it alot more and exposed St Kilda's lack of pace on the outside from stoppages.


This was soooooooo obvious. We looked good against the Pies in clearances but all taps were near the ruckman's feet. Ess and Saints learned from this and continually sharked our hit outs. Why didn't Ratts & co. try belting it clear (either fwd or back) and getting our blokes to run onto it ? Would've even been better off losing the taps by playing Waite in the ruck FFS


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 12:32 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8206
dannyboy wrote:
Bad, bad loss, mainly because it shows the improvement is not as much as I'd hoped. I suspect that until we have a CHF and an extractor or two in the midfield to help Judd and Murph we will struggle to take the next step. That Brock has not been able to fill that role as the extractor and the talls we recruited have not become CHF's (yet?) means while I think many things about this side are better, the weaknesses are the same as last year and the year before. I'd be happy to take a step or two back, play some players other than the same 25 we rotate through, and try and find the answers.

I understand that the injuries to talls mean we may be stuck without a CHF but lets try some things that are different. Give some other players a chance. Perhaps try to develop players we need to play them - even those we think not ready etc.



Yes, CHF. With all the talk of free agency and Travis Cloke we should be chasing hard.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 12:34 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
we should not have to worry about who to play on their players.
they should worry about us!

Gibbs has been used as a tagger for too long.

what teams are doing to us is swarming the midfield so we cannot get our hands on the ball decisively and this is dragging the spread players into the quicksand effectively suffocating our greatest asset! the spread!

can't see a solution till we can get more ball winners in.

everyone will be doing that now!

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 12:50 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 10:07 pm
Posts: 1984
We were soft.
We were flat.
We didn't work hard enough.
The umps murdered us.
If we kicked straight, we would have won :banghead:


We are really missing Yarran, Laidler and Carrots.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 12:54 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21541
Location: North of the border
It has been obvious to all and sundry that our clearance work has been woeful since Carrotts went down
Brocky won 8 clearance in that Bombers game and is dropped because he doesn't run and spread

Shouldnt we at least consider him so we can at least get first use of the ball 8-10 times a game

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 1:01 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19420
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
Bluevain mentioned in the match thread how our ruckmen need to mix it up a bit. When you have such ruck dominance it becomes very predictable to the opposition - see Sandilands. Hayes is just about best in the league at sharking opposition hitouts. Hampson likes to use his right hand to softly hit it left at centre bounces. As BV mentioned, get more distance on the hitout...instead of hitting it within a few metres radius, hit it further...make it unpredictable.

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 1:02 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
Effes wrote:
Bluevain mentioned in the match thread how our ruckmen need to mix it up a bit. When you have such ruck dominance it becomes very predictable to the opposition - see Sandilands. Hayes is just about best in the league at sharking opposition hitouts. Hampson likes to use his right hand to softly hit it left at centre bounces. As BV mentioned, get more distance on the hitout...instead of hitting it within a few metres radius, hit it further...make it unpredictable.


Agreed, once in a while just punch the absolute @#$%&! out of it.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 1:08 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
doing that also not makes things predictable but sets a dominant mindset!

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 1:09 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
Effes wrote:
Bluevain mentioned in the match thread how our ruckmen need to mix it up a bit. When you have such ruck dominance it becomes very predictable to the opposition - see Sandilands. Hayes is just about best in the league at sharking opposition hitouts. Hampson likes to use his right hand to softly hit it left at centre bounces. As BV mentioned, get more distance on the hitout...instead of hitting it within a few metres radius, hit it further...make it unpredictable.

It seems so basic and logical, so why wouldn't this be implemented at the time?

Lack of pre-game preparation from the coaches ?

Lack of ability to adapt by the players due to lack of composure and thought process ?

either way, it's a huge worry


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 1:21 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:35 am
Posts: 2125
Wow. The reaction is worse than the Bomber game. I felt that the game against Collingwood told us as much about our weaknesses as our strengths. How would we go when we didn't easily win every centre square, when our defence was under real pressure and our forwards didn't get good delivery?

Our weaknesses have been shown up. Done by the Bombers and Saints and lucky to beat Freeo. Waite is a handy third tall but not a power forward. Big K and Hammo are rucks not forwards. Sure, rest them up there, but they are not key forwards. We have never taken a big bodied mid in the ND - that may just be because they weren't available, but we don't have a Jordan Lewis/Heath Hocking type. We went after Brock and the Swans went after Kennedy. They got it right, we didn't.

Stats Ratts needs to start watching the games and being in control not sitting at the back of the dugout watching the interchanges. Sides seem to have worked us out. We need to turn ruck dominance into possession. Jammo is looking just workmanlike. JR has gone backwards. Gibbs is neat and clean, but very outside and doesn't change matches. We have been passed by the Bombers and WCE and maybe Adelaide. We should have been aiming for a grand final not top four, that was very marginal improvement. If we continue to be ahead of sides we were ahead of last year then we are progressing, if they get to us or pass us, that is not enough progress. Lucky Taylor Walker is out next week, our defence is struggling. Juddy is still carrying us on his shoulders. TBird may come in but that is just deck chairs on the Titanic. I can't see Warnock helping much, we won most of the hitouts last night anyway. Give Collins a go. I know he won't help much with hard ball gets, but I'd like to see if he has anything to offer. Apart from Yarran is there much to come back in the next few weeks?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 1:25 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 23921
gerry atric wrote:
Wow. The reaction is worse than the Bomber game. I felt that the game against Collingwood told us as much about our strengths as our weaknesses. How would we go when we didn't easily win every centre square, when our defence was under real pressure and our forwards didn't get good delivery?

