Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jun 24, 2025 9:35 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 380 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 ... 19  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2009 9:42 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 5:03 pm
Posts: 573
Location: Camberwell
phoenix johnson wrote:
Match ups anyone?

AJ/Black?
Jamo/Brown?

Who goes on Drummond?


Personally i think AJ should go on Johnstone as he can carve you up with his disposal and cant cope with the tag, making him a logical target...Black hasnt been in great form and his in-and-under style is harder to tag... AJ can be swapped to Black if he becomes damaging.

Im not sure but i think Jamo might be giving away a bit of height to Brown? I wouldnt mind seeing Setanta on him with sole purpose to be in body contact with him at all times with Thornton helping out...

Carrazzo on Drummond

_________________
Carlton Premiers '10


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2009 9:42 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
If Russell plays this week and contributes positively to the Carlton Football Club I will be happy.

If Russell does not play this week but plays well in the reserves and then earns his spot back and then contributes positively to the Carlton Football Club I will be happy.

If Russell does not play this week and struggles in the reserves and never plays seniors again but gives 100% I will be happy.

If Russell plays this week and contributes negatively to the Carlton Football Club I will be sad.

If Russell does not play this week and does not put in 100% in the reserves and never plays seniors again I will be sad.

That just about covers it.

Apply that to every player and that is my philosophy.

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2009 9:44 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48548
Location: Prison Island
I think AJ might take hooper

we need to be wary of ash mcgrath too

he tore the kangaroos to shreds last week

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2009 9:47 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 5:03 pm
Posts: 573
Location: Camberwell
grrofunger wrote:
I think AJ might take hooper

we need to be wary of ash mcgrath too

he tore the kangaroos to shreds last week


I think AJ took hooper last time didnt he?
Who took Johnstone in round 2?

I woulda thought as AJ is more a midfield tagger he'd take Johnstone
Then Armfield take Hooper as he plays in the back half

_________________
Carlton Premiers '10


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2009 9:47 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24645
Location: Kaloyasena
Translated so Jar's point is relevant to the topic in this forum:

If Carltonl plays this week and contributes positively to the Carlton Football Club I will be happy.

If Carlton does not play this week but plays well in the reserves and then earns his spot back and then contributes positively to the Carlton Football Club I will be happy.

If Carlton does not play this week and struggles in the reserves and never plays seniors again but gives 100% I will be happy.

If Carlton plays this week and contributes negatively to the Carlton Football Club I will be sad.

If Carlton does not play this week and does not put in 100% in the reserves and never plays seniors again I will be sad.

That just about covers it.

Apply that to every Carlton and that is my philosophy. :wink:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2009 9:49 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48548
Location: Prison Island
jt wrote:
grrofunger wrote:
I think AJ might take hooper

we need to be wary of ash mcgrath too

he tore the kangaroos to shreds last week


I think AJ took hooper last time didnt he?
Who took Johnstone in round 2?

I woulda thought as AJ is more a midfield tagger he'd take Johnstone
Then Armfield take Hooper as he plays in the back half


russell took johstone last game and probably will this weekend too when he comes in as a late change

im more worried about hooper, harding, adcock, drummond and mcgrath

than black , johnstone and power

the midfield can go head to head

we need to shut down their small forwards and running defenders

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:03 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 9:30 pm
Posts: 380
The selections are clearly a reaction to the Adelaide game. Horses for courses. Aussie is really unlucky but he'll be back. Just hope the inclusions are not underdone: 3 blokes who haven't played much footy of late.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:15 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
lara #25 wrote:
HELLAS BLUE wrote:
Dr.SHERRIN wrote:
Quote:
LMFAO at all the posters celebrating Russell's omission. They're all in for a nasty shock come 7PM Saturday


Carrazzo out, Russell in - Hellas?


Not my source but said person has been right on the money lately Doc, I guess we'll see Saturday night. :wink:



even if that happens, it's a good wake-up call for russell... i think a couple games in the 2s and he'll have his confidence back.

pretty happy with the selection, austin omission a bit stiff but ratts did say he was going for maturity so hopefully it pays off, and austin will be back very soon me thinks

im getting more confident about this game, and my lions-supporting family is a little bit worried! :wink:


...Can't make up his mind, that bloke, did someone have a little word in his ear. :? I would have hoped that he would have come up with a more subtle denouement, myself.

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:17 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
yibbida wrote:
Really hope he doesn't read any of this rubbish. Remember he has played more AFL games than everyone on this site combined.


Actually yibbida you are quite catagorically wrong, there is at least one semi-regular poster here (and from TBV days) who has played more senior games for CFC than JR.

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:22 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 9:27 pm
Posts: 5270
Who?

_________________
The problem will be made. for the solution to be sold, to your face before your eyes, tolerance is now the new danger


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:23 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25323
Location: Bondi Beach
DownUnderChick wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
aramari wrote:
Juddy&theKruezers wrote:
Can we re-open the Russell thread on talking players please....just for a day come on please... :lol:


Two active threads during the week and 6 on the weekend - welcome to the new TC :thumbsup:


Locking away an assett is plain ridiculous. I wont say what I really think about those who made the Bjelke-Peterson type decisons...or was it the Chinese Censorship Commission which made the decision?

