Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Wed May 07, 2025 9:03 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 284 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 12:25 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 6:11 pm
Posts: 14900
Still shattered. Yesterday should have been spent organising finals tickets not wonder "what if". :cry: :cry:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 12:32 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:52 pm
Posts: 2289
Location: Geelong
Sydney Blue wrote:
The three worst decisions all day was

When Goodes was tackled close to goal and dropped the ball in the first quarter and it resulted in a Swans goal


And the Second was when Robbo run down Munford and caught him cold the ball rolled out and was called a throw in - That ball should have been heading straight back in our 50

and the third was when Matner totally retarded Walker from getting near the ball he just hung onto him and it was called play on


so as usual it is not the ones they pay its the ones they dont


Why I'm defending the umps I do not know, but ...

I think that the Matner one was ok. I reckon Walker had his arm locked in. If I'm right, then it was clever staging from Walker and even cleverer umpiring.

The Goodes one ... looked obvious to me, but there were a lot of players around, maybe the ump was blindsided and assumed he got a hand-ball in? Don't know, I was pretty cranky at the time.

Mumford ... this one I just cannot explain. Second time this year this has happened and for the life of me I cannot see why. Three umps should've had a clear view - any could've called it. Prior opportunity ... etc etc. Ticked every box, but no free. I don't see how they could justify that call. If they acknowledge that it was an error, I still don't understand what they were thinking.

Maybe as the tackle was laid they sneezed and missed it. All of them. At the same time. In both games. :?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 12:45 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 4:49 pm
Posts: 1170
Our defence is still our achilles heel. A little bloke chews us up again (Dennis-Lane 4 goals from 6 kicks). And 11 entries in the final quarter by Sydney for seven scores (3.4), disappointing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 1:37 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 9:02 pm
Posts: 13155
Location: Melbourne
BigKev wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
The three worst decisions all day was

When Goodes was tackled close to goal and dropped the ball in the first quarter and it resulted in a Swans goal


And the Second was when Robbo run down Munford and caught him cold the ball rolled out and was called a throw in - That ball should have been heading straight back in our 50

and the third was when Matner totally retarded Walker from getting near the ball he just hung onto him and it was called play on


so as usual it is not the ones they pay its the ones they dont


Mumford ... this one I just cannot explain. Second time this year this has happened and for the life of me I cannot see why. Three umps should've had a clear view - any could've called it. Prior opportunity ... etc etc. Ticked every box, but no free. I don't see how they could justify that call. If they acknowledge that it was an error, I still don't understand what they were thinking.

Maybe as the tackle was laid they sneezed and missed it. All of them. At the same time. In both games. :?


Watching the replay even Bruce thought it shoulda been a free kick to us!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 1:52 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 12:05 pm
Posts: 6
Location: Sydney
For mine the problem with the umpiring is the decisions they don't play. Specifically the belief that players are entitled to tackle Chris Judd whether he has the ball or not.
Watch the first goal from Kieran Jack again. Judd drags him thrrough the contest like he was a tire in a sprinting drill. Once Judd is out of the way, Jack picks up the ball and scores. Why is he allowed to tackle, or impeed Judd without the pill?

_________________
You can't take the magic away from me, man!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 4:28 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:35 am
Posts: 2125
Quote:
The punch in the melon that AJ got that left him dazed on the ground whilst the Swans ran into an open goal.


Watch that piece of play. As a supporter I am far more concerned that AJ was looking at what was coming rather than the ball, so he fumbled then got an incidental whack in the face. If he hadn't taken his eyes off the ball the situation wouldn't have arisen, as with Waite when he dropped an uncontested mark, got a slap in the face and lay prone while the Swans ran away with it. Let's get ourselves right rather than excusing our bad play because of line ball umpiring decisions.

While on AJ, can't the guy bend and pick up the ball? It happened last week against Freeo when he gave them a point for a 7 point lead, and again ag the Swans when he kicked the ball 20 metres towards the Swans goal instead of gathering it, or even attempting to gather it - result Swans goal.

Id AJ is good enough to get a game with us, we are not good enough to go beyond where we are.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 4:31 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 9:32 pm
Posts: 2014
Location: perth
cortez wrote:
Our defence is still our achilles heel. A little bloke chews us up again (Dennis-Lane 4 goals from 6 kicks). And 11 entries in the final quarter by Sydney for seven scores (3.4), disappointing.


100% with you on that one. Our defensive unit is poor. Think of the amount of times we went forward for no result, compared to the swans.
Our defenders may be ok 1 on 1 but we lack the collective effort to stop teams. We rarely have players who chop off the ball coming in, whether it be structure or our players aren't confident enough to peel off. Collingwood do it very well, so do the cats.