Our weaknesses have been shown up. Done by the Bombers and Saints and lucky to beat Freeo. Waite is a handy third tall but not a power forward. Big K and Hammo are rucks not forwards. Sure, rest them up there, but they are not key forwards. We have never taken a big bodied mid in the ND - that may just be because they weren't available, but we don't have a Jordan Lewis/Heath Hocking type. We went after Brock and the Swans went after Kennedy. They got it right, we didn't.

Stats Ratts needs to start watching the games and being in control not sitting at the back of the dugout watching the interchanges. Sides seem to have worked us out. We need to turn ruck dominance into possession. Jammo is looking just workmanlike. JR has gone backwards. Gibbs is neat and clean, but very outside and doesn't change matches. We have been passed by the Bombers and WCE and maybe Adelaide. We should have been aiming for a grand final not top four, that was very marginal improvement. If we continue to be ahead of sides we were ahead of last year then we are progressing, if they get to us or pass us, that is not enough progress. Lucky Taylor Walker is out next week, our defence is struggling. Juddy is still carrying us on his shoulders. TBird may come in but that is just deck chairs on the Titanic. I can't see Warnock helping much, we won most of the hitouts last night anyway. Give Collins a go. I know he won't help much with hard ball gets, but I'd like to see if he has anything to offer. Apart from Yarran is there much to come back in the next few weeks?



Mitch robinson/Jordan Lewis/Hocking?? Potentially at least??

_________________
That’s not a political statement — it’s a harsh reality, and we must act,” she said. “He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free. I support impeachment.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 1:37 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 15848
It's OK everyone, just relax.

St Kilda, it seems, are the real deal. We lost to a genuine flag threat by just 4 goals.

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/s ... 1yo7a.html

Quote:
Henderson said last night's loss reflected more on where St Kilda were in their development under Watters than any major chinks in Carlton's armoury


Really?

_________________
"I had to eat"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 1:44 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 9:10 am
Posts: 5
club29 wrote:
teknodeejay wrote:
dominc fotia wrote:
Bryce Gibbs needs to be dropped. His form this year has been poor. He gives us nothing off half back (no run), he never looks tired or spent like he's not willing to pay a price for victory. His disposal is unacceptable. For his last 50 games he's been cruising. Dropping him makes a statement and shows that nobody is safe if they don't perform.


I think this is an over reaction saying he has been cruising for 50 games. So for the last 2 years he has been cruising? I disagree. I thought he was quite good last season, particularly toward the end of it and he was missed in the WCE final.

I just think this season he is disappointing to say the least. Maybe dont drop him this week, but he needs a talking to. Maybe a shift in position would be suitable for him. But there's no more excuses for Gibbs.

He shouldn't be in the "contributed" section of the team. He should be in the "won the match" section of the team with his other highly regarded team members.


3 out of his last 4 weeks have been bad but he was very good against Richmond, Brisbane, Collingwood and Freo.

Terrible last night, no good against the Bombers and had a good second half against GWS and an average 1st half.
He wont get dropped. He will be asked to find something and lift after last night. He will be a professional and knuckle down and work hard to try to recapture his early season form.
I am betting he will have plenty more top games this season.



He played good games against weaker sides. My point about his last 50 games is in 08/09 he was on track to be an elite midfielder but hasn't improved since then. He should be a better player than Murphy. He's bigger, good overhead and as skilled but he just doesn't put in. In his defence, he needs to be let loose and push forward more. I really can't see the point of him loitering around in defence getting cheap kicks which he doesn't use it as effectively as he could.
Above all, he needs to be dropped to make a statement. Halfway through 08? Ross Lyon dropped Del Santo, Montagna and Milne. It turned their season around and they made prelim and the GF in 09/10.

This is a crucial point in Ratten's career. Make a statement and get this right and you minimise the chance of these performances happening again. We missed the top 4 last year because of slack efforts like this one (WB, WCE) and we're on track to repeat it unless something is done.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 2:09 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
Navy Blue Horse wrote:
It's OK everyone, just relax.

St Kilda, it seems, are the real deal. We lost to a genuine flag threat by just 4 goals.

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/s ... 1yo7a.html

Quote:
Henderson said last night's loss reflected more on where St Kilda were in their development under Watters than any major chinks in Carlton's armoury


Really?


Happy to have him talk the opposition up as long as that's not what is said when the team reviews the match.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 469 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 ... 24  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bluebo baggers, Crusader, GreatEx and 29 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group