TC has been grossly devalued by closing down the Players thread; the real differentiator between Club public forums. Not enough thought gone into the decision. Yeah some thought, but not balanced.

TC is now a forum which reflects the voice of the moderator.

Heard of democracy? It's the opposite of dictatorship.

I feel very strongly about this, not only because it's the antithesis of a public forum and freedom of speech, but because the forum is so now thin in Carlton content and unless you want to focus on movies, music and non footy related threads...well it's thin. If that's what the Moderators wanted to attract, then it should be renamed to Talking Moderators who barrack for Carlton. :lol:

DEMOCRACY RULES everyone


bb there is something called the Issues thread where your concerns can be raised.

As excited as everyone is about JR being dropped, you might look a bit sheepish if he comes in on Saturday.

Let's tone the excitement levels.


Wrong thread...sorry...just responding to comment made about the players thread. I've got no idea where the issues thread is...I'm into football and CFC.

I have nothing bad to say about anyone, in fact I wanted to congratulate Austin last week for stepping up, Stevens for throwing his body in and showing all the knockers, Houla for the class he added, to welcome back Garlett, support AA consideration for Bower, the return of Simmo 'the captain', Judd wrecking machine, Fevola could still kick a ton in the remaining season, I thought Russell was not bad and good at times etc...just to counter all the negative comments about those players.

AS for me being sheepish on Saturday....why would I? I hadn't dropped Russell, and he's not going to make or break our chances, he'd add a different angle.

Now now, don't be so precious.

WE are going to smash them in the ruck.

If Carrots' hand can withstand tackling, then I would like him to tag Black.
If Russell plays, I would like him to tag Black.

Then our midfield can strut there stuff. Great to see Scotto added to the centreline. Looks strong.

We are going to win because our forwardline is going to function, the midfield will put scoreboard pressure on and we will have the pill more than them.

It's important we shut the home crowd down right from the start...then the Carlton supporter base will overpower them too and make it feel like a home game.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:33 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
TheBluesMuse wrote:
Who?


I'm not naming them, and I don't expect anyone else here who knows to name anyone either because it is just grandstanding really. There is no need because it is really not that big a deal, they are just another supporter contributing to the forum. If you have read TBV and TC over the last 5 years you would have had a chance to see it pretty clearly.

... and knowing what I know about the Carlton online community (through people contacting the blueseum) there are many many, players, girlfriends of players, relatives of players, past players, relatives of past players, and also officials and administrators of the club who read, and sometimes contribute to all the CFC forums.

It's a slice of the CFC community and that includes people who are now part of CFC directly or indirectly.

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:42 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 9:27 pm
Posts: 5270
Yep, fair enough.

I think the decisions at TC, re TP and even the issues with player bashing are quite obviously influenced by those who have personal relationships with the players.

_________________
The problem will be made. for the solution to be sold, to your face before your eyes, tolerance is now the new danger


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:43 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 11:55 pm
Posts: 12596
Location: Brisbane
The reactions over JR centre on his (perceived) playing ability, not on the person himself. And subsequently on the MC.

_________________
THEY LIKE TO SEND UP!!!!!!!!

Until each team plays each other the same number of times, the AFL, as a fair dinkum competition, cannot be taken seriously.

He (Mr Swann) said the honour and pride associated with the club's traditional navy blue jumper was priceless.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:43 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 12:22 pm
Posts: 6272
Location: Lurking
exsing wrote:
Let's put this in perspective. The people who are bagging the forum members here for being happy that Russell has been omitted (pending any late changes) should take a chill pill.

I for one, have been unhappy with Russell's performances lately and is happy that he has been dropped. However, and I trust that I speak for the pro Russell omission group, my happiness is not because I don't like Russell as a person. I am happy because I don't think he is in the type of form at the moment to warrant selection.

So before getting on your high horses and knocking the people here for "celebrating" Russel's omission, understand that it is not personal.

My personal opinion is that there is a huge difference between saying "I agree with Russel's omission this week", or "I'm happy that JR has been dropped"; and saying things in the manner of "thank god he's gone!", or posting pictures and videos of fireworks/celebrations/praising the lord.

_________________
I AM DISENFRANCHISED


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:51 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17222
Quote:
... and knowing what I know about the Carlton online community (through people contacting the blueseum) there are many many, players, girlfriends of players, relatives of players, past players, relatives of past players, and also officials and administrators of the club who read, and sometimes contribute to all the CFC forums.


Couple of Premiership players read it...couple who used to have a quiet drink with Premiership players read it, couple who taught players at school - they post on here, bloke who delivered newspapers for Bruce Doull posts on here, bloke who signed Mark Maclure to an Aquila shoes deal posts on here and a bloke who got his dog neutered by Andy McKay posts regularly on here too. Blues by 17 points.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:51 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 1:29 pm
Posts: 1566
Location: Melbourne
Lurker Blue wrote:
exsing wrote:
Let's put this in perspective. The people who are bagging the forum members here for being happy that Russell has been omitted (pending any late changes) should take a chill pill.