We aren't able to for some reason! I remember white doing a good job of filling the void earlier in the year, hopefully he can develop more next year


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 5:27 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:49 pm
Posts: 27793
Location: Southbank.
bluegirl72 wrote:
yep well that stung.
and you go over stuff in your head...could 've..what if...if only .
but..I'm so proud of 'em..and the way they fought.

sure it'll be tough to watch dogs v swans..but that's because we know we are good enough. we weren't just making up the numbers..we earnt some respect..and in a way..we still stuck it up a lot of people.
I don't think we'll be dismissed so easily in people's reckoning for 2011.
since they copped a huge whack from everyone a few weeks back..they haven't folded. they stand up and fight.

There is just so much to look forward to next year.
thanks blueboys. :clap: :thumbsup:

http://talkingcarlton.com/files/blueboys.mp3

maybe I'll get my song up on the new website? :lol:

((pigs might fly!!)


Great song!.....I've added it to my favourites!........ :thumbsup:

_________________
No ones listening till you make a mistake.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 7:52 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
kkk wrote:
Effes wrote:
kkk wrote:
Apparently frees finished 20-15 our way. If you were umpiring it would be something like 80-2.


Anyone who brings up the free kick count in a discussion about the quality of umpiring cannot be taken seriously.


Why? Because it doesn't suit your argument?

Often we hear the quote "Yeah. But where did we get them?" This game Defence Carlton 1 South 3; Midfield Carlton 13 South 9; Forward Carlton6 South 3.

Sometimes we hear "Yeah but they got that goal from a crap free". Goals from frees; Carlton 3 South 1.

Anyone who blames umpires for the result of a game of football cannot be taken seriously.



SPOT ON.
Jordan Russell could've easily given away 2 frees inside 50 that weren't given. Its swings and roundabouts.
The day I blame umpires for a loss is the day I give up barracking for Carlton.
Improve disposal, decision making and drills. The rest will look after itself.

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 8:25 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:18 am
Posts: 1321
Location: Melbourne
diesel_85 wrote:
bax wrote:
The last two years Eddie has faded badly in the second half of the year. We need to be aggressive in the trade period.

Let's make some smart decisions. Let's build a better backline.

Kruezer, Hoops, Lucas, Yarran, White, Mclean out of this team. The future is still bright but this is such a f^&ken dark day!!!


wiat...... so you want kreuzer, Lucas, Yarran and Mclean delisted or traded??
If thats the case you are a f&%@! wake up to yourself, the world hasn't ended, what has happened is we've unearthed some good kids, shown some depth, gone forward from fev+stevens and by golly if we trade sauce over hammer the shit will hit the fan.
No chance is hammer a better option for the future, he may be athletic but that means jack, sauce s a brilliant tap ruckman, can go forward, and has an excellent footy brain! NO MORE WORK IN PROGRESS TYPES.


Now Diesel, I hope you have calmed down a little. I meant we had those players " out " of the team that played Sydney.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 8:32 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:18 am
Posts: 1321
Location: Melbourne
I agree we can't blame the umpires for losing but did anyone else notice the umpire getting in the way of Judd's run at goal in the last quarter. It forced Judd to go out wider than he would have.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 8:56 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 12:15 am
Posts: 3175
Location: The Wild West
99prelim wrote:
kkk wrote:
Effes wrote:

Anyone who brings up the free kick count in a discussion about the quality of umpiring cannot be taken seriously.


Why? Because it doesn't suit your argument?

Often we hear the quote "Yeah. But where did we get them?" This game Defence Carlton 1 South 3; Midfield Carlton 13 South 9; Forward Carlton6 South 3.

Sometimes we hear "Yeah but they got that goal from a crap free". Goals from frees; Carlton 3 South 1.

Anyone who blames umpires for the result of a game of football cannot be taken seriously.



SPOT ON.
Jordan Russell could've easily given away 2 frees inside 50 that weren't given. Its swings and roundabouts.
The day I blame umpires for a loss is the day I give up barracking for Carlton.
Improve disposal, decision making and drills. The rest will look after itself.



:banghead: :banghead: :banghead:

For flowers sake!!!!

When are people going to realise that complaining about the shit quality of the umpiring in a match and blaming the umpiring for a loss are 2 completely different things?

The "I don't complain about umpiring" side reckon that it's embarrassing to have whinge about shit umpiring, well I reckon it's more embarassing not to be able distinguish between the 2.

Is it really that hard to understand? :confused:

_________________
"If everyone is moving forward together, then success takes care of itself" - Henry Ford


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 9:06 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 2:54 pm
Posts: 1121
bax wrote:
diesel_85 wrote:
bax wrote:
The last two years Eddie has faded badly in the second half of the year. We need to be aggressive in the trade period.

Let's make some smart decisions. Let's build a better backline.