I for one, have been unhappy with Russell's performances lately and is happy that he has been dropped. However, and I trust that I speak for the pro Russell omission group, my happiness is not because I don't like Russell as a person. I am happy because I don't think he is in the type of form at the moment to warrant selection.

So before getting on your high horses and knocking the people here for "celebrating" Russel's omission, understand that it is not personal.


My personal opinion is that there is a huge difference between saying "I agree with Russel's omission this week", or "I'm happy that JR has been dropped"; and saying things in the manner of "thank god he's gone!", or posting pictures and videos of fireworks/celebrations/praising the lord.


So you are unhappy about the actual words used to describe a person's emotion about a particular subject? Didn't know there is a template for something like this.

Any reasonable person would assume that these guys are playing the ball and not the man. I am pretty certain the comments are not personal. Let's not get too precious here.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:51 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 1:06 pm
Posts: 3996
Location: Steven Seagal's Martial Arts Academy
People need to get over it!!!!!

The satisfaction is not over JR having poor form and getting dropped - he is a number one draft pick and I would WISH that he turns into a gun and is not a wasted pick.

THE SATISFACTION IS THAT RATTEN FINALLY HAD THE BALLS TO DROP HIM

If ANY OTHER player is not up to scratch form-wise he would be dropped. Are you 'leave jordy alone' bleeding hearts honestly saying that Joe Anderson or Dennis Armfield or Mitch Robinson never try very hard?
JUST BECAUSE JR TRIES HARD DOES NOT MEAN HE SHOULD BE AN AUTOMATIC SELECTION

Ratts has finally caved in and gotten a bit of perspective and dare I say it ruthlessness.
You CAN'T PLAY FAVOURITES at this level.

Nobody is suggesting that JR is the worst player in the AFL, or even our team.

WE ARE JUST VENTING OUR FRUSTRATION, and subsequent relief,
That Ratts and the MC have finally taken a positive step in their OWN development and given JR a week off - which is the right thing to do.
Not to say that last week was his worst game, but he has not been in our best 22 EVERY week, and NOBODY should be immune.

If you're going to send a message to Scotty and Houla, then you have to send a message to JR as well.
Too bad if his mum or his grandma doesn't like it.

He's a big boy and he needs to try harder if he's going to make it.
That's the harsh reality.




I WOULD RATHER BE A PREMIERSHIP CLUB THAT MAKES THE HARD DECISIONS ON EVERYONE, than a kindergarten for unfulfilled first round draft picks.
WE ARE NOT RICHMOND !!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:52 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 12:25 am
Posts: 456
Location: Kalgoorlie, WA
I'm glad to see that we have gone with some more run for this trip, and having a couple of older players interstate is not a bad thing. The only concern would be Carrazzo's finger and whether he is really ready for a game. Scotland is quality and Grigg, although not flying in the 2's, has played a couple of games and will hopefully raise the bar accordingly.

Disappointed to see Austin out but know that team balance probably means he has to go. He's had a taste and will get another go.

Glad the big Irishman is still in, as I think his athleticism and strength will be useful, and needs a run to see to give him a chance. Hopefully he takes it with both hands, and even his feet too if needs be.

I quite like Russell, but think it is good if he can go back to the Bullants for a bit and find some form (not sure how it works, but apparently wherever it gets lost, it always seems to wind up at the 2's). I'd like to see him develop a bit more of a running game, and so when he comes back he can hurt the opposition more the other way. He's quite a good size and would love to see him take them on, run through a few tackles.

And with luck, and having Scotland and Grigg back in, Gibbs might be spared from the half back area and have a run in the midfield/half-forward area. He sets it up so well and is such a good link man. Always seems to make the right choice. And with him and Carrazzo up there, it might give Drummond and Adcock more to worry about and less chance to create the drive from half-back.

AJ to Black or Power. Carrazzo in the same role he had against the bulldogs. Grigg on Johnstone?

Maybe Kreuzer can drop down forward too, stretch their defense, making them drag Bradshaw down back. But I can't see Voss letting that happen. Bradshaw is too useful up forward.

Prediction: Judd to play a pearler, including one goal on the run ala his effort against the Lions when he played in blue and yellow. Murphy to go to town. Fev for at least 4. The Brisbane forwards to cause us trouble, but not enough as we win by 2 or 3 goals.

_________________
I would like to thank Collingwood for helping me keep faith in my old man. He always told me that 'People are thick'.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:54 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 1:06 pm
Posts: 3996
Location: Steven Seagal's Martial Arts Academy
Bluey44 wrote:
People need to get over it!!!!!

The satisfaction is not over JR having poor form and getting dropped - he is a number one draft pick and I would WISH that he turns into a gun and is not a wasted pick.



ok so obviously i mean A TOP draft pick, not a number one


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 380 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 ... 19  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: azzurro, Bing [Bot], Blue Vain, Google [Bot], Mickstar and 23 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group