Kruezer, Hoops, Lucas, Yarran, White, Mclean out of this team. The future is still bright but this is such a f^&ken dark day!!!


wiat...... so you want kreuzer, Lucas, Yarran and Mclean delisted or traded??
If thats the case you are a f&%@! wake up to yourself, the world hasn't ended, what has happened is we've unearthed some good kids, shown some depth, gone forward from fev+stevens and by golly if we trade sauce over hammer the shit will hit the fan.
No chance is hammer a better option for the future, he may be athletic but that means jack, sauce s a brilliant tap ruckman, can go forward, and has an excellent footy brain! NO MORE WORK IN PROGRESS TYPES.



yep, acknowledged! apologies for that 1! :screwy:
read the post while still seething and misunderstood it.
Now Diesel, I hope you have calmed down a little. I meant we had those players " out " of the team that played Sydney.

_________________
i AM CARLTON


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 9:07 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 2:54 pm
Posts: 1121
bax wrote:
diesel_85 wrote:
bax wrote:
The last two years Eddie has faded badly in the second half of the year. We need to be aggressive in the trade period.

Let's make some smart decisions. Let's build a better backline.

Kruezer, Hoops, Lucas, Yarran, White, Mclean out of this team. The future is still bright but this is such a f^&ken dark day!!!


wiat...... so you want kreuzer, Lucas, Yarran and Mclean delisted or traded??
If thats the case you are a f&%@! wake up to yourself, the world hasn't ended, what has happened is we've unearthed some good kids, shown some depth, gone forward from fev+stevens and by golly if we trade sauce over hammer the shit will hit the fan.
No chance is hammer a better option for the future, he may be athletic but that means jack, sauce s a brilliant tap ruckman, can go forward, and has an excellent footy brain! NO MORE WORK IN PROGRESS TYPES.


Now Diesel, I hope you have calmed down a little. I meant we had those players " out " of the team that played Sydney.



apologies :lol:

_________________
i AM CARLTON


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2010 1:04 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:34 pm
Posts: 1223
Location: East Coburg
Mil,

I love that new location of yours.

_________________
"You can't polish a James Hird"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2010 7:33 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 12:15 am
Posts: 3175
Location: The Wild West
kkk wrote:
Mil,

I love that new location of yours.


:lol:

The funny thing is that I have actually had that location there for the whole time I have been a member here.(around 3 years)

Just an indication of how tragic the Geelong Advertiser is and indeed most of the town during football season......

_________________
"If everyone is moving forward together, then success takes care of itself" - Henry Ford


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2010 8:09 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
Why? Because it doesn't suit your argument?

Often we hear the quote "Yeah. But where did we get them?" This game Defence Carlton 1 South 3; Midfield Carlton 13 South 9; Forward Carlton6 South 3.

Sometimes we hear "Yeah but they got that goal from a crap free". Goals from frees; Carlton 3 South 1.

Anyone who blames umpires for the result of a game of football cannot be taken seriously.[/quote]


SPOT ON.
Jordan Russell could've easily given away 2 frees inside 50 that weren't given. Its swings and roundabouts.
The day I blame umpires for a loss is the day I give up barracking for Carlton.
Improve disposal, decision making and drills. The rest will look after itself.[/quote]


:banghead: :banghead: :banghead:

For !@#$%& sake!!!!

When are people going to realise that complaining about the shit quality of the umpiring in a match and blaming the umpiring for a loss are 2 completely different things?

The "I don't complain about umpiring" side reckon that it's embarrassing to have whinge about shit umpiring, well I reckon it's more embarassing not to be able distinguish between the 2.

Is it really that hard to understand? :confused:[/quote]

Shit umpiring and good umpiring decisions occur in every single game. It's irrelevant and inconsequential. Let's talk about the difference b/w good plays and bad plays within a game. That's what we can control and funnily enough, that's why people go to the footy.

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2010 8:43 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 6:23 am
Posts: 1687
Location: Smorgyland Village North Carlton
I think playing a mini final with a man down at Subi, killed us in the last quarter in Sydney.
Suspect fatique was a major factor in missing goals like Waitey's horrid miss, Hendo dropping marks.
Hendo really needs a good pre-season to build his tank.
Imagine if Collingwood copped Round 22 Perth road trip, Eddie would have a coronary.

_________________
Green Shooter


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2010 8:57 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
I wrote down all the clangers we made that cost goals. I'm not going to reproduce them here. All the postmortems in the world won't change the result.

6 months to go until we open the 2011 season against Richmond.

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 10:40 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:59 am
Posts: 8628
Notice last weeks birthday boy, Dennis-Lane didn't trouble the scorers last night against the dogs :banghead:

_________________
Cheats never prosper (except in the AFL)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 284 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cazzesman, kftorly78 and 123 